• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:16
CEST 11:16
KST 18:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou17Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four2BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET7Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)81
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Weekly Cups (March 17-23): Clem Bounces Back
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle RSL Season 3 Qualifier Links and Dates $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
SnOw's Awful Building Placements vs barracks BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET Is there anyway to get a private coach? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 [ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Roaring Currents ASL final [I] Funny Protoss Builds/Strategies
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Sabrina was soooo lame on S…
Peanutsc
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1839 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 12

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
October 12 2012 03:56 GMT
#221
Maybe you could just link the wall and the statue together so that if one does the other does too?
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 12 2012 03:58 GMT
#222
On October 12 2012 12:56 TheFish7 wrote:
Maybe you could just link the wall and the statue together so that if one does the other does too?

That would work as long as the wall is untargetable / undamageable. You'd also have to make 4 separate instances of each pair so they could all be separately conjoined. Might try this. Was planning to use triggers (pretty simple) but first I have to set up the units/footprints/HP/sounds/etc.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 12 2012 04:04 GMT
#223
On October 12 2012 05:47 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:27 The_Templar wrote:
@HypertonicHydroponic the first map looks pretty boss like for FFA.
The second map is wayyy too chokey, although the design isn't too bad (mains are too small also) if you get rid of all the really tiny passages.

To "mains are too small also":
+ Show Spoiler [CC grid] +

[image loading]
As you can see here, there are approximately 30 CC's worth in the main. As far as I know, this is still generally held as the approximate target size.

+ Show Spoiler [model Terran base] +

[image loading]
Here is a model Terran base since Terran production generally takes up the most space. This was done in the 10/11 o'clock position -- milage may vary. Without building too far out into the natural, Terran in this picture is able to accommodate 11 barracks, 3 factories, 6 starports (all production with add-ons), 4 armories, 2 engineering bays, 4 ghost academies, 1 fusion core, 3 bunkers, 11 turrets, and probably more supply depots than necessary, with 3 command centers. This is without tessellation of the production buildings with their add-ons to maximize space (which I'm still not sure why pros do not do ... speed vs space I guess...).


To "wayyy too chokey":
+ Show Spoiler [gateway/pylon walls] +

[image loading]
This is just to give maybe a better sense of the space toward the middle. Obviously, force fields to not need to contend with building restrictions for placement to lock down a path, but I'm not sure that this is quite as chokey as you claim -- at least not so problematically with the possible flanks.


@ EatThePath -- Would you care to take a spin with me sometime? I see you on constantly, but I don't think I've ever pinged you. XD

We played some games and the map is actually much more fluid than it would seem from a quick look at the obvious trouble spots. The size is bigger than the picture seems. Concluded it's broken because of tanks warp-ins multiple entrance main/nat etc etc but it's a fun map that plays well! Not sure if it's possible to "fix" it but even if it's not, check it out, you might get some ideas.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
October 12 2012 05:06 GMT
#224
On October 12 2012 13:04 EatThePath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 05:47 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:27 The_Templar wrote:
@HypertonicHydroponic the first map looks pretty boss like for FFA.
The second map is wayyy too chokey, although the design isn't too bad (mains are too small also) if you get rid of all the really tiny passages.

To "mains are too small also":
+ Show Spoiler [CC grid] +

[image loading]
As you can see here, there are approximately 30 CC's worth in the main. As far as I know, this is still generally held as the approximate target size.

+ Show Spoiler [model Terran base] +

[image loading]
Here is a model Terran base since Terran production generally takes up the most space. This was done in the 10/11 o'clock position -- milage may vary. Without building too far out into the natural, Terran in this picture is able to accommodate 11 barracks, 3 factories, 6 starports (all production with add-ons), 4 armories, 2 engineering bays, 4 ghost academies, 1 fusion core, 3 bunkers, 11 turrets, and probably more supply depots than necessary, with 3 command centers. This is without tessellation of the production buildings with their add-ons to maximize space (which I'm still not sure why pros do not do ... speed vs space I guess...).


To "wayyy too chokey":
+ Show Spoiler [gateway/pylon walls] +

[image loading]
This is just to give maybe a better sense of the space toward the middle. Obviously, force fields to not need to contend with building restrictions for placement to lock down a path, but I'm not sure that this is quite as chokey as you claim -- at least not so problematically with the possible flanks.


@ EatThePath -- Would you care to take a spin with me sometime? I see you on constantly, but I don't think I've ever pinged you. XD

We played some games and the map is actually much more fluid than it would seem from a quick look at the obvious trouble spots. The size is bigger than the picture seems. Concluded it's broken because of tanks warp-ins multiple entrance main/nat etc etc but it's a fun map that plays well! Not sure if it's possible to "fix" it but even if it's not, check it out, you might get some ideas.

Thanks for the beat down. :D Anyway, one of the things that I meant to say specifically, but I think you got the gist of it, is that the map is meant to be one of those "strategy" maps as DYEalabaster said it in his tourney thread -- something that you have to prepare something special for, but once it is figured out gets rotated out quickly. Fun to watch, and fun to play (hopefully even for a zerg XD).

Now for EatThePath's map....... 8*) I think the map played out pretty well. We only got to one game of it since a lot time we spent was on my map, but the game on his was pretty interesting. Having watched the replay, I think I have a better understanding of what happened in our game -- lol, dat mortal -- but also a better feel for the map. Anyway, specifics of the game we played aside, here are my thoughts on a few things.

1) The invincible force field walls. I think these are fine just being rocks. If you are going out of the front of your natural to blow up the computer console, you are actually less in a defensible position than if you were to poke at it on the ramp (or at the bottom with ranged. Now you get more surface area killing the statue/console, but I'm not really sure it is going to speed up breaking down the barrier all that much. Don't get me wrong, I think it is a neat idea for switches to be used to open pathways, temporary, permanent, remote, etc., but I am unsure of whether there is a real benefit to doing it here other than the sake of demonstration and getting the idea out there more prominently. Then again, look at my maps. XD GO FOR IT!

2) The watchtowers. I think the towers covering the 4:30/10:30 bases are strong, but okay since it doesn't take too much from the high ground to spot with an overlord/supply depot/pylon to see if your base is being spied on. However, the other two towers I think are maybe a little two strong in their current state, and think if you keep them they should be nerfed a bit. Here's my reasoning -- in close positions (which we didn't get to play yet), it is almost certainly going to be your third if the game doesn't A) end in a 1-2 base all-in, B) you ninja a base elsewhere, or C) you are terran and planetary/tank the 4:30/10:30 (or even a center base). So if you have the tower to help protect your third, you get to see the attack coming from a mile away, plus, your army is already going to be out in front there in between the nat & 3rd. So essentially harassing once on three base is going to be pretty tough to come by, and an unharassed 3 bases leads to deathball. So in a sense, the postion you were trying to save gets "broken" for a reason other than rush distance (or maybe in addition to?). Instead, maybe if that plateau was made into a valley, where it could be picked at from above and thus made less invincible, it might make certain plays more viable (ling, muta, medivac, hellion, warp prism, etc.). Also, if used offensively in the same positions, you pretty much have a lockdown on when the 3rd/4th are going up. I think for cross and close air it's not as big of a deal, although, it is still quite strong for close air, but it seems like if you are trying to save close positions you might want to nerf it somehow.

3) The center bridgework. Forcefield heaven, no? Not that it is necessarily a bad thing, but the very center I think is P/T favored even though there is quite a bit of zerg friendly open space around it. I think Metal was somewhat Z favored if I recall correctly, so this might be a Good Thing (tm) as far as making it play differently and/or more balanced. But when it gets down to the late, late game (thinking Haypro vs MVP), I think whoever controls this area wins, and it will be easier for P/T to hold it and control the center bases, which on this map could be as many as 6.

Thanks again for the games and comments (and for liking crazy maps!).
[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
October 12 2012 05:22 GMT
#225
On October 12 2012 14:06 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
1) The invincible force field walls. I think these are fine just being rocks. If you are going out of the front of your natural to blow up the computer console, you are actually less in a defensible position than if you were to poke at it on the ramp (or at the bottom with ranged. Now you get more surface area killing the statue/console, but I'm not really sure it is going to speed up breaking down the barrier all that much. Don't get me wrong, I think it is a neat idea for switches to be used to open pathways, temporary, permanent, remote, etc., but I am unsure of whether there is a real benefit to doing it here other than the sake of demonstration and getting the idea out there more prominently. Then again, look at my maps. XD GO FOR IT!

I'm pretty sure the main purpose of the forcefield walls instead of rocks is that the enemy can't destroy them from the outside - it's entirely up to the defender to choose when to break them. If they were rocks then the attacker could destroy them from the 3rd, then they'd have too great of an advantage (high ground behind a choke).
vibeo gane,
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-12 06:01:32
October 12 2012 06:00 GMT
#226
@hydro: thanks for comments and games. all the stuff you bring up, fair points that I had to consider when putting it together -- may be better way to do it. I'm not super happy with the towers but I feel like a remake of metal should have them. The idea with the towers is that they watch the shortest path for adjacent spawns. The way the map has to be laid out, they necessarily see the 3rd base in the other orientation. I don't think this is too bad, it gives incentive for defender to be a little active so they don't get spied on for free; by same token it lets you scout on a big map with lots of bases. For close spawns, the towers actually create an incentive to be active in all the lanes and spreads out the attack paths. I want players to fight back and forth across the middle in more and more lanes as the game goes on.

That's why the middle has two bridges and not a wide passage. It would be too easy to move across the map. It also makes late game battles a lot more positional. Either side can easily cede the high ground if they want to move to more open territory. So it makes you arrange large scale flanks and concentrate on how you engage. The center bases should be really hard to take because they are the last base with 6-7 before them, which is plenty.



@negzero: yeah they are meant to be more defensively oriented, mostly a concession to the close spawns, and also to make the natural a little less ridiculously open and transitable. I am thinking it will have 1000 hp and 500 shield (with 3 hp armor like rocks) so that's it's not too easy to take it down with lings or something while the defender is forced to turtle. So faster than rocks to kill so that it's not a burden to open the 3rd if you want, but still protected.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-12 06:47:31
October 12 2012 06:33 GMT
#227
On October 12 2012 14:22 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 14:06 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
1) The invincible force field walls. I think these are fine just being rocks. If you are going out of the front of your natural to blow up the computer console, you are actually less in a defensible position than if you were to poke at it on the ramp (or at the bottom with ranged. Now you get more surface area killing the statue/console, but I'm not really sure it is going to speed up breaking down the barrier all that much. Don't get me wrong, I think it is a neat idea for switches to be used to open pathways, temporary, permanent, remote, etc., but I am unsure of whether there is a real benefit to doing it here other than the sake of demonstration and getting the idea out there more prominently. Then again, look at my maps. XD GO FOR IT!

I'm pretty sure the main purpose of the forcefield walls instead of rocks is that the enemy can't destroy them from the outside - it's entirely up to the defender to choose when to break them. If they were rocks then the attacker could destroy them from the 3rd, then they'd have too great of an advantage (high ground behind a choke).

Fair enough, however, that just gives Terran a leg up because they should be able to range it and break it down with the high ground advantage without being able to stop them. If you are really going to make a remote switch to bring down the wall it should probably sit on the main side of the natural or something. Otherwise, just make it rocks and give everyone even footing. Nevermind, I thought it was closer than it was.
[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
Coppermantis
Profile Joined June 2012
United States845 Posts
October 12 2012 20:14 GMT
#228
[image loading]

Improvements have been made. The working title is currently Vespene Pumping Station.
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
October 12 2012 20:36 GMT
#229
Interesting 3rd. Possibly too hard to hold for protoss, but interesting.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-13 02:30:56
October 12 2012 22:11 GMT
#230
@copper: That's looking so cool now. The layout -- hugely improved. I love the look of seeping oil in the middle. Really nice aesthetics so far.


-------


I have implemented the remote destructible gate! (I am way more excited than is warranted, but I consider any foray into the data editor without mass casualties a glorious victory.)

+ Show Spoiler [picture] +

[image loading]


If you want to try it out, the map is uploaded as Metalopolis -- Presidium on NA.

Does anyone know why there's an actor bug with the shields. And how to fix it? I guess I'll just remove the shields.
Update: figured it out thanks to this thread at sc2mapster. Oh data editing. >_<
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Coppermantis
Profile Joined June 2012
United States845 Posts
October 13 2012 00:41 GMT
#231
You might want to put some sort of wire leading from the trigger to the gate. Right now there isn't very much that would let a player know that you need to break the statue to bring down the gate.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-13 04:06:14
October 13 2012 01:29 GMT
#232
On October 13 2012 09:41 Coppermantis wrote:
You might want to put some sort of wire leading from the trigger to the gate. Right now there isn't very much that would let a player know that you need to break the statue to bring down the gate.

Yeah, will be duly represented with some doodad work. ^^

Also plan to edit the statue to have text that says what it does.

update:

+ Show Spoiler [new picture] +

Like this
[image loading]
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
October 13 2012 04:13 GMT
#233
@ Path

Is a map like that able to be uploaded as melee? Or does it have to be custom? Probably a noob question but I haven't really delved into that kind of thing at all.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 13 2012 10:09 GMT
#234
On October 13 2012 13:13 Fatam wrote:
@ Path

Is a map like that able to be uploaded as melee? Or does it have to be custom? Probably a noob question but I haven't really delved into that kind of thing at all.

You can add triggers and modify data and it will still be a melee map, unlike in BW.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
lefix
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany1082 Posts
October 13 2012 20:46 GMT
#235
another update
[image loading]

- mains slightly bigger
- highground third moved further out
- wider ramps in center
- 6th base moved lowground, with a sneak/harass path behind them

I'm starting to like the map alot now personally, as the bases are well spread across the map and each base is different from another.
Map of the Month | The Planetary Workshop | SC2Melee.net
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 13 2012 21:09 GMT
#236
Don't like how cramped the high ground 3rd is. Would like a little more openness (not so close to the main cliff). Might need to push it out even a little further / reduce the main size slightly.

The 6th base is pretty far out there, pretty close to the opponent if you take either side. What if you push it outside more and make it vulnerable by high ground instead of by frontal attack:

[image loading]
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
October 14 2012 00:02 GMT
#237
I feel this version is the most interesting and aesthetic, but probably too cramped:

[image loading]

THese two however are less cramped, but also less interesting I feel:

[image loading]

[image loading]

So which one do you like more, any other ideas?
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 14 2012 03:13 GMT
#238
@Sisko - it's hard to judge what's going on without context. o.O

But I like the first one best. If you're worried it's too cramped, widen the ramps that lead up to the bridge (maybe pull them back one notch to make more space up there). Perhaps this map wants another 4 squares of X and Y for more space in the middle?
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
October 14 2012 03:49 GMT
#239
Well, context is that it's basically a new take on Xel'NAga Caverns I'd honestly might just make the entire map wider though.

Here's a top view of the first version. I feel XNC was a pretty cool map but not really up to date with today's metagame of course.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 14 2012 05:28 GMT
#240
Well, why do any of these changes improve it? It seems like you don't understand the major problems with WNC and added a bunch of random stuff.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 170
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 1560
firebathero 393
actioN 349
Bisu 237
sorry 106
Shine 103
TY 80
ToSsGirL 55
zelot 28
Stork 28
[ Show more ]
Sharp 9
Sacsri 9
Noble 4
Dota 2
XaKoH 270
XcaliburYe102
NeuroSwarm96
BananaSlamJamma0
League of Legends
JimRising 609
Counter-Strike
olofmeister4597
shoxiejesuss1039
allub170
Super Smash Bros
Westballz16
Other Games
summit1g7020
ceh9569
crisheroes213
Happy194
Sick77
Mew2King66
rGuardiaN22
Trikslyr12
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick586
Counter-Strike
PGL135
Other Games
BasetradeTV104
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 27
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV532
League of Legends
• Jankos1626
• Lourlo692
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
44m
OSC
2h 44m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
Online Event
1d 6h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
RSL Revival
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
[ Show More ]
CrankTV Team League
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.