• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:34
CEST 04:34
KST 11:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202543Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up5LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced58
StarCraft 2
General
Clem Interview: "PvT is a bit insane right now" Serral wins EWC 2025 TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Would you prefer the game to be balanced around top-tier pro level or average pro level? Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? BW General Discussion Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Bitcoin discussion thread 9/11 Anniversary
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 597 users

[M] (2) Prophets Passage

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Normal
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-13 04:27:03
April 30 2012 02:37 GMT
#1
[image loading]

Prophets Passage is my newest 2 player creation. I wanted to create something unique that hasn't been done before. With that said, I definitely feel I've shaken some things up a little bit. With all the smaller chokes and elevation changes, as well as the easy to hold bases, I feel all three races will benefit different ways from this map. The most unique thing about this map is that the main has a backdoor that is blocked by Rich Minerals.

Specs:
Availability: US
Map Size: 136x152
Expansions: 10 8m2g bases, 4 6m1rg
XWT: Two

[image loading]

Map Overview:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


Analyzer Overview:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


Features:
+ Show Spoiler +


Easy to hold natural that has a backdoor ramped blocked off by Rich Minerals. (56 total resources). This allows you to take a fast expansion and mine out the mineral wall at a later date.
[image loading]

Middle has plenty of ramps to keep zerg in check, but also plenty of open space to get surrounds.
[image loading]

The 4th base is fairly easy to grab but watch out because it can be easily harassed by the high ground behind you.
[image loading]

The fifth base is actually safe and quite easy to hold. It is also farther out of the way so it could easily be sneaked.
[image loading]



Pretty!
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


Any Problems/Bugs/Glitches you find with the map, please feel free to let me know.
Search Prophets Passage on US to play!

Thanks,
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
thurst0n
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States611 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-30 03:02:17
April 30 2012 02:42 GMT
#2
Are those just LOS blocker going form main to natural? I feel like having 2 openings to main just isn't feasible.. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 pool..Am I missing something?
Hehe I tried to edit, but you guys quoted me, it's all good. I played the map, it feels like it would be zerg favored, but not entirely sure I only played vs the computer haha. once you have 3 bases up it's way easier to hold than 2. Because when trying to defend only the main and nat, the attacker can bounce back and forth from easier than defender can.. not sure how I feel about that.
P.S. I'm nub. If you'd like you can follow me @xthurst but its not worth it ill be honest
WarSame
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Canada1950 Posts
April 30 2012 02:44 GMT
#3
On April 30 2012 11:42 thurst0n wrote:
Are those just LOS blocker going form main to natural? I feel like having 2 openings to main just isn't feasible.. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 pool..Am I missing something?

There are HY minerals.
Can it be I stayed away too long? Did you miss these rhymes while I was gone?
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
April 30 2012 02:45 GMT
#4
On April 30 2012 11:42 thurst0n wrote:
Are those just LOS blocker going form main to natural? I feel like having 2 openings to main just isn't feasible.. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 pool..Am I missing something?


Low resource count gold minerals with LoS blockers behind the mineral line so you are not able to warp in units over it. You have to mine out the resources to allow the opening. They only have 35 minerals so I suppose you "could" 6 pool, but you'd have to bring 5 of your drones with you to be able to mine out 1 patch.

Image so you can see. It's also linked under the "Features" Section.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
April 30 2012 03:07 GMT
#5
On April 30 2012 11:45 SidianTheBard wrote:
Low resource count gold minerals with LoS blockers behind the mineral line so you are not able to warp in units over it. You have to mine out the resources to allow the opening. They only have 35 minerals so I suppose you "could" 6 pool, but you'd have to bring 5 of your drones with you to be able to mine out 1 patch.

Image so you can see. It's also linked under the "Features" Section.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

I dunno about only having 35 minerals each. I think they should either be blue patches, so it takes 7 harvests, or increase the mineral amount. Since there are LoS blockers on the inside, it's tough to know they're working on knocking down that door, and having the drones with the zerglings makes it even more of an all-in. It's probably not as imbalanced as I'm making it seem, it's just something that would be a nasty surprise for the defending player, and nasty surprises usually aren't fun.

The rest of the map looks really cool though. I love how there are several different expansion patterns you can take, based on your race and opening. The aesthetics are pretty neat, too.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
April 30 2012 03:22 GMT
#6
It would take a long time for all 5 drones to mine through that as well. You'd definitely have time to get zealots/marines up, even if you didn't know it was coming.

I really like the orange lines and the aesthetic as a whole. The map feels very put together.

The natural is very open... I feel like it's too vulnerable for forge fast expands and 15cc, and too easy to bunker rush. Perhaps bringing it in just a little closer to the ramp? so that you can get that partial wall off with two 3x3 buildings and protect your pylon?

The high ground in the middle is also interesting, but it means that almost all the open areas where a zerg would normally want to engage are on the low ground... just something to consider.
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
April 30 2012 03:31 GMT
#7
wonderful layout, but i think there needs to be more space to maneuver, also the rock/snow works really well in some areas but others seems like too stark.
Veloh15
Profile Joined January 2012
United States161 Posts
April 30 2012 03:34 GMT
#8
I dont like the back door too the main... I like the idea but I feel like the size of it makes it too small to be practical. Obviously there are alot of possibilities for getting hellions or lings into the main, but medivacs and drops will come out faster, and this passage will only be opened once you have a 3rd. It seems that you can use it defensively, but I think that the entrance is too small because running your units into that small of a choke is going to be disadvantageous for you. I would like to hear your take on it tho. I love the aesthetics on this map, and how creative you are being really stretching your map to the limit. Those are my two cents keep up the inspiring work!
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-30 03:45:31
April 30 2012 03:37 GMT
#9
On April 30 2012 11:42 thurst0n wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Are those just LOS blocker going form main to natural? I feel like having 2 openings to main just isn't feasible.. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 pool..Am I missing something?
Hehe I tried to edit, but you guys quoted me, it's all good. I played the map, it feels like it would be zerg favored, but not entirely sure I only played vs the computer haha. once you have 3 bases up it's way easier to hold than 2. Because when trying to defend only the main and nat, the attacker can bounce back and forth from easier than defender can.. not sure how I feel about that.



Haha, sorry about the quoting! To be honest from my testing I was only worried about PvX matchups and that's mainly because I did feel that the low ground natural is still a little open. It's why I added rocks at one of the enterances to give it a better choke.

Also, about the attacker able to bounce back and forth easier, that's only the case if you take the backdoor expansion as your natural. Remember, unless they bring 5 workers they won't be able to get through the wall and therefore you can park your army by your lowground nexus.


On April 30 2012 12:07 NewSunshine wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I dunno about only having 35 minerals each. I think they should either be blue patches, so it takes 7 harvests, or increase the mineral amount. Since there are LoS blockers on the inside, it's tough to know they're working on knocking down that door, and having the drones with the zerglings makes it even more of an all-in. It's probably not as imbalanced as I'm making it seem, it's just something that would be a nasty surprise for the defending player, and nasty surprises usually aren't fun.

The rest of the map looks really cool though. I love how there are several different expansion patterns you can take, based on your race and opening. The aesthetics are pretty neat, too.


This is something I'm considering as well. Mineral walls haven't really been used nor tested all that much. I figured 35 is quick enough that if you want to Fast expand to the high ground expansion you are put one of your first couple workers to start to mine it out and it wouldn't take too long. Also, having 5 workers mine from the same patch does take some extra time, plus if they accidently screw up and mine from the wrong patch they are screwed. ^_^

Appreciate the comments are the expansion paths / aesthetics. I worked hard on those. :D


On April 30 2012 12:22 RFDaemoniac wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

It would take a long time for all 5 drones to mine through that as well. You'd definitely have time to get zealots/marines up, even if you didn't know it was coming.

I really like the orange lines and the aesthetic as a whole. The map feels very put together.

The natural is very open... I feel like it's too vulnerable for forge fast expands and 15cc, and too easy to bunker rush. Perhaps bringing it in just a little closer to the ramp? so that you can get that partial wall off with two 3x3 buildings and protect your pylon?

The high ground in the middle is also interesting, but it means that almost all the open areas where a zerg would normally want to engage are on the low ground... just something to consider.


Thanks sir! As I said earlier in this post I added those d-rocks later in my testing to try to make the low ground natural a little "safer" Protoss could also have the luxury of walling off the small ramp, opening up the backdoor and taking their natural there. You could then just keep 1 or 2 sentries by your front ramp to forcefield (for emergencies!) and keep most of your army by the high ground expansion.

Also, yes most of the open areas where a zerg would normally engage are on low ground, but you'd be surprised how well Banelings, Fungal, Mutas & Brood lords work in those smaller chokes.

On April 30 2012 12:31 WniO wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

wonderful layout, but i think there needs to be more space to maneuver, also the rock/snow works really well in some areas but others seems like too stark.


Are you a zerg player? I feel with all the chokes it makes roach play not as strong, especially since Mass Roach play off 3 base (it's easy for zergs to get 3 base here) is very strong. I'm hoping it encourages more ling/infestor/muta/broodlord play since those are what are going to be very strong on this map.

Also, to be honest it's not meant to be snow but it does look like it too much. >_< Oh well, I'll take what I can get and I'll keep slowly working on it.


On April 30 2012 12:34 Veloh15 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I dont like the back door too the main... I like the idea but I feel like the size of it makes it too small to be practical. Obviously there are alot of possibilities for getting hellions or lings into the main, but medivacs and drops will come out faster, and this passage will only be opened once you have a 3rd. It seems that you can use it defensively, but I think that the entrance is too small because running your units into that small of a choke is going to be disadvantageous for you. I would like to hear your take on it tho. I love the aesthetics on this map, and how creative you are being really stretching your map to the limit. Those are my two cents keep up the inspiring work!


The thing is you never have to mine it out if you don't want too. More then likely the enemy isn't going to bring at least 5 workers to mine it out either. Yes, you can block it with 1 forcefield, but with the LoS blockers & and way the minerals are set up it'll take more then 1 3x3 building. I thought it'd work out best like that, but as always I'm sure as there is more playtesting I'll figure out what works best. Maybe it can be abused since it is a smaller path but it's also a quick easy way to move from your bases so in theory, defending "should" be easier.

Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
April 30 2012 06:05 GMT
#10
Make sure you manually test the warp in possibility very thoroughly at both bases. Sometimes you can drop a zealot in right at the near edge of the LosB, which would grant vision on the other side as soon as it was finished warping -> move a skosh.

Also that is plainly light colored sand not snow. ;D

I like it in general, I don't like the chokiness in the middle and at the middle bases, and I'm not sure how much the back door really adds given that the defensive dynamic doesn't change much either way if you have natural and 3rd. The natural unwallableness (that's a word!) is fine by me but I'm not sure you can convince SC2dom at large.

But all those things are cool, and worth trying out. I would just simplify those highground things with ramps on either side of middle. Shorten by one diagonal quantum and get rid of the jutting side platforms--or something. Also the holes around the cliff of the main, I would fill that in to create a little more width along that lowground channel that feeds into the base next to center. I would. (meh)

Very eye-catching aesthetics, nicely done! Quite a map to show up with.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
DYEAlabaster
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Canada1009 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-30 06:27:45
April 30 2012 06:19 GMT
#11
Interesting dynamic, very original as always

HOWEVER, you need to test your model VERY THOROUGHLY before publishing it. 35 minerals isn't alot- an all in sixpool handles that nicely. You need to make it so that at least 10 or so harvesters are required to clear one patch. Cause If I get sixpooled with all drones....

Also- I would think about making the foreword base HY. Double also, I haven't stalked you in a while. How have you been ^^
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-30 07:36:06
April 30 2012 07:35 GMT
#12
On April 30 2012 15:05 EatThePath wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Make sure you manually test the warp in possibility very thoroughly at both bases. Sometimes you can drop a zealot in right at the near edge of the LosB, which would grant vision on the other side as soon as it was finished warping -> move a skosh.

Also that is plainly light colored sand not snow. ;D

I like it in general, I don't like the chokiness in the middle and at the middle bases, and I'm not sure how much the back door really adds given that the defensive dynamic doesn't change much either way if you have natural and 3rd. The natural unwallableness (that's a word!) is fine by me but I'm not sure you can convince SC2dom at large.

But all those things are cool, and worth trying out. I would just simplify those highground things with ramps on either side of middle. Shorten by one diagonal quantum and get rid of the jutting side platforms--or something. Also the holes around the cliff of the main, I would fill that in to create a little more width along that lowground channel that feeds into the base next to center. I would. (meh)

Very eye-catching aesthetics, nicely done! Quite a map to show up with.


I've messed around with warp-ins for a little bit and didn't seem to be able to warp passed the LoSB so hopefully it's good. I'll have to keep testing it just to make sure. The highground pieces in the middle that you mention are actually stuff I put in my map much closer to the end of my design. At first I had it flat and I didn't like it at all. I also had it as low ground but I thought it played out worse. So, if Low sucks and Mid sucks, make it high! :D

I'll keep in mind about opening up the side path around the lowground channel. I think the only reason I have space there is because I didn't want too much low ground touching the main.

I'm glad some of it you enjoy though, it's definitely been awhile since I've had time to make a map so trying to come up with new and unique things is quite difficult. :p


On April 30 2012 15:19 DYEAlabaster wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Interesting dynamic, very original as always

HOWEVER, you need to test your model VERY THOROUGHLY before publishing it. 35 minerals isn't alot- an all in sixpool handles that nicely. You need to make it so that at least 10 or so harvesters are required to clear one patch. Cause If I get sixpooled with all drones....

Also- I would think about making the foreword base HY. Double also, I haven't stalked you in a while. How have you been ^^


The mineral wall is such a huge test at the moment especially since there aren't really any maps out there right now that use this feature. I think at most I'd Increase the minerals to 49 or 56 which would be 7 or 8 trips. I know when I made it 35, that it's 5 trips. Looking at the wiki it takes a worker about 3 seconds (2.8) to mine 5 minerals. So that's about an extra 15 seconds of time you get just for them to break through the mineral wall. To get an extra 15 seconds before a 6 pool hits you is quite a lot of time, especially since the rush distance main to mineral wall is quite long as it is (like ~190 in the sc2 analyzer)

Geez, I thought my map was already unique enough and you want me to try to incorperate golds into it as well? You crazy!

I've been great actually, super busy mon-thurs usually, but my weekends are very relaxing so I've been slowly working on this map for the past couple of them. I actually started to draw the layout of this map in a notebook during the week because I was bored lol. Stalk me anytime bud! Oh and feel free to use this map for any certain Canadian events...Ehhh?? Ehhhh??? /cough /cough /wink hahahah <3
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
Corak
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany187 Posts
April 30 2012 07:39 GMT
#13
I really like that you try new ideas.
And good ones

As a Protoss player the natural looks scary to me. Your post of a Wall-in does not defend the nexus vs lings, which is at least very annoying.
Oh, and don't make the forward base a gold. It will be the classic Antiga counter to FFE by Zerg.

I don't think any of the ideas is broken, per se. But it will take a lot of testing. I really hope the TL mappers are up for it!
ArcticRaven
Profile Joined August 2011
France1406 Posts
April 30 2012 11:03 GMT
#14
This is violently good o____o

Although I'd definitely 6-pool with drones every single game ^^ I think those bloacking min patches should really contain more than 35.
[Govie] Wierd shit, on a 6 game AP winning streak with KOTL in the trench. I searched gandalf quotes and spammed them all game long, trenchwarfare247, whateva it takes!
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
April 30 2012 11:17 GMT
#15
Eh, I may kinda regret wasting my 5k post, but the proximity of that mineral blocker to that gas reminded me of a certain old BW game...



Basically, Flash used a Refinery to exchange his SCVs' minerals for gas so that they could return to mine those blocking minerals. Perhaps that may work on this map?
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
April 30 2012 16:56 GMT
#16
On April 30 2012 20:03 ArcticRaven wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

This is violently good o____o

Although I'd definitely 6-pool with drones every single game ^^ I think those bloacking min patches should really contain more than 35.


And when I finally put the mineral wall in, I was only worried that a Terran All-in where they bring like 15 scvs was going to be the only problem. Come to find out, no one gives a crap about that and everybody is worried about 6 pools!!! I'll most likely tweak the mineral fields to have more minerals.

About the whole 6-pool argument, most protoss forge FE, so if they notice a 6pool they'll build their first cannon by their main nexus and just sacrific their pylon & forge down by the natural. Zerg breaking in the back door isn't going to change anything. Zergs can't wall in anyway so a 6 pool is still a 6 pool. The only matchup I feel it could have a significate advantage in would be ZvT but most terrans wall off the front ramp anyway and when they notice it's a 6-pool they could just move 1 marine back to the mineral wall and pretty much deny it.

But, since many people are scared of it either way, I will for sure up the mineral count, maybe double (so it takes 10 workers)

On April 30 2012 20:17 eviltomahawk wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Eh, I may kinda regret wasting my 5k post, but the proximity of that mineral blocker to that gas reminded me of a certain old BW game...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDNMvEVtInA

Basically, Flash used a Refinery to exchange his SCVs' minerals for gas so that they could return to mine those blocking minerals. Perhaps that may work on this map?


w00t, 5k posts. This would actually be a genius idea because yes It would work. Think of the possibilities this map could bring if tournaments picked it up. How epic would it be to see MVP build a refinery by the enemy mineral wall, confusing everybody until he starts to mine away at the wall with that 1 scv only to bring his entire force through that tiny hole. Epicccccc. :D
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
April 30 2012 18:05 GMT
#17
On May 01 2012 01:56 SidianTheBard wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2012 20:17 eviltomahawk wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Eh, I may kinda regret wasting my 5k post, but the proximity of that mineral blocker to that gas reminded me of a certain old BW game...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDNMvEVtInA

Basically, Flash used a Refinery to exchange his SCVs' minerals for gas so that they could return to mine those blocking minerals. Perhaps that may work on this map?


w00t, 5k posts. This would actually be a genius idea because yes It would work. Think of the possibilities this map could bring if tournaments picked it up. How epic would it be to see MVP build a refinery by the enemy mineral wall, confusing everybody until he starts to mine away at the wall with that 1 scv only to bring his entire force through that tiny hole. Epicccccc. :D

While it would be cool, it's not actually as epic as in BW because you can shift queue the mining directly between the geyser and the minerals (I think the geyser building needs to finish before the shift queue back to the geyser is taken as a harvest command, but I could be wrong -- it's been a while since I've messed with it) like 5 times. So really, with just 30 conscutive clicks, you could mine out that whole wall and not even have to keep tabs on it while you built up your army, scouted, etc.

Also, have you considered mineral patch stacking? Two mule trips and that wall is breached. If you want to force 5 trips per patch you should make them each 7 minerals or less (since they are high yield), then select them all, go to the object properties, and choose ignore placement restrictions. Then copy and paste the group directly over the first group 4 more times. This method will allow for a little more possibilty for "epic" plays since you could send 15 workers across the map and mine out the whole section in one fell swoop thereby creating a tense situation where the workers could be scouted and picked off before opening the hole. Anyway, just something to think about.
[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
April 30 2012 18:21 GMT
#18
The back door isn't scary except for terran SCV pulls. The time it takes to mine an opening is more than enough buffer against any silly rushes like 6 or 7 pool. It's also significant run distance to go back there, and if they pulled workers just to mine the back door they are even more SOL when you stop their attack.

Since mules only mine 27, you already need 2 to open a small hole, or 4 to open the whole gate, so I don't think you need to stack.

If you think back to the back door dynamics on Blistering Sands [OMG that was EVER used in competitive play?!] it was bad of course, but plenty of people defended an attack they knew was going to come by splitting their army well and bouncing back and forth, using building placement to maximize the difficulty for the attacker. That was with rocks on a 2ramp, and a shorter distance between entrances for the attacker. I really doubt it will be a degenerate map feature in the metagame we have today where everyone knows how to defend anyway.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
titanicnewbie
Profile Joined February 2011
63 Posts
April 30 2012 18:21 GMT
#19
It seems to me you can fix the LOS blocker/mineral wall issue by turning one of the high ground pods into a pathable, buildable area with a ramp into the main. Then you could build a scout pylon or depot to keep an eye on the mineral wall. The enemy couldn't hurt it without a flying unit giving vision, which would negate the LOS blockers anyway.

I also agree that it's going to be very hard to have 2 bases on this map.
Heh_
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Singapore2712 Posts
April 30 2012 19:48 GMT
#20
The map looks really nice and the idea behind the mineral-blocked backdoor is awesome, but there's a problem with the natural. The method you used to wall off is impractical: it's easy to roach/baneling bust and a single cannon doesn't cover all the mineral patches. I would suggest putting destructible rocks at the second entrance to the natural so the choke can be walled off without using the nexus.

Another concern would be opponents taking the long path to get to the third, allowing easy siege of the natural. You might want to separate the third from the natural a bit more.
=Þ
thurst0n
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States611 Posts
April 30 2012 22:00 GMT
#21
"Space for 510 CC's" that is just hilarious! hahaha

Anyone want to test out the 6 pool on the map?
P.S. I'm nub. If you'd like you can follow me @xthurst but its not worth it ill be honest
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-30 22:58:29
April 30 2012 22:25 GMT
#22
On May 01 2012 03:05 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

While it would be cool, it's not actually as epic as in BW because you can shift queue the mining directly between the geyser and the minerals (I think the geyser building needs to finish before the shift queue back to the geyser is taken as a harvest command, but I could be wrong -- it's been a while since I've messed with it) like 5 times. So really, with just 30 conscutive clicks, you could mine out that whole wall and not even have to keep tabs on it while you built up your army, scouted, etc.

Also, have you considered mineral patch stacking? Two mule trips and that wall is breached. If you want to force 5 trips per patch you should make them each 7 minerals or less (since they are high yield), then select them all, go to the object properties, and choose ignore placement restrictions. Then copy and paste the group directly over the first group 4 more times. This method will allow for a little more possibilty for "epic" plays since you could send 15 workers across the map and mine out the whole section in one fell swoop thereby creating a tense situation where the workers could be scouted and picked off before opening the hole. Anyway, just something to think about.



I haven't considered mineral stacking at all actually. It's something else I could easily try out and see how I like it. Again, I'll be playing around with the amount of resources on the backdoor until hopefully it gets to a number that works.

On May 01 2012 03:21 titanicnewbie wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

It seems to me you can fix the LOS blocker/mineral wall issue by turning one of the high ground pods into a pathable, buildable area with a ramp into the main. Then you could build a scout pylon or depot to keep an eye on the mineral wall. The enemy couldn't hurt it without a flying unit giving vision, which would negate the LOS blockers anyway.

I also agree that it's going to be very hard to have 2 bases on this map.


You're a genius. I like this idea a lot actually. Props! I didn't even think about that. I'll mess around with making one of those high ground pieces pathable and see how I like it.


On May 01 2012 04:48 Heh_ wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The map looks really nice and the idea behind the mineral-blocked backdoor is awesome, but there's a problem with the natural. The method you used to wall off is impractical: it's easy to roach/baneling bust and a single cannon doesn't cover all the mineral patches. I would suggest putting destructible rocks at the second entrance to the natural so the choke can be walled off without using the nexus.

Another concern would be opponents taking the long path to get to the third, allowing easy siege of the natural. You might want to separate the third from the natural a bit more.


True, although here's another way you could wall it off that would make it much safer against baneling/roach aggression.

[image loading]

Or you could also just wall off your main ramp, mine through the minerals and then block off the highground natural with 3 3x3 buildings. You'd then be able to keep at least 1 or 2 sentries at your main ramp to forcefield it off if needed.

[image loading]

As I've said Protoss Fast Expansions were probably my biggest concern on this map, mainly PvZ. I know mid and end game it'll be fine but yeah, I am a little worried about FE. Although, Dual Sight and XNC both had wiiide open naturals as well.

On May 01 2012 07:00 thurst0n wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

"Space for 510 CC's" that is just hilarious! hahaha

Anyone want to test out the 6 pool on the map?


lol yeah...about that.

If you do some tests regarding 6 pools please feel free to post your results here. I'd love to read any additional feedback you may have.
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
Yonnua
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2331 Posts
April 30 2012 22:49 GMT
#23
On May 01 2012 07:25 SidianTheBard wrote:
As I've said Protoss Fast Expansions were probably my biggest concern on this map, mainly PvZ. I know mid and end game it'll be fine but yeah, I am a little worried about FE. Although, Dual Sight and XNC both had wiiide open naturals as well.


But both of those maps have been panned for pretty much that exact reason.
LRSL 2014 Finalist! PartinG | Mvp | Bomber | Creator | NaNiwa | herO
See.Blue
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2673 Posts
April 30 2012 23:18 GMT
#24
On May 01 2012 07:49 Yonnua wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2012 07:25 SidianTheBard wrote:
As I've said Protoss Fast Expansions were probably my biggest concern on this map, mainly PvZ. I know mid and end game it'll be fine but yeah, I am a little worried about FE. Although, Dual Sight and XNC both had wiiide open naturals as well.


But both of those maps have been panned for pretty much that exact reason.


Yeah that. I love this map aesthetically and other than this one point design-wise, but simply put I dont think it would be picked up if its so FFE unfriendly, whereas with a few tweaks I could see this being used in tournaments easily.
Megakenny
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada829 Posts
April 30 2012 23:28 GMT
#25
I really like this map. I'd be interested in playing some games and/or seeing some high level games played on it. :D
Heh_
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Singapore2712 Posts
May 01 2012 00:28 GMT
#26
On May 01 2012 07:25 SidianTheBard wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2012 04:48 Heh_ wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The map looks really nice and the idea behind the mineral-blocked backdoor is awesome, but there's a problem with the natural. The method you used to wall off is impractical: it's easy to roach/baneling bust and a single cannon doesn't cover all the mineral patches. I would suggest putting destructible rocks at the second entrance to the natural so the choke can be walled off without using the nexus.

Another concern would be opponents taking the long path to get to the third, allowing easy siege of the natural. You might want to separate the third from the natural a bit more.


True, although here's another way you could wall it off that would make it much safer against baneling/roach aggression.

[image loading]

I don't really like this idea because the warp gate is soooo exposed. Roaches will take free potshots at it. As Yonnua said, maps with wide open naturals are frowned upon. In the ladder, the only map with a wide open natural is metalopolis. And that map was almost voted out, but there was shattered temple. I favor the style of metropolis: in other words, you can wall off from the ramp to the rocks (in a horizontal manner), with the other choke obstructed by another set of destructible rocks.
=Þ
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-01 03:04:12
May 01 2012 02:00 GMT
#27
I'm currently thinking of some ideas toward the natural. If changes do happen to it it won't be that massive of changes. Even maps where you can wall off and only have to worry about roaches from one side there are many positions that roaches are able to position themselves in to pick off certain buildings.

As for updates on the map, I'll be changing the minerals to most likely to 56, which will take 8 workers to mine through one field. That takes 24 seconds for those 8 workers to mine through it which should be plenty of extra time to get some extra units, a cannon, spine crawler or bunker up to defend against a 6 pool.

Since I won't be able to map edit much tues/wed/thurs I've decided to do a small update to the map. These are the changes that will stay until at least friday. Enjoy! New version is up on NA.

[image loading]

Reasons for changes
:
+ Show Spoiler +


56 minerals takes 8 workers to mine it out. Since each worker takes about 3 seconds to mine minerals that means to mine out 1 patch of minerals it'll take 24 seconds. 24 seconds is plenty of extra time to build up some more defense, especially early game.

High ground pod helps the defender a lot. You can now place a unit or building up on the high ground pod to grant vision of the mineral wall so you can easily tell if they are mining away at it. It also helps because it looks over onto the lowground natural so it'll help defend it a little bit.

Ramp moved closer to the low ground natural and the choke has been decreased a tiny bit to help protoss FE.
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
See.Blue
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2673 Posts
May 04 2012 19:01 GMT
#28
Still struck by how aesthetically awesome this map is, and can't wait to see how it plays out. Hope this gets submitted for a MOTM sometime. Great work and love the changes
DYEAlabaster
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Canada1009 Posts
May 04 2012 19:41 GMT
#29
Hey Sidian- that highground pod, don't do it! Please!

The problem with the orginal Bel'Shir Beach was that it had a highground pod like this as well, but because of the lacking ramp and the way pvp worked out, it was a 4gate heaven. Imagine putting a pylon on the low ground, warping in units on the highground by sneaking a stalker there, and just... yeah.

Highground pods like that don't work out when they overhang the mainramp/are within range of proxy pylons where there is no ramp
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-04 20:13:06
May 04 2012 20:10 GMT
#30
I've actually got some pretty big changes to this map coming. I got some nice feedback by some high level players (Incontrol, plexa, etc etc) I just haven't been able to work on it too much the past couple days. Expect an update probably Saturday; Sunday at the latest.

Highground pod...I'll experiment with it. For the enemy to actually gain vision of that high ground pod they'll have to get a unit far into the enemy base to make it up that ramp. I suppose I could see warp prism play being a nightmare, especially with it having such a small ramp. We'll see, I might take it out in this next update because it probably won't be needed.
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
DYEAlabaster
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Canada1009 Posts
May 05 2012 00:30 GMT
#31
On May 05 2012 05:10 SidianTheBard wrote:
I've actually got some pretty big changes to this map coming. I got some nice feedback by some high level players (Incontrol, plexa, etc etc) I just haven't been able to work on it too much the past couple days. Expect an update probably Saturday; Sunday at the latest.

Highground pod...I'll experiment with it. For the enemy to actually gain vision of that high ground pod they'll have to get a unit far into the enemy base to make it up that ramp. I suppose I could see warp prism play being a nightmare, especially with it having such a small ramp. We'll see, I might take it out in this next update because it probably won't be needed.


Good. Like I said, Bel'Shir Beach version 1 ---> highground pod nightmaretown
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
May 05 2012 05:56 GMT
#32
On May 05 2012 04:41 DYEAlabaster wrote:
Hey Sidian- that highground pod, don't do it! Please!

The problem with the orginal Bel'Shir Beach was that it had a highground pod like this as well, but because of the lacking ramp and the way pvp worked out, it was a 4gate heaven. Imagine putting a pylon on the low ground, warping in units on the highground by sneaking a stalker there, and just... yeah.

Highground pods like that don't work out when they overhang the mainramp/are within range of proxy pylons where there is no ramp

That isn't why Bel'shir 1 was a 4gate heaven.. it was the fact that it was difficult to forcefield off due to the nat/main having the same height
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
DYEAlabaster
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Canada1009 Posts
May 05 2012 06:28 GMT
#33
On May 05 2012 14:56 Plexa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 04:41 DYEAlabaster wrote:
Hey Sidian- that highground pod, don't do it! Please!

The problem with the orginal Bel'Shir Beach was that it had a highground pod like this as well, but because of the lacking ramp and the way pvp worked out, it was a 4gate heaven. Imagine putting a pylon on the low ground, warping in units on the highground by sneaking a stalker there, and just... yeah.

Highground pods like that don't work out when they overhang the mainramp/are within range of proxy pylons where there is no ramp

That isn't why Bel'shir 1 was a 4gate heaven.. it was the fact that it was difficult to forcefield off due to the nat/main having the same height


Yeah- I mention that as well. However, with the proximity of the high-ground pod, it made things even worse if a stalker did manage to sneak up there. It's like pouring salt on a wound.
IronManSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States2119 Posts
May 05 2012 07:01 GMT
#34
Rocks near the natural are gonna be a bit strong for siege tank pushes. Siege up behind the rocks and just gradually push in... it's going to be hard to get surrounds as Zerg.
SC2 Mapmaker || twitter: @ironmansc || Ohana & Mech Depot || 3x TLMC finalist || www.twitch.tv/sc2mapstream
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
May 05 2012 07:16 GMT
#35
On May 05 2012 15:28 DYEAlabaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 14:56 Plexa wrote:
On May 05 2012 04:41 DYEAlabaster wrote:
Hey Sidian- that highground pod, don't do it! Please!

The problem with the orginal Bel'Shir Beach was that it had a highground pod like this as well, but because of the lacking ramp and the way pvp worked out, it was a 4gate heaven. Imagine putting a pylon on the low ground, warping in units on the highground by sneaking a stalker there, and just... yeah.

Highground pods like that don't work out when they overhang the mainramp/are within range of proxy pylons where there is no ramp

That isn't why Bel'shir 1 was a 4gate heaven.. it was the fact that it was difficult to forcefield off due to the nat/main having the same height


Yeah- I mention that as well. However, with the proximity of the high-ground pod, it made things even worse if a stalker did manage to sneak up there. It's like pouring salt on a wound.

If a stalker got up there you deserved to lose.... the issue was you could just warp over anyway? With no need to sneak a stalker across. In fact, the high ground helped to give the defender some advantage
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
titanicnewbie
Profile Joined February 2011
63 Posts
May 05 2012 11:15 GMT
#36
On May 05 2012 16:16 Plexa wrote:
If a stalker got up there you deserved to lose.... the issue was you could just warp over anyway? With no need to sneak a stalker across. In fact, the high ground helped to give the defender some advantage


I think that's the case with this map as well. The highground pod in the image he gave us leads directly to where the command center is going to be. If you've got a stalker that close then the enemy being able to warp in across those LOS blockers is the least of your problems.

Also, the whole point of the highground pod in question is to allow scouting to the far side. A supply depot/pylon/overlord on or above the pod would give you advance notice of the Protoss setting up his proxy pylon anyway.
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-05 21:20:57
May 05 2012 21:19 GMT
#37
Map has been updated. OP has been updated.

[image loading]

Top down Overview:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Analyzer Summary:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Changes:

Rocks at the natural have been removed to open it up more.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


High ground passages have been removed in the middle. Also, a new ramp has been added, it is blocked by rocks though.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


Backdoor has been changed. Still rich mineral fields (56 resources) but they are moved farther back and put on a ramp. You now have a safe natural to take yet you will have to keep an eye out on the mineral wall.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

[image loading]


Any Problems/Bugs/Glitches you find with the map, please feel free to let me know.
Search Prophets Passage on US to play!

Thanks,
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
titanicnewbie
Profile Joined February 2011
63 Posts
May 06 2012 03:18 GMT
#38
I like this. It's turning what we were originally thinking of as the natural into a third. That justifies making it so much harder to hold.

My only concern right now is the 6th base (yeah a little late-game I know). The natural is now safely tucked in the back, and the third is right out front. But the 4th and 5th are both in a line from the natural, which leaves the 6th awkwardly stuck on the far side of the map.

Not sure if I have a solution for you right now, but I'm imagining that that 6th would be mighty underutilized...
See.Blue
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2673 Posts
May 06 2012 23:08 GMT
#39
I actually like those dynamics less than the old. With the minerals being moved, I see them coming into play much later in the game now, at a time players are likely to have that third already, removing a lot of the excitement/danger of them. I think its still an awesome map, and I havent the faintest what to do myself, but my gut reaction is that a lot of the danger is lost with the new configuration
Yonnua
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2331 Posts
May 07 2012 00:14 GMT
#40
Assuming you can't gain vision past the minerals, I like the change. The backdoor's no longer an issue early game but it's a viable means of, for example, busting a FFE as zerg. The Protoss sees the mineral fields dropping and has to get cannons there in time. In principle, that's great.

In practice there are still problems. If the defending player only has the main and the back door expansion, it's faster for the attacking player to get from ramp to ramp. The defending player has to go nearly twice the distance with their units to be able to hold off the attacker. Much like the back door on blistering sands. It's getting better but it still needs some work.
LRSL 2014 Finalist! PartinG | Mvp | Bomber | Creator | NaNiwa | herO
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10160 Posts
May 07 2012 00:34 GMT
#41
i like the mineral block, but unsure if it will really be of any use.

but i really like the map. i think the only thing to change is make the outside natural 1 gas and 5 patches so you cant just camp off 3 bases.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 00:54:49
May 07 2012 00:52 GMT
#42
On May 06 2012 12:18 titanicnewbie wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I like this. It's turning what we were originally thinking of as the natural into a third. That justifies making it so much harder to hold.

My only concern right now is the 6th base (yeah a little late-game I know). The natural is now safely tucked in the back, and the third is right out front. But the 4th and 5th are both in a line from the natural, which leaves the 6th awkwardly stuck on the far side of the map.

Not sure if I have a solution for you right now, but I'm imagining that that 6th would be mighty underutilized...


Yeah the 6th bases were kind of added in there at the end. Honestly they could be a viable base to hold end game due to camping the xel naga watch tower so you can easily see which path they are going to attack you from. Most likely the 6th bases won't be used very often but I'd rather give the option for a base rather then having just empty space.


On May 07 2012 08:08 See.Blue wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I actually like those dynamics less than the old. With the minerals being moved, I see them coming into play much later in the game now, at a time players are likely to have that third already, removing a lot of the excitement/danger of them. I think its still an awesome map, and I havent the faintest what to do myself, but my gut reaction is that a lot of the danger is lost with the new configuration


It is the main reason why I changed them to where they are now though. To make the early game not as risky. If it was just terran and zerg I'd be fine with keeping it how it is, but since Protoss would have a very hard time expanding to the forward base I figure by doing this it gives them a "free" backdoor but you'll still have to watch out for the mineral wall.


On May 07 2012 09:14 Yonnua wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Assuming you can't gain vision past the minerals, I like the change. The backdoor's no longer an issue early game but it's a viable means of, for example, busting a FFE as zerg. The Protoss sees the mineral fields dropping and has to get cannons there in time. In principle, that's great.

In practice there are still problems. If the defending player only has the main and the back door expansion, it's faster for the attacking player to get from ramp to ramp. The defending player has to go nearly twice the distance with their units to be able to hold off the attacker. Much like the back door on blistering sands. It's getting better but it still needs some work.


You can not gain vision past the minerals, not even able to blink past them either. The thing why I kept it a mineral wall instead of d-rocks is mainly the issue you pointed out on Blistering Sands. More then likely you will only mine through the mineral wall if you feel safe enough or are expanding to your 4th. Plus, again it takes 8 scvs to mine through 1 mineral patch. Think how easy workers are to kill. Also, even if they only open up 1 patch...that's still only 1 patch which means it's a VERY tiny choke you'd have to funnel through.


On May 07 2012 09:34 FlaShFTW wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

i like the mineral block, but unsure if it will really be of any use.

but i really like the map. i think the only thing to change is make the outside natural 1 gas and 5 patches so you cant just camp off 3 bases.



This is something I've been getting feedback on quite a bit actually. A lot of people seem to think it might be too easy to turtle on 3 base. Yet I think it should be okay with how many paths there are, how many high ground patches there are, with how exposed your main is from the middle of the map. Sure you could park your army outside the ramp by your 3rd base and not have to move much, but then you still have to watch out for drops, flying units, your backdoor, etc etc. Plus since the 4th and 5th are fairly easy to grab, if you are turtling on 3 base expect the enemy to be easily grabbing a 4th, 5th or even 6th base.

Again, I'll keep games tracked and if needed to I can always reduce the mineral count on that base. (Or hell, maybe I'll make a FRB version hah)
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
AssyrianKing
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Australia2111 Posts
May 07 2012 23:15 GMT
#43
Aesthetically beautiful
John 15:13
Yonnua
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2331 Posts
May 07 2012 23:25 GMT
#44
On May 07 2012 09:52 SidianTheBard wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2012 09:14 Yonnua wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Assuming you can't gain vision past the minerals, I like the change. The backdoor's no longer an issue early game but it's a viable means of, for example, busting a FFE as zerg. The Protoss sees the mineral fields dropping and has to get cannons there in time. In principle, that's great.

In practice there are still problems. If the defending player only has the main and the back door expansion, it's faster for the attacking player to get from ramp to ramp. The defending player has to go nearly twice the distance with their units to be able to hold off the attacker. Much like the back door on blistering sands. It's getting better but it still needs some work.


You can not gain vision past the minerals, not even able to blink past them either. The thing why I kept it a mineral wall instead of d-rocks is mainly the issue you pointed out on Blistering Sands. More then likely you will only mine through the mineral wall if you feel safe enough or are expanding to your 4th. Plus, again it takes 8 scvs to mine through 1 mineral patch. Think how easy workers are to kill. Also, even if they only open up 1 patch...that's still only 1 patch which means it's a VERY tiny choke you'd have to funnel through.


Workers are pretty difficult to kill if you're doing a forge fast expand and have no units.

Ultimately, in its current state it comes down to one of two things:

OPTION 1 : The back-door is so easily defendable that it'll never be used. This is really boring and uninteresting.

OPTION 2 : The back-door can indeed be used for attacks at some point. because of the way the map is set up this'll have to be before the third base is taken. At this point the attacker will always be favoured and will likely be able to overwhelm the defender and win the game.

For the ideal back-door scenario you need the door to be able to be used (option 2) but it can't immediately lead to a game over, so the defender needs to be able to get between the doors faster than the attacker.
LRSL 2014 Finalist! PartinG | Mvp | Bomber | Creator | NaNiwa | herO
titanicnewbie
Profile Joined February 2011
63 Posts
May 08 2012 13:31 GMT
#45
I would agree with Yonnua about the nature of the back-door minerals.

The back-door in the original was reasonably close to the "ideal" because it was viable in the early game but offered a defenders advantage due to a closer walk distance and the high-ground pod spotting the far side. It gave the defender 2 distinct advantages: positioning and vision.
The back-door now is, in my opinion, closer to the option 2 he described. It takes a defender rather longer to move between the ramps than it takes the attacker. That negates the positioning advantage.

In my opinion, if you want to keep this mineral-wall back door idea relavent, then the key is to retool the third. Move the ramp from the main down to the low-ground from its present location to the place where you formerly had the high-ground pod. Then shift the minerals into the space left by the ramp. You might need to change the other pod with minerals to allow for better arcs on the part of the defender to make this work.

The reason this works is because it drastically reduces the walk distance between the main ramp and the mineral patches. That gives you your defenders advantage. Also, with cliffs all along the way between them, you add an additional advantage to long-range units if the attacker doesn't walk far enough away.
In terms of the third, you make it slightly more vulnerable to attack because the minerals are more exposed. But you compensate a little by allowing the main to overlook the patches. It doesn't become too turtle-y because to secure that third, your army needs to be in essentially the same place as it is in the current form.

It would make 2 base play super-easy. But realistically, it's pretty easy right now. If you want to spread things out a little more, then think about moving the whole third area a little bit farther away from the minerals and reduce the size of the main overall.
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
May 13 2012 04:23 GMT
#46
New Version up!
[image loading]

Changes:
Front natural is now 6 minerals & 1 rich gas.
Backdoor changed to make aggressor take longer to path between the two.
4th base moved, new ramp added in at middle. 4th minerals now can be harassed easily by the 5th.
5th base ramp removed. Will be harder to hold, yet easier to sneak.

New Images:
+ Show Spoiler +


[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


OP has been updated.
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
May 13 2012 06:56 GMT
#47
This is considerably different and also very interesting for new reasons. I like it, and I like it much better I think. ^^

The new ramps with rocks are a good addition for better flow in the lategame to compensate for the somewhat tight areas at the hotspots. The general twistiness of the pathways is just right for the map's style, and doesn't take it too far.

That was kind of a bold choice to add that water ditch to cut off the low ground connection to the back door ramp. But it's definitely the right call. I love the tension now between the front small 3rd (which feeds you into the center small 4th) compared to opening the back door and taking a full fledge 3rd that is farther away from the enemy but also more distant for you, and more vulnerable spatially.

The progression of expansions has a nice curve of more demanding map presence, and there are lots of interesting places for army dances or army standoffs throughout the phases of a game.

The only little thing I'd like to see changed (that I can think of)... since the towers currently don't cover the main route, it'd be nice if there was a small high ground pod where you could park a unit to watch for enemy push coming through the middle. You already have those pillars with crystals on top next to the watch tower. This makes them bad overlord spots because tower vision will just reveal them anyway. Why not make these pathable with a small ramp? That way it becomes useful tactical terrain, as well as an excellent place that gives you a lookout spot over the middle path -- like a mini watch tower, but significantly apart from the tower vision despite the proximity.

Okay I lied there is one more change except it's not a nitpick, it's pretty important. You need to adjust the choke to the backdoor natural somehow, because right now it's automatic cannon walloff spot in PvZ. Maybe the whole choke + 1-2 tiles around it should be unbuildable (but allow creep)? Or just use checkerboard LosB around there? I think I like those better than a parade of sunken depots.

Really curious to hear what other people think about the new version, nice work. ;D
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
May 13 2012 07:41 GMT
#48
On May 13 2012 15:56 EatThePath wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

This is considerably different and also very interesting for new reasons. I like it, and I like it much better I think. ^^

The new ramps with rocks are a good addition for better flow in the lategame to compensate for the somewhat tight areas at the hotspots. The general twistiness of the pathways is just right for the map's style, and doesn't take it too far.

That was kind of a bold choice to add that water ditch to cut off the low ground connection to the back door ramp. But it's definitely the right call. I love the tension now between the front small 3rd (which feeds you into the center small 4th) compared to opening the back door and taking a full fledge 3rd that is farther away from the enemy but also more distant for you, and more vulnerable spatially.

The progression of expansions has a nice curve of more demanding map presence, and there are lots of interesting places for army dances or army standoffs throughout the phases of a game.

The only little thing I'd like to see changed (that I can think of)... since the towers currently don't cover the main route, it'd be nice if there was a small high ground pod where you could park a unit to watch for enemy push coming through the middle. You already have those pillars with crystals on top next to the watch tower. This makes them bad overlord spots because tower vision will just reveal them anyway. Why not make these pathable with a small ramp? That way it becomes useful tactical terrain, as well as an excellent place that gives you a lookout spot over the middle path -- like a mini watch tower, but significantly apart from the tower vision despite the proximity.

Okay I lied there is one more change except it's not a nitpick, it's pretty important. You need to adjust the choke to the backdoor natural somehow, because right now it's automatic cannon walloff spot in PvZ. Maybe the whole choke + 1-2 tiles around it should be unbuildable (but allow creep)? Or just use checkerboard LosB around there? I think I like those better than a parade of sunken depots.

Really curious to hear what other people think about the new version, nice work. ;D


Thank you sir!

At first when I added the water I really didn't like how it set up with how I had the 4th before, so by moving the 4th and adding another 3x wide ramp I think it makes it much better, as well as still makes it "safe" to grab that 3rd.

Making the forward base a 1/2 base was just something that was mentioned a lot. You said it best by you either take the safer base but it's only a 1/2 base, or you open up the back door and spread yourself out a little more to take the full base.

Your two concerns. I'll test around with the high ground pieces in the middle and see how it would play out. I was also tempted to add some LoSB around the middle of the map to make it feel more "dangerous" if you want to take the path out of vision of the water towers. I'll keep experimenting and see how it works.

About PvZ cannon walloffs. /facepalm It's funny because before hand when I had the mineral wall there and the LOSB there it was fine, but after moving the backdoor I totally forgot about that. I'll most likely add in LoSB in certain areas so it can't easily be walled off with 2-3 pylons. Thanks for pointing that out, can't believe I missed it myself! >.<
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
May 14 2012 00:12 GMT
#49
Added LoSB by the small choke between the main & natural.

[image loading]

It takes at least 4 pylons/depots/cannons to completely wall it off. It also gives a place to hide a worker. You can wall it off with 2 3x3 buildings and 1 2x3 though (2 rax & 1 depot) (gateway, core & pylon)

Thanks EatThePath! :D
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#43
PiGStarcraft415
CranKy Ducklings143
SteadfastSC101
davetesta45
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft408
RuFF_SC2 111
SteadfastSC 103
-ZergGirl 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 790
ggaemo 307
Sharp 65
JulyZerg 45
Sexy 39
Icarus 10
Stormgate
WinterStarcraft1316
UpATreeSC255
Nina67
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 352
Other Games
summit1g10778
shahzam1564
Fnx 809
C9.Mang0297
ViBE209
Maynarde113
Trikslyr45
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1100
BasetradeTV25
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH136
• practicex 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush885
Other Games
• Scarra1245
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Summer Champion…
8h 26m
Stormgate Nexus
11h 26m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
13h 26m
The PondCast
1d 7h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 21h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.