• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:26
CEST 06:26
KST 13:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 539 users

[D] Reflection vs. Rotational Symmetry in (4) 1v1

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Normal
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
September 21 2010 23:54 GMT
#1
Reflection Symmetry vs. Rotational Symmetry

This is a discussion of the use of reflection symmetry vs. the use of rotational symmetry in the making of 4 player 1v1 maps. We will discuss the differences and their advantages and disadvantages in balancing. First of all, let's examine what Reflection Symmetry and Rotational Symmetry mean and how they pertain to map making.

Reflection Symmetry (Wikipedia entry)
Reflection symmetry, also known as mirror symmetry is when a figure (or map in this case) is reflected along an axis such that both sides appear the same. If you'd like to tell if a map is symmetrical by reflection, then all you must do is find the axis of symmetry and draw a line down it. If you then mentally fold the image along the line, the two halves should match up where they touch. You can see this type of symmetry in maps such as Lost Temple or Metalopolis.

Example of Reflection Symmetry: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Lost Temple with highlighted axis of symmetry: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Rotational Symmetry (Wikipedia entry)
Rotational symmetry, I've seen described as "pinwheel" symmetry, is when a figure can be rotated by a certain amount and appear the same. If you'd like to tell if a map is symmetrical by rotation, then all you must do is rotate it at the center until it matches the original. Generally in 4 player maps, you just rotate the map by 90 degrees and the everything should be the same. You can see this type of symmetry in maps such as Delta Quadrant.

Example of Rotational Symmetry: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Delta Quadrant with lines to highlight rotated sections: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


How does this affect map balance?
Here comes the discussion part and where I'll share with you my opinion on the subject.

The way that this affects map balance is in 4 player maps, is with positional balance with regard to spawn locations. With a 1v1 game played on a 4 player map, the spawn locations of the players are variable. Therefore, balance consideration needs to be taken into account such that all possible variations of spawn locations for the two players are equally balanced. When using one of the two types of symmetry we've seen earlier, the considerations are different, and rotational symmetry is considerably more difficult to balance. The biggest area of concern, in my opinion, would be expansion placement when considering expanding patterns.

When using reflection symmetry, the designer is actually inherently given a balanced map. When looking at Lost Temple, if it were perfectly reflected, then no matter where the players spawn, they are both given the same advantages and disadvantages. If they spawn close positions, they both have to contend with being unable to easily expand to a third base. No matter where the players spawn, they are given the same choices for expansions and their expansion patterns are the same.

When using rotational symmetry, the designer must contend with inherent imbalances. Unless the players spawn in cross positions there are going to be imbalances. Much care and consideration are needed in order to make it balanced. It may look balanced since it is symmetrical, but don't let that fool you. In order to discuss some of these imbalances I'm going to use an example map.

I chose the Starcraft 2 remake of Fighting Spirit by prodiG because it's good but you can still see some of these imbalances. An image of Fighting Spirit for reference: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


With spawn positions at 2, 5, 8 and 11 o'clock, let's use the top spawns at positions 2 and 11 for our examples. From the very start of the game, you'll notice the positions of the natural expansions. When spawning at the 2 o'clock position, taking your natural expansion, you expand towards your opponent at the 11 o'clock position, while they take their natural and expand away. This does not seem like much of an imbalance yet, but when looking at the air attack paths, a straight attack path from 11 to 2 has the player traveling over the 1 o'clock natural, where it does not travel over the 10 o'clock natural. Of course, this wouldn't stop you from expanding at your natural since the benefits of the close natural outweigh these imbalances.

But when choosing a third expansion, this may not be as easy a choice. The player at the 1 o'clock position could take a third at the 3 o'clock position and they would safely be expanding away from their opponent. Unfortunately, the player at the 11 o'clock position could not expand to the same relative base at the 12 o'clock position and gain the same safety. They would be expanding towards their opponent and decreasing the opponent's attack distance. Fortunately, there is another viable third expansion for our 10 o'clock player would be the third at the 9 o'clock position which is of similar distance away from the natural.

Fortunately, the designer of Fighting Spirit is quite good and was able to account for the inherent imbalances with good expansion placement, but in the hands of inexperienced map makers, rotational symmetry's imbalances could be amplified. When doing rotational symmetry, there are a lot more things to consider other than just giving each player the same number of expansions. The positions of these expansions and how they relate to each spawn point needs to be considered.

These are my thoughts. I would love to hear yours.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
September 22 2010 01:34 GMT
#2
I believe that Starcraft needs maps that are both rotational and mirrored. It looks like you covered all of the points I was going to make
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 22 2010 02:19 GMT
#3
--- Nuked ---
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
September 22 2010 02:49 GMT
#4
I agree. Both types should be used when making maps. I hope I didn't sound too harsh when speaking about rotational symmetry. I believe it's more challenging to balance, but that does not mean it shouldn't be done.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
September 22 2010 03:23 GMT
#5
Dude, Rotational is so much more pimp. Seriously, the X, Y, XY symmetry gets so boring. In Brood War, the Paranoid Android symmetry was the most pro because it's so hard to execute but not so in SC2 where mirroring is eternally more annoying but better.

tl;dr: Reflection symmetry is balanced, Rotational symmetry is so much more fun.
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
September 22 2010 17:01 GMT
#6
Isn't this an issue of the past?! When BW mappers did positional balance for rotational symmetry either they are geniuses, VERY careful mappers, or they had a secret tool to help them.

For SC2 we have the map analyzer--and balancing interesting symmetries (or lots of asymmetry) is exactly what this pig is for! Case in point: the map analyzer says adjacent spawns on prodiG's iCCup Fighting Spirit are quantitatively balanced, positionally.

+ Show Spoiler [Fighting Spirit] +

[image loading]


Boom!
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 17:29:27
September 22 2010 17:23 GMT
#7
--- Nuked ---
SilverPotato
Profile Joined July 2010
United States560 Posts
September 22 2010 17:42 GMT
#8
It seems the "best" maps currently are Reflection maps with two pairs of parallel ramps (Lost Temple, Metal). This creates very diverse games, with three different possibilities, Cross, close ground, close air.

However, I think Rotational maps with their two possibilities really help give a player a fallback if they aren't very comfortable with having to adapt to the map based on spawn location.

In short, both are needed.
"The ability to learn faster than your competitors may be the only sustainable competitive advantage." ~Arie de Geus
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
September 22 2010 18:15 GMT
#9
@dimfish, I'd love to know the algorithm that you use to calculate "influences" and what factors it takes into account.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
MangoTango
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States3670 Posts
September 22 2010 18:26 GMT
#10
What your analysis fails to take into account is that on a rotational symmetry map, you're equally likely to be "upwind" as "downwind." This produces some problems when it comes to things like muta harass, which is rough on FS's natural with an upwind Zerg against downwind Terran, but much less so with Zerg downwind.

Still, rotational symmetry produces interesting maps and situations, and should be part of the map pool.
"One fish, two fish, red fish, BLUE TANK!" - Artosis
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 18:31:23
September 22 2010 18:29 GMT
#11
An explanation of influence --> positional balance.

Admittedly, the analyzer model has parameters, so adjusting them adjusts the overall balance. Here's the gist of it:

The analyzer finds all the bases on a map and calculates, for each starting location, how far away is that base by ground, cliff-walking and by air? Using this data we can calculate influence as inversely proportional to some weighted combination of those values. Example: my natural is close by ground, cliff-walk AND air when compared to another start location, so the combined distances are LOW and the resulting influence is HIGH. It is expressed as a percentage, and you can alter that percentage by playing with the influence weights in the map analyzer constants.txt. At the moment ground is weighted heavily, air is important and cliff-walking is generally low.

Okay, so you consider each pair of starting locations at a time (a possible spawn for both players in 1v1) and decide which start location influences which base by how much. Now you have to choose an attribute of the bases to balance by. It doesn't matter if I have 99% influence over a base with one mineral patch as much as a lots of influence over a gold base, right? So the analyzer gives you two positional balance scores at the top of the image: one by total resources per base and one by openness per base. If my natural is more open than your natural, even though they are positioned fairly, then the overall balance will come out off.

The algorithm can be tweaked and perfected and I have plans for more base attributes (think cliffable versus a non-cliffable base, very different bases), but I think the overall idea is very, very useful for deciding if a rotational symmetric map is "in the ballback" of positionally balanced.

And yeah, Barrin, the analyzer can only do this taking the entire map into account. How about this: suppose the influence calculation ALSO says "bases that are closer to BOTH spawns are more important to the calculation" so the variations between your spawns are taking more into account? Do you think that would better show the balance?

edit: Mango, the air distance takes into account "upwind" and "downwind" but if muta harass is very important when compared to ground distances, then the analysis constants should be altered to reflect that.
DamageInq
Profile Joined April 2010
United States283 Posts
September 22 2010 18:34 GMT
#12
I don't like rotation maps. While it adds a nice twist in 2v2, it makes 1v1 imbalanced. I say this in all of my posts in the map threads.

Delta Quadrant isn't affected by this largely because there's almost a line of semetry in the middle horrazonally and vertically. On close positions, one player is closer to the natural and the third than the other player is to his. The position of the gold doesn't play a huge role because a player can opt to take the one farther away from his opponent as it is nearly the same distance as his own.
"Scissors are OP. Rock is fine." -Paper
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 18:50:34
September 22 2010 18:45 GMT
#13
@MangoTango, I'm sorry but your terminology confuses me. Instead of upwind/downwind do you mean north/south or counter-clockwise/clockwise?

@dimfish, The analyzer seems to work well to provide good general results. I thought it was only taking into account the ground distance between spawn points and expansions, so it's good to know you also take into account cliff and air distances. There are some more complicated factors that I can think of that could be taken into account but would make the calculation much more difficult, such as high ground vs. low ground expansions, ramp widths, and destructible rocks. Destructible rocks seem to be a difficult thing to analyze at the moment. Perhaps an option to run the analyzer where it would ignore destructible rocks would be good, so we can compare the analysis of the map with and without them. (This is perhaps the wrong thread for this discussion. )

Edit: @DamageInq, This is why I chose not to analyze Delta Quadrant in my original post. It does a good job of factoring the imbalances of rotational symmetry by aligning itself with the center. Meaning, the naturals go towards the center and the gold expansions are between each base. The biggest imbalance is probably the backdoor third blocked by rocks.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 21:05:01
September 22 2010 20:53 GMT
#14
--- Nuked ---
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
September 22 2010 21:50 GMT
#15
1. Positional balance has nothing to do with Racial balance.
2. Rotational symmetry can still be relatively balanced while being far more pimp than reflectional. Katrina was probably the most problematic in regards to rotational in the Brood War pro map scene, where the mains were more vulnurable one way than in another, but even there, people cared far more about the racial balance than the positional.
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
September 22 2010 23:45 GMT
#16
I think rotational versus reflection symmetry for the high-level layout (let's call it macro symmetry) is less important for positional balance than micro symmetry.

Consider that reflection symmetry maps usually have some asymmetry.

Metalopolis has some weird spacing and size asymmetries, even though it is deceptively reflection symmetric.
+ Show Spoiler [Metalopolis Asymmetry] +

[image loading]

But the overall effect on Metalopolis is that major distances between key points are balanced, and the fine details are exact (the center has perfect symmetry for instance). And apparently the community at large believes Metalopolis is fair.

Other maps with reflection macro symmetry have more problematic micro asymmetries: on Scrap Station the choke between the natural and the third base is tighter for the southern spawn. And I believe on Lost Temple (maybe patched in 1.1?) that Thors on the natural cliff can kill hatcheries at 3 o'clock and one other spawn, but not the other two. So in a ZvT where Zerg spawns in a Thor-cliffable spawn it might influence whether the player expands to the natural, which is a significant imbalance.

As long as the asymmetries are within reason, I think rotational macro symmetry is far less of a factor than the exact shape of main chokes or natural layouts or whatever.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 23 2010 04:02 GMT
#17
--- Nuked ---
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
September 23 2010 14:43 GMT
#18
Lost Temple is not the best example of a reflectionally symmetrical map being balanced. If you and opponent are at 7 and 8 bases air rush distance is tiny, which to me is worse than your natural taking you closer to an opponent.

With rotational symmetry you're not going to see any of the mains right next to each other like that (barring some weird 2 way only rotational symmetry on a 4 player map, but I've never seen one of those)
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-23 22:23:47
September 23 2010 22:22 GMT
#19
--- Nuked ---
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-23 22:38:24
September 23 2010 22:37 GMT
#20
OP was saying with rotational the distance from your natural to their main will be different depending on whether they are located clockwise or counterclockwise to you (ignoring cross positions). This is true, but how is it worse than the distance between mains being greatly different on a reflectionally symmetric map like Lost Temple (again, ignoring cross positions)?

True, in Lost Temple the variability applies equally to both players. On a non mirror match though it can make a big difference. Like in BW, a closer air distance between mains, even though it's the same for both players, greatly benefits a Zerg.

But yeah, reflectional symmetry does mean the distances will at least be the same for both players, while it won't be with rotational (main to natural)
SaltyDog
Profile Joined January 2011
Uganda73 Posts
February 14 2011 23:20 GMT
#21
Rotational symmetry in 1v1 maps like Xel'Naga Caverns is clearly a great thing. Rotationally symmetric maps look less symmetric, more natural and so are more aesthetically pleasing. Rotational symmetry in 2v2 maps like Delta Quadrant (in the context of a 1v1 match) creates inerrant imbalance excluding cross positions. Also, trying to limit this positional imbalance stems creativity to an extent; rotational symmetry in 2v2 maps tends to encourage large, reflected center areas with small, rotated main bases (it would be interesting to see a map that did this the other way around) which is not necessarily bad but a bit monotonous.

Although reflective symmetry is a little weird in 1v1 maps, in 2v2 it enables varied strategy in relation to spawn positions without inherent positional imbalance. Lost temple, Metalopolis, Shakuras plateau, all the poplar 2v2 maps have bi-axial, reflective symmetry.

So rotation for 1v1, reflection for 2v2. Although it's all about the 1v1 play, so why bother making 2v2 maps? Big, rotational 1v1s with lots of expansions are the way forward imo.
I'm unemployed, so I make maps.
ggb667
Profile Joined June 2007
United States16 Posts
February 23 2011 20:14 GMT
#22
I have read these threads on symmetry and am unconvinced it is needed. If positions are substantially similar in terms of distance, expansions, and choke points I can't see why the map should be a mirror or rotationally symmetric in each case. It also limits the influence of the map on strategy. It should be OK for some positions to encourage expansion or turtling as long as the overall win percentage from each starting position for each race is identical.
Give a man a fire and he is warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he is warm for the rest of his life.
iGrok
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5142 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-23 22:28:42
February 23 2011 20:23 GMT
#23
On February 24 2011 05:14 ggb667 wrote:
I have read these threads on symmetry and am unconvinced it is needed. If positions are substantially similar in terms of distance, expansions, and choke points I can't see why the map should be a mirror or rotationally symmetric in each case. It also limits the influence of the map on strategy. It should be OK for some positions to encourage expansion or turtling as long as the overall win percentage from each starting position for each race is identical.


Yeah, good luck doing that. Once you become Testbug (the mapper not the map), let us know.

P.S. Seven Sins ftw.
MOTM | Stim.tv | TL Mafia | Fantasy Fighting! | SNSD
ggb667
Profile Joined June 2007
United States16 Posts
March 09 2011 15:35 GMT
#24

Yeah, good luck doing that. Once you become Testbug (the mapper not the map), let us know.

P.S. Seven Sins ftw.


You agree the principle is right then? Good. Difficult? Yes, fun? Oh yea!
Give a man a fire and he is warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he is warm for the rest of his life.
adso
Profile Joined March 2011
718 Posts
March 09 2011 15:56 GMT
#25
What iGrok is implying ggb667, is that you are sort of posting vs in a fan club thread, no one minds
mapmakers are the kindest of souls (inside)
but while i agree with you that it's fun that we all want, i concur that it's a hell of a task to do


thank you for sharing BoomStevo
mapmaker bow to you sir

Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 34m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 243
ProTech72
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 379
Light 246
Noble 99
Snow 25
Icarus 7
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K704
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox614
Other Games
tarik_tv8012
summit1g6470
monkeys_forever476
Maynarde192
RuFF_SC297
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1512
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH464
• practicex 48
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt253
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
5h 34m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 5h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.