|
|
|
I really don't like what calix is trying to push here. Sure what nu is doing is super bad play and from first glance it looks scummy but it's not actually scummy. Why would scum post that he can be modconfirmed town? That makes 0 sense.
And now she's trying to push some stupid Lynch based on content but no one has done shit anyway. Fake activity
|
All of you need to stay up man. Useless pieces of American timezone shits
|
She wants to Lynch you and repeatedly calls your play scummy, I don't see how I can read that as anything else
|
NU, is calix mafia?
##vote superbia
Calix the fake activity is refering to you being mafia and just pushing shit for the sake of creating posts.
Nu, can you explain why stutters is mafia?
|
Lol wtf you guys played like less than 10 games together and profess to be able to read each other one post into the game, come on man.
Calix that's really soft. Why can't I vote for superbia? Am I gonna lose my vote? No. Am I free to vote again? Yes.
So why is my vote even alignment indicative when there are still more than 24 hours to Lynch?
I would like to hear this.
|
Lol what the fuck.
Can you tell me what reads you got from the nu push and the people that responded calix?
|
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
|
On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1.
Dude what the fuck. So you think that finding mafia isn't your first priority but instead, staying alive is your first priority? Full of shit
|
On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read?
Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum?
|
On October 04 2016 22:18 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:16 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1. Dude what the fuck. So you think that finding mafia isn't your first priority but instead, staying alive is your first priority? Full of shit Wow you caught me. That is 100% the exact reason I want to stay on the sidelines.
I'm still not sure how staying on the sidelines is conductive to you finding scum, pls explain.
|
On October 04 2016 22:21 Calix wrote:
You're not even voting for Superbia. I just checked the vote thread.
So what the fuck are you doing?
Why the fuck do I need to vote in the vote thread???
|
On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read.
Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind.
|
On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis.
In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist
|
On October 04 2016 22:28 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:25 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read. Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind. I have studied them thoroughly and have conclusively concluded that they are not only incredibly townie, they are the key to town winning this game.
Explain
|
On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope.
Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched.
|
On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts.
Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment?
|
On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off.
I said my point already.
Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him.
|
I really don't understand why you expect me to pour all my thoughts out into the game.
Is it not obvious that when I vote for someone it's because I think they are scummy?
So I have to say "xx is scummy vote xx" before voting? That's ludicrous.
And it says absolutely nothing about my alignment. So far in this game you have proceed with 2 ridiculous pushes.
|
On October 04 2016 22:57 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off. I said my point already. Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him. If you're saying that you don't give a fuck about other people voting for Superbia and if you haven't given any compelling arguments for mafia!Superbia then where is the pressure? You just randomly 'voted' for Superbia out of nowhere and didn't explain your reasoning for multiple posts. You're really confusing me tbh.
What I'm saying is that when I want to actually get people to vote for and Lynch superbia, I will vote in the voting thread and try to convince people.
I think the vote was enough pressure, superbia came in after that. I'm not too much of a fan of his posts so far but since he promised actual activity, I'm gonna wait in anticipation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
