• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 07:41
CET 13:41
KST 21:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1811Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises1Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises Starcraft 2 Zerg Coach ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What are former legends up to these days? BW General Discussion How soO Began His ProGaming Dreams Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB & LB Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Mechabellum Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
organización de música organización de música Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread 12 Days of Starcraft Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Saturation point
Uldridge
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1467 users

OneGoal: A better SC2 [Project Hub] - Page 36

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 34 35 36 37 38 78 Next
FoxyMayhem
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
624 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-03 16:14:43
February 01 2013 15:06 GMT
#701
Thanks for your support Crypto ^_^
AnomalySC2
Profile Joined August 2012
United States2073 Posts
February 01 2013 17:42 GMT
#702
Man this is a really cool idea and some of the designs sound great. I just may have to reinstall sc2 to give this a try D:
gCgCrypto
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany297 Posts
February 01 2013 19:27 GMT
#703
i´ll be on NA waiting for some One Goal oponents for lthe next 2 or so hours. If anyone wants to play some then gogo.
L E E J A E D O N G ! <3
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
February 01 2013 19:36 GMT
#704
Nice videos. Your ideas expressed just reinforced my faith in this team and I will continue to stick by and playtest it out for you
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
ItWhoSpeaks
Profile Joined September 2010
United States362 Posts
February 01 2013 20:52 GMT
#705
Thanks guys. We care about this and want to be as open as possible with you all.
Reflection and Respect.
gCgCrypto
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany297 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-01 22:23:53
February 01 2013 22:23 GMT
#706
Some food for thought by ArmadaVega from the US Bnet forums

[image loading]

(original post: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/7811541332)

While i think it´s risky to add any BW units (in this case Lurker), Vega´s Idea could solve a lot of issues that currently exist in HotS but also a little in OG.

The current implementation of the SH, while its way better then in HotS, still is a unit that gets way way better when in huge masses,
It also has this wierd gimickyness to it where it stopped working properly against strong armys.
One could think the´d be good vs mech but from what i´ve seen in my games they really dont, especially with the 2supply tank.

Vega´s SH would give the SH a real identity as a anti air unit that Zerg is despretly lacking imo.
In HotS air armys by both Terran and Protoss are far from beatable, no matter how meny bases you are up on your oponent, and completly disregard what happened in the early and midgame (similar to Broodlord infestor but stronger)

This would maby be a even better place to implement Scourages, that is more SC like.
Let the SH spawn scourages instead of locusts.
Like this you have very potent anti air and also a alternative to Mutas ZvZ (OG ZvZ seems even more of a mutafeast then HotS, dont take me wrong i like it but like this you could have a unit composition that is stronger then pure mutas (Muta SH) but could still be beaten with good micro (JAEDONGUUUUU)

Also now with a T1 Hydra its like there never was a better moment to reimplement the Lurker.
i <3 Lurker
everyone <3 Lurker (eccept for Broder and Kim .... )
so yeah, would love to hear your take on this.
L E E J A E D O N G ! <3
NDDseer
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Australia204 Posts
February 02 2013 12:58 GMT
#707
Holy cow, just found this, it's pretty damn awesome and I'm liking what I'm reading.
[On balance, and qq about cheese] "Sure some strategies might be easier to execute, but you can do them too - you have the same tools as your opponent, including your race selection." - Pokebunny
sunglasseson
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States145 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-02 13:30:14
February 02 2013 13:15 GMT
#708
the problem with a lot of this is you basically just mimic bw (i wish it was BW with better graphics...) blizzard even though they have made the HOTS units similar to broodwar, they will resist the suggestion like a child to bad tasting medicine. its good for you but the child (blizzard) refuses it for refusals sake and thus hurts in the end

edit - yeh wow its all just "make it like broodwar" one suggestion was probes dont auto mine and bring back single building select. k did u guys not see they make the drones auto mine AT THE START? blizzard is a casual gaming company that got lucky as HELL and because they were limited in technology, produced great games that were time consuming and skill intensive simply because thats the era they were in. BW was luck. clunky mechanics lead to high skill caps. god i want sc2 to be great but we all know its not and never will be because blizzard constantly does things that are going in the opposite direction of what we keep talking about.

i also want to point out that so many people here think they want skill but really dont know what they are getting into. this era of instant gratification and false senses of accomplishment extend to the people who think they are really good and want the game to be harder so they can increase the "gap" between themselves and others without understanding they are doing well because of how easy the games mechanics are. the harder a game is, the less popular it is. if blizzard made sc2 hard, most of you would quit within the first few months and go play games like LoL. ladder anxiety exists, theres a nice search bar if you dont believe me. if blizzard could make sc2 easier they would, i assure you.

for your ideas to matter at all, they cant be "make the hydra turn into a lurker", stop being stupid dustin browder has said he will never add the lurker. it cant be "in broodwar this was important" as soon as you compare broodwar they are going to instantly zone out the next and crucial aspect of your "point/idea" its the psychology of a person in dustin browders shoes. you need to be special, the idea needs to be the new, well oiled game engine era equiv of broodwars clunky unit AI leading to better game fights/balance
NDDseer
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Australia204 Posts
February 02 2013 13:30 GMT
#709
Has work on the colossus been considered where it has an attack that it lobs an infested terran like egg that then explodes (after short duration) for AOE damage?

Let's say, range 9, takes about 1 second to lob, takes about 1.5 seconds to explode, "egg" deals small radius (1-2) of AOE damage, each colossus can perhaps use three "eggs" before needing a cooldown period (maybe 8-15 seconds somewhere, so that they could possibly be used at the start but also end of a battle, or to cover a retreat). Even make it so that an exploding "egg" kills friendly "eggs" in range, so that you don't just spam them everywhere or you're shooting yourself in the foot.

For the protoss, the skill would be in the placement and timing of eggs (since they have small, delayed AOE, you could chuck them behind a terran for synergy with zealot for example, or in front to delay a push). This also seems pretty good with cliff walk type stuff, if you can use ridges to allow colossi to perform raiding attacks by lobbing eggs from range with micro back across a cliff to retreat.

I'm imagining that the counter play opportunities to this are good, as the defender can either split their units back from the eggs or if they're quick can focus fire the "eggs" to snipe them before they blow up.

This scales well with the skill of players on both sides, but perhaps would have to be slightly weak at the lower leagues level to avoid being totally OP for really good players.
[On balance, and qq about cheese] "Sure some strategies might be easier to execute, but you can do them too - you have the same tools as your opponent, including your race selection." - Pokebunny
NDDseer
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Australia204 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-02 14:56:43
February 02 2013 14:51 GMT
#710
On December 15 2012 07:05 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:

Dark Templar
-Figment Removed
-Uraj Talisman added 150/150/80: Increases Speed by 20% and grants immunity to all Slows and Stuns.



I play DT openings a lot in WoL, and I like the idea that the way to give them increased utility is by increasing their mobility, allowing them to remain swift and fragile, and increasingly effective with a player's ability to keep them out of the way of detection. So here's an idea...

Blink upgrade also applies to DTs (Zeratul style).

Getting blink with your initial DTs will cut into the number of DTs you actually have (tradeoff to make there).
Getting blink later on does several things:
1. Promotes synergy with stalkers in small raiding parties
2. Encourages straight DT harassment where they blink in and take out static detection (cannons, spores, turrets) then start killing stuff. Note however that this is a large gas investment and still paper thin vs (well controlled/positioned) mobile detection, encouraging better usage/multitasking of the defending players with regards to scans/ravens/overseers/observers. The strength of this type of specialized play will also be limited by the decreased usage of Warp Gates, making warp ins on your opponents side of the map for this kind of play a bigger investment than you would think (given it is a quite high reward strategy)
3. Possibly promotes aggressive DT blinks as a solution vs widow mine/swarm host/siege tank zone pressure that is sloppy about detection (haven't played enough of HoTS or One Goal to know, but seems alright in theory)
4. It's a simple, clean design adaptation of what's already in the game.

EDIT: Works thematically too I think, DT/observer creep clearing could be alright as well, DT base trading would be as powerful as both players ability to multitask, Stalker/DT vs Stalker/DT both with blink or even just Stalkers (with Blink, but obs are kinda slow) vs DT (with Blink) in PvP would be so sick, the number of reasons I can see that this makes sense is incredible.
[On balance, and qq about cheese] "Sure some strategies might be easier to execute, but you can do them too - you have the same tools as your opponent, including your race selection." - Pokebunny
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
February 02 2013 16:39 GMT
#711
On February 02 2013 23:51 NDDseer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2012 07:05 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:

Dark Templar
-Figment Removed
-Uraj Talisman added 150/150/80: Increases Speed by 20% and grants immunity to all Slows and Stuns.



I play DT openings a lot in WoL, and I like the idea that the way to give them increased utility is by increasing their mobility, allowing them to remain swift and fragile, and increasingly effective with a player's ability to keep them out of the way of detection. So here's an idea...

Blink upgrade also applies to DTs (Zeratul style).

Getting blink with your initial DTs will cut into the number of DTs you actually have (tradeoff to make there).
Getting blink later on does several things:
1. Promotes synergy with stalkers in small raiding parties
2. Encourages straight DT harassment where they blink in and take out static detection (cannons, spores, turrets) then start killing stuff. Note however that this is a large gas investment and still paper thin vs (well controlled/positioned) mobile detection, encouraging better usage/multitasking of the defending players with regards to scans/ravens/overseers/observers. The strength of this type of specialized play will also be limited by the decreased usage of Warp Gates, making warp ins on your opponents side of the map for this kind of play a bigger investment than you would think (given it is a quite high reward strategy)
3. Possibly promotes aggressive DT blinks as a solution vs widow mine/swarm host/siege tank zone pressure that is sloppy about detection (haven't played enough of HoTS or One Goal to know, but seems alright in theory)
4. It's a simple, clean design adaptation of what's already in the game.

EDIT: Works thematically too I think, DT/observer creep clearing could be alright as well, DT base trading would be as powerful as both players ability to multitask, Stalker/DT vs Stalker/DT both with blink or even just Stalkers (with Blink, but obs are kinda slow) vs DT (with Blink) in PvP would be so sick, the number of reasons I can see that this makes sense is incredible.

Even as a toss player, i can already tell that dts with blink sounds op as fuck. At that point, you can just mass them up and have them as your core army. With +3 atk, they already do 60 dmg, so being able to just blink up to mmm sounds terrifying.
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Emuking
Profile Joined June 2012
United States144 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-02 17:27:47
February 02 2013 17:25 GMT
#712
I'm not trying to start a fire in this thread but I think some moba's have really interesting champ designs which in my mind is
"a unit." It might be a good idea to look at some League of Legends champs to gain some ideas.

Anyway the reason i bring this up is my patch idea for the colossus would be to make its attack animation a laser (single laser or double laser i am not sure of, i think single would work better) that is guided by the player (point A to point B). It would look something like Viktor's Death Lazer from league of legends. It allows skill on both sides, you can still dodge the laser and a person with multiple colossus can maybe create laser patterns on the ground that make it more difficult to dodge etc. This might increase the colossus range very far if a colossus with 9 range directs the laser forward rather than side to side, but thats the fun of it :D



It would be really cool if you could implement this idea because there are 360 different degrees you can fire your laser and it would make colossus attack animation micro pretty sick to watch.
When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breath, then you'll be successful.
NDDseer
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Australia204 Posts
February 02 2013 21:08 GMT
#713
On February 03 2013 01:39 da_head wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2013 23:51 NDDseer wrote:
On December 15 2012 07:05 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:

Dark Templar
-Figment Removed
-Uraj Talisman added 150/150/80: Increases Speed by 20% and grants immunity to all Slows and Stuns.



I play DT openings a lot in WoL, and I like the idea that the way to give them increased utility is by increasing their mobility, allowing them to remain swift and fragile, and increasingly effective with a player's ability to keep them out of the way of detection. So here's an idea...

Blink upgrade also applies to DTs (Zeratul style).

Getting blink with your initial DTs will cut into the number of DTs you actually have (tradeoff to make there).
Getting blink later on does several things:
1. Promotes synergy with stalkers in small raiding parties
2. Encourages straight DT harassment where they blink in and take out static detection (cannons, spores, turrets) then start killing stuff. Note however that this is a large gas investment and still paper thin vs (well controlled/positioned) mobile detection, encouraging better usage/multitasking of the defending players with regards to scans/ravens/overseers/observers. The strength of this type of specialized play will also be limited by the decreased usage of Warp Gates, making warp ins on your opponents side of the map for this kind of play a bigger investment than you would think (given it is a quite high reward strategy)
3. Possibly promotes aggressive DT blinks as a solution vs widow mine/swarm host/siege tank zone pressure that is sloppy about detection (haven't played enough of HoTS or One Goal to know, but seems alright in theory)
4. It's a simple, clean design adaptation of what's already in the game.

EDIT: Works thematically too I think, DT/observer creep clearing could be alright as well, DT base trading would be as powerful as both players ability to multitask, Stalker/DT vs Stalker/DT both with blink or even just Stalkers (with Blink, but obs are kinda slow) vs DT (with Blink) in PvP would be so sick, the number of reasons I can see that this makes sense is incredible.

Even as a toss player, i can already tell that dts with blink sounds op as fuck. At that point, you can just mass them up and have them as your core army. With +3 atk, they already do 60 dmg, so being able to just blink up to mmm sounds terrifying.


Attack the design, not the balance. And I can't see that really being a problem anyways, an aggressive blink on top of MMM -> one scan and you get absolutely destroyed, unless you are WAAAAAAAAY ahead in terms of army investment, but then it's true for anything (oh, mass colossi destroys bio....). Not to mention that although DT do a lot of damage, they are still absolutely paper thin when exposed, they are melee range so massing them past a certain point isn't really the best idea because they just get in each others way, and EMP would roll face over mass DT if used properly. What COULD be good however would be DT-blink snipes to kill ghosts, that take skill by both players (if scanned you're still going to lose them, or if there's a raven nearby, which if opponent going DT you should be doing anyways) or perhaps 1-3 DT harassment where the blink is used to escape an opponent that does not have a raven, and can pick off a couple of units for free if your anticipation skills are good/you know your opponent is going to take >2 seconds to notice and respond.
[On balance, and qq about cheese] "Sure some strategies might be easier to execute, but you can do them too - you have the same tools as your opponent, including your race selection." - Pokebunny
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
February 03 2013 01:45 GMT
#714
On February 03 2013 06:08 NDDseer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 03 2013 01:39 da_head wrote:
On February 02 2013 23:51 NDDseer wrote:
On December 15 2012 07:05 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:

Dark Templar
-Figment Removed
-Uraj Talisman added 150/150/80: Increases Speed by 20% and grants immunity to all Slows and Stuns.



I play DT openings a lot in WoL, and I like the idea that the way to give them increased utility is by increasing their mobility, allowing them to remain swift and fragile, and increasingly effective with a player's ability to keep them out of the way of detection. So here's an idea...

Blink upgrade also applies to DTs (Zeratul style).

Getting blink with your initial DTs will cut into the number of DTs you actually have (tradeoff to make there).
Getting blink later on does several things:
1. Promotes synergy with stalkers in small raiding parties
2. Encourages straight DT harassment where they blink in and take out static detection (cannons, spores, turrets) then start killing stuff. Note however that this is a large gas investment and still paper thin vs (well controlled/positioned) mobile detection, encouraging better usage/multitasking of the defending players with regards to scans/ravens/overseers/observers. The strength of this type of specialized play will also be limited by the decreased usage of Warp Gates, making warp ins on your opponents side of the map for this kind of play a bigger investment than you would think (given it is a quite high reward strategy)
3. Possibly promotes aggressive DT blinks as a solution vs widow mine/swarm host/siege tank zone pressure that is sloppy about detection (haven't played enough of HoTS or One Goal to know, but seems alright in theory)
4. It's a simple, clean design adaptation of what's already in the game.

EDIT: Works thematically too I think, DT/observer creep clearing could be alright as well, DT base trading would be as powerful as both players ability to multitask, Stalker/DT vs Stalker/DT both with blink or even just Stalkers (with Blink, but obs are kinda slow) vs DT (with Blink) in PvP would be so sick, the number of reasons I can see that this makes sense is incredible.

Even as a toss player, i can already tell that dts with blink sounds op as fuck. At that point, you can just mass them up and have them as your core army. With +3 atk, they already do 60 dmg, so being able to just blink up to mmm sounds terrifying.


Attack the design, not the balance. And I can't see that really being a problem anyways, an aggressive blink on top of MMM -> one scan and you get absolutely destroyed, unless you are WAAAAAAAAY ahead in terms of army investment, but then it's true for anything (oh, mass colossi destroys bio....). Not to mention that although DT do a lot of damage, they are still absolutely paper thin when exposed, they are melee range so massing them past a certain point isn't really the best idea because they just get in each others way, and EMP would roll face over mass DT if used properly. What COULD be good however would be DT-blink snipes to kill ghosts, that take skill by both players (if scanned you're still going to lose them, or if there's a raven nearby, which if opponent going DT you should be doing anyways) or perhaps 1-3 DT harassment where the blink is used to escape an opponent that does not have a raven, and can pick off a couple of units for free if your anticipation skills are good/you know your opponent is going to take >2 seconds to notice and respond.

i guarantee that 20 dts blinkin on a bio ball will shred it to pieces. The terran will take 2-3 seconds to react, and by then, they would have lost a sizable chunk of their army.
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
NDDseer
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Australia204 Posts
February 03 2013 03:46 GMT
#715
On February 03 2013 10:45 da_head wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 03 2013 06:08 NDDseer wrote:
On February 03 2013 01:39 da_head wrote:
On February 02 2013 23:51 NDDseer wrote:
On December 15 2012 07:05 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:

Dark Templar
-Figment Removed
-Uraj Talisman added 150/150/80: Increases Speed by 20% and grants immunity to all Slows and Stuns.



I play DT openings a lot in WoL, and I like the idea that the way to give them increased utility is by increasing their mobility, allowing them to remain swift and fragile, and increasingly effective with a player's ability to keep them out of the way of detection. So here's an idea...

Blink upgrade also applies to DTs (Zeratul style).

Getting blink with your initial DTs will cut into the number of DTs you actually have (tradeoff to make there).
Getting blink later on does several things:
1. Promotes synergy with stalkers in small raiding parties
2. Encourages straight DT harassment where they blink in and take out static detection (cannons, spores, turrets) then start killing stuff. Note however that this is a large gas investment and still paper thin vs (well controlled/positioned) mobile detection, encouraging better usage/multitasking of the defending players with regards to scans/ravens/overseers/observers. The strength of this type of specialized play will also be limited by the decreased usage of Warp Gates, making warp ins on your opponents side of the map for this kind of play a bigger investment than you would think (given it is a quite high reward strategy)
3. Possibly promotes aggressive DT blinks as a solution vs widow mine/swarm host/siege tank zone pressure that is sloppy about detection (haven't played enough of HoTS or One Goal to know, but seems alright in theory)
4. It's a simple, clean design adaptation of what's already in the game.

EDIT: Works thematically too I think, DT/observer creep clearing could be alright as well, DT base trading would be as powerful as both players ability to multitask, Stalker/DT vs Stalker/DT both with blink or even just Stalkers (with Blink, but obs are kinda slow) vs DT (with Blink) in PvP would be so sick, the number of reasons I can see that this makes sense is incredible.

Even as a toss player, i can already tell that dts with blink sounds op as fuck. At that point, you can just mass them up and have them as your core army. With +3 atk, they already do 60 dmg, so being able to just blink up to mmm sounds terrifying.


Attack the design, not the balance. And I can't see that really being a problem anyways, an aggressive blink on top of MMM -> one scan and you get absolutely destroyed, unless you are WAAAAAAAAY ahead in terms of army investment, but then it's true for anything (oh, mass colossi destroys bio....). Not to mention that although DT do a lot of damage, they are still absolutely paper thin when exposed, they are melee range so massing them past a certain point isn't really the best idea because they just get in each others way, and EMP would roll face over mass DT if used properly. What COULD be good however would be DT-blink snipes to kill ghosts, that take skill by both players (if scanned you're still going to lose them, or if there's a raven nearby, which if opponent going DT you should be doing anyways) or perhaps 1-3 DT harassment where the blink is used to escape an opponent that does not have a raven, and can pick off a couple of units for free if your anticipation skills are good/you know your opponent is going to take >2 seconds to notice and respond.

i guarantee that 20 dts blinkin on a bio ball will shred it to pieces. The terran will take 2-3 seconds to react, and by then, they would have lost a sizable chunk of their army.


You see your opponent investing in almost pure DT, and DON"T build a raven?
[On balance, and qq about cheese] "Sure some strategies might be easier to execute, but you can do them too - you have the same tools as your opponent, including your race selection." - Pokebunny
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-03 03:49:51
February 03 2013 03:49 GMT
#716
Hey guys. I recorded and casted a few community games today with itwhospeaks. Just a warning, the first video gets kinda laggy and the in game sound is too loud (also my casting is horrendous T_T). But the purpose of these videos (will be posting more in the future), is to showcase this great mod in action. Enjoy.
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
February 03 2013 04:01 GMT
#717
On February 03 2013 12:49 da_head wrote:
the in game sound is too loud


Try 10% to 15% for Master Volume.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
February 03 2013 04:09 GMT
#718
On February 03 2013 13:01 MNdakota wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 03 2013 12:49 da_head wrote:
the in game sound is too loud


Try 10% to 15% for Master Volume.

yep im tinkering with it. This record session was literally, in game lobby, o hey i should record this. ok get on skype. so very last minute and unprepared (hence the lag and sound issues haha)
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
topsecret221
Profile Joined September 2012
United States108 Posts
February 03 2013 06:10 GMT
#719
Since I was out for the last week or so, I very much appreciated the cast. Helped give me an idea on where our dynamics stand without me having to get a hold of a replay
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-03 19:17:03
February 03 2013 16:50 GMT
#720
On February 03 2013 12:46 NDDseer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 03 2013 10:45 da_head wrote:
On February 03 2013 06:08 NDDseer wrote:
On February 03 2013 01:39 da_head wrote:
On February 02 2013 23:51 NDDseer wrote:
On December 15 2012 07:05 ItWhoSpeaks wrote:

Dark Templar
-Figment Removed
-Uraj Talisman added 150/150/80: Increases Speed by 20% and grants immunity to all Slows and Stuns.



I play DT openings a lot in WoL, and I like the idea that the way to give them increased utility is by increasing their mobility, allowing them to remain swift and fragile, and increasingly effective with a player's ability to keep them out of the way of detection. So here's an idea...

Blink upgrade also applies to DTs (Zeratul style).

Getting blink with your initial DTs will cut into the number of DTs you actually have (tradeoff to make there).
Getting blink later on does several things:
1. Promotes synergy with stalkers in small raiding parties
2. Encourages straight DT harassment where they blink in and take out static detection (cannons, spores, turrets) then start killing stuff. Note however that this is a large gas investment and still paper thin vs (well controlled/positioned) mobile detection, encouraging better usage/multitasking of the defending players with regards to scans/ravens/overseers/observers. The strength of this type of specialized play will also be limited by the decreased usage of Warp Gates, making warp ins on your opponents side of the map for this kind of play a bigger investment than you would think (given it is a quite high reward strategy)
3. Possibly promotes aggressive DT blinks as a solution vs widow mine/swarm host/siege tank zone pressure that is sloppy about detection (haven't played enough of HoTS or One Goal to know, but seems alright in theory)
4. It's a simple, clean design adaptation of what's already in the game.

EDIT: Works thematically too I think, DT/observer creep clearing could be alright as well, DT base trading would be as powerful as both players ability to multitask, Stalker/DT vs Stalker/DT both with blink or even just Stalkers (with Blink, but obs are kinda slow) vs DT (with Blink) in PvP would be so sick, the number of reasons I can see that this makes sense is incredible.

Even as a toss player, i can already tell that dts with blink sounds op as fuck. At that point, you can just mass them up and have them as your core army. With +3 atk, they already do 60 dmg, so being able to just blink up to mmm sounds terrifying.


Attack the design, not the balance. And I can't see that really being a problem anyways, an aggressive blink on top of MMM -> one scan and you get absolutely destroyed, unless you are WAAAAAAAAY ahead in terms of army investment, but then it's true for anything (oh, mass colossi destroys bio....). Not to mention that although DT do a lot of damage, they are still absolutely paper thin when exposed, they are melee range so massing them past a certain point isn't really the best idea because they just get in each others way, and EMP would roll face over mass DT if used properly. What COULD be good however would be DT-blink snipes to kill ghosts, that take skill by both players (if scanned you're still going to lose them, or if there's a raven nearby, which if opponent going DT you should be doing anyways) or perhaps 1-3 DT harassment where the blink is used to escape an opponent that does not have a raven, and can pick off a couple of units for free if your anticipation skills are good/you know your opponent is going to take >2 seconds to notice and respond.

i guarantee that 20 dts blinkin on a bio ball will shred it to pieces. The terran will take 2-3 seconds to react, and by then, they would have lost a sizable chunk of their army.


You see your opponent investing in almost pure DT, and DON"T build a raven?

You'd be surprised how many progames i've seen where the terran throwns down 10+ scans instead of making a raven haha.

I'm gonna post the second vod i recorded. Note that this was right after the first game. I switched to fraps for this so the video quality should be a lot better/smoother but the game volume is still too high (ill fix it for upcoming games). Enjoy.

edit: Also ill be on for the next few hours if anyone wants to jump on and play some games.
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Prev 1 34 35 36 37 38 78 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
12:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
WardiTV613
IndyStarCraft 134
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko216
IndyStarCraft 127
SortOf 121
SC2Nice 43
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 57311
Sea 3565
Jaedong 704
ggaemo 441
firebathero 305
Mini 254
Barracks 238
Rush 232
Soma 188
Stork 163
[ Show more ]
Light 133
Mong 119
Hyun 112
sorry 111
ZerO 92
Pusan 91
PianO 88
Snow 73
ToSsGirL 58
soO 49
Movie 36
Sea.KH 36
Sacsri 22
ajuk12(nOOB) 16
scan(afreeca) 13
Bale 9
GoRush 9
Noble 8
Shine 7
Icarus 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe239
League of Legends
C9.Mang0451
Counter-Strike
olofmeister3018
x6flipin717
allub155
rGuardiaN115
Other Games
B2W.Neo2189
singsing1150
Pyrionflax501
Fuzer 337
Sick239
RotterdaM167
ZerO(Twitch)12
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1204
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 57
• naamasc256
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
OSC
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
OSC
3 days
IPSL
4 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
4 days
OSC
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Patches Events
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W2
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
Underdog Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.