• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:13
CEST 13:13
KST 20:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-69SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)14Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE18
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) StarCraft 2 at SC4ALL II Invite #4/8 - Percival Protoss AoE skill expression 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) StarCraft 2 at SC4ALL II Invite #3/8 - Clem
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool Recent recommended BW games Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3 SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Diablo 2 thread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Iain M Banks Says He Has Cancer And Months To Live US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Clem Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
NBA General Discussion Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3985 users

[G] PvZ - FE 1 Gate & Fast Warp Gate Research - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
sAfuRos
Profile Joined March 2009
United States743 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 04:32:28
April 20 2011 04:31 GMT
#21
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame


Disagree; in what situation would i ever want to have less gas, especially in the most gas intensive matchup, especially if the gas i do get contributes to a fast warpgate tech that does not really benefit me?
sAfuRos // twitch.tv/sAfuRos // contact for coaching
L3g3nd_
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand10461 Posts
April 20 2011 04:38 GMT
#22
would love to see some replays! esp against early roach pressure/all ins
https://twitter.com/#!/IrisAnother
Saechiis
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Netherlands4989 Posts
April 20 2011 06:40 GMT
#23
I'd love to see some replays! Have been playing around with various sorts of 1Gate expands in PvZ but haven't settled on anything stable yet.
I think esports is pretty nice.
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 06:48:57
April 20 2011 06:48 GMT
#24
This is what HuK does against Terran, and it actually works out quite well. Haven't ever tried it against Zerg though, looks interesting, but I can't help but feel those Sentries are worth the late expo if you aren't going to forge expand
rsvp
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States2266 Posts
April 20 2011 06:54 GMT
#25
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.
ThunderGod
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
New Zealand897 Posts
April 20 2011 06:59 GMT
#26
Cool nice to see the man behind the name.
Been wondering who Capoch was since SA server began.
"Certain forms of popular music nowadays, namely rap and hip hop styles, are just irritating gangsters bragging about their illegal exploits and short-sighted lifestyles." - Shiverfish ~2009
rsvp
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States2266 Posts
April 20 2011 07:12 GMT
#27
On April 20 2011 11:04 Capoch wrote:
You only pull probes out of gas to build the nexus, after that, you pull them right back to the gas.


Ok, really how much of a difference does that make? You have 2 probes mining gas, you put those 2 probes back on minerals for... 10 seconds so that you can get 400 minerals for a nexus 2 seconds faster? I have a really hard time believing that this is the "secret" to this build.

Look, Capoch I know you're a great player, I have no doubts that you've used this build successfully at the highest level of play, and I think the idea behind this build has great potential. But honestly this guide is just bad. You don't describe the build well (leaving out important details like when you put probes back on gas), you don't explain why it's good (how does this compare to the 2 other popular PvZ FE builds?). On top of that you say you're just testing it and don't have any replays. Why not wait until after you have more experience/testing with this build, and then create a thread with replays?

Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.
Zelderd
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom34 Posts
April 20 2011 07:32 GMT
#28
Anyone got some replays? sounds nice
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
April 20 2011 07:42 GMT
#29
On April 20 2011 16:12 Anihc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 11:04 Capoch wrote:
You only pull probes out of gas to build the nexus, after that, you pull them right back to the gas.


Ok, really how much of a difference does that make? You have 2 probes mining gas, you put those 2 probes back on minerals for... 10 seconds so that you can get 400 minerals for a nexus 2 seconds faster? I have a really hard time believing that this is the "secret" to this build.

Look, Capoch I know you're a great player, I have no doubts that you've used this build successfully at the highest level of play, and I think the idea behind this build has great potential. But honestly this guide is just bad. You don't describe the build well (leaving out important details like when you put probes back on gas), you don't explain why it's good (how does this compare to the 2 other popular PvZ FE builds?). On top of that you say you're just testing it and don't have any replays. Why not wait until after you have more experience/testing with this build, and then create a thread with replays?

Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.

You do that to get the pylon up Faster.

When I see HuK do it, recently he just keeps the two probes on gas then puts the third after he drops his Pylon , not sure if there is a big difference TBH.

Keep in mind this is PvT though, he is also aggresive after the expand-- sets up a proxy pylon and warp's in 3 Stalkers then drops a Robo. At that stage of the game the Nexus is only a 300 mineral investment as it replaces one of the early pylons as well AND you start mining efficiently from both bases very quickly.

It is't a terrible build TBH, but it seems to have some holes in PvZ though..10-12 speedlings off 2 base can nexus cancel a regular 3gate expo, this will surely fall to that :/
Jayrod
Profile Joined August 2010
1820 Posts
April 20 2011 07:52 GMT
#30
On April 20 2011 15:54 Anihc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.

Well the title implies an emphasis on the fast warpgate tech. What he does with that tech is what im curious about. Would need to see replays to see if the faster warpgate can be used towards an objective or if the economy doesn't kick in fast enough to be able to produce from a meaningful number of warpgates.
Saechiis
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Netherlands4989 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 08:05:48
April 20 2011 08:03 GMT
#31
Edit: Resubmitted my comment when I used the back button on my browser :S
I think esports is pretty nice.
stink123
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States241 Posts
April 20 2011 08:07 GMT
#32
This could be a great build to use against someone who random's Zerg, but not sure if it would be superior to 3 gate FE in that situation.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
April 20 2011 08:18 GMT
#33
While I agree with Anihc, that Nexus first is better on the bigger maps, I think that this BO has good potential on maps where Nexus first is too risky. Namely Metalopolis, once you've ruled out close positions and Shattered Temple. I'm not sure about Xel Naga, the natural is so open, good zergs might find timings to abuse this heavily.
What I've always disliked about Nexus first is the heavy, heavy commitment you make BEFORE actually knowing wtf your opponent is doing. This comes pretty much by definition, since you don't make a gate. While this build might be inferior to Nexus first, it's definitely safer since you can - at any time - decide to just not pull probes of gas.

However, I agree with this:
On April 20 2011 16:12 Anihc wrote:
Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.


Capoch, you are an amazing player who made a so-so OP. It seems like currently you are just winging the build and go with what your gut tells you. While this may work for you because you have great gamesense (or more negatively put: because your opponents don't know how to react properly yet), a good guide must account for - if not all - then many of the usual follow-ups.
Some questions that you need to answer in my opinion for this [d]iscussion to become really [g]uide-worthy:
a) When to build additional production structures if zerg expands. Do you cut probes shortly, like in the classic one gate FE vs terran?
b) What to do vs TWO-base all-ins, namely mass roach accompanied by a few lings. Maybe you need to implement an earlier forge on some maps to be safe?
c) TRANSITIONS! You really need to go at least into mid-game with your guide. You won't have any scouting intel and don't have enough sentries to make hallucination a good investment. What do you build at this zero-mapcontrol-point in the game based on which tells? Nexus first / forge FE is very often followed up by stargate, 3 gate expand more often followed up by robo. Your build is "in the middle": which route do you normally take, and why?
Especially, what to do against these zerg follow-ups:
Fast 2 base hydra --> your build is low on sentries, the initial push seems very threatening to me without the sentry-count to block hydras out until colossi are on the field. Or do timings work out?
Fast 3rd by zerg --> doesn't seem that big of a problem, nevertheless since you will have very low scouting intel at this point. How to prepare, how to react?
d) Map-analysis: You should depict which maps are more suitable for your build and which aren't. Counter-intuitively I think (!) - what Anihc has already mentioned - that due to the possible 15 Nex / forge FE, this build is quite weak on larger maps. Because if you want to pressure, you go 3 gate expo, if you want to macro, you can 15 Nex / forge FE. On Xel Naga however, I think (!) that this build might be too risky. Maybe (!) on Typhon Peaks and Backwhater gulch too? You should notice the level of uncertainty here.

Same as Anihc, I appreciate you posting here and don't want to bash on your skills. I just hope you don't "give up" on this thread and find the time and take the effort, to include all the things that unfortunately are still missing.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Nyast
Profile Joined November 2010
Belgium554 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 09:14:11
April 20 2011 09:13 GMT
#34
I guess it's allright vs a fast expanding Zerg, but what about vs a zerg that pools at 13/14 and takes a fast gas for speedlings, and starts his expand around 4' ? You don't know if he's FE or all-in until he drops his hatch, so it sounds very risky to do it in that scenario. Basically, this only ever works vs a Zerg expanding first, and I don't know for you, but I don't see too many Zergs doing hatch-1st nowadays, except on huge maps where there's a good chance they'll be scouted late, in which case you're better doing a forge FE anyway.
Geiko
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
France2025 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 10:58:28
April 20 2011 10:57 GMT
#35
Thanks for posting !
This strategy looks to be very map dependent as others have already pointed out and could fill the gap between gate expand and nexus/forge first builds.
I have a question, your core finishes at about the same time as you put your nexus down, wouldn't it be a good idea to time the probes on gaz so you get exactly 50 gaz as your core finishes ?
That way you can put 3 probes on gaz at a certain time and not have to pull them in and out of gaz (which in my experience makes you lose a lot of mining time).
I know I always like to time my builds so I can build stuff with probes coming out of the nexus and never have to pull probes out of mining because that makes you lose A LOT of mining time.

Also for example with the wall-in you used for your natural on metalopolis vs spanishiwa, how do you deal with harassing zerglings attacking the pylon on the far side (far from the opening where the zealot is) ?

Once again thanks for posting here, we really need high level players to share their strategies. The comments from the blue posts are true however, a bit more complete OP with replays would be nice.
Looking forward to try this out
geiko.813 (EU)
Capoch
Profile Joined April 2010
Argentina179 Posts
April 20 2011 11:14 GMT
#36
On April 20 2011 15:54 Anihc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.


I totally understand what you're saying, but as I said before, I do have replays doing this strat successfully, I just don't know where to post them. If you want send me a PM with your MSN and I can send them to you later today.
Andybendy
Profile Joined February 2011
42 Posts
April 20 2011 11:15 GMT
#37
I dont see how this strategy would work if the zerg just puts up another hatch. There is no way the aggression could come fast enough if youre putting down a 18 nexus and still trying to play agressively. this leaves many openings to some of those more greedy zergs.
Capoch
Profile Joined April 2010
Argentina179 Posts
April 20 2011 11:40 GMT
#38
On April 20 2011 17:18 sleepingdog wrote:
While I agree with Anihc, that Nexus first is better on the bigger maps, I think that this BO has good potential on maps where Nexus first is too risky. Namely Metalopolis, once you've ruled out close positions and Shattered Temple. I'm not sure about Xel Naga, the natural is so open, good zergs might find timings to abuse this heavily.
What I've always disliked about Nexus first is the heavy, heavy commitment you make BEFORE actually knowing wtf your opponent is doing. This comes pretty much by definition, since you don't make a gate. While this build might be inferior to Nexus first, it's definitely safer since you can - at any time - decide to just not pull probes of gas.

However, I agree with this:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 16:12 Anihc wrote:
Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.


Capoch, you are an amazing player who made a so-so OP. It seems like currently you are just winging the build and go with what your gut tells you. While this may work for you because you have great gamesense (or more negatively put: because your opponents don't know how to react properly yet), a good guide must account for - if not all - then many of the usual follow-ups.
Some questions that you need to answer in my opinion for this [d]iscussion to become really [g]uide-worthy:
a) When to build additional production structures if zerg expands. Do you cut probes shortly, like in the classic one gate FE vs terran?
b) What to do vs TWO-base all-ins, namely mass roach accompanied by a few lings. Maybe you need to implement an earlier forge on some maps to be safe?
c) TRANSITIONS! You really need to go at least into mid-game with your guide. You won't have any scouting intel and don't have enough sentries to make hallucination a good investment. What do you build at this zero-mapcontrol-point in the game based on which tells? Nexus first / forge FE is very often followed up by stargate, 3 gate expand more often followed up by robo. Your build is "in the middle": which route do you normally take, and why?
Especially, what to do against these zerg follow-ups:
Fast 2 base hydra --> your build is low on sentries, the initial push seems very threatening to me without the sentry-count to block hydras out until colossi are on the field. Or do timings work out?
Fast 3rd by zerg --> doesn't seem that big of a problem, nevertheless since you will have very low scouting intel at this point. How to prepare, how to react?
d) Map-analysis: You should depict which maps are more suitable for your build and which aren't. Counter-intuitively I think (!) - what Anihc has already mentioned - that due to the possible 15 Nex / forge FE, this build is quite weak on larger maps. Because if you want to pressure, you go 3 gate expo, if you want to macro, you can 15 Nex / forge FE. On Xel Naga however, I think (!) that this build might be too risky. Maybe (!) on Typhon Peaks and Backwhater gulch too? You should notice the level of uncertainty here.

Same as Anihc, I appreciate you posting here and don't want to bash on your skills. I just hope you don't "give up" on this thread and find the time and take the effort, to include all the things that unfortunately are still missing.


Hi sleepingdog,

Thanks for posting this. I know the OP wasnt very good, I wrote it down fast just explaining the basics. I'll try to get more detail soon.
Once I'm back from work, I'll answer all the questions you've made and try to back them up with a couple of replays.

Cheers
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 11:51:56
April 20 2011 11:50 GMT
#39
E: nvm sry for this post
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 12:14:27
April 20 2011 12:13 GMT
#40
On April 20 2011 20:14 Capoch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 15:54 Anihc wrote:
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.


I totally understand what you're saying, but as I said before, I do have replays doing this strat successfully, I just don't know where to post them. If you want send me a PM with your MSN and I can send them to you later today.


A good page for member-hosted reps is this one:
http://www.gamereplays.org/portals.php
If you upload your games you get a link that you can copy, so reps appear like this (notice that this is already the download-link):
[image loading]

Also looking forward to your response
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
09:00
Season 6 - Playoffs Day 5
Clem vs SolarLIVE!
Serral vs Rogue
Tasteless1347
Ryung 966
ComeBackTV 808
IntoTheiNu 724
RotterdaM532
IndyStarCraft 187
Rex139
CranKy Ducklings60
CranKy Ducklings SOOP8
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 1347
Ryung 966
RotterdaM 532
Lowko265
IndyStarCraft 187
Rex 139
BRAT_OK 48
MindelVK 7
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 31271
Bisu 2293
firebathero 676
BeSt 474
Larva 335
actioN 305
Pusan 280
EffOrt 200
Stork 168
Leta 135
[ Show more ]
Last 125
ZerO 124
Dewaltoss 114
Hyun 96
Mind 64
Rush 51
JYJ 38
Sexy 35
sorry 34
[sc1f]eonzerg 34
HiyA 32
Barracks 31
sSak 26
scan(afreeca) 17
Nal_rA 15
Dota 2
XcaliburYe112
League of Legends
JimRising 306
Counter-Strike
fl0m3360
SPUNJ288
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King87
Other Games
singsing1323
B2W.Neo241
Happy108
Livibee72
ZerO(Twitch)6
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV122
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 19
lovetv 11
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH270
• 3DClanTV 113
• StrangeGG 60
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV293
• lizZardDota2160
League of Legends
• Jankos1400
Upcoming Events
Ladder Legends
6h 47m
Ladder Legends
8h 47m
RSL Revival
21h 47m
OSC
1d 1h
OSC
1d 12h
WardiTV Weekly
1d 23h
The Patches Monday
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.