EPTThe korean New Map!! - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
|
Turgid
United States1623 Posts
Poll: Do you want this map in the GSL? I want this in the GSL. (26) I do not want to see this in the GSL. (25) 51 total votes Your vote: Do you want this map in the GSL? (Vote): I want this in the GSL. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
 . | ||
|
Candide
456 Posts
| ||
|
PatouPower
Canada1119 Posts
On another note, I like that fact that you can't siege or storm the mineral lines easily and that they are far enough from the entrances so your economy isn't automatically over when you get contained. | ||
|
UruzuNine
Canada162 Posts
| ||
|
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
| ||
|
KevinIX
United States2472 Posts
| ||
|
TheKanAry
United States149 Posts
It actually looks imbalanced for all three races, i like that  | ||
|
ThE_ShiZ
United States143 Posts
| ||
|
uSnAmplified
United States1029 Posts
| ||
|
heishe
Germany2284 Posts
The expansions seem to be really far apart (even though I have a hard time right now judging how big the map is actually in total - it might turn out that these distances are more Steppes Of War-like) which combined with the fact that there are only 4 total bases per side makes for a lot of 2 base builds. On March 08 2011 16:22 Shockk wrote: People haven't seen a single game on the map and already everyone's complaining and arguing about how things will develop and why this map sucks. The new set of GSL maps have shown that the larger macro maps can lead to some really interesting games with high level play (GSTL), but may also cause stale macro fests where nothing happens except for one huge battle and a GG after 15 minutes (Code A). Smaller maps have their place, and with 8 bases you have about the amount that gets taken in longer games anyway. The number of games where a 5th or 6th is properly utilized is small anyway. In addition, this map is gorgeous. And I see no reason why we couldn't have a map like this in the GSL. You're right, we should wait for a couple of games on this map. I still doubt that it's going to turn out to be an awesome map though. | ||
|
Shockk
Germany2269 Posts
The new set of GSL maps have shown that the larger macro maps can lead to some really interesting games with high level play (GSTL), but may also cause stale macro fests where nothing happens except for one huge battle and a GG after 15 minutes (Code A). Smaller maps have their place, and with 8 bases you have about the amount that gets taken in longer games anyway. The number of games where a 5th or 6th is properly utilized is small anyway. In addition, this map is gorgeous. And I see no reason why we couldn't have a map like this in the GSL. | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
The mixing of two tile sets is sort of cool and adds more dynamic; you'll probably like one side more. But that also means there'll be one you like less xD Just first impression it seems like it will be a 3 base turtle map leading into lategame fighting for a fourth while both players are very low on resources. Sounds epic | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
 It actually looks a bit small too | ||
|
oblong
United States86 Posts
On March 08 2011 14:12 Antoine wrote: Looks like he took a cue from Testbug on the mixing of 2 different tilesets haha LSPrime is the one who made Tal'darim right? I remember the creator of that map saying they thought Tal'darim was too big, and this is definitely the opposite direction. The middle looks like it'll make for good battles, but it does look quite tough to take a 4th. its not even hard to take your 4th, and even if it was... what would be wrong with that? maps should not be made to give you inifinity free bases, and zerg players should quit pretending that would be good map design | ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
| ||
|
iko
New Zealand137 Posts
Beautiful visuals. | ||
|
v3chr0
United States856 Posts
| ||
| ||
