• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:45
CEST 09:45
KST 16:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 29085 users

[G] How Geysers and Refineries Block Pathing

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Normal
sevia
Profile Joined May 2010
United States954 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-18 20:52:46
January 18 2011 08:44 GMT
#1
While examining some old BW maps, one concept that immediately interested me was the reverse semi-island map. These maps have two assimilators that allow all units to pass through, until they are destroyed, after which almost no units can pass through: a few examples are (Wiki)Troy and (Wiki)Battle Royal. It got me wondering if vespene geysers behaved similarly in SC2. I did a few simple tests, and it turns out they behave very differently. However, they still work in an odd way, with certain combinations allowing some units to pass through while others do not.

I couldn't find any other resource on this topic, so I wrote a simple guide as to what can pass through what. Everything here applies to extractors and assimilators as well.

First off, I found that when dealing with geysers, you can divide units into three size categories:

[image loading]

Note: Colossi are MEDIUM, archons are LARGE. I accidentally left them out of the picture.

Large units can never pass next to a vespene geyser or refinery if it is adjacent to another geyser, refinery, or cliffside. The notable unit here is siege tanks: although they appear to be smaller than immortals and queens, they actually are counted the same as thors and ultras.

Now, as for small and medium units. They behave mostly the same, except for one special case: diagonal cliffside + geyser, which I'll get to in a second. So, what exactly can small and medium units pass through?




Small/medium units CAN pass through two adjacent geysers, vertical or horizontal, OR a refinery and a geyser, stacked vertically (if the geyser is on the bottom):

[image loading]

Small/medium units can NOT pass through two adjacent refineries, vertical or horizontal, OR a refinery and a diagonal cliffside:

[image loading]

Small units CAN pass through a diagonal cliffside + a geyser, but medium units can NOT:

[image loading]

Small/medium units CAN pass through a vertical refinery + geyser, IF the geyser is on the bottom. If the geyser is on top, units can NOT pass through.

[image loading]




So now that we have this information, how can we use it? What sort of creative terrain can you make with adjacent refineries and geysers? Well, for one example, take an expansion like this:

[image loading]

It starts off as an island, blocked by two 500hp refineries with 1 armor. After destroying both refineries, you can fit workers, queens, and other small/medium units through. Now, you have a choice: you can take one or both geysers, turning the expansion back into an island, OR you can leave them unharvested, giving you a mineral-only expansion that can still be defended by marines/hydras/stalkers/etc. Of course, that's only one example.

Feel free to use this info without credit, I just felt like clearing up a somewhat nebulous issue in mapmaking. I think SC2's geyser behavior is much more interesting than BW's and could provide for some very unique maps.

Post corrections/feedback if needed!
최지성 Bomber || 김동환 viOLet || 고병재 GuMiho
MavercK
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2181 Posts
January 18 2011 08:46 GMT
#2
you could achieve the same thing as in BW by changing the footprints of the refineries or vespene geysers.
Brood War Remake - SC2BW - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145316
sevia
Profile Joined May 2010
United States954 Posts
January 18 2011 08:56 GMT
#3
On January 18 2011 17:46 MavercK wrote:
you could achieve the same thing as in BW by changing the footprints of the refineries or vespene geysers.


Wouldn't modifying footprints make it non-melee? This is more intended for standard melee maps, just explaining how they block in SC2 rather than trying to recreate BW.
최지성 Bomber || 김동환 viOLet || 고병재 GuMiho
iGrok
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5142 Posts
January 18 2011 09:01 GMT
#4
not necessarily - it depends on the exact unit that you modify. not sure about refineries
MOTM | Stim.tv | TL Mafia | Fantasy Fighting! | SNSD
Magrath
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada292 Posts
January 18 2011 10:06 GMT
#5
Pretty interesting concept. Would require that to be common knowledge before it is used in any high level setting. It's definatly not something explored enough, but the game is still yound and I can't wait to see a map with this in to change up the game a little.

I'm assuming Colossus is a large unit when considering two gysers.
Anything can be acheived through persistence and thought
shawty
Profile Joined June 2010
United Kingdom294 Posts
January 18 2011 10:40 GMT
#6
that does sound quite interesting, however it does seem like the geysers would be too vulnerable, and it would annoy me!

also troy and battle royal were two of my most hated maps in BW.
EunByuL
Profile Joined September 2010
Vietnam77 Posts
January 18 2011 14:06 GMT
#7
This is interesting, reminds me of walling of in SC1 where you really had to know your building placement quite a bit to make stuff zergling tight.
Tôi không
Arccotangent
Profile Joined October 2010
519 Posts
January 18 2011 14:39 GMT
#8
Interesting; thanks for taking the time to test out this idea. I could definitely see these ideas incorporated into future maps.
"Taste the zombie's drug, now you want more."
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-18 14:48:59
January 18 2011 14:40 GMT
#9
sorry off topic:
thanks, i'd like someone to discuss the same thing for minerals
+ Show Spoiler +
(link anyone?)

on topic:

love "mapmaking" rants/posts/banwagon/stickied/balance ... mapmaking discussions threads like this one+ Show Spoiler +
but would rather discuss more common "issue" of minerals
someone should link the two recent "balanced" maps with gas issues...+ Show Spoiler +
Gas Chamber comes of course to mind (catchy still)... but there was another with a "gas only base" map...iwillreturnifnooneget'sit
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
NullCurrent
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden245 Posts
January 18 2011 16:42 GMT
#10
Is the footprint the same for assimilators and extractors?
(One can assume so, but I don't think that is a good thing to do )

Otherwise it is a neat idea, and it will certainly be interesting to try
The Planetary Workshop - TPW - Mapmaking Team
sevia
Profile Joined May 2010
United States954 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-18 17:31:51
January 18 2011 17:21 GMT
#11
On January 19 2011 01:42 NullCurrent wrote:
Is the footprint the same for assimilators and extractors?
(One can assume so, but I don't think that is a good thing to do )


As far as I can tell, they do. I copied over all the tests with assimilators and extractors and didn't notice anything different.

----

One more thing that I just noticed a few minutes ago, that's actually quite important: When a geyser and a refinery/assim/extractor/etc. are stacked vertically, the geyser must be on the bottom for units to pass through. If the refinery is on the bottom, it forms a solid wall.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


I'll edit this into the OP in a second.

최지성 Bomber || 김동환 viOLet || 고병재 GuMiho
Antares777
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1971 Posts
January 18 2011 17:36 GMT
#12
Cool. I'll try to implement this in a future map.

prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
January 18 2011 18:26 GMT
#13
On January 18 2011 18:01 iGrok wrote:
not necessarily - it depends on the exact unit that you modify. not sure about refineries

You can modify any unit in the game and keep the map melee. Large tournaments will not pick up a map knowing that the map has altered some core game mechanics like that (This was a subject of huge internal debate on my mapmaking team in regards to Obsidian Inferno)
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
pullarius1
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States522 Posts
January 18 2011 18:27 GMT
#14
Great post. Very interesting.
@pullarius1
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25977 Posts
January 18 2011 18:38 GMT
#15
Amazing post. I love when someone focuses on a smart part of SC/SC2 and summarizes everything you could want to know about it. It's great
Moderator
BuuGhost
Profile Joined December 2010
Netherlands340 Posts
January 18 2011 19:33 GMT
#16
I'd say this is somewhat imbalanced for toss, As who ever uses archons in actual combat, but collosus are mosly used as combat unit
Now, I don't want to start off a balance discussion, But im just pointing it out in a somewhat quesitonable form.

However, this seems to be pretty damn nice if implented into maps. It adds to security and aswell to danger.
Your gas is heavily under easy pressure without you being able to do little. But your mineral line is well protected in return.

Whatsoever, All in all, Nice read and a great post. Like pointed out already.
"Kinda like this thing but there’s something you should know, I just came to say hello."
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
January 18 2011 19:38 GMT
#17
On January 19 2011 03:38 Chill wrote:
Amazing post. I love when someone focuses on a smart part of SC/SC2 and summarizes everything you could want to know about it. It's great


Got to agree here. I love little tidbits of info like this quite a bit .

Sort of reminds me of the Troy Gates from BW.
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
Nokarot
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1410 Posts
January 18 2011 20:34 GMT
#18
That is... a really interesting thing to consider. I guess I never really thought about it. I assumed that geysers would have the same collision as refineries. I take it all these rules apply to Assimilators and Extractors, as well?

Also, that expansion idea would be even more awesome (for any mappers looking at this thread) if..
a) the cliffs were thinner, so no tanks on it
b) line of sight blockers in front of the gas geysers? If possible, to the point where you are forced to send a small unit to investigate.
beep beep boop
Superiorwolf
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States5509 Posts
January 19 2011 03:00 GMT
#19
Wow this is a great post. I can foresee some interesting maps in the future utilizing this! Thanks ^^
Check out my stream at www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=315053 and follow me on Twitter @EGSuppy! :)
lyAsakura
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1414 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-19 03:23:29
January 19 2011 03:21 GMT
#20
On January 19 2011 04:38 iCCup.Diamond wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2011 03:38 Chill wrote:
Amazing post. I love when someone focuses on a smart part of SC/SC2 and summarizes everything you could want to know about it. It's great


Got to agree here. I love little tidbits of info like this quite a bit .

Sort of reminds me of the Troy Gates from BW.


Sounded exactly like troy and battle royal. Haha, didn't know the same thing would pop up in SC2.
Gosh, he even addressed both those maps in the OP. Who reads the opening paragraph when there isn't a banner anyways?^^
WeMade FOX would be a deadly SC2 team.
G_Wen
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada525 Posts
January 19 2011 06:48 GMT
#21
This is great stuff. I'd be interested in seeing if HY geysers had any affect on it. I know in beta they had weird pathing issues but now i'm wondering if they can be exploited.
ESV Mapmaking Team
Quixxotik
Profile Joined December 2010
United States54 Posts
January 19 2011 08:41 GMT
#22
I love when I see someone curious about something small in the game, and, instead of just posting an "open for discussion on TL", he or she goes out and learns, quite literally, everything there is to know about the topic.

Kudos to you.

My sentence is not a run-on.
Foresteye
Profile Joined July 2010
United States23 Posts
January 23 2011 20:45 GMT
#23
Good post keep it up.
pirsq
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Australia145 Posts
February 01 2011 06:55 GMT
#24
A few more facts:

1. Corner gap between refineries.
In a block of buildings that looks like
RB
RB
where R = refinery, B = other building, there is a gap right in the middle where the 4 corners meet (it does not work when two B positions are occupied by a single building). A worker that blocks itself in here will not teleport out like they usually do. When this worker mines gas at the refinery, it pops out at the same spot (even if the spot is now occupied - see below) and remains stuck.

2. Dropping things between geysers.
You can never drop a unit between two geysers, even if it can walk there. However, you can drop a small unit into the gap described above, as long as the spot is not already occupied. You cannot warp in a unit there. I haven't tested with infested terrans or viking landings.

3. Construction of refineries.
You can never block the construction of a refinery by standing units at locations that would be inaccessible if the refinery were built. The refinery builds anyway, and the units remain there. They can walk in either direction as if it was an unbuilt geyser, but once they reach the corner of the refinery, they can't move back.

I tested this on the map Crossfire, which has two adjacent geysers at the natural.
WenHe
Profile Joined February 2017
34 Posts
November 14 2017 05:57 GMT
#25
so can we see the interesting Protoss gas of Tory an Battle to Royal in StarCraft2?
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-11-14 09:52:19
November 14 2017 09:52 GMT
#26
On November 14 2017 14:57 WenHe wrote:
so can we see the interesting Protoss gas of Tory an Battle to Royal in StarCraft2?

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/CalDeum

as far as i know, this old GSL map is the only pro map to ever take advantage of the geyser collision boxes, featuring a neutral assimilator which can be destroyed to open a narrow gap into the nat.

highly doubt anything like this will make it onto ladder unfortunately, it'll be deemed "too complex/unintuitive for noobs" or something like that
vibeo gane,
Uvantak
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Uruguay1381 Posts
November 18 2017 07:29 GMT
#27
Bit late to the party, but iirc they changed the footprint of gas extraction structures, so Caldeum and this thread might not work very well anymore.
@Kantuva | Mapmaker | KTVMaps.wordpress.com | Check my profile to see my TL map threads, and you can search for KTV in the Custom Games section to play them.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech54
trigger 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 32964
TY 876
Pusan 396
ToSsGirL 293
Nal_rA 240
actioN 220
Aegong 167
Shine 130
Leta 95
Movie 43
[ Show more ]
NaDa 25
NotJumperer 19
Sharp 8
Dota 2
XcaliburYe248
Fuzer 153
BananaSlamJamma132
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss507
Stewie2K485
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor130
Other Games
summit1g6650
WinterStarcraft461
Pyrionflax30
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4063
Other Games
gamesdonequick595
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 54
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
1h 45m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
16h 15m
Replay Cast
18h 15m
GSL Code S
1d 1h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.