[N] Uninspired Mafia - Page 25

On May 02 2019 18:47 Holyflare wrote:
Why is anything on me if we lose? Lol what a shit point. Everyone is an independent responsible for their own actions.

My reads being awful is not going to convince anyone of anything to do with my alignment. If you would actually spend the time attacking your mafia reads as much as you did defending your town reads with narratives and figures maybe you'd figure that out.

On May 02 2019 07:14 Holyflare wrote:

















This guy is suspect numero uno. Anybody that uses the phrase "that's scummy regardless of Jock's alignment" is a guy that has tmi and makes it want to look like he's weighing up his options.

Let us also not forget that he agreed with all the points on Jock, fought against rayn that jock looked scummy, said rayn was scummy for not trying to save his town read and then dropped it all to try and shenanigan with rayn.

On May 02 2019 04:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Because he is completely useless and it makes about 70% of the game actually play the game and not just pile their votes on random lurkers and do nothing else.

Look if youre town please try to understand that its not necessarily scummy to not play the way you want people to. If i said what i said maybe 5 years ago it probs would make me mafia but i am over trying to convince everyone and everything about that i am right. I play this game for my own amusement nowdays because of reasons, i dont care what people think of me and i only care about if i am right or not and say what i think into the thread. I try to emulate that as much as possible when i am mafia but as mafia i actually have a team and a plan and i also try to execute it. It shows at least to some people, it always does.

So idc, if you think i am scummy regardless of jocks alignment maybe you should try get me lynched for whatever on D2. It's gonna be almost as bad as this day pahse.

Let us also not forget that Pandain wanted to lynch rels (based on incorrect meta that was highlighted several times already) despite a wagon building on Jock, his also scum read, to make rels active again. Then when that didn't take off, Pandain, master of misdirection, avoided joining the jock wagon (his scum read) again for terrible shenanigans.

Then when Jock, his scum read, flipped town (after pandain said he's probably town for no discernable reason why arguing that he was still mafia) Pandain decides to call the entire wagon on Jock, his scum read, and also maybe town read, mafia.

No thanks. You mafia mate. Lynch Pandain when I'm gone.

On May 02 2019 18:50 Holyflare wrote:
To everyone else thinking bugs is town just look at where he spends his time when in thread:

Pointless already answered questions.

Calling cases bad but then not addressing the case and instead writing walls of text on defending a town read Pandain instead.

Even with Jock it was asking about reading the guide and then complaining about the Jock meta being wrong after the fact.

On May 02 2019 03:18 Pandain wrote:
I mean he could be town perhaps even likely. Im not even voting him. But it's day 1 so do what you do

On May 02 2019 19:07 wherebugsgo wrote:


are you serious

I've avoided confronting you because I didn't want to pollute the thread, but if you're town, you need to be told this as honestly you're so arrogant, ESPECIALLY when you're wrong. I pointed out that I disagreed with your meta case on Jock right at the beginning and you chose to tell me I don't know how to read. I responded reasonably and instead of entertaining the thought that you could be wrong, you decided to make the environment completely hostile.

Now you call me scum because I disagree with you and provide reasons for my town reads.

Literally the only acceptable reason for you to play like this is if you are scum.

On May 02 2019 19:18 Holyflare wrote:


That looks like a town read to me, not even a hedge.

I stand by the comment that you were unable to see the differences, it's laughable since you've spent more time defending pandain in the same way I attacked jock than even checking up on Jock. The meta was not wrong in the slightest, he played differently to both his previous games. I just attributed that to being mafia. It was wrong, big deal.

Similarly, you've just done the EXACT same defending Pandain. I don't agree with it, in fact it looks like a scummy narrative. I think you're mafia for it because you've spent more time doing that than responding to the actual case in the first place. You then asked me a pointless question about 3 people I've largely already even talked about, which shows you just didn't care about reading me.

You simultaneously say I'm going to ruin the game because if I die people will sheep me but also call me mafia. But then attack me in a way that only makes sense if you know I'm town. It's my literal job as mafia to shit up a thread and make it hostile and out talk people but at every step it's the old fake hedge from you.

On May 02 2019 18:35 Holyflare wrote:


What a pointless trivial question which I've addressed already. Mz has posted shit all, could be anything. Vivax has done nothing to sway me one way or the other and didn't post anything I hated yet. BC has only made posts I've agreed with.

Rayn I can't believe you fell for my posts last night. Reread them as if I'm talking about actual insects :D

I will lynch bugs with you.

On May 02 2019 19:37 wherebugsgo wrote:


Rayn is this scum HF being fake aggressive or town HF who thinks he's posted something but actually hasn't?

I ask him about MZ, Vivax, and BC.

1. Up until this post, MZ is not at all mentioned in HF's filter. Here, HF doesn't take a stance.
2. HF did say the same thing about Vivax earlier, so sure, fine. But again, no stance.
3. "BC only made posts I've agreed with" no direct interaction besides that first weird mistake post HF had, we can come to this conclusion I suppose based on the fact that BC and HF both voted Jock but why should vote alignment matter in reading BC?

So why does HF say this is a pointless question when the only thing that HF actually said was #2?

On May 02 2019 19:56 Holyflare wrote:



1. What has mz done since that required me to take a stance on him? Like I said, he's done shit all. Also I quite categorically do mention him in my filter. I ask him when he's going to stop fannying around not voting Jock, which now Jock has flipped town makes him look more suspicious. Regardless, I don't have enough information because he just hasn't posted enough. If anyone says they can form an opinion on him they're either lying or wrong.

2. Yup.

3. What has BC posted since that would make me change my mind? If you think it's anything to do with voting alignment or whatever nonsense then ok but it's clearly not and I've highlighted that in my post. If someone says stuff I am thinking before I've posted it when reading the thread there's a strong chance we're on the same wavelength and are the samw alignment.

That's a pretty basic tenet of mafia.


Either way, you've only just now blatantly gone through my filter to check these things and then point it out after the fact. You've asked me the question before you even knew whether I had answered them. So this question WAS largely pointless because:

A) you didn't know if I had already talked about them

B) you didn't actually care about the response because you've gained nothing from it other than showing your true colours

1. What has mz done since that required me to take a stance on him? Like I said, he's done shit all. Also I quite categorically do mention him in my filter. I ask him when he's going to stop fannying around not voting Jock, which now Jock has flipped town makes him look more suspicious. Regardless, I don't have enough information because he just hasn't posted enough. If anyone says they can form an opinion on him they're either lying or wrong.

On May 02 2019 20:21 Holyflare wrote:
Then I will leave you in disbelief. All the evidence is here for everyone to look at themselves now

Yes, I do filter people before I ask them questions because otherwise it is pointless.