EPTOn October 04 2016 22:59 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Calling a vote a pressure vote kills its intent.
Do you have actual reads?
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2016 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
I said my point already.
Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him.
On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:
That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant.
And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate.
Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end.
Spit it out or piss off.
On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:
Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched.
On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope.
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope.
Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched.
That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant.
And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate.
On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment?
On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:
I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts.
On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:
In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist
On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:
Can you explain why you are doing it as town?
I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little.
So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot"
You're welcome for this incisive analysis.
On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:
Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum?
On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING.
You stated "Calix is scummy"
You voted for Superbia.
You did not state a scum-read on Superbia.
Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote?
If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read?
On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING.
You stated "Calix is scummy"
You voted for Superbia.
You did not state a scum-read on Superbia.
Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote?
If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read?
Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum?
Can you explain why you are doing it as town?
I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little.
So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot"
You're welcome for this incisive analysis.
In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist
I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts.
Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment?
Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end.
Spit it out or piss off.
I said my point already.
Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him.
Calling a vote a pressure vote kills its intent.
Do you have actual reads?
Intent over already.
I think koshi has been skating by on pithy little comments.
I seem to remember other people promising shit but not delivering. I think it's stutters so he's leaning scum. Pretty sure Marv and Palmar are town. They don't give enough of a shit.
