• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:19
CEST 07:19
KST 14:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 568 users

[M] (2) AEM Ion

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Normal
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-13 23:25:10
February 11 2014 00:46 GMT
#1
Publish as Ion Tt on
NA EU KR SEA
By Timetwister22
v1.0


[image loading]

Playable: 120x152

Concept
+ Show Spoiler +
I wanted this map to allow for macro and late game play, while giving plenty of opportunity to harass.

The interesting take on the natural is the most notable feature of the map. While the base and mineral line is on the high ground, the player must defend the low ground to be able to mine. The choke on the low ground is as wide as an average natural choke, yet the backdoor is quite wide. If the low ground is lost, the player will most likely lose mining ability at the natural, but not the base.

The other bases were designed with aggression in mind as well, so harassment can continue into the late game.

This map has no Xel'Naga watchtowers.


Tileset
+ Show Spoiler +

Ulaan Dirt
Ulaan Grunge
Shakuras Sand Dark
Avernus Small Tiles
Ulaan Dirt Cracked
Korhal Platform Tiles


Zhakul'Das Organic Cliffs
Korhal Platform Manmade Cliff

Zhakul'Das Lighting - slightly altered in increase brightness.


Aesthetic Shots
+ Show Spoiler +

Inspired by one of my previous maps, Tanzanite.

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]



Change Log
+ Show Spoiler +

V0.x
Minor aesthetic bug updates.
V1.0
-Fixed many bugs where units were able to blink or be dropped in unintended areas.
-Fixed areas where units would get stuck via blink/cliff walking
-Made the map look slightly nicer on low settings
V1.1 - + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

-Changed large diagonal rocks to collapse rocks. This will have that third path initially open, so Zerg can more easily take a quick third. Yet, the path can still be closed to secure the low ground or cut of forces from third.


As always, feedback is more than welcome
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
ZeromuS
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada13389 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-11 01:33:31
February 11 2014 01:31 GMT
#2
NVM about uploads, the res is too high for me to use staff uploads for it.

- Other than that cool looking map.

I wonder if the low to high ground nat thing would be problematic for cannon rushes similar to what happened on Akilon later in its life PvZ. But then again the ramp is closer to the low ground on this map so it might not be as hard to hold as it was on akilon, which eventually became easier. Though akilon was worse because it also denied a potential third base location.
StrategyRTS forever | @ZeromuS_plays | www.twitch.tv/Zeromus_
Zax19
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Czech Republic1136 Posts
February 11 2014 02:03 GMT
#3
Hm, this one actually looks interesting. I’d get rid of some of the bases in the centre and make it a bit wider (with some rock, of course). Other than that There might be a lot of in base proxing and such but every non-traditional map brings out some cheese…
Really Blizz, really? - Darnell
geokilla
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada8230 Posts
February 11 2014 03:36 GMT
#4
I don't think canon rushing is possible because the mineral line seems to be pretty far from the natural ramp. The third base might be a bit too far though and makes it a bit too easy for Protoss and Terran to deny against a Zerg it seems. I think adding destructible rocks at the 3rd natural by the edge of the map would make it better?

This map reminds me of that other ladder map which had an in base natural and was terrible to play on..
FaZ-
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States187 Posts
February 11 2014 05:28 GMT
#5
Nice idea- I'm interested to see some games on it. The obvious play is to FE but there are so many spots for proxies because of the size of the main, so that'll help to counterbalance macro play. I especially like the 4th bases towards the center of the map- this was pretty common in SC:BW but completely fell out in SC2 and I have no idea why. It makes securing that extra base pretty advantageous and gives you basically a staging point while still protecting your income.

At this point, though, I'm excited to see basically anything that isn't an Akilon Wastes clone or a 4-player map with a ring of bases around the outside.
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
February 11 2014 08:38 GMT
#6
The. Aesthetics. Holy.

This is a beautiful map.
Hellblitz
Profile Joined December 2012
France5 Posts
February 11 2014 09:24 GMT
#7
This map isnt very good, i'm affraid.

There is a big issue with the second base, in TvT, or TvZ, terran can push with tank and take a position behind the second base to deny mining. I think it would be too much efficient.

My other concern is about the third base, its soooo far away. There is no reason for that and too me its like sending a message to protoss player to just allin in PvZ and PvT and honnestly, who in this world want more protoss allin ?

I think you can fix those issues by changing the position of the second base inside the B1 and make a larger space (not a corridor i mean) between B2/B3 while put some rock on the second way to the third base (the path in the corner of the map), this way, protoss wouldnt be allowed to push the third base and block a simple path with 3 or 4 FF.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
February 11 2014 09:38 GMT
#8
On February 11 2014 18:24 Hellblitz wrote:
This map isnt very good, i'm affraid.

There is a big issue with the second base, in TvT, or TvZ, terran can push with tank and take a position behind the second base to deny mining. I think it would be too much efficient.

My other concern is about the third base, its soooo far away. There is no reason for that and too me its like sending a message to protoss player to just allin in PvZ and PvT and honnestly, who in this world want more protoss allin ?

I think you can fix those issues by changing the position of the second base inside the B1 and make a larger space (not a corridor i mean) between B2/B3 while put some rock on the second way to the third base (the path in the corner of the map), this way, protoss wouldnt be allowed to push the third base and block a simple path with 3 or 4 FF.

If you consider that by the time you're on 2 bases and about to take a 3rd your army should be positioned in the area in front of your 2 initial bases, not at the top of your main ramp, then the 3rd really isn't that far away.
vibeo gane,
Rasias
Profile Joined November 2013
Germany51 Posts
February 11 2014 09:52 GMT
#9
From a Zerg perspective i think that it would be pretty hard to take a third, either you'd need quite some creep spread to get the left one or you need units to destroy the rocks to the third. I'm not sure if it's maybe too hard to take it.
What i really like is the rocks to the main, which makes it much harder to ff the ramp for protoss and i guess.. that would achieve getting rid of a lot of the annoying warpgate-sentry harass.
Zax19
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Czech Republic1136 Posts
February 11 2014 11:55 GMT
#10
On February 11 2014 18:52 Rasias wrote:
From a Zerg perspective i think that it would be pretty hard to take a third, either you'd need quite some creep spread to get the left one or you need units to destroy the rocks to the third. I'm not sure if it's maybe too hard to take it.
What i really like is the rocks to the main, which makes it much harder to ff the ramp for protoss and i guess.. that would achieve getting rid of a lot of the annoying warpgate-sentry harass.

Hm, I’m not sure why we don’t see them anymore but how about the rocks which block the minerals but not the base placement? That should make things a bit more even.
Really Blizz, really? - Darnell
lorestarcraft
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1049 Posts
February 11 2014 12:15 GMT
#11
This most beautiful map I've ever seen.
SC2 Mapmaker
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
February 11 2014 12:50 GMT
#12
Epic design. But I think, textures will be simplified a bit, like on yeonsu.
eTcetRa
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia822 Posts
February 11 2014 13:02 GMT
#13
My eyes hurt.

don't get me wrong though. Beautiful, cool, amazing attention to detail. I just find it hard to follow.

I like the idea behind the natural too. Nice work!
Retired Mapmaker™
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
February 11 2014 14:58 GMT
#14
I like the natural a lot because you set up a situation where players need to move down their main ramp to defend it. Then you have a fairly normal sized choke to defend plus a backdoor with rocks. The backdoor here doesn't create the problems that many other backdoors have created on maps. I would also be a bit concerned about zerg taking a fast 3rd but I don't think creep spread is an issue given that it looks like the natural hatchery will spread some creep down the ramp to the low ground on its own. You can just put a tumor down in the main and swing it around towards the closer third. The rocks are the real obstacle to defending it.

I would advocate reducing the resource density in the middle of the map by moving the 3oclock base closer to a 2oclock postion (and the 9oclock closer to 8oclock). Nice aesthetics work for sure.
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
February 11 2014 15:19 GMT
#15
On February 11 2014 23:58 TheFish7 wrote:
I like the natural a lot because you set up a situation where players need to move down their main ramp to defend it. Then you have a fairly normal sized choke to defend plus a backdoor with rocks. The backdoor here doesn't create the problems that many other backdoors have created on maps. I would also be a bit concerned about zerg taking a fast 3rd but I don't think creep spread is an issue given that it looks like the natural hatchery will spread some creep down the ramp to the low ground on its own. You can just put a tumor down in the main and swing it around towards the closer third. The rocks are the real obstacle to defending it.

I would advocate reducing the resource density in the middle of the map by moving the 3oclock base closer to a 2oclock postion (and the 9oclock closer to 8oclock). Nice aesthetics work for sure.


Thank you. Your point about resource density was entirely intentional on my part. I didn't want an easy split map scenario. Instead I wanted that tense harass aggression to be able to continue into the late game. By forcing players to spread out and push them toward one another, aggression should follow.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Rasias
Profile Joined November 2013
Germany51 Posts
February 11 2014 15:39 GMT
#16
On February 11 2014 23:58 TheFish7 wrote:
I don't think creep spread is an issue given that it looks like the natural hatchery will spread some creep down the ramp to the low ground on its own. You can just put a tumor down in the main and swing it around towards the closer third. The rocks are the real obstacle to defending it.

I just tested it, the creep reaches to the edges of the natural cliff and barely to the ramp.
I think you'd have to either destroy the rocks and get the closer third, or you take the further one (4 creep tumors to connect). It seems, like a later 3rd is kind of necessary for zerg on this map.
geokilla
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada8230 Posts
February 11 2014 16:52 GMT
#17
On February 12 2014 00:39 Rasias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2014 23:58 TheFish7 wrote:
I don't think creep spread is an issue given that it looks like the natural hatchery will spread some creep down the ramp to the low ground on its own. You can just put a tumor down in the main and swing it around towards the closer third. The rocks are the real obstacle to defending it.

I just tested it, the creep reaches to the edges of the natural cliff and barely to the ramp.
I think you'd have to either destroy the rocks and get the closer third, or you take the further one (4 creep tumors to connect). It seems, like a later 3rd is kind of necessary for zerg on this map.

That forces Zerg to be more aggressive then. Good way for diversified matches?
Rasias
Profile Joined November 2013
Germany51 Posts
February 11 2014 16:56 GMT
#18
On February 12 2014 01:52 geokilla wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 00:39 Rasias wrote:
On February 11 2014 23:58 TheFish7 wrote:
I don't think creep spread is an issue given that it looks like the natural hatchery will spread some creep down the ramp to the low ground on its own. You can just put a tumor down in the main and swing it around towards the closer third. The rocks are the real obstacle to defending it.

I just tested it, the creep reaches to the edges of the natural cliff and barely to the ramp.
I think you'd have to either destroy the rocks and get the closer third, or you take the further one (4 creep tumors to connect). It seems, like a later 3rd is kind of necessary for zerg on this map.

That forces Zerg to be more aggressive then. Good way for diversified matches?

Don't get me wrong, I don't think it's bad that way, but i think it should be considered
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
February 11 2014 17:00 GMT
#19
On February 12 2014 01:52 geokilla wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 00:39 Rasias wrote:
On February 11 2014 23:58 TheFish7 wrote:
I don't think creep spread is an issue given that it looks like the natural hatchery will spread some creep down the ramp to the low ground on its own. You can just put a tumor down in the main and swing it around towards the closer third. The rocks are the real obstacle to defending it.

I just tested it, the creep reaches to the edges of the natural cliff and barely to the ramp.
I think you'd have to either destroy the rocks and get the closer third, or you take the further one (4 creep tumors to connect). It seems, like a later 3rd is kind of necessary for zerg on this map.

That forces Zerg to be more aggressive then. Good way for diversified matches?


Aggression you say? Almost seems intentional with the map concept ^^
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Uvantak
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Uruguay1381 Posts
February 12 2014 00:36 GMT
#20
omg Time twister this map is freaking gorgeous! My only plea is that if the third proves to be too hard fix it! even if it breaks the map's concept a bit, don't let this map become a new Phantasm.
@Kantuva | Mapmaker | KTVMaps.wordpress.com | Check my profile to see my TL map threads, and you can search for KTV in the Custom Games section to play them.
Kiaph
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
112 Posts
February 12 2014 00:44 GMT
#21
10/10 for the map design, you put so much time into this map, and it very easy to see, and maybe even a future competition map,

I would not be suprised to see this in tournaments in the future, or on the ladder, there may be some slight modifications needed, related to balance, but no way to find out.. cause I am to busy looking at the map to actually go and play it
Zax19
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Czech Republic1136 Posts
February 12 2014 01:49 GMT
#22
So how about the changing the 3rd - rather than blocking the path just have mineral blocking rocks like on Testbug?
Really Blizz, really? - Darnell
Antares777
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1971 Posts
February 12 2014 01:59 GMT
#23
The main-natural design is one of the most creative I've seen in a while. In-base naturals are nothing new, but most of the time are designed in a straightforward way with each expansion having their own clear "area", while here both the main and natural are blended together into the same area.

Most maps with in-base expansions tend to lean towards macro games, since the natural is easy to expand to and defend. Here, that isn't the case. The mineral line is right on the edge of a direct path to your base. This makes it so that the opposing army doesn't have to split forces to harass your natural, they can straight up harass it with their main force.
On February 11 2014 23:58 TheFish7 wrote:
I like the natural a lot because you set up a situation where players need to move down their main ramp to defend it.

The nail has been hit on the head. This is an interesting feature. To add to its vulnerability, the main-nat ramp is 3x once the rocks go down. The natural is deceptively difficult to defend. It looks like an in-base expansion, but plays out like a regular natural expansion. So cool dude!

I honestly don't really know what to think of the rest of the layout. The expansions are ambiguous and spread out, yet there are many choke points as well. I can't really comment on much else.

Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
February 12 2014 02:48 GMT
#24
As far as the third, I think it's fine as is for the time being until I get some games on it. The rocks between the nat low ground and the third will probably remain, as the current design of the natural relies on them. If the third becomes too hard for any race, I'll probably make choke size/distance adjustments.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
February 12 2014 08:43 GMT
#25
This is painful to look at, ow. I keep trying. Like it's cool for sure, but just seems unplayable (aesthetically). But that's not the biggest problem for a map to have, just putting my vote in.

The forward nat choke is pretty rough for any tight build orders, being so far. But it will make for interesting games for sure. I really think you'd see people put their infrastructure on the lowground to make a 2nd wall/simcity in case the rocks are broken to help defend the nat cliff. It's funny to me that this map of all things could be the first successful map to promote building outside the main.

I agree with fish that the 3oclock should be more towards 2oclock. I understand the motivation to keep it far and I assumed this was the intention, but I think it's going to force a basetradey mapsplit, not the harass / poke / multiprong you're looking for. In fact, I think the best thing for this map would be embrace the awkwardness of that area and make them gold bases so they function more the way you want. Or overhaul that area (possibly removing a pathway and creating a cliff vulnerability instead).

The focus of the map will be the unique nat design, so I really don't think it's a huge problem overall. Would like to see this map get used! Below I try and explain why the 2/3oclock area is awkward / not contributing to the map the way I think it's intended to.
+ Show Spoiler [long] +

If a player takes it as a 4th, they need their army to defend it because it's an open-face base location, and the army will need to camp there without constant knowledge of opponent's movements, since the enemy reinforce with the rocks down is so short and the defender travel path from center of mass is long and narrow. In the situation both players expand this way, it creates a very unstable basetrade favored positioning. It's like if your 4th on Daybreak was the base outside their main by air.

If you want to avoid this, you break the rocks to take the righthand 4th, which leads much more naturally to a 5th base anyway (the 3oclock, maybe the center base in some cases). Now you have a much more stable situation where the better player can make better movements than their opponent without being forced into a trade scenario (due to travel distances). This also brings the middle into play nicely. However the problem reemerges at the 5th base, because it bring you so close again (to the opponent's 3rd) and a defensive stance from both players results in a trade scenario again.

These issues are especially bad for zerg because the map doesn't offer a viable secondary location to put an alternate base site, which can be very important in a tight game where they have to sacrifice one of the two recent expansions because they'd be gg to engaging a timing.

Pushing the 3oclock to 2oclock alleviates many of the problems due to short distance and preserves it main vulnerability as an open-facing base, and also maintains the superior defensive position of forward army placement without mandating it. Because of the clever design of the 3rd base's back entrance (which I love), it wouldn't even make it much worse when they belong to opposing players. Redesigning the pathways here could help it along even more.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-12 16:02:04
February 12 2014 15:57 GMT
#26
The 3 o'clock is the intended fourths for player A, while the 2 o'clock are intended fifths/sixths for player B. I want the players to progressively take control of the middle of the map, and eventually take the base there. By forcing armies that close to one another, you will not see base trades. The armies simply will be able to get I to position to defend one another too easily. Instead, you'll see pokes and harass, especially with the little path that goes through the central bases. The 2 and 3 o'clock are not intended to be taken by the same player.

However, I should add that when both players are on four bases, this is when bases trades are most likely to happen since this is when armies are furthest.

As for tthe aesthetics, let's just say it's super shinny in the pictures. After pictures were taken, I dropped the bloom, gamma, "glory settings", and saturation by just a bit to make it playable in game. Not to say it looks entirely different, just less strain on the eyes. Just had to make it look good for public view since I posted it on reddit.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
February 15 2014 22:18 GMT
#27
Map has been updated to version 1.0. The update includes various bug fixes, and some minor aesthetic changes.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
L3monsta
Profile Joined May 2012
New Zealand149 Posts
February 15 2014 23:23 GMT
#28
I really like it, but the textures look waay too busy in the corner bases
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
February 18 2014 00:40 GMT
#29
ESV Ion has been included in the map pool for Team Dignitas Reverse Race Tournament 3!
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
May 02 2014 00:03 GMT
#30
Update to V1.2

Changed large diagonal rocks to collapse rocks. This will have that third path initially open, so Zerg can more easily take a quick third. Yet, the path can still be closed to secure the low ground or cut of forces from third.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
May 02 2014 02:34 GMT
#31
Pretty!

I like the inbase natural design, could make for some interesting plays!
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Zax19
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Czech Republic1136 Posts
May 06 2014 23:34 GMT
#32
Cool update, not as good as the Testbug style of mineral block but better than before
Really Blizz, really? - Darnell
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
May 07 2014 04:21 GMT
#33
Can you simplify textures a bit? Seems like same problem as on early versions of Yeonsu - nice map but textures are hard to fight on except if there is a creep everywhere
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 220
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 211
Noble 181
Bale 19
Dota 2
monkeys_forever680
NeuroSwarm92
ODPixel63
League of Legends
JimRising 852
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K755
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor119
Other Games
summit1g9655
shahzam688
hungrybox413
ViBE169
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick42077
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH357
• Hupsaiya 91
• Light_VIP 54
• practicex 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo829
• Stunt465
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
4h 41m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
7h 41m
Replay Cast
18h 41m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 10h
OSC
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.