• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
TeamLiquid Liquipedia LiquidDota LiquidLegends
EDT 04:26
CEST 10:26
KST 17:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Lore of the Nexus: The Angiris Council0DHM Valencia: Power Rank43[TSL9] Prize Pool & Talent18Code S RO10 - Group B, Day 1 Preview (Season 2)7Code S RO10 - Group A, Day 1 Preview (Season 2)11
Community News
2022 AfreecaTV Challengers Starleague Season 210BSL 2v2 ProLeague x ShieldBattery - SIGN UP NOW!14Code S RO10 Groups announced, RO20 final results1ESL Open #128: ByuN, MaxPax, Scarlett win3Artosis to leave Korea after GSL Season 3, possibility of online GSL casts?87
StarCraft 2
General
Vidalista 20mg | Generic Tadalafil: Best ED Cure DHM Valencia: Power Rank Rogue & Trap out for DHM Valencia? Forbidden Ground buildings Shopify TeamLiquid StarLeague 9
Tourneys
DreamHack Masters: Valencia 2022 - Day 1 What Is The Price Of Chillwell Portable AC Reviews [GSL 2022] Code S:Season 2 - Ro10 Group A [NationWars 7] Ro8 thread [Alpha Pro Series] Rogue v TIME
Strategy
Hero's pvz Simple Questions Simple Answers What should I try to work on to improve my TvZ [G] YAKS LOTV: Yet Another hotKey Setup - zerg
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [A] SC Real Scale
External Content
Mutation # 323 Well Trained Mutation # 322 Warp Zone Mutation # 321 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 320 Retribution
Brood War
General
YellOw wins poker tournament for $696,000 USD Future Cup 4 Under 18 ¿BSL U18? Titan Reactor - Year 2 [Update]ShieldBattery: New Ranked System BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[BSL15] - RO16 Group C - Friday 17:00 CEST [BSL15] - Ro16 Group D - Sunday 17:00 CEST The Casual Games of the Week Thread Artosis vs Gauntlet of the Apes
Strategy
ZvT Guardian Hydra Optimized Strategy before the gosus Project: Strat Update [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Diablo Immoral The PlayStation 5 Crossfire: Legion - A new RTS combining C&C and SC Final Fantasy XIV Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official Dota and Chess General Discussion TL.net migration megathread + LiquidDota archive [DPC 21-22] Tour 3 Discussion/LR LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net LiquidDota Site Rules
League of Legends
[Patch 12.7] Arcana Skins Release Discussion LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net [Summer Split] LoL Esports General Discussion [Patch Notes] Release General Discussion
Heroes of the Storm
Lore of the Nexus: The Angiris Council HotS: WP and Funny Moments Mapping Heroes: Battleground Stats Last Flight To Paris: MCC Group Stage
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
British Empire Mini Mafia II TL Mafia Community Thread Chezinu streak(s) Mafia Sengoku Mafia Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Coronavirus and You Summer Games Done Quick 2022! Trading/Investing Thread Kashmir - Article 370 revoked
Fan Clubs
Day[9] Fan Club soO Fan Club Zest Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [TV] HBO Game of Thrones Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece [Manga] Berserk
Sports
2021 - 2022 Football Thread 2021 NFL/CFB Season NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread The Ultimate Mouse Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
On Radicalization and S…
plasmidghost
Bravery and cowardice…
Starlightsun
My daughter wants to pla…
JoinTheRain
On gun violence in America…
MrBitter
First time having "S*X".
Garnet
Gomorrah
Broodwar4lyf
Getting Back to it..!.20 years…
FuDDx
Age
AmericanUmlaut
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1062 users

Map Design: Understanding Circle Syndrome

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
IronManSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States2119 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-20 04:02:31
January 19 2012 06:24 GMT
#1
It is time for our third map design topic for melee map-making. For the next few days, let's discuss circle syndrome. This is a bit of a touchy subject, but this is one of the most important details to pay attention to when it comes to melee map-making, because map concepts/layouts, play styles, and expansion patterns depend heavily on circle syndrome.

Map-makers, let's answer a few questions about circle syndrome for anyone who might be interested in melee map-making. I don't want to keep these threads for map-maker answers only however... any discussion on the topic matters! Please keep in mind that we are looking for more constructive answers rather than "just don't make bases in a giant circle."

-Go crazy Barrin ^^

+ Show Spoiler [What are these threads about anyways?] +

For anyone who is unaware, these map design questions are specifically for map-makers to gather and give their perspectives and feedback on melee map design according to each topic. This has nothing to do with gameplay balance or player perspectives, but for map-maker's opinions and thoughts. In the end I'll make a nice collaboration thread containing all the topics ^^


________________________________________________________




Understanding: Circle Syndrome


What is your definition of 'Circle Syndrome'?
Why is circle syndrome a bad thing to have in a map?
How do you know if your map has circle syndrome?
If your map has circle syndrome, what are ways you can fix it?
What are the major problems that can occur if your map has circle syndrome?
Optional: Provide at least one example of a map that displays circle syndrome


________________________________________________________


Barrin and Monitor have taken the time to address circle syndrome with great detail in these threads:

Circle Syndrome Thread - By Barrin
Expansion Layouts - By Monitor
SC2 Mapmaker || twitter: @ironmansc || Ohana & Mech Depot || 3x TLMC finalist || www.twitch.tv/sc2mapstream
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
January 19 2012 06:38 GMT
#2
Im not sure what you mean? i guess ill wait till someone does the optional and shows a good example of a map doing this "syndrome" before i spout some stuff.
Zolek
Profile Joined September 2011
United States86 Posts
January 19 2012 08:26 GMT
#3
This thread should be interesting if only because someone will finally define it. I *think* the actual complaint is "ratio of defensive surface area to available resources is too large" which actually has little/nothing to do with circles. Korhal Compound has the bases arranged in an almost perfect circle and yet the map plays fine/great so clearly circular base arrangement is not the cause of whatever the ailment is (be it real or imagined). I mean no offense to anyone but I also think the problem is significantly overblown and also pushes mapmakers away from making maps with contested bases that can reasonably be taken by either player.
sCnDiamond
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany340 Posts
January 19 2012 10:12 GMT
#4
So happy this pops up right now, since i tried to find out what circle syndrome is, but i was unable to a definition of it anywhere.
formerly spinnaker.
eTcetRa
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia822 Posts
January 19 2012 10:57 GMT
#5
"Understanding circle syndrome"

Nobody does, it is a lie
Retired Mapmaker™
Samro225am
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany982 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-19 13:32:54
January 19 2012 13:29 GMT
#6
when someone says "CS" he is just to lazy to say what is really wrong with your map. And many aspects that can be regarded as adding up to "CS" are actually possible features, when done right.


so i think this thread leads nowhere except the OP says what he thinks and we can react to it.

imho we should rather discuss the Relation of (in most cases vertical and horizontal) openess axis, we should discuss areas of control for each base, we should discuss the distance betweenm bases and if it should increase or not, we should discuss last bases closer to opponent than to your base etc.

but we could also try to build some more maps and have some examples to show what we mean instead of talking
sCnDiamond
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany340 Posts
January 19 2012 13:51 GMT
#7
Hmmm, so i guess i have to call Ragoo and RumbleBadger. Feel free to use my map as an example, doodle around in paint. Is it that all outer expos are arranged in a circle? That's what i think it is at the moment, but i'm still not sure of it. Also, why is it a bad thing? What problems are caused by it in terms of gameplay? Please drop some knowledge.
formerly spinnaker.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5290 Posts
January 19 2012 14:01 GMT
#8
I've been wondering this myself. Not only what is it exactly, but why was it ever a bad thing? I've been building my skills with this sort of knowledge in the back of my head, that being able to expand in 2 or 3 different directions was a good thing. But apparently, implementing this in a map just gives it circle syndrome. It could be some real issue, but I think it's more a way of saying "the expansion pattern isn't spelled out for me and I don't like that".
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
sCnDiamond
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany340 Posts
January 19 2012 14:07 GMT
#9
On January 19 2012 23:01 MisfortuneS Ghost wrote:
that being able to expand in 2 or 3 different directions was a good thing. But apparently, implementing this in a map just gives it circle syndrome.
Exactly... and i really like when a map allows players different paths to expand. Especially since SC2 is lacking a lot of the area control units that Brood War had, i think it adds a lot to a map and can make for some interesting strategic decisions.
formerly spinnaker.
Yonnua
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2322 Posts
January 19 2012 14:10 GMT
#10
Isn't it basically where your bases are such that they're closer to your opponent's army than yours, so it makes it harder to defend them reasonably?
LRSL 2014 Finalist! PartinG | Mvp | Bomber | Creator | NaNiwa | herO
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
January 19 2012 14:15 GMT
#11
There's a lot of misinformation about Circle Syndrome and what it actually means. It's actually pretty simple and has been proven as a core concept in BW. I will try to answer all of these questions later (:
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
January 19 2012 14:53 GMT
#12
Well, I mapped in BW and I honestly have no idea what Circle Syndrome is lol. Could someone explain?
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
January 19 2012 15:35 GMT
#13
its a conundrum.

people dont want too many bases on a map, herp.
people dont want bases too far away, derp.

solution, maps end up being circles. result, creativity goes out the window, maps end up all-looking-the-same.
starleague forever
wrl
Profile Joined April 2011
United States209 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-19 15:53:12
January 19 2012 15:52 GMT
#14
I think we should all be more worried about horseshoe syndrome.
It's funny; I dream a lot, but I'm not a very good sleeper.
Barrin
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5002 Posts
January 19 2012 15:54 GMT
#15
I told you I wanted to make my own OP about circle syndrome lol >.< I literally just started it right before seeing this (been busy doin other things).

I am postponing 8m2g/economy thread to write it.

---

I will say here that I do not like how circle syndrome is being used as an excuse to outright dismiss maps.

There are many degrees of circle syndrome (as there are many factors), and while I don't like maps with too much circle syndrome (at all), quite frankly it would be boring as shit if every map had zero circle syndrome.

Sorry but I need a few more days and I can bring this more to light.

btw these are my original posts about circle syndrome (warning: incomplete and convoluted):
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=288965#17
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=288965&currentpage=2#33
Grandfather of LotV's resource model. "Fewer Resources per Base"
RumbleBadger
Profile Joined July 2011
322 Posts
January 19 2012 18:43 GMT
#16
On January 19 2012 22:51 spinnaker wrote:
Hmmm, so i guess i have to call Ragoo and RumbleBadger. Feel free to use my map as an example, doodle around in paint. Is it that all outer expos are arranged in a circle? That's what i think it is at the moment, but i'm still not sure of it. Also, why is it a bad thing? What problems are caused by it in terms of gameplay? Please drop some knowledge.

In this case the circle syndrome is because the bases are arranged in the circle (it's the easiest way to get circle syndrome, hence the name).

Your map has circle syndrome, but because of the number of bases, it's not as bad as I originally thought in that it won't really effect gameplay until each player has at least 3 bases (when a zerg will have four). Also the thirds are easy, which makes it not as bad.

Really the main circle syndrome factor is the low ground bases at the 4:30 and 10:30 positions. They cause circle syndrome because they are equidistant from both players, because they are close to possible fourths or thirds for both players, and because they are equidistant between the two bases on either side of them. These bases will, in short, never be taken. It is way too easy for both players to harass these bases and too difficult to take/hold them because they are so close to opponents bases.

An easy fix would be to either shift those bases to either side (would require an amount of reworking on the map) thus clearly showing who should have the base and who shouldn't, while still making the base harassable/pressurable. Or you could just remove the bases, but if you want 6 bases available to each player that probably isn't your top choice.

A more convoluted explanation of why these bases are troublesome:
For a long time people liked bases equidistant between players as bases the players would contend over. While the idea of having the players battle over bases is good, having bases that no one will hold for more than 2 seconds is not good. Thus, the new goal is that each player knows what bases are 'theirs' but those bases can still be pressured. A player should be able to hold the base fine, if they put in a big enough commitment.

Sorry about my original post on your map thread, I was feeling way to lazy to explain all this, but I probably should have just sucked it up and done it, because now I'm doing it anyways. Hopefully it all makes sense, and I'll try to answer questions, but really Barrin is the only one who I think truly understands circle syndrome in its full extent. What I've said here is my understanding of circle syndrome, but it could be just my opinion (read: I think I'm right, but I might now be).
Games before dames.
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 18:17:39
January 19 2012 22:16 GMT
#17
On January 20 2012 03:43 RumbleBadger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 22:51 spinnaker wrote:
Hmmm, so i guess i have to call Ragoo and RumbleBadger. Feel free to use my map as an example, doodle around in paint. Is it that all outer expos are arranged in a circle? That's what i think it is at the moment, but i'm still not sure of it. Also, why is it a bad thing? What problems are caused by it in terms of gameplay? Please drop some knowledge.



A more convoluted explanation of why these bases are troublesome:
For a long time people liked bases equidistant between players as bases the players would contend over. While the idea of having the players battle over bases is good, having bases that no one will hold for more than 2 seconds is not good. Thus, the new goal is that each player knows what bases are 'theirs' but those bases can still be pressured. A player should be able to hold the base fine, if they put in a big enough commitment.


This is basically right. I think you got the idea

Btw I just said this was a proven concept in BW because most of the maps don't have any CS, and if they do only very little.

This is my personal opinion about Circle Syndrome, it might not match what Barrin had in mind when he created this word and it might be flawed.

What is your definition of 'Circle Syndrome'?
Circle Syndrome is when the expansions in a map are placed in such a way that you end up expanding very close to your opponent's expansion (by ground).
This also means that all the expansion have a similar distance from each other, and it's "viable" to expand from every expansion to another. Thus the name "Circle Syndrome" cause you can expand around the map and in both directions in a "circle" (obviously it doesn't have to be a circle).

I want to emphasize that ground distance (and vulnerability) is way morer important for this, your last base can be literally directly next to the opponent's main with only a small buffer inbetween, but this close air distance doesn't mean it's CS.

Also while many 4p rotational maps may have CS it doesn't really matter cause the amount of bases you can take is so big.

Basically you can say CS discourages expanding and encourages direct aggression.

From Nightmarjoo's BW mapmaking guide
+ Show Spoiler +
An "owned" expansion is one nearer to one player. If you have an owned expansion, you must have another expansion for the other player(s) as well to be fair. You can vary positioning somewhat without hurting gameplay much, such as in (4)Fantasy, but it's safer to just mirror everything proportionally. A neutral expansion is one equally distanced between players, that players have the opportunity to fight over. Owned expansions tend to be favoured, part of it is that the distance to a neutral expo is almost inherently longer. Also, you need to have enough resources, and using neutral expansions usually reduces the total amount of expansions available.

You don't want your expansions too close to eachother, and you don't want two "owned" expansions owned by different players to be too close. Either pull the expo away, or make it a single neutral expansion. Exceptions for the former occur with the nat and 3rd base often, and for the latter with island and ground expos, which are more acceptable to have in close proximity than two ground expansions.


Why is circle syndrome a bad thing to have in a map?
Later (last) expansions are almost impossible to take. So mostly you just don't take one and the game ends.
If you want to expand then you only can do that when you defend it with your deathball all the time, forcing your enemy to have his deathball at his expansion as well. Obviously the close proximity just makes it very aggressive.
Compare that to maps that don't have CS, the last bases are still "easy" to take and you don't come close to your enemy's base/army. In fact if your enemy attacks your last bases with his whole army he will put himself out of position, so instead it's encouraged to do small army movements/drops. And that's kinda what you want to encourage more, harrass and multitasking > 1a.
Also the game just doesn't end because you can't take any more expansions, even tho there are still expansions.

But I would not call this "bad", I would say this is something most people currently don't want to see but you could design a map around it if you know what this will mean for the gameplay.

How do you know if your map has circle syndrome?
As I basically explained before, just check if expanding in both directions is completely viable and you thus end up close to your enemy's expansion with your last expansion.
If you want to avoid CS completely there should only be 2 types of exopansions: Owned expansions that only one player can really take and neutral expansions (in the middle) that nobody owns and that don't set you up to expand afterwards (into your opponent's expansions).

Bases that have little or no ground vulnerability (islands and bases that only have rly small chokes/1x ramps) can be in closer proximity to other bases while still being neutral.

If your map has circle syndrome, what are ways you can fix it?
Simply avoid the things that cause Circle Syndrome. For every map it's something different.
Generally it means deleting expansions, increasing distances between certain expansions or reducing ground vulnerability (like making an expansion an island takes it out of the normal expansion pattern and unable to cause any CS in most cases).

What are the major problems that can occur if your map has circle syndrome?
Answered before.


Optional: Provide at least one example of a map that displays circle syndrome


Maps without CS:
TPW Vulture
ESV Equinox
Only owned expansions.

Daybreak
ESV Discord
Mostly owned expansions, middle expansions are neutral.

Benzene
Match Point
Heartbreak Ridge
Alternative
Only owned expansions. You end up expanding close by air to your opponent's main, but as I said before this does not matter for CS. (Heartbreak Ridge has a winner expansion, an expansion you can only take when you already won basically).

Monte Cristo
I didn't play BW but I assume that island belongs to the person who has his main next to it... if so then only owned expansions, if not the islands are neutral.

Loki II
Destination
Chupung-Ryeong
Only owned expansions bar two neutral middle expansions (Chupung additionally has two winner expansions).

And maps with CS:

Dual Sight
Bel'Shir Beach
ESV Deception
Fractured
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
January 19 2012 23:07 GMT
#18
I think this is a good topic to talk about because in BW, this sort of thing was never discussed, but I can see that it's a legitimate problem here. When I look back at the BW maps, there were clearly player-owned expansions and only a few neutral expansions. Even when looking at the foreign made BW maps (that no one cares about), none of them had the number of neutral bases that a lot of SC2 maps had. For some reason, this problem only exists in SC2.

Interesting discussion. I'd like to hear mroe about it.
sCnDiamond
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany340 Posts
January 20 2012 01:03 GMT
#19
Thanks to Ragoo & RumbleBadger for sprinkling some wisdom. Until now i thought it's a good thing that players get into each other territories more after a certain amount of bases has been taken. I guess avoiding circle syndrome also means that the map will necessarily be split in a certain fashion or force players to take a certain expansion path. Some interesting input to think about indeed.
formerly spinnaker.
Barrin
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5002 Posts
January 20 2012 01:30 GMT
#20
btw Bel'Shir Beach Winter is well within the bounds of acceptable circle syndrome
Grandfather of LotV's resource model. "Fewer Resources per Base"
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
ESL Pro Tour
08:00
DH Valencia 2022 - Day 2
ESL.tv2032
Esl_sc22032
IndyStarCraft 1140
ALGaming 572
ESL_sc2b559
TaKeTV 412
Crank 282
Maincast Studio 189
ESL_sc2c157
OGamingTV SC2 136
ESL120
HorussTv 43
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 1140
Crank 282
ROOTSuperNova 210
ProTech63
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 17829
Horang2 3592
PianO 736
ToSsGirL 245
Shuttle 219
Leta 208
ggaemo 180
Shinee 89
Terrorterran 72
scan(afreeca) 71
[ Show more ]
sSak 55
zelot 52
CadenZie 21
Jumperer 14
Beast 7
Dota 2
resolut1ontv 1278
Attackerdota811
XcaliburYe549
XaKoH 545
febbydoto130
Super Smash Bros
Westballz53
Other Games
tarik_tv22196
summit1g21947
singsing1661
WinterStarcraft572
m0e_tv394
Livibee319
mouzStarbuck120
KnowMe58
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick64723
Dota 2
BeyondTheSummit17991
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO266
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Bosshoore 2
• Gussbus
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Poblha
• Alpha X_
• aXEnki
• Migwel
• intothetv
• CSOeSports
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamez Trovo
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament2
• STPLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV1476
League of Legends
• Rush9241
• Stunt386
Upcoming Events
DPC 2021/2022 Tour 3
1h 34m
Team Bald Reborn vs Nigma
OG vs TBD
CSO Contender
7h 34m
DPC 2021/2022 Tour 3
10h 34m
Evil Geniuses vs TBD
ESL Pro Tour
18h 34m
ESL Pro Tour
23h 34m
Ultimate Battle
1d 2h
Soulkey vs Rush
BSL: ProLeague
1d 6h
ESL Pro Tour
2 days
ESL Pro Tour
2 days
DPC 2021/2022 Tour 3
3 days
Evil Geniuses vs TBD
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Endless Battle 3: Mihu vs KuKu
DHM Valencia: EU
PSISTORM HC 2022
Roobet Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 15: GosuLeague
STL37
RCG 2021
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2022 Season 2
Nine-Tathlon Invitational
HoneyCai Friendlies Season 4
GAN Race Survival Season 4
CWCL Season 4
FS Mania
Big Baby Popularity Contest
KCM Race Survival 2022 Season 2
BSL Season 15
TOP Challenge Qualifier
2022 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
Deathfate Pro Team League
WTL 2022 Summer
2022 GSL S2: Code S
StarCraft II: NationWars 7
DH Masters Valencia
Community Clash League S4
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Quals.
Masters Clash Champ. 2022
ESL Challenger Valencia 2022

Upcoming

BSL Season 15: HasuLeague
Future Cup 4 (U18)
Luck Over Strength
TOP Challenge
2022 ACS Season 2
WSL Season 3
Ultimate Battle: Soulkey vs Rush
2022 GSL: ST 2
DH Masters Atlanta
2022 GSL S3: Code S
TSL 9
HomeStory Cup XXI
X-Cup Summer 2022
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 7
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 6
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 5
IEM Rio Major 2022
ESL Challenger Melbourne 2022
ESL Pro League Season 16
BLAST Premier Fall Groups
ESL Challenger League S42 NA
ESL Challenger League S42 EU
ESL Challenger League S42 AP
IEM Cologne 2022
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2022 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.