EPTWhat is your opinion on the Parting/MKP decision in the GS…
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
cTrFray
Sweden13 Posts
| ||
|
ZerphyR
Slovenia275 Posts
On April 11 2012 03:43 pPingu wrote: Still waiting for a pro to say that parting wouldn't have won this According to this screenshot http://i.imgur.com/IuHuA.jpg, mkp has 21 supply in reprod, and just enough money to make 5 more marauders, still not enough to reach parting supply. You assume that parting will suicide his whole army and not produce anything, so mkp will be able to defend And no, mkp didn't have the better economy, in fact parting had it http://i.imgur.com/jugZC.jpg Mkp had no advantage over parting, parting had the better economy, the better army, he still had hts alive while mkp had no more tech units, and they had about the same in upgrades (something like 3/3 and 3/1(2)/3 iirc) He had 5 or 6 orbitals his 5th finishe imagine 10 mules in this situation  | ||
|
ZerphyR
Slovenia275 Posts
On April 11 2012 03:44 cTrFray wrote: Zerphyr i think marineking is the best player in the world and parting is not but marineking lost that is fact prime most feel awful and creator and byon was to easy to snipe this is what i mean when I say you guys dont under stand anything about team games! lol, what ar u some kind of top level coach, cus im just a high masters terran. Who wached GSTL for over a year now. ;P | ||
|
NOOBALOPSE
Canada802 Posts
On April 11 2012 02:01 RenSC2 wrote: I'm generally okay with either decision. Without having the replay in front of me, it's tough to say exactly what the game state was. Parting clearly had an advantage and if he plays it right, he'll get the win. However, we've seen many players overextend in that sort of situation and lose the game. One round of well-microed MKP units could have potentially wiped an overextended army and turned the game back in MKP's favor. It just stinks that MKP was almost eliminated, but then got the re-game and was able to sweep the rest so that decision to re-game ended up being so critical. I think what should have happened, was that it becomes a BO3 with partinG up 1 game... I really think PartinG had won at that point. Damn you GSTL!! EDIT: Damn you blizzard for no LAN | ||
pPingu
Switzerland2881 Posts
On April 11 2012 03:49 ZerphyR wrote: He had 5 or 6 orbitals his 5th finishe imagine 10 mules in this situation Protoss are supposed to keep up with economy with terrans with same amount of bases, counting mules, you suppose that mkp had 2 mules ready in each of his orbitals while he could have already used all of them, what's important is the economy he had during the reproduction On April 11 2012 03:52 ZerphyR wrote: lol, what ar u some kind of top level coach, cus im just a high masters terran. Who wached GSTL for over a year now. ;P I think they might be a bit higher that high master and don't agree with you, also might have a bit more experience in GSTL  http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/IPL4/Day2/504_05011_t.jpg | ||
|
cTrFray
Sweden13 Posts
| ||
|
Ravar
United States445 Posts
On April 11 2012 03:58 cTrFray wrote: yeha but because ur a MKP fanboy like the rest of this dumb comuntiy cant see the whole sitation again im just a platinum zerg who have played the game for 2 months but i still can read the situation better then 90 procent of the comuntiy because im not blinded by the fanboyism like the rest of you by the way every thing i said before is true and none of you can say anything that indicates that my statements are wrong!!!!!! You sound like a 12 year old talking about music. | ||
|
ZerphyR
Slovenia275 Posts
On April 11 2012 03:56 pPingu wrote: Protoss are supposed to keep up with economy with terrans with same amount of bases, counting mules, you suppose that mkp had 2 mules ready in each of his orbitals while he could have already used all of them, what's important is the economy he had during the reproduction I think they might be a bit higher that high master and don't agree with you, also might have a bit more experience in GSTL http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/IPL4/Day2/504_05011_t.jpg Yeah they are, and also they made the right choise :D It was still anyones game. | ||
|
ZerphyR
Slovenia275 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:01 Ravar wrote: You sound like a 12 year old talking about music. What if ur wrong and the 90% percent are right, cuz that seems logical to me. | ||
|
fezvez
France2903 Posts
Because, as unlikely as it seems, there are incredible comebacks in SC2 Look at White-Ra vs MMA game at 10:45 | ||
|
Leetley
1794 Posts
Damn you blizzard for no LAN Even if it was a hardware failure, it could've been Bnet 0.2 aswell. | ||
|
Fryioq
United States16 Posts
I've heard that maybe in such a case where someone is ahead and not 100% going to win, they change it to a Bo3 with the better looking person one game up? Im not sure, but a new rule has to be put in place to deal with these situations. Either some definition of what "100% going to win" is or Some alternate set up where perhaps a Bo3 or something similar is held where the person with the advantage has a game already? Otherwise re-game seems the correct position, given the rules. | ||
|
ProxyKnoxy
United Kingdom2572 Posts
Come on guys, lets be serious. Parting had that EASILY. | ||
|
Wampaibist
United States476 Posts
| ||
|
refmac_cys.cys
United States166 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:48 Wampaibist wrote: I'm a bit torn. I think the correct option should have been a best of three with parting start a game up. But who am i to make calls You could do something like that in an individual tournament, but in a Winner's League type Team League, that gives whoever wins the Bo3 a bit of a disadvantage. I, honestly, would like to see something like what TL did during TSL with the Nightend v. Boxer game. Have a panel of pros ready to look at the game for a bit, and then decide from there whether it would be a regame or a win for Parting. | ||
|
Akash1223
United States91 Posts
Imo, the game from TSL3 where Boxer was given the win over Nightend was a less clear situation than this. | ||
|
naimina
17 Posts
| ||
|
Ollie
United States142 Posts
| ||
|
Devilldog
United States66 Posts
| ||
|
Jugan
United States1513 Posts
| ||
| ||
