• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:30
CEST 17:30
KST 00:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall4HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Retirement From ASL22Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 $200 Biweekly - StarCraft Evolution League #1
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Retirement From ASL Where did Hovz go? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 601 users

[D] Reflection vs. Rotational Symmetry in (4) 1v1

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
September 21 2010 23:54 GMT
#1
Reflection Symmetry vs. Rotational Symmetry

This is a discussion of the use of reflection symmetry vs. the use of rotational symmetry in the making of 4 player 1v1 maps. We will discuss the differences and their advantages and disadvantages in balancing. First of all, let's examine what Reflection Symmetry and Rotational Symmetry mean and how they pertain to map making.

Reflection Symmetry (Wikipedia entry)
Reflection symmetry, also known as mirror symmetry is when a figure (or map in this case) is reflected along an axis such that both sides appear the same. If you'd like to tell if a map is symmetrical by reflection, then all you must do is find the axis of symmetry and draw a line down it. If you then mentally fold the image along the line, the two halves should match up where they touch. You can see this type of symmetry in maps such as Lost Temple or Metalopolis.

Example of Reflection Symmetry: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Lost Temple with highlighted axis of symmetry: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Rotational Symmetry (Wikipedia entry)
Rotational symmetry, I've seen described as "pinwheel" symmetry, is when a figure can be rotated by a certain amount and appear the same. If you'd like to tell if a map is symmetrical by rotation, then all you must do is rotate it at the center until it matches the original. Generally in 4 player maps, you just rotate the map by 90 degrees and the everything should be the same. You can see this type of symmetry in maps such as Delta Quadrant.

Example of Rotational Symmetry: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Delta Quadrant with lines to highlight rotated sections: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


How does this affect map balance?
Here comes the discussion part and where I'll share with you my opinion on the subject.

The way that this affects map balance is in 4 player maps, is with positional balance with regard to spawn locations. With a 1v1 game played on a 4 player map, the spawn locations of the players are variable. Therefore, balance consideration needs to be taken into account such that all possible variations of spawn locations for the two players are equally balanced. When using one of the two types of symmetry we've seen earlier, the considerations are different, and rotational symmetry is considerably more difficult to balance. The biggest area of concern, in my opinion, would be expansion placement when considering expanding patterns.

When using reflection symmetry, the designer is actually inherently given a balanced map. When looking at Lost Temple, if it were perfectly reflected, then no matter where the players spawn, they are both given the same advantages and disadvantages. If they spawn close positions, they both have to contend with being unable to easily expand to a third base. No matter where the players spawn, they are given the same choices for expansions and their expansion patterns are the same.

When using rotational symmetry, the designer must contend with inherent imbalances. Unless the players spawn in cross positions there are going to be imbalances. Much care and consideration are needed in order to make it balanced. It may look balanced since it is symmetrical, but don't let that fool you. In order to discuss some of these imbalances I'm going to use an example map.

I chose the Starcraft 2 remake of Fighting Spirit by prodiG because it's good but you can still see some of these imbalances. An image of Fighting Spirit for reference: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


With spawn positions at 2, 5, 8 and 11 o'clock, let's use the top spawns at positions 2 and 11 for our examples. From the very start of the game, you'll notice the positions of the natural expansions. When spawning at the 2 o'clock position, taking your natural expansion, you expand towards your opponent at the 11 o'clock position, while they take their natural and expand away. This does not seem like much of an imbalance yet, but when looking at the air attack paths, a straight attack path from 11 to 2 has the player traveling over the 1 o'clock natural, where it does not travel over the 10 o'clock natural. Of course, this wouldn't stop you from expanding at your natural since the benefits of the close natural outweigh these imbalances.

But when choosing a third expansion, this may not be as easy a choice. The player at the 1 o'clock position could take a third at the 3 o'clock position and they would safely be expanding away from their opponent. Unfortunately, the player at the 11 o'clock position could not expand to the same relative base at the 12 o'clock position and gain the same safety. They would be expanding towards their opponent and decreasing the opponent's attack distance. Fortunately, there is another viable third expansion for our 10 o'clock player would be the third at the 9 o'clock position which is of similar distance away from the natural.

Fortunately, the designer of Fighting Spirit is quite good and was able to account for the inherent imbalances with good expansion placement, but in the hands of inexperienced map makers, rotational symmetry's imbalances could be amplified. When doing rotational symmetry, there are a lot more things to consider other than just giving each player the same number of expansions. The positions of these expansions and how they relate to each spawn point needs to be considered.

These are my thoughts. I would love to hear yours.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
September 22 2010 01:34 GMT
#2
I believe that Starcraft needs maps that are both rotational and mirrored. It looks like you covered all of the points I was going to make
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 22 2010 02:19 GMT
#3
--- Nuked ---
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
September 22 2010 02:49 GMT
#4
I agree. Both types should be used when making maps. I hope I didn't sound too harsh when speaking about rotational symmetry. I believe it's more challenging to balance, but that does not mean it shouldn't be done.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
September 22 2010 03:23 GMT
#5
Dude, Rotational is so much more pimp. Seriously, the X, Y, XY symmetry gets so boring. In Brood War, the Paranoid Android symmetry was the most pro because it's so hard to execute but not so in SC2 where mirroring is eternally more annoying but better.

tl;dr: Reflection symmetry is balanced, Rotational symmetry is so much more fun.
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
September 22 2010 17:01 GMT
#6
Isn't this an issue of the past?! When BW mappers did positional balance for rotational symmetry either they are geniuses, VERY careful mappers, or they had a secret tool to help them.

For SC2 we have the map analyzer--and balancing interesting symmetries (or lots of asymmetry) is exactly what this pig is for! Case in point: the map analyzer says adjacent spawns on prodiG's iCCup Fighting Spirit are quantitatively balanced, positionally.

+ Show Spoiler [Fighting Spirit] +

[image loading]


Boom!
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 17:29:27
September 22 2010 17:23 GMT
#7
--- Nuked ---
SilverPotato
Profile Joined July 2010
United States560 Posts
September 22 2010 17:42 GMT
#8
It seems the "best" maps currently are Reflection maps with two pairs of parallel ramps (Lost Temple, Metal). This creates very diverse games, with three different possibilities, Cross, close ground, close air.

However, I think Rotational maps with their two possibilities really help give a player a fallback if they aren't very comfortable with having to adapt to the map based on spawn location.

In short, both are needed.
"The ability to learn faster than your competitors may be the only sustainable competitive advantage." ~Arie de Geus
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
September 22 2010 18:15 GMT
#9
@dimfish, I'd love to know the algorithm that you use to calculate "influences" and what factors it takes into account.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
MangoTango
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States3670 Posts
September 22 2010 18:26 GMT
#10
What your analysis fails to take into account is that on a rotational symmetry map, you're equally likely to be "upwind" as "downwind." This produces some problems when it comes to things like muta harass, which is rough on FS's natural with an upwind Zerg against downwind Terran, but much less so with Zerg downwind.

Still, rotational symmetry produces interesting maps and situations, and should be part of the map pool.
"One fish, two fish, red fish, BLUE TANK!" - Artosis
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 18:31:23
September 22 2010 18:29 GMT
#11
An explanation of influence --> positional balance.

Admittedly, the analyzer model has parameters, so adjusting them adjusts the overall balance. Here's the gist of it:

The analyzer finds all the bases on a map and calculates, for each starting location, how far away is that base by ground, cliff-walking and by air? Using this data we can calculate influence as inversely proportional to some weighted combination of those values. Example: my natural is close by ground, cliff-walk AND air when compared to another start location, so the combined distances are LOW and the resulting influence is HIGH. It is expressed as a percentage, and you can alter that percentage by playing with the influence weights in the map analyzer constants.txt. At the moment ground is weighted heavily, air is important and cliff-walking is generally low.

Okay, so you consider each pair of starting locations at a time (a possible spawn for both players in 1v1) and decide which start location influences which base by how much. Now you have to choose an attribute of the bases to balance by. It doesn't matter if I have 99% influence over a base with one mineral patch as much as a lots of influence over a gold base, right? So the analyzer gives you two positional balance scores at the top of the image: one by total resources per base and one by openness per base. If my natural is more open than your natural, even though they are positioned fairly, then the overall balance will come out off.

The algorithm can be tweaked and perfected and I have plans for more base attributes (think cliffable versus a non-cliffable base, very different bases), but I think the overall idea is very, very useful for deciding if a rotational symmetric map is "in the ballback" of positionally balanced.

And yeah, Barrin, the analyzer can only do this taking the entire map into account. How about this: suppose the influence calculation ALSO says "bases that are closer to BOTH spawns are more important to the calculation" so the variations between your spawns are taking more into account? Do you think that would better show the balance?

edit: Mango, the air distance takes into account "upwind" and "downwind" but if muta harass is very important when compared to ground distances, then the analysis constants should be altered to reflect that.
DamageInq
Profile Joined April 2010
United States283 Posts
September 22 2010 18:34 GMT
#12
I don't like rotation maps. While it adds a nice twist in 2v2, it makes 1v1 imbalanced. I say this in all of my posts in the map threads.

Delta Quadrant isn't affected by this largely because there's almost a line of semetry in the middle horrazonally and vertically. On close positions, one player is closer to the natural and the third than the other player is to his. The position of the gold doesn't play a huge role because a player can opt to take the one farther away from his opponent as it is nearly the same distance as his own.
"Scissors are OP. Rock is fine." -Paper
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 18:50:34
September 22 2010 18:45 GMT
#13
@MangoTango, I'm sorry but your terminology confuses me. Instead of upwind/downwind do you mean north/south or counter-clockwise/clockwise?

@dimfish, The analyzer seems to work well to provide good general results. I thought it was only taking into account the ground distance between spawn points and expansions, so it's good to know you also take into account cliff and air distances. There are some more complicated factors that I can think of that could be taken into account but would make the calculation much more difficult, such as high ground vs. low ground expansions, ramp widths, and destructible rocks. Destructible rocks seem to be a difficult thing to analyze at the moment. Perhaps an option to run the analyzer where it would ignore destructible rocks would be good, so we can compare the analysis of the map with and without them. (This is perhaps the wrong thread for this discussion. )

Edit: @DamageInq, This is why I chose not to analyze Delta Quadrant in my original post. It does a good job of factoring the imbalances of rotational symmetry by aligning itself with the center. Meaning, the naturals go towards the center and the gold expansions are between each base. The biggest imbalance is probably the backdoor third blocked by rocks.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 21:05:01
September 22 2010 20:53 GMT
#14
--- Nuked ---
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
September 22 2010 21:50 GMT
#15
1. Positional balance has nothing to do with Racial balance.
2. Rotational symmetry can still be relatively balanced while being far more pimp than reflectional. Katrina was probably the most problematic in regards to rotational in the Brood War pro map scene, where the mains were more vulnurable one way than in another, but even there, people cared far more about the racial balance than the positional.
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
September 22 2010 23:45 GMT
#16
I think rotational versus reflection symmetry for the high-level layout (let's call it macro symmetry) is less important for positional balance than micro symmetry.

Consider that reflection symmetry maps usually have some asymmetry.

Metalopolis has some weird spacing and size asymmetries, even though it is deceptively reflection symmetric.
+ Show Spoiler [Metalopolis Asymmetry] +

[image loading]

But the overall effect on Metalopolis is that major distances between key points are balanced, and the fine details are exact (the center has perfect symmetry for instance). And apparently the community at large believes Metalopolis is fair.

Other maps with reflection macro symmetry have more problematic micro asymmetries: on Scrap Station the choke between the natural and the third base is tighter for the southern spawn. And I believe on Lost Temple (maybe patched in 1.1?) that Thors on the natural cliff can kill hatcheries at 3 o'clock and one other spawn, but not the other two. So in a ZvT where Zerg spawns in a Thor-cliffable spawn it might influence whether the player expands to the natural, which is a significant imbalance.

As long as the asymmetries are within reason, I think rotational macro symmetry is far less of a factor than the exact shape of main chokes or natural layouts or whatever.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 23 2010 04:02 GMT
#17
--- Nuked ---
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
September 23 2010 14:43 GMT
#18
Lost Temple is not the best example of a reflectionally symmetrical map being balanced. If you and opponent are at 7 and 8 bases air rush distance is tiny, which to me is worse than your natural taking you closer to an opponent.

With rotational symmetry you're not going to see any of the mains right next to each other like that (barring some weird 2 way only rotational symmetry on a 4 player map, but I've never seen one of those)
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-23 22:23:47
September 23 2010 22:22 GMT
#19
--- Nuked ---
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-23 22:38:24
September 23 2010 22:37 GMT
#20
OP was saying with rotational the distance from your natural to their main will be different depending on whether they are located clockwise or counterclockwise to you (ignoring cross positions). This is true, but how is it worse than the distance between mains being greatly different on a reflectionally symmetric map like Lost Temple (again, ignoring cross positions)?

True, in Lost Temple the variability applies equally to both players. On a non mirror match though it can make a big difference. Like in BW, a closer air distance between mains, even though it's the same for both players, greatly benefits a Zerg.

But yeah, reflectional symmetry does mean the distances will at least be the same for both players, while it won't be with rotational (main to natural)
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 30m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 429
mouzHeroMarine 386
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 4555
EffOrt 1356
Larva 1304
Stork 410
Mini 368
BeSt 275
ZerO 240
Light 179
Rush 133
Snow 132
[ Show more ]
hero 120
Hyun 109
Mind 77
Zeus 58
Sharp 56
Shinee 46
Barracks 41
JYJ39
Movie 39
Aegong 29
Terrorterran 17
Rock 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Noble 13
scan(afreeca) 12
IntoTheRainbow 10
SilentControl 10
zelot 9
HiyA 8
Hm[arnc] 7
Shine 7
Dota 2
Gorgc10806
qojqva2859
febbydoto10
League of Legends
singsing2532
Counter-Strike
markeloff130
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King139
amsayoshi31
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor151
Other Games
hiko1326
FrodaN1120
B2W.Neo432
RotterdaM352
Liquid`VortiX315
Happy298
crisheroes212
ArmadaUGS96
Trikslyr47
QueenE36
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 26
• iHatsuTV 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2810
• WagamamaTV377
League of Legends
• TFBlade873
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
30m
OSC
3h 30m
SHIN vs Bunny
Cham vs MaNa
SKillous vs TBD
PAPI vs Jumy
Gerald vs Moja
ArT vs TBD
Replay Cast
8h 30m
The PondCast
18h 30m
RSL Revival
18h 30m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
1d
Replay Cast
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 18h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
2 days
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
4 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.