• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:43
CET 05:43
KST 13:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Foreign Brood War Data analysis on 70 million replays BW General Discussion MBCGame Torrents
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1712 users

[G] PvZ - FE 1 Gate & Fast Warp Gate Research - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
sAfuRos
Profile Joined March 2009
United States743 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 04:32:28
April 20 2011 04:31 GMT
#21
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame


Disagree; in what situation would i ever want to have less gas, especially in the most gas intensive matchup, especially if the gas i do get contributes to a fast warpgate tech that does not really benefit me?
sAfuRos // twitch.tv/sAfuRos // contact for coaching
L3g3nd_
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand10461 Posts
April 20 2011 04:38 GMT
#22
would love to see some replays! esp against early roach pressure/all ins
https://twitter.com/#!/IrisAnother
Saechiis
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Netherlands4989 Posts
April 20 2011 06:40 GMT
#23
I'd love to see some replays! Have been playing around with various sorts of 1Gate expands in PvZ but haven't settled on anything stable yet.
I think esports is pretty nice.
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 06:48:57
April 20 2011 06:48 GMT
#24
This is what HuK does against Terran, and it actually works out quite well. Haven't ever tried it against Zerg though, looks interesting, but I can't help but feel those Sentries are worth the late expo if you aren't going to forge expand
rsvp
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States2266 Posts
April 20 2011 06:54 GMT
#25
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.
ThunderGod
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
New Zealand897 Posts
April 20 2011 06:59 GMT
#26
Cool nice to see the man behind the name.
Been wondering who Capoch was since SA server began.
"Certain forms of popular music nowadays, namely rap and hip hop styles, are just irritating gangsters bragging about their illegal exploits and short-sighted lifestyles." - Shiverfish ~2009
rsvp
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States2266 Posts
April 20 2011 07:12 GMT
#27
On April 20 2011 11:04 Capoch wrote:
You only pull probes out of gas to build the nexus, after that, you pull them right back to the gas.


Ok, really how much of a difference does that make? You have 2 probes mining gas, you put those 2 probes back on minerals for... 10 seconds so that you can get 400 minerals for a nexus 2 seconds faster? I have a really hard time believing that this is the "secret" to this build.

Look, Capoch I know you're a great player, I have no doubts that you've used this build successfully at the highest level of play, and I think the idea behind this build has great potential. But honestly this guide is just bad. You don't describe the build well (leaving out important details like when you put probes back on gas), you don't explain why it's good (how does this compare to the 2 other popular PvZ FE builds?). On top of that you say you're just testing it and don't have any replays. Why not wait until after you have more experience/testing with this build, and then create a thread with replays?

Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.
Zelderd
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom34 Posts
April 20 2011 07:32 GMT
#28
Anyone got some replays? sounds nice
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
April 20 2011 07:42 GMT
#29
On April 20 2011 16:12 Anihc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 11:04 Capoch wrote:
You only pull probes out of gas to build the nexus, after that, you pull them right back to the gas.


Ok, really how much of a difference does that make? You have 2 probes mining gas, you put those 2 probes back on minerals for... 10 seconds so that you can get 400 minerals for a nexus 2 seconds faster? I have a really hard time believing that this is the "secret" to this build.

Look, Capoch I know you're a great player, I have no doubts that you've used this build successfully at the highest level of play, and I think the idea behind this build has great potential. But honestly this guide is just bad. You don't describe the build well (leaving out important details like when you put probes back on gas), you don't explain why it's good (how does this compare to the 2 other popular PvZ FE builds?). On top of that you say you're just testing it and don't have any replays. Why not wait until after you have more experience/testing with this build, and then create a thread with replays?

Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.

You do that to get the pylon up Faster.

When I see HuK do it, recently he just keeps the two probes on gas then puts the third after he drops his Pylon , not sure if there is a big difference TBH.

Keep in mind this is PvT though, he is also aggresive after the expand-- sets up a proxy pylon and warp's in 3 Stalkers then drops a Robo. At that stage of the game the Nexus is only a 300 mineral investment as it replaces one of the early pylons as well AND you start mining efficiently from both bases very quickly.

It is't a terrible build TBH, but it seems to have some holes in PvZ though..10-12 speedlings off 2 base can nexus cancel a regular 3gate expo, this will surely fall to that :/
Jayrod
Profile Joined August 2010
1820 Posts
April 20 2011 07:52 GMT
#30
On April 20 2011 15:54 Anihc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.

Well the title implies an emphasis on the fast warpgate tech. What he does with that tech is what im curious about. Would need to see replays to see if the faster warpgate can be used towards an objective or if the economy doesn't kick in fast enough to be able to produce from a meaningful number of warpgates.
Saechiis
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Netherlands4989 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 08:05:48
April 20 2011 08:03 GMT
#31
Edit: Resubmitted my comment when I used the back button on my browser :S
I think esports is pretty nice.
stink123
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States241 Posts
April 20 2011 08:07 GMT
#32
This could be a great build to use against someone who random's Zerg, but not sure if it would be superior to 3 gate FE in that situation.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
April 20 2011 08:18 GMT
#33
While I agree with Anihc, that Nexus first is better on the bigger maps, I think that this BO has good potential on maps where Nexus first is too risky. Namely Metalopolis, once you've ruled out close positions and Shattered Temple. I'm not sure about Xel Naga, the natural is so open, good zergs might find timings to abuse this heavily.
What I've always disliked about Nexus first is the heavy, heavy commitment you make BEFORE actually knowing wtf your opponent is doing. This comes pretty much by definition, since you don't make a gate. While this build might be inferior to Nexus first, it's definitely safer since you can - at any time - decide to just not pull probes of gas.

However, I agree with this:
On April 20 2011 16:12 Anihc wrote:
Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.


Capoch, you are an amazing player who made a so-so OP. It seems like currently you are just winging the build and go with what your gut tells you. While this may work for you because you have great gamesense (or more negatively put: because your opponents don't know how to react properly yet), a good guide must account for - if not all - then many of the usual follow-ups.
Some questions that you need to answer in my opinion for this [d]iscussion to become really [g]uide-worthy:
a) When to build additional production structures if zerg expands. Do you cut probes shortly, like in the classic one gate FE vs terran?
b) What to do vs TWO-base all-ins, namely mass roach accompanied by a few lings. Maybe you need to implement an earlier forge on some maps to be safe?
c) TRANSITIONS! You really need to go at least into mid-game with your guide. You won't have any scouting intel and don't have enough sentries to make hallucination a good investment. What do you build at this zero-mapcontrol-point in the game based on which tells? Nexus first / forge FE is very often followed up by stargate, 3 gate expand more often followed up by robo. Your build is "in the middle": which route do you normally take, and why?
Especially, what to do against these zerg follow-ups:
Fast 2 base hydra --> your build is low on sentries, the initial push seems very threatening to me without the sentry-count to block hydras out until colossi are on the field. Or do timings work out?
Fast 3rd by zerg --> doesn't seem that big of a problem, nevertheless since you will have very low scouting intel at this point. How to prepare, how to react?
d) Map-analysis: You should depict which maps are more suitable for your build and which aren't. Counter-intuitively I think (!) - what Anihc has already mentioned - that due to the possible 15 Nex / forge FE, this build is quite weak on larger maps. Because if you want to pressure, you go 3 gate expo, if you want to macro, you can 15 Nex / forge FE. On Xel Naga however, I think (!) that this build might be too risky. Maybe (!) on Typhon Peaks and Backwhater gulch too? You should notice the level of uncertainty here.

Same as Anihc, I appreciate you posting here and don't want to bash on your skills. I just hope you don't "give up" on this thread and find the time and take the effort, to include all the things that unfortunately are still missing.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Nyast
Profile Joined November 2010
Belgium554 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 09:14:11
April 20 2011 09:13 GMT
#34
I guess it's allright vs a fast expanding Zerg, but what about vs a zerg that pools at 13/14 and takes a fast gas for speedlings, and starts his expand around 4' ? You don't know if he's FE or all-in until he drops his hatch, so it sounds very risky to do it in that scenario. Basically, this only ever works vs a Zerg expanding first, and I don't know for you, but I don't see too many Zergs doing hatch-1st nowadays, except on huge maps where there's a good chance they'll be scouted late, in which case you're better doing a forge FE anyway.
Geiko
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
France1939 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 10:58:28
April 20 2011 10:57 GMT
#35
Thanks for posting !
This strategy looks to be very map dependent as others have already pointed out and could fill the gap between gate expand and nexus/forge first builds.
I have a question, your core finishes at about the same time as you put your nexus down, wouldn't it be a good idea to time the probes on gaz so you get exactly 50 gaz as your core finishes ?
That way you can put 3 probes on gaz at a certain time and not have to pull them in and out of gaz (which in my experience makes you lose a lot of mining time).
I know I always like to time my builds so I can build stuff with probes coming out of the nexus and never have to pull probes out of mining because that makes you lose A LOT of mining time.

Also for example with the wall-in you used for your natural on metalopolis vs spanishiwa, how do you deal with harassing zerglings attacking the pylon on the far side (far from the opening where the zealot is) ?

Once again thanks for posting here, we really need high level players to share their strategies. The comments from the blue posts are true however, a bit more complete OP with replays would be nice.
Looking forward to try this out
geiko.813 (EU)
Capoch
Profile Joined April 2010
Argentina179 Posts
April 20 2011 11:14 GMT
#36
On April 20 2011 15:54 Anihc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.


I totally understand what you're saying, but as I said before, I do have replays doing this strat successfully, I just don't know where to post them. If you want send me a PM with your MSN and I can send them to you later today.
Andybendy
Profile Joined February 2011
42 Posts
April 20 2011 11:15 GMT
#37
I dont see how this strategy would work if the zerg just puts up another hatch. There is no way the aggression could come fast enough if youre putting down a 18 nexus and still trying to play agressively. this leaves many openings to some of those more greedy zergs.
Capoch
Profile Joined April 2010
Argentina179 Posts
April 20 2011 11:40 GMT
#38
On April 20 2011 17:18 sleepingdog wrote:
While I agree with Anihc, that Nexus first is better on the bigger maps, I think that this BO has good potential on maps where Nexus first is too risky. Namely Metalopolis, once you've ruled out close positions and Shattered Temple. I'm not sure about Xel Naga, the natural is so open, good zergs might find timings to abuse this heavily.
What I've always disliked about Nexus first is the heavy, heavy commitment you make BEFORE actually knowing wtf your opponent is doing. This comes pretty much by definition, since you don't make a gate. While this build might be inferior to Nexus first, it's definitely safer since you can - at any time - decide to just not pull probes of gas.

However, I agree with this:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 16:12 Anihc wrote:
Again, I'm not bashing the player or the idea, I'm bashing the opening post. If your name wasn't behind the thread, it would get insta-closed for failing to meet multiple strat forum guideline requirements.


Capoch, you are an amazing player who made a so-so OP. It seems like currently you are just winging the build and go with what your gut tells you. While this may work for you because you have great gamesense (or more negatively put: because your opponents don't know how to react properly yet), a good guide must account for - if not all - then many of the usual follow-ups.
Some questions that you need to answer in my opinion for this [d]iscussion to become really [g]uide-worthy:
a) When to build additional production structures if zerg expands. Do you cut probes shortly, like in the classic one gate FE vs terran?
b) What to do vs TWO-base all-ins, namely mass roach accompanied by a few lings. Maybe you need to implement an earlier forge on some maps to be safe?
c) TRANSITIONS! You really need to go at least into mid-game with your guide. You won't have any scouting intel and don't have enough sentries to make hallucination a good investment. What do you build at this zero-mapcontrol-point in the game based on which tells? Nexus first / forge FE is very often followed up by stargate, 3 gate expand more often followed up by robo. Your build is "in the middle": which route do you normally take, and why?
Especially, what to do against these zerg follow-ups:
Fast 2 base hydra --> your build is low on sentries, the initial push seems very threatening to me without the sentry-count to block hydras out until colossi are on the field. Or do timings work out?
Fast 3rd by zerg --> doesn't seem that big of a problem, nevertheless since you will have very low scouting intel at this point. How to prepare, how to react?
d) Map-analysis: You should depict which maps are more suitable for your build and which aren't. Counter-intuitively I think (!) - what Anihc has already mentioned - that due to the possible 15 Nex / forge FE, this build is quite weak on larger maps. Because if you want to pressure, you go 3 gate expo, if you want to macro, you can 15 Nex / forge FE. On Xel Naga however, I think (!) that this build might be too risky. Maybe (!) on Typhon Peaks and Backwhater gulch too? You should notice the level of uncertainty here.

Same as Anihc, I appreciate you posting here and don't want to bash on your skills. I just hope you don't "give up" on this thread and find the time and take the effort, to include all the things that unfortunately are still missing.


Hi sleepingdog,

Thanks for posting this. I know the OP wasnt very good, I wrote it down fast just explaining the basics. I'll try to get more detail soon.
Once I'm back from work, I'll answer all the questions you've made and try to back them up with a couple of replays.

Cheers
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 11:51:56
April 20 2011 11:50 GMT
#39
E: nvm sry for this post
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-20 12:14:27
April 20 2011 12:13 GMT
#40
On April 20 2011 20:14 Capoch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 15:54 Anihc wrote:
On April 20 2011 13:29 Belha wrote:
On April 20 2011 10:54 Anihc wrote:
The thing that doesn't make sense is that you pull probes off gas. If you can make this build work without having to pull probes off gas, then I can see why this build may be good.


I'm one of your macro builds fan Anihc, but that sentence is wrong. Its the oposite. Any build refined to perfection should include moving workers in or out of gas, specially for early timmings when the gas requirements are so tight. I mean, maybe the Capoch build could be better with some improvements, like "not moving probes out of gas", but a build is not bad just because it moves probes from gas.

Nice variation for FE builds Capoch, is nice to take zergs out of their regular metagame




I only see one advantage this build has over a nexus first build, and that is you get earlier gas. This can be extremely useful because it means faster robo or stargate tech, or earlier sentries for more forcefields when you move out with your warpgate timing attack. What other advantage does it have? It's not safer. It doesn't give you a better economy. Capoch did mention that you can often "fool" the zerg into being overly aggressive, but I've actually been experimenting with going nexus -> gate and skipping the forge, and I've found it to be pretty successful on large maps or when zerg goes hatch first (and these are conditions that Capoch stated are necessary for his build to work as well).

So why go gate core nexus when you can go nexus gate core? Because you get earlier gas. And by removing probes off gas, you're losing the only advantage you get.


I totally understand what you're saying, but as I said before, I do have replays doing this strat successfully, I just don't know where to post them. If you want send me a PM with your MSN and I can send them to you later today.


A good page for member-hosted reps is this one:
http://www.gamereplays.org/portals.php
If you upload your games you get a link that you can copy, so reps appear like this (notice that this is already the download-link):
[image loading]

Also looking forward to your response
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Patches Events
23:00
5.4k Patch Clash #9
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft591
PiGStarcraft401
RuFF_SC2 116
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 872
PianO 357
Leta 249
Bale 168
Pusan 81
yabsab 75
Snow 65
Noble 45
ZergMaN 12
Icarus 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm125
LuMiX1
League of Legends
C9.Mang0316
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv252
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor100
Other Games
summit1g10331
JimRising 544
shahzam515
ViBE137
Maynarde113
Mew2King48
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1041
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 96
• practicex 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 37
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4184
• Lourlo746
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 18m
Wardi Open
7h 18m
StarCraft2.fi
11h 18m
Monday Night Weeklies
12h 18m
Replay Cast
19h 18m
WardiTV 2025
1d 7h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 11h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 20h
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV 2025
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
WardiTV 2025
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Tarson vs DragOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Revival: Season 3
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.