Or they should have thrown out both Parting and MKP and made the teams re-pick. I mean it's about seeing which is the best team and not the best player anyways.... Who's to say if Parting would have won that he wouldn't have went on to beat everyone else? I say either a BO3 with Parting up 1 game or throw both players out would have been a good call.

9incher

2 Posts

April 16 2012 03:15 GMT

#224

wow, did anyone see the come back MKP did against Oz in the first game of the MLG prizefights?

MKP's comebacks are insane...

NGeX

Canada72 Posts

April 16 2012 08:23 GMT

#225

A regame was the right call. If a player dc's a regame, no matter how ahead one player was from the other, is the most logical solution rather than just giving someone a win. Parting could have easily made a series of errors that could have cost him that game hadn't he dc'd. It's unlikely, but possible. I believe GSTL was correct to call a regame.

Monsen

Germany2516 Posts

April 16 2012 09:08 GMT

#226

Poll needs a "Fu Blizzard giev LAN" option. There was no just call to be made there and Blizzard is responsible for creating the situation.

blackbrrd

Norway477 Posts

April 16 2012 12:03 GMT

#227

I think they should have given Parting the win, but at the same time I can't fault Gom for doing a rematch.

The best solution would have been to restart the game from the replay which is a feature I hope Blizzard will implement into Starcraft 2.

WeavingHarp9

Sweden22 Posts

April 16 2012 13:09 GMT

#228

I think that at one point into a game they need to completely remove the remake option, like here for example its +25minutes long, oh so many other sports and games if something similar happened the player that can't continue the game would get the loss.
I still think MKP had a chance of winning this game, there have been bigger turnarounds in games but I still think the win should have gone to Parting because of the length of the game.

Klaent

Sweden362 Posts

April 16 2012 18:39 GMT

#229

I understand the call, MKP probably wasent completly out of the game. But Parting got robbed anyway, 95% sure the game was over.

NotSorry

United States5951 Posts

April 16 2012 21:17 GMT

#230

On April 11 2012 03:29 ZerphyR wrote:
MKP's production was about to pop in a matter of seconds, and he can beat the zealots w 8 marauders and 16 marines more. Als he had a better economy so it was still anyones game :D

MKP's main productions were fine, Parting was attacking the 3 extra raxs MKP made towards the middle of the map, the rest of his production was safe, and Parting whole remaining army were red/orange hp and would have been cleaned up quickly with Partings reinforcements on the other side of the map and not enough income to even do a full wave.

DidYuhim

Ukraine1901 Posts

April 17 2012 04:19 GMT

#231

On April 17 2012 06:17 NotSorry wrote:

Show nested quote +

Wow, nice joke. It's sort of funny how fanbois make more and more ridiculous assumptions every time they add another post.

Lumi

United States1610 Posts

April 17 2012 08:25 GMT

#232

The problem with this poll is that you have bronze to diamond players weighing in for the majority of it. And those kiddos love to be MKP fanboys because they just spary their shorts for a level of micro that was pretty standard among WC3 Pros. Every single masters player I've talked to about this is fully confident that the game was over, in Partings favor. Anyone looking at the screenshots of the chart for how things were at the end of the game SHOULD be able to tell that it was over. VERY over.

The correct decision would have been made, if it were made by players who know what's going on, instead of, for god only knows what reason, people that clearly did not. Just like this poll

hillman

United States162 Posts

April 17 2012 14:37 GMT

#233

I do find the MKP fanboys annoying...its hard not to picture them on the side of Prime here, saying that a rematch was the correct response, MKP could have won, etc..... Parting seemingly had him in a bad position that would have been tough to recover from and take the win.

The real loser here are the fans and esports in general because of blizzards reluctance to allow LAN. Of course, they are worried about pirates being able to play this on LAN or something and thus pirates bring the whole community down. What other reason could there be for Blizzard's actions?

KookyMonster

United States309 Posts

April 18 2012 01:23 GMT

#234

MKP had a chance to comeback. However, Parting was pretty far ahead (from what I saw) and that is why the rematch is even an issue. LAN play would be nice, but we shouldn't hold our breath.

DoubleDare

Canada43 Posts

April 18 2012 01:35 GMT

#235

Definitely think parting should've been given that game.

Objectively I think pPingu's post pretty much sums up that parting clearly was ahead, and while it was possible for MKP to have taken it, that was highly unlikely. I also feel like Parting played better in that game than MKP, but I am personally biased as a P player.

Teodice

Sweden600 Posts

April 18 2012 04:33 GMT

#236

I guess its all about setting a standard. Since no resume function exist I guess calling it a regame was the best choice. BUT I think that it´s sad since MKP simply would´ve lost the game.

Xenocryst

United States519 Posts

April 18 2012 08:40 GMT

#237

WHY NO LANNNNN!!!!!!!

(((((

GefsTee

Germany1 Post

April 18 2012 08:43 GMT

#238

On April 16 2012 18:08 Monsen wrote:
Poll needs a "Fu Blizzard giev LAN" option. There was no just call to be made there and Blizzard is responsible for creating the situation.

signed

Danglars

United States11124 Posts

April 18 2012 09:16 GMT

#239

Definately Parting's game. The regame was a terrible decision.

lifecanwait

96 Posts

May 02 2012 23:17 GMT

#240

I have seen this game before, and it was really epic.

Anyone knows where to find it now? As far as I know, its not uploaded on GOMTV bec. of cancellation. IPL stream maybe?