EPTthey should be #47 and #48... do not?
Top 48 Changes - Page 2
| Forum Index > Razer TSL Forum |
|
ilbh
Brazil1606 Posts
they should be #47 and #48... do not? | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
thunk
United States6233 Posts
(That's a neutral comment, for those of you ready to read into the lines). | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
Bagira
16 Posts
G5 played 3 games near the end of the ladder vs a second iccup account started by LzGaMeR where he won all 3 games (pvz, pvp, pvt). While this alone would not warrent a ban, G5 has come up on the TSL abuse radar far too often for one tournament and the evidence compounds so greatly that we cannot ignore it. This includes 2 disconnect complaints against him, 3 noted abuse games at the end of the ladder and some underhanded and deceitful complaint requests long after their play dates. TSL admins have done nothing by try to be fair in the situations that have arisen, especially with G5 but the evidence against him leaves us with little choice but for his removal from the top 48. Sry for my question, but isnt LzGaMeR an abuser too when hes helping other to abuse? Shouldnt he get a punishment for this? | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
As for G5, Kennigit already explained that this was simply the last straw in a series of bad incidents. We have been more than fair and accommodating to him, spending countless hours resolving messes that he created. | ||
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On April 22 2008 11:52 Hot_Bid wrote: Unfortunately, there was no rule stated that you were not allowed to play TSL players with a second, non-TSL account. In fact, I know that many of the Top 48 used alternate, non-TSL accounts to play against TSL players. A frantic hunt for aka's and past games is unfair to the players and impractical in scope. Did they notify mods of their smurf akas before they started playing? I guess at this point it doesn't really matter. | ||
|
HotZhot
Colombia677 Posts
| ||
|
That_guy
47 Posts
| ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
anyway, those near the 48 definitely worked for it, and it sucks that a handful of points decided who moves on and who doesnt. congrats~ | ||
|
EGLzGaMeR
United States1867 Posts
(monkey see monkey do) T.T Sorry again -Lz | ||
|
Bagira
16 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On April 22 2008 11:54 BroOd wrote: Did they notify mods of their smurf akas before they started playing? I guess at this point it doesn't really matter. It wasn't really a smurf because the second account wasn't registered in the TSL team. I agree, next time we will make a rule against playing with a separate, non-TSL account and interacting with the TSL ladder. But this time so many players were doing it that it'd be unfair and impossible to go back and try to fix all of it. | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
Superiorwolf
United States5509 Posts
Oh yeah and G5 is a huge bm asshole so glad he's out  Good job TSL Admins and Mods. Doing a wonderful job!!! | ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
Good luck testie. If you lose R1 you have to play techies for an entire day. | ||
|
greatmeh
Canada1964 Posts
| ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On April 22 2008 12:32 CubEdIn wrote: Good decision. At least everyone who was saying Ultraling got Flaf to drop games will shut the hell up now. Good luck testie. If you lose R1 you have to play techies for an entire day. WTf? Will you shut the hell up those people were RIGHT your defending of him was WRONG. | ||
|
iLjh
United States160 Posts
| ||
| ||
