EPTIt's a gamble. If we lynch scum today we effectively buy an extra day. But if we guess wrong we lose. I'm not sure im comfortable lynching today, despite how bad TW looks as a whole
[M][N] I'm a cop you idiot mafia --- the reboot - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
It's a gamble. If we lynch scum today we effectively buy an extra day. But if we guess wrong we lose. I'm not sure im comfortable lynching today, despite how bad TW looks as a whole | ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
On December 08 2016 18:52 ExO_ wrote: I'm asking you to explain why you stopped town tunneling me. Just announcing it serves no purpose for town. It doesn't help us in any way. What town motivation do you have for just announcing it without explaining Announcing it serves the purpose that people don't start acting all surprised and worked up when they perceive me 'suddenly' get all up in your face. Cuz, y'know, some folks can't spot hints or read between the lines. Gotta spell it all out. Not explaining it now has a town motivation of denying information to scum. I don't see a need to explain everything now and give scum time to ponder over it. Town doesn't need my full explanation today (game D1, not real time), but will have it by tomorrow (that is to say, D2.) when it matters. --- On December 08 2016 19:32 ExO_ wrote: I largely agree with your reasoning on TW. But a no lynch is our safest play. I don't like the idea of the game being over if we're wrong, when we can wait for a day, get more information, and hopefully cop stays alive and really makes it easier. It's a gamble. If we lynch scum today we effectively buy an extra day. But if we guess wrong we lose. I'm not sure im comfortable lynching today, despite how bad TW looks as a whole You do you. I'm pretty much done with TW for now unless we get some earth-shattering revelation. Lynch him today failing which continue lynching him tomorrow. You "largely agree with [my] reasoning", so what part do you not agree with? Besides the bit about the gamble. --- Anyhow, we don't have time to muck about. Can't afford to wait for one scum to flip before looking for others. Should be obvious that I'm looking at you next ExO; still in the midst of diving your filter atm. Gotta take a break for dinner and brief relax but when I get back, watch out! | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
My reads right now are this: cakepie - strong town-lean based on content, and #127 was a town post Chairman Ray - scum-lean: his whole filter is him making a big deal out of the tw and my plans and churning it. He makes no comment on cakepie, ExO, H1 at all, and his comments on tw and I are limited to that aspect he keeps bringing back. ExO - weak scum-lean - posts are not impactful, and I disagree with cakepie on the post he said read town. In that post, he stated the obvious that town is in a bad spot and talked mechanics about why cop should claim, and that is his biggest post atm which is worrysome. However, I liked 129 and 153. TW - lean-scum: He has some later posts I haven't commented on that make me think he is befriending me, he is playing reactively rather than proactively, and he isn't sharing his thoughts on other players other than stating if they are active or not. I'm not entirely convinced by cakepie's case on him though. H1 - Null: Haven't read that guy yet. I've more scum-reads than town-reads, and that's why I am not confident in placing my vote today. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
I have explained my ExO townread and it's a fucking good reason that you all should sleep me for. doing the math I multiplied five-sevenths by five-sixths, because I forgot that scum won't kill themselves. and if one more punk decides to vote me scum can and will hammer without warning. we are in MyLo, aka lose the game if you're wrong mode. are you really so confident in yourself because you wrote more words than me that you would risk this. for the love of god, don't be stupid | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
I want Koshi back | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
| ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
I'm not right because I wrote a WoT. It's because you've been useless and + Show Spoiler + I don't or want to or have the time to give some highly explained reasons doing the math I multiplied five-sevenths by five-sixths, because I forgot that scum won't kill themselves. There's other things you forgot or got wrong, but this at least settles for me where 25 and 42 came from and establishes for me never to listen to you regarding probabilities because you're terrible at it. On December 09 2016 00:32 Tumblewood wrote: and if one more punk decides to vote me scum can and will hammer without warning. we are in MyLo, aka lose the game if you're wrong mode. are you really so confident in yourself because you wrote more words than me that you would risk this. for the love of god, don't be stupid Partially correct reaction. You're pleading for town?cakepie to stop being stupid and worried that one fool plus two scum will make 4. I can't find that one fool, though. But you know what, I'll upgrade you to correct on account of panic and such. Now that I have your attention, try being a bit more useful and I'll reevaluate you on your contribution. | ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
On December 09 2016 00:46 Tumblewood wrote: speaking of Koshi, cakepie's performance in this game really reminds me of Koshi in R1H mafia.tunneled on me all game with a bad but extensively written case and refused to back down, and also won. Koshi was mafia that game btw You're trying to apply Koshi meta on me. That's ... disingenuous. | ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
| ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
getting some red flags from him because a) he only focuses on me and NU b) he posts as if it is a given that NU and I are scum, even from his third or fourth post of the game there's a whole game out there, and ray is content to ignore it. maybe normal with someone heavily tunneled, but it's been that way all game. ray what do you think of 1der, ExO, and cakepie? | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On December 09 2016 01:14 cakepie wrote: You're trying to apply Koshi meta on me. That's ... disingenuous. fair point, except the part where it's disingenuous. | ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
On December 09 2016 01:13 cakepie wrote: nvm all error accounted for. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On December 09 2016 01:27 Tumblewood wrote: fair point, except the part where it's disingenuous. you're taking one persons meta and applying it to another person. Thats fucking ludicrous. I'm <-> this close to just putting a vote on you to see if scum mylo victory, but I wont. ##vote: No Lynch My previous list stands. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
| ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
how do I convince people I'm right in a town where no one plays like me or has played with me (except NU, once) | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
| ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
On December 09 2016 01:27 Tumblewood wrote: fair point, except the part where it's disingenuous. Right, I'm suppose to give you a fair chance here so maybe "disingenuous" isn't the word I'm looking for. But yeah #166 still doesn't earn you any points. #170 is a start. I've tried to engage Ray without much luck though. He didn't take me up on "NU+TW are not both scum". Not sure how much better you'd fare. On December 09 2016 01:39 Tumblewood wrote: I have figured out (probably) both the scum out of three people wow, do tell. (Sorry bud, it ain't me) | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
| ||
|
cakepie
985 Posts
On December 09 2016 01:40 Tumblewood wrote: how do I convince people I'm right in a town where no one plays like me or has played with me (except NU, once) You don't "convince people [you're] right". Town finds each other by finding things they agree on because they see something the same way, because they're coming from the same perspective. It's called consensus. For example, I don't fully agree on your ExO TR but I can agree with you that as we approach EoD1 Ray is starting to look strange and entering scum territory for being very one-track-minded on scumming two players together all of D1. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On December 09 2016 01:46 Tumblewood wrote: all scumhunting is anyway is taking someone's posting, comparing it to their meta, and comparing it to the "general meta" of how scum overall tend to act. I don't think it's disingenuous to say "the last time I saw someone act like this, they were scum". that's a pretty normal thought process to me I agree with TW here. cakepie, I think you're giving TW too much credit for 170 + Show Spoiler + On December 09 2016 01:24 Tumblewood wrote: just looked at ray's filter getting some red flags from him because a) he only focuses on me and NU b) he posts as if it is a given that NU and I are scum, even from his third or fourth post of the game there's a whole game out there, and ray is content to ignore it. maybe normal with someone heavily tunneled, but it's been that way all game. ray what do you think of 1der, ExO, and cakepie? On December 08 2016 23:25 NeverUnlucky wrote: I'm leaving for school soon, I'll be back in aout 3 hours and respond to cakepie and hopefully make the comments I wanted to make. My reads right now are this: cakepie - strong town-lean based on content, and #127 was a town post Chairman Ray - scum-lean: his whole filter is him making a big deal out of the tw and my plans and churning it. He makes no comment on cakepie, ExO, H1 at all, and his comments on tw and I are limited to that aspect he keeps bringing back. ExO - weak scum-lean - posts are not impactful, and I disagree with cakepie on the post he said read town. In that post, he stated the obvious that town is in a bad spot and talked mechanics about why cop should claim, and that is his biggest post atm which is worrysome. However, I liked 129 and 153. TW - lean-scum: He has some later posts I haven't commented on that make me think he is befriending me, he is playing reactively rather than proactively, and he isn't sharing his thoughts on other players other than stating if they are active or not. I'm not entirely convinced by cakepie's case on him though. H1 - Null: Haven't read that guy yet. I've more scum-reads than town-reads, and that's why I am not confident in placing my vote today. On December 08 2016 11:00 NeverUnlucky wrote: They were not 'game math' posts as you put it. We were arguing why cop/medic should claim USING 'math' to demonstrate it. Also, you're hardly pushing either of us. You shared your thoughts on me and TW discussing game mechanics, but other than asking us why we town-leaned each other, you never engaged in a conversation with either of us to push us. That, and your whole contribution this game is about me and TW. So. What is your take on ExO and cakepie? | ||
| ||
