• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:21
CEST 21:21
KST 04:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea ASL21 General Discussion How Can I Add Timer & APM Count? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1688 users

[A] Starbow - Page 27

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 537 Next
PrsdntKmacho
Profile Joined January 2011
United States19 Posts
July 05 2012 16:30 GMT
#521
I think you should make it a multi target specialty unit for targetting bio or something. Something that seems like a War of the Worlds type thing but not splash and still mostly the same feel as it is now.
I thought yo head would be bigger...
Natespank
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada449 Posts
July 06 2012 03:04 GMT
#522
- Queen don´t lay permanent eggs anymore. Instead the eggs lasts 60 seconds.

Something about reaver scarabs too.


You seem to be deliberately introducing a number of irritating mechanics that just make it harder to play mechanically. That doesn't help the game or improve it in any way. If you want it to have demanding mechanics, make the game more complex and require more multitasking. Obnoxious UI mechanics are awful, lets find something better to spend the APM on.
Natespank
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada449 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-06 03:12:03
July 06 2012 03:09 GMT
#523
FRB and the "BW-model" has been uploaded for some days now.

The problem with FRB:

Each base requires 24+3 workers to be fully saturated. There is no reason to have more than 4 bases anyway because 4x27 workers are half your supply.

The income in the start is really slow, meaning that its a very long early game with a slow income acceleration. (Since each worker generates so little income per minute)




The problem with the "BW-model":

Players get extremely rich once they grab the third base. Each base generates to much money. (Even though the amount is still lower than an SC2 base, its still to much.) Unspendable amounts if you reach 4 or 5 bases.





The optimal would be:

A faster income acceleration at the start. More money in the beginning = more options.
Each fully saturated base generates less income compared to a SC2 base,
Each base requires "fewer" workers, meaning that players are able to expand more. (And have supply for workers)

I think games which involves many bases on both sides tends to be funniest to both play and watch. Thats why I try to implement aspects of area control. It shall be a risk to take an expansion, but you will have acess to the right tools so you can defend it properly. Something I feel SC2 lacks and BW has plenty of.

I ain´t satisfied with either of the two models. But with some tweaking I think we will hit jackpot ^^


I told Barrin this, lemme explain:

You want expanding to occur frequently so that players spread out as much as possible. Ideally, base raids that wipe out an expansion aren't game ending too.

Instead of blue minerals, use all gold minerals- I think it's 4 gold minerals to get a 1 base income off such a base. In that way there's incentive to expand until you're up to about 6-8 mining bases, and the setup cost of each expansion is much lower. Further, losing one will not end the game and they force you to spread out and multitask like crazy.

Related to my post directly above, this would sink a player's apm into multitasking actions rather than just annoying mechanics like no autocast on scarabs and such.

For an idea of how this would play out, check out some Dawn of War 1 or Dawn of War soulstorm games, Vaul casted some good ones:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL558EBD82D0B4D03E&feature=plcp
(dow was good in so many ways, but horribly unbalanced and the devs didn't fix the problems. The food caps in it were very restricting too. too bad...)
hersenen
Profile Joined November 2011
Belize176 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-06 03:19:13
July 06 2012 03:18 GMT
#524
Maybe colossus can only deal a certain amount of damage per attack because it's all their laser charge can go through before needing a recharge? For example the max amount of damage it could deal per 1 attack is like 60 so if it deals any more damage than that the other units arent affected. An upgrade could allow it to deal out more (total splash) damage per attack.
Natespank
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada449 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-06 03:47:31
July 06 2012 03:46 GMT
#525
My 2 cents on colossus: they're awful.

How about making them a mobile, fragile harassment unit?

Double their speed, make them 1/4 the size, non-massive (or skinny yet still tall so vikings can hit them); cut their hp and damage and make them a mobile, fragile med-long-range harassment unit. Give them forcefields too, even better harassment At least cliffwalk would be handy then. They'd be super powerful, but if they were tall and skinny you could counter them as they crop up with vikings, and besides: overpowered units are what made sc1 fun. Just gotta give lots of them to every race.

Of course, you'd have to make forcefield an upgrade, not a default ability, maybe tier 3. It would help prevent those lame timing attacks where toss forcefields your ramp early game and smashes your natural or your main because of one tiny slip-up.

I think it would be fun. Stealing ff from sentries wouldn't hurt my feelings either, I don't like sentries at all. I mean... do you?
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
July 06 2012 03:53 GMT
#526
I am going to be regularly streaming content on Starbow much more often now.

You can find that here: www.twitch.tv/mndakota

On July 06 2012 12:46 Natespank wrote:
I think it would be fun. Stealing ff from sentries wouldn't hurt my feelings either, I don't like sentries at all. I mean... do you?


Forcefield is currently on the dark archon which I think it okay!
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
TaShadan
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany1979 Posts
July 06 2012 07:42 GMT
#527
On July 06 2012 12:46 Natespank wrote:
My 2 cents on colossus: they're awful.

How about making them a mobile, fragile harassment unit?

Double their speed, make them 1/4 the size, non-massive (or skinny yet still tall so vikings can hit them); cut their hp and damage and make them a mobile, fragile med-long-range harassment unit. Give them forcefields too, even better harassment At least cliffwalk would be handy then. They'd be super powerful, but if they were tall and skinny you could counter them as they crop up with vikings, and besides: overpowered units are what made sc1 fun. Just gotta give lots of them to every race.

Of course, you'd have to make forcefield an upgrade, not a default ability, maybe tier 3. It would help prevent those lame timing attacks where toss forcefields your ramp early game and smashes your natural or your main because of one tiny slip-up.

I think it would be fun. Stealing ff from sentries wouldn't hurt my feelings either, I don't like sentries at all. I mean... do you?


its true that every race had some imba units in sc1 but too many isnt good either
also forcefield is a micro killing ability
Total Annihilation Zero
TaShadan
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany1979 Posts
July 06 2012 08:41 GMT
#528
On July 06 2012 12:09 Natespank wrote:
Show nested quote +
FRB and the "BW-model" has been uploaded for some days now.

The problem with FRB:

Each base requires 24+3 workers to be fully saturated. There is no reason to have more than 4 bases anyway because 4x27 workers are half your supply.

The income in the start is really slow, meaning that its a very long early game with a slow income acceleration. (Since each worker generates so little income per minute)




The problem with the "BW-model":

Players get extremely rich once they grab the third base. Each base generates to much money. (Even though the amount is still lower than an SC2 base, its still to much.) Unspendable amounts if you reach 4 or 5 bases.





The optimal would be:

A faster income acceleration at the start. More money in the beginning = more options.
Each fully saturated base generates less income compared to a SC2 base,
Each base requires "fewer" workers, meaning that players are able to expand more. (And have supply for workers)

I think games which involves many bases on both sides tends to be funniest to both play and watch. Thats why I try to implement aspects of area control. It shall be a risk to take an expansion, but you will have acess to the right tools so you can defend it properly. Something I feel SC2 lacks and BW has plenty of.

I ain´t satisfied with either of the two models. But with some tweaking I think we will hit jackpot ^^


I told Barrin this, lemme explain:

You want expanding to occur frequently so that players spread out as much as possible. Ideally, base raids that wipe out an expansion aren't game ending too.

Instead of blue minerals, use all gold minerals- I think it's 4 gold minerals to get a 1 base income off such a base. In that way there's incentive to expand until you're up to about 6-8 mining bases, and the setup cost of each expansion is much lower. Further, losing one will not end the game and they force you to spread out and multitask like crazy.

Related to my post directly above, this would sink a player's apm into multitasking actions rather than just annoying mechanics like no autocast on scarabs and such.

For an idea of how this would play out, check out some Dawn of War 1 or Dawn of War soulstorm games, Vaul casted some good ones:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL558EBD82D0B4D03E&feature=plcp
(dow was good in so many ways, but horribly unbalanced and the devs didn't fix the problems. The food caps in it were very restricting too. too bad...)


in starbow the income is already higher (a drone/probe/scv returns 8 minerals or 6 gas)
also there is a reason for the non autocast of scarabs... you can actually deplete the amunition if the opponent is distracted by another attack or just isnt paying attention to it
Total Annihilation Zero
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-06 13:35:32
July 06 2012 13:15 GMT
#529
I think the collussus should get a way shorter attack animation so you can actually animation cancel. But it has a moderate attack cool down. Faster attacking than the reaver but a lot slower than a marine for example. Thus making it microable. Then give it low damage vs everything but workers and zerglings (small units?) and no splash. Give it an upgradeable ability: 'Incinerate' or something. Every unit that gets attacked by the collussis will slowly built up internal heat, explode and cause mild splash damage upon explosion. (kind of like doom in wc3 or radiate of the science vessel). This way it will be worthless in battles (deathballs), could be good for defending chokes and has an excellent harrassing role. (Warp prism needed for dropping). Give it the same speed as a stalker (? or slow?) but make it quite fragile.

Just a quick brainstorm.

It would be quite worthless in battles because the built up (explosion) is rather slow, specific timings can be argued for.
It would be really good for harrassing since depending on it's speed, we either need a warp prism for it or not (arguable speed!). It could do a harrassing role on worker lines before incinerate since it has high damage versus small units. Once it has incinerate you can use it to harras the worker line and even armies because it has a quite large range combined with warp prism (speed) you could drop it outside of armies range, attack a unit or two (even target which unit you want because of animation cancel) and it would explode after a certain time, so the opponent also has to micro the unit out of his army.

perhaps let it not work on massive units or something or perhaps it should work on massive units? All arguable. I just like the incinerate concept combined with the harrassing role (worker lines + army), kinda like vulture/reaver/science vessel.


It would be great for defending your base since (perhaps we should make it slow?) it can attack units from uphill or on cliffs outranging a lot of units. The enemy will have to move the attacked units out of his army or suffer splash damage eventually. Because it takes quite some time for it to kill a unit, it won't be that good in deathballs since all those units can still do damage versus yours. You want stuff that kills fast in a deathball and the collussi won't do that.


Or just another brainstorm idea: you could give the collussi a quick harrassing role (fragile, animation cancelling, splash/no splash) and then give it an upgrade 'stone form' or something. This way it turns into a sturdy, long range unit, immobile (like the siege tank). So again it wouldn't be that useful in deathballs because turning into the stone form could take same time as rooting a spine crawler or something.



Qwyn
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2779 Posts
July 06 2012 15:45 GMT
#530
Hey, maybe you might add a limited form of macro mechanics?

Zerg just doesn't feel the same without spawn larva for some reason. Love the lurkers though. Really love it. I can never forgive Blizzard, lol.

And as it stands I see absolutely no reason to get queens otherwise. Especially not when I have access to such an early hydra den.

Also on Starbow Daybreak, you forgot to remove the extra geyser at the leftside 3rd.
"Think of the hysteria following the realization that they consciously consume babies and raise the dead people from their graves" - N0
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
July 06 2012 18:21 GMT
#531
I am online now on EU. Wanna join and try some games? Join the Starbow chat channel!

Need some testers to try some things ^^
Creator of Starbow
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
July 06 2012 18:40 GMT
#532
On July 07 2012 00:45 Qwyn wrote:
Zerg just doesn't feel the same without spawn larva for some reason/


Instead of worrying about your bases. Let's worry about the fight!
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-07 00:17:13
July 06 2012 19:54 GMT
#533
Would someone like to play on NA?

No one has been on all day.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
TaShadan
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany1979 Posts
July 07 2012 08:23 GMT
#534
you should think about one of these
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=335595
Total Annihilation Zero
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
July 07 2012 08:56 GMT
#535
On July 03 2012 19:45 TaShadan wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349968
check this out


This one is already implemented in the MOD.



On July 07 2012 17:23 TaShadan wrote:
you should think about one of these
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=335595


Sounds interesting. I would prefer damage reduction over miss chance, since it is not random/luck based. I will try one of them in the coming future.
Creator of Starbow
TaShadan
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany1979 Posts
July 07 2012 09:07 GMT
#536
yes me 2 altough the system worked with wc3 and bw i think reduction might work better
Total Annihilation Zero
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
July 07 2012 09:11 GMT
#537
Im online on EU now if anyone wanna try some games. Join the Starbow chat channel!
Creator of Starbow
pzea469
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1520 Posts
July 07 2012 10:13 GMT
#538
I really like this. I haven't tried the mod, but what I mean is I like this type of effort on making changes for yourself with the help of the community. I strongly believe that a game edited and balanced by members of the community will make much better esports. So bravo for that. I'll be sure to check it out very soon.

Anyways I'm glad MM was put into it as I think that can only bring good things. About the high ground advantage, one thing to keep in mind is that it's not really random. BW had a lot of gambling, and while it might be seen as luck, it's really about instinct, taking chances, and calculating percentages. It might seem random to make it a percentage based chance to hit highground or miss, but it's really analyzing the situation and taking a gamble that you think is in your favor. Anyways, I wouldn't be completely against a damage reduction instead of percentage based chance, I'm just saying that percentage chance shouldn't just be seen as random and luck.
Kill the Deathball
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
July 07 2012 10:37 GMT
#539
On July 07 2012 19:13 pzea469 wrote:
I really like this. I haven't tried the mod, but what I mean is I like this type of effort on making changes for yourself with the help of the community. I strongly believe that a game edited and balanced by members of the community will make much better esports. So bravo for that. I'll be sure to check it out very soon.

Anyways I'm glad MM was put into it as I think that can only bring good things. About the high ground advantage, one thing to keep in mind is that it's not really random. BW had a lot of gambling, and while it might be seen as luck, it's really about instinct, taking chances, and calculating percentages. It might seem random to make it a percentage based chance to hit highground or miss, but it's really analyzing the situation and taking a gamble that you think is in your favor. Anyways, I wouldn't be completely against a damage reduction instead of percentage based chance, I'm just saying that percentage chance shouldn't just be seen as random and luck.


Thank you

Yeah this is still a MOD under heavy development. Things changes, are added or removed. Ideas are tried. Nothing is final. Some things are starting to settle, and we are a bunch of people who plays it regulary on the EU server. I aim to get a "really playable version" up before the end of July. I mean a version that has almost everything (units, abilities etc) decided.

I will then add better info at the opening post and try to spread the word in a much better way than now. I also try to get help from the community, as now, where people here discuss and comes with ideas and feedback.
Creator of Starbow
PrsdntKmacho
Profile Joined January 2011
United States19 Posts
July 07 2012 13:42 GMT
#540
Hey Kabel would you want to borrow an account to play some games with us on NA? We play lots of games over here and it would be good to have you lay some with us. I have an extra account just pm me for details.
I thought yo head would be bigger...
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 537 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 136
ProTech129
Hui .94
gerald23 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4602
Mini 990
Horang2 621
EffOrt 382
firebathero 342
Soulkey 233
BeSt 232
actioN 170
Dewaltoss 88
hero 55
[ Show more ]
Backho 33
yabsab 27
Aegong 19
Sexy 17
910 15
IntoTheRainbow 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever95
capcasts58
Counter-Strike
fl0m1331
byalli663
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu447
MindelVK13
Other Games
gofns9610
summit1g3537
Grubby3214
FrodaN1732
Beastyqt827
RotterdaM639
ArmadaUGS233
Fuzer 156
ToD142
C9.Mang0117
QueenE66
Trikslyr45
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 43
• 80smullet 25
• HerbMon 11
• RayReign 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1683
• WagamamaTV735
• lizZardDota2112
Other Games
• imaqtpie930
• Shiphtur143
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 39m
RSL Revival
14h 39m
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
23h 39m
RSL Revival
1d 11h
Cure vs Rogue
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 18h
BSL
1d 23h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.