On December 31 2015 06:52 scott31337 wrote:
Giygas ain't happening bud, so.
Giygas ain't happening bud, so.
ANY could happen. Not Fidei with Onegu voting him
I'm sorry, I did my best to not have you lynched but there are things I cannot comply :/
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 31 2015 06:52 scott31337 wrote: Giygas ain't happening bud, so. ANY could happen. Not Fidei with Onegu voting him I'm sorry, I did my best to not have you lynched but there are things I cannot comply :/ | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 31 2015 07:06 NocturneMage wrote: I need to reassess everyone on the scott wagon it looks like. Regarding Irish, honestly, nothing is jumping out right now, and Irish's continued reasoning for scumming Scott, honestly I can't argue that because Irish did have a reason to town Onegu even though I'm not sure I fully agreed with it, I don't see that it could make him scum. The early voting makes him more townie and I didn't get a chance to fully look through Noon today which was his other willing vote. I know someone pinged me out earlier for putting Noon in the lynch list but that was because he was going after KMatt for white knighting or something and then didn't follow up at the time I looked at him. I am curious to see where people are calling Irish tryhard scum. He really believed in the case on Scott. So you don't think he is scummy? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 09:23 NocturneMage wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:29 Irishbound wrote: I can already tell my complete lack of meta or understanding of what happend in prior games you guys have played together is going to make it difficult to scumhunt and follow some conversations. Know it's a weak thing but I'm leaning town on Noonian already, think scum would be less likely to be so brazen to make #62 and like his instant "That's anti-town to do" reaction towards Glowings statement. I understand that we're meant to be voting in a separate thread to make it easier for the mod to tally up votes but I'd appreciate if everyone also posted here with their vote -- it'll make following the game and reading into context behind votes much easier than attempting to line up timestamps of when people voted in comparison to their thoughts/posts in here. @Glowing - Who is this Kush you're voting? Alright so starting off, I'm not sure I agree with this read and some of this boils down to the definition of anti-town. Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:04 nooniansoong wrote: On December 29 2015 07:02 GlowingBear wrote: ![]() it's so anti-town to claim vt The use of "anti-town" here could be coming from either alignment, when anti-town is considered to mean not just scummy, but possibly also from town not acting in the best interest of town. Any VT (when referencing GB's comment) saying "I wish I was blue" can be considered anti-town because one can make the argument that claiming VT narrows down the field for mafia to find who the blue(s) are. So this can be considered anti-town (not in the best interest) even if the comment is coming from town. To this end, and seeing that Irishbound is an experienced mafia player, it's safe to say this comment should not have warranted the town read that he gave him. To me, this read should have been null at best, as I feel a comment like this could come from either alignment. On this alone, that's a scumlean, but I'll continue through the rest of the thread. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 31 2015 23:17 nooniansoong wrote: @GB if you think the scumslip is a legitimate why do you have a weak townread on shape? I don't believe in scumslips, I've quoted that because I find hard to believe Onegu would see a slip from fidei but wouldn't from Shapelog. To add to that, he said "then shape is Mafia too" but just forgot about that and now he is only scum reading me and Fidei | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 31 2015 23:45 nooniansoong wrote: GB where did he say "then shape is mafia too" he said he doesn't read shape. Do you think he's lying? I can understand him not reading shape. ONEGU is shape mafia too due to the scumslip? Yes I beliebe he is lying. it's one of the first posts in the game. He can decide to not read him after some time but I doubt he didn't read the very first posts of everyone if he really started to read the thread. Anyway, after I quoted it, Onegu just called the guy Mafia but quickly forgets about him | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 31 2015 23:55 nooniansoong wrote: ok gb i found it. he says "then shape scumslipped too" but he doesn't say if he thinks shape is mafia or not. Kush ROFL if someone says "HE SCUM SLIPPED TOOL they are calling the guy Mafia. LMAO are you high right now? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 01 2016 00:11 nooniansoong wrote: Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 23:58 GlowingBear wrote: On December 31 2015 23:55 nooniansoong wrote: ok gb i found it. he says "then shape scumslipped too" but he doesn't say if he thinks shape is mafia or not. Kush ROFL if someone says "HE SCUM SLIPPED TOOL they are calling the guy Mafia. LMAO are you high right now? I haven't smoked weed for several months now. My job drug tests so I had to quit. Weed is magical but it is also very addictive for me. In some ways I'm glad I stopped, but I still miss it. Now I just drink a lot instead. Shape is known to spam, so he could have chosen to ignore shape before reading his first posts. Although I think a more townie approach would be to read shape until a townread could be formed, and only then start ignoring him. I am interested in how Onegu clarifies his feelings towards Shape, given the scumslip. Anything can be said right now. He can find any excuse. I won't trust any, so whatever. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
![]() | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 01 2016 02:01 Onegu wrote: also shape wasnt talking about me It doesn't matter, he still worded "mislynch", implying I was town (under your POV) | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 01 2016 02:01 Onegu wrote: also shape wasnt talking about me The fact that you used THIS defence just makes me feel more confident in this scum read on you. Keep digging your grave ![]() | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Where's the night kill? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 01 2016 13:33 Shapelog wrote: Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 04:25 Irishbound wrote: On December 31 2015 04:21 GlowingBear wrote: Kush and fidei are probably town It should be clear that Kmatt is Mafia right now So you think Onegu is town? Mderg also? Yes, I've got a town read on Onegus reaction towards Fideis post, it's not a particularly strong one but not even remotely interested in lynching there. I do have a very strong town read on Mderg, his reads and thoughts mirror mine when catching up quite often, I can understand his reasoning behind almost all of his reads, I'd almost bet the entire game on him being town. Want to make an agreement Glowing? We lynch Scott today, if he's mafia like I expect you let me tell you where to put your vote tomorrow, if he flips town you can tell me where to place mine. Page 28. This is either a big ass mafia slip (which btw, mderg copied his scum slip from me! look at the filter its their.) Or one huge town tell So it is NAI, basically | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 15:09 Kmatt wrote: Alright this time for real. Let me address some of the concerns following my last-second vote switch Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 02:24 GlowingBear wrote: This is what I don't like on Kmatt. He says I'm fishy but keeps backtracking on it. It just feels like he is trying to give an opinion while not really relying on it. Am I fishy or not? What does fishy means? Mafia? If so, why not just saying I'm scummy and going against it? Prior to Wednesday morning I was still undecided. However that morning I re-read the filter again and saw some stuff I didn't like. Firstly, the townread on Irish, while later found to be true, didn't have any real ground to it. Irish makes a townread on Kush that he himself says is weak (from a single day 1 post mind you). Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 08:25 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 08:14 mderg wrote: On December 29 2015 08:07 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 07:29 Irishbound wrote: I can already tell my complete lack of meta or understanding of what happend in prior games you guys have played together is going to make it difficult to scumhunt and follow some conversations. Know it's a weak thing but I'm leaning town on Noonian already, think scum would be less likely to be so brazen to make #62 and like his instant "That's anti-town to do" reaction towards Glowings statement. I understand that we're meant to be voting in a separate thread to make it easier for the mod to tally up votes but I'd appreciate if everyone also posted here with their vote -- it'll make following the game and reading into context behind votes much easier than attempting to line up timestamps of when people voted in comparison to their thoughts/posts in here. @Glowing - Who is this Kush you're voting? You're the quickest townread I have ever had! Hi! Welcome to the forums! Kush is nooniasoong. This account he is using is actually a smurf. Every time I talk about kush, I am talking about nooniasoong. Don't worry with meta. I think most of us in this thread doesn't use it. But we may talk about past games. It won't take much part of the game, so you can relax How did you get a townread on him for that post? Pretty much sincere opening with him giving an opinion right away on what he likes. Sounds like someone who feels free to play the game without concern of how he looks. So he thinks the single opening post was "sincere", even though Irish even doubted his own credibility. Looks to me like he just gave that out at the first person he could read just so he could have a townread for everyone to see. The he just fullquotes Irish's next post to say he agrees and nothing else. Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 03:00 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 09:47 Irishbound wrote: @Kmatt - Thanks for your elaboration on your Glowing scum lean, I don't agree with it at all but I can at least understand it now. I think being "helpful" in that manner is more playstyle based combined with the being a newbie game and don't think it's an issue, if anything the phrasing behind his town read on me "You're the quickest town read I've ever had" actually came across as genuine and am leaning town on him at the moment. @Glowing - I don't make anything of NM's opening in #194 at all, is your "I like this opening" in an alignment indicative sense or just find it enjoyable? Kind of hard to tell from what you wrote. @NM - I am well aware of the definition of "Anti-Town", what I liked was the speed of Noons reaction towards Glowings comment (The difference between it being posted and his response was 1 minute) which fits more with a natural townie reaction towards the comment being "That's going to hurt us" one and while I don't doubt that it's fake-able for mafia to do that I just find that mafia are more likely to think through the post or it's consequences more there. Again it's not a strong town read but out of everything that had occurred at the time it's only town read I had. I like it like it's coming from town. His tone feels like carefree too. Then another townread on Shapelog for no explained reason. Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 03:14 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 11:40 Shapelog wrote: No you know what fuck it. I am going to just keep rereading the 2 pages and memorize it to the heart! Or pass out infront of the desktop. Which is why i am not laddering ![]() This makes you probably town And his explanation for that one is... Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 03:28 GlowingBear wrote: Because you could've just left and keep laddering. Instead, you've stayed here, wanting to play the game, anxious for more content to be posted. This kind of excited is something that usually comes from town and is rarely faked by Mafia I'm gonna take a Nap and keep catching up So someone's active in the thread on the first day. Groundbreaking analysis right here folks. Just like with Irish he declares the guy town out of the blue and follows up with "evidence" with made-up context. Then comes the scumread on me. Oh, now he's digging deep, ready to contribute to the most important discussion in the thread at the moment. Let's see what thread contributions he has with his declared lynch target. Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 07:39 GlowingBear wrote: Ok fully caught up I'm voting Kmatt because reasons ##Vote: Kmatt k Well just like with his other reads he pulls that from seemingly nowhere. At least everyone can see he's a real scumhunter, throwing out the dangerous vote! Stay tuned for the full scoop. Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 07:47 Shapelog wrote: On December 30 2015 07:39 GlowingBear wrote: Ok fully caught up I'm voting Kmatt because reasons ##Vote: Kmatt and people have red bumps on their genitalia for "reasons" Can u explain GB? Drumroll please... So still nothing. Note that now he's actually getting other people in the thread involved in this "discussion" about nothing. Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 30 2015 07:55 Shapelog wrote: Don't pull a onegu on me. Why do you think hes scummy. Before I answer: do you have any reads on him? Shapelog literally handed you the soapbox to voice your actual case that you actually have for everyone to hear and examine. Instead you turn the question back for him. Why would you need someone else to discuss this read? You already have one (or so we're told)! Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 09:22 GlowingBear wrote: I think Kmatt's filter has been wishy washy, that's why I voted him. I could quoting and explaining my rwas but I'm actually too lazy right now to put effort I'm also playing another game which from times to times keeps me from giving my full attention to this one So how many posts is he going to use before he starts contributing to the thread. He posted reads, asked questions with no real follow-up or conclusions, and now wants other people to discuss a case he himself refuses to acknowledge. Imagine if every post I quoted so far was never posted. How much information would we have missed? How much further from winning would we be? Oh right nowhere because he's not actually contributing anything. Surely he's not just making these posts to clog the thread and bait responses, right? That's so obviously scum behavior, so clearly Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 09:36 GlowingBear wrote: I usually delay explanation and post just votes and questions just to have people talking. If I answered you right at that moment I would destroy this premise. So I was just trying to have people talking about it for a longer time. No, that's actually exactly what he's doing. K. Moving on Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 11:20 GlowingBear wrote: On December 30 2015 10:42 NocturneMage wrote: GB, two that I recall. In Newbie 14, Scott was engaged with the thread, and very active and made strides to solve that game. You were mafia in that game, Fidei threw in 2:1 lylo. In my last newbie, he was town but not as engaged and scum Trfel pushed him to death day 1. I'm loathe to use meta so I would rather opt to flesh him out as much as I can in this current game. His scum games, he is not quite as active or does very little, but as I've never actually been in a game with him as scum, I'd rather just flesh him out. If you check most of his games, he is mainly inactive. Don't you think it is kinda early to consider him mafia? When did making early reads become a problem? For some reason you're suddenly hesitant to call Scott Mafia, even though NM never actually accused him of scum, just wanted to pressure him. But we'll come back to that. Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 14:57 GlowingBear wrote: On December 30 2015 12:33 NocturneMage wrote: I need to head to bed, but with where my head is, I think the lynch list needs to be somewhere in this: Noon/GB/Scott Further fleshing out: Scott/Fidei/GigyaS Last resort/policy lynch: Onegu For GigyaS there was one post that I felt was unlikely to come from scum, but considering where he's not been in thread for >24h now, getting a mindset read with all that has happened is I think pretty important with a few of the concerns brought up. The fact that I believe kush is likely to be town and that scott is impossible to know right now makes me want to lynch you very hard. Anyway I know I'm lacking contribution. I'll step up tomorrow. Alright so now you're threatening a lynch based on the fact that you have opposing reads. And by "reads", I mean you called Kush 'town'. Note that posts like this still aren't developing any claims, just showing off that he's totally scumhunting for real guys. At least he's become self-aware, that's good, right? Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 00:30 GlowingBear wrote: I did forget. I will be reading the thread in one hour from now, then I'll give inputs. Still, I think Scott isn't the lynch for today Irish, I will be answering you soon. So still no info other than that Scott isn't a lynch target. He just claimed that he was null (and therefore possibly scum) but now Scott is off the board. Of course there's no actual analysis or anything, just look at the shiny claim. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 02:24 GlowingBear wrote: This is what I don't like on Kmatt. He says I'm fishy but keeps backtracking on it. It just feels like he is trying to give an opinion while not really relying on it. Am I fishy or not? What does fishy means? Mafia? If so, why not just saying I'm scummy and going against it? Alright almost 19 hours later he finally has a reason for his vote. I'm indecisive on my read towards him and therefore am scum. Now while I don't agree with his logic (if I were scum I wouldn't have to doubt my reasons for wanting him dead, since I'd know he's a kill target anyway I don't even need a valid "reason". Sound familiar?), at least he finally posts something marginally substantial. He then uses five more posts to explain the same point that indecisiveness=scum. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:01 GlowingBear wrote: And now I think mderg is mafia, kush. Mderg and Onegu. Oh look two more scumreads! Again, no content, no explanation, just "hey these guys are scum". He's practically got this entire game figured out by now. At least he shares that much insight with us. Then TheCow decides to play and starts asking questions to garner information to analyze and develop a case. What does our hero do? + Show Spoiler + On December 31 2015 03:11 GlowingBear wrote: Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 12:07 TheCow wrote: This post is being written as of post 415. @Kmatt Before we proceed, I'd like to ask you three quick questions just to get a better understanding of you as a player. 1) How much experience do you have with the game Mafia? 2) How do you feel about this game in its current state? 3) In one sentence, describe yourself as a person. (not a question, but close enough ._.) @Irish On December 30 2015 11:25 Irishbound wrote: @TheCow - I'll need you to explain a few things for me; 1) Given that you're aware your secondary scum read has two votes on them and your initial one has none why didn't you vote Scott and ensure that a scum read of yours has a higher chance of getting lynched? 2) Can you explain your conflicted reads on myself and GB in some detail for me and 3) What makes you not trust your ability to read Fidelis and Onegu? 1) I did not and do not want to narrow my own and the threads field of vision by simply bandwagoning the leading wagon. Aside from that, Scott's activity level would waste the pressure of a vote -- much unlike Kmatt who is here now. 2) You, Irish, I had as topscum for a little while when I was catching up. Between that time and me catching up, you managed to redeem yourself in my eyes and became a void read. GB, I am conflicted because though they have been somewhat anti-town, they have not been overtly scummy -- or enough for a vote, at least. 3) Onegu looks like a player who is mislynch bait and without meta-experience, I do not feel comfortable making a definitive read without more evidence. For Fidelis, here is a quote from my notes: + Show Spoiler + [Fidea] seems to be the type of player I will scumread into oblivion regardless of their actual alignment. I have always had issues reading players like Fidea -- just their style and attitude doesn't mesh well with me. ![]() Oh an image macro. Information and analysis are for nerds anyway. Now we go back to the Onegu scumread. If you can even call it that. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:12 GlowingBear wrote: On December 31 2015 03:08 nooniansoong wrote: but onegu On December 31 2015 01:13 Onegu wrote: Kush is odd. Like he doesnt qualify for the onegu rule because he didnt call me scum. Onegu rule is I troll and post little day one and if you call me scum for it you are scum looking for a mislynch. But since kush says it is complete policy he is fine. What I do find kinda odd is kush is a very similar player to me. And last game when he was scum and people wanted to lynch him day one I was the one who said give him time. Yet this game he wants to lynch me? Why didnt he want to lynch me in the last game we just played. Doesnt make much since to me that he wants to do it this game but not last game. it would have been so easy for him to scumread me there are he didnt. He usually does this to get towncred. My very first game with him he did it as scum. He defended me when I was getting scumread. I actually have a good reason to call Onegu scum ![]() So he's meta-gaming from that one time Onegu made a similar post while being Mafia. Leak-proof case right here. Now TheCow comes back to share his ideas with the thread. How will GB contribute to finding answers? Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:14 GlowingBear wrote: On December 30 2015 12:32 TheCow wrote: This post is being written as of 425. === Regarding my early-game read on Irish. Irish's comment of scott "bandwagoning" noonian felt like an overreaction and the usage of the buzzword (##aside <I realize the irony of using this word>) left a bad taste in my mouth. The entirety of 185 looked like shade, with that bit on 168 also sticking out. This worry was partially extinguished by giaga lamping 172. Distancing occurred between Kmatt and Irish in the early game with Irish putting (from a SvS PoV) unnecessary pressure onto Kmatt. This caused minor polarizations in my reads. At this moment, Irish was gut-scum. #236 furthered this read. The developments in my Kmatt and Scott reads contributed to me reevaluating my Irish read. Upon reevaluating the earlier posts in the context of the later posts, things started to line up in a more town-ish way especially with the recent #395. So ultimately it was a null read. Would you like me to go into more specific detail and do post analysis, or does an overview suffice? Awwwwww! This guy is so cute What compels you to hit "Post"? What could we possibly gain from this? At least Shapelog's spam was kind of funny, this is just stupid. Again, TheCow is trying to figure out the game, you try to be an epic trole. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:13 Onegu wrote: On December 31 2015 03:12 GlowingBear wrote: On December 31 2015 03:08 nooniansoong wrote: but onegu On December 31 2015 01:13 Onegu wrote: Kush is odd. Like he doesnt qualify for the onegu rule because he didnt call me scum. Onegu rule is I troll and post little day one and if you call me scum for it you are scum looking for a mislynch. But since kush says it is complete policy he is fine. What I do find kinda odd is kush is a very similar player to me. And last game when he was scum and people wanted to lynch him day one I was the one who said give him time. Yet this game he wants to lynch me? Why didnt he want to lynch me in the last game we just played. Doesnt make much since to me that he wants to do it this game but not last game. it would have been so easy for him to scumread me there are he didnt. He usually does this to get towncred. My very first game with him he did it as scum. He defended me when I was getting scumread. I actually have a good reason to call Onegu scum ![]() Your reason is? Alright time for a shot at redemption. Let's see GB post his case to help further figure out the game. All he has to do is not deflect, ignore, or shitpost... Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:15 GlowingBear wrote: THERE! I've got your attention ![]() How do you read mderg, shapelog and scott? God damn it. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:20 GlowingBear wrote: On December 30 2015 23:30 Kmatt wrote: Pretty much the same sentiment as above for me. I leave for work in 30 mins and don't get out until 5pm Burger-time (vote o'clock). However I am going to assert that GB is the more dangerous target. Sure, Scott was acting "scummy" by not really participating, but he hasn't really derailed the thread or caused trouble (yet). GB on the other hand is an active poster who has been calling quite a few scumreads (myself included) with virtually no justification, as well as some very empty townreads. The fishy interactions with Noon are enough to seal the deal for me. More importantly, if we were to lynch Scott, we would learn almost nothing. Even if he came up scum, his posts have been so hollow that we wouldn't have a solid lead to go from there. Unless GB can clean up his act in time, there's a lot more to be gained out of him. ##unvote GiygaS ##vote GlowingBear This is bad, I was just townreading you :/ U wot m8. When the hell did I become town again? I know you have no standards but come on. As for myself I'm going to explain the point raised against me. My read onto GiygaS was kind of BS. I was getting flak (mostly from GB) for being indecisive and not presenting solid reads. I understand that doesn't help the game so I had to take a shot at something. I didn't have any solid scumreads (was reconsidering GB at the time of the GiygaS vote), so I decided to turn my attention to my least favorite AFK player. No I couldn't defend my scumread on GiygaS but I was being pressured to make a call so I made one. As for why I switched to GB, see above. If I didn't mention it already, I had work that day and wouldn't be back in time before the 5:00pm window closed, so I wouldn't get to make this wall of text. Without presenting my reasoning I didn't have a reason to expect anyone else to follow me, but I'd rather make my vote count towards something more important than my forced GiygaS read. Now comes GB's wall of text. Have a look at this gem Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:35 GlowingBear wrote: Scott is null. I've made a promise to keep him alive for more than one day because he usually plays like this. Actually, those incongruences you've guys found in Scott's post could come from town Scott based on his previous games (I think Battle of the Drams is the one I'm thinking about, but I'm not really sure the name of the game I remember him playing like this as town) Once again Scott is a no-lynch for now a poorly-founded meta reason. Any grievances people had against him written off as Scott doing it as town in other games. The good part comes up next. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:35 GlowingBear wrote: Kmatt I had him as mafia, then I reevaluated and thought he might be town (after talking to kush), then he voted me using a very poor reasoning to do so. He is null but very close to scum. Who was it that raised a fuss because I was being "wishy-washy"? Suddenly in spite of all my heinous crimes (worthy of an insta-vote, mind you), suddenly Kush convinced him that my behavior actually makes me town (when did this even happen?) but now I'm almost scum again. Maybe I'd understand this train of thought better if he posted something of substance every now and again. But then again, that would take away time from posting silly dog pictures. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:40 GlowingBear wrote: On December 31 2015 03:15 disformation wrote: Vote Count - Day 1 scott31337 (3): Irishbound, NocturneMage, mderg GiygaS (2): Onegu (1): nooniansoong Kmatt (1): TheCow nooniansoong (1): Shapelog GlowingBear (1): Kmatt Fidei86 (1): Onegu Not Voting (2): GiygaS, GlowingBear At this time, scott31337 is slated to be lynched. Day 1 ends in on Wednesday, Dec 30 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00). The voting thread is here. Only votes there will be counted. Actualy ROFL the thinks scott is a bad lynch when his main scumread IS THE SECOND WAGON but instead of arguing people should vote Gyigas with him he UNVOTES HIS MAIN SCUMREAD to VOTE ME while saying multiple times I could be town. Now he's back on me again because my vote on him was unfounded and that I wasn't hard committing to GiygaS. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 03:40 GlowingBear wrote: I'm lynching Kmatt today and no one else. Spoiler alert: He won't Skipping over some posts where he argues about wanting to lynch me when no one else jumps on his wagon. Now he defends Scott a third time. And by "defends", I mean he repeats his empty meta-case and swears to protect Scott. Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 04:10 GlowingBear wrote: On December 31 2015 04:05 Irishbound wrote: On December 31 2015 03:56 GlowingBear wrote:I would never hard align myself with scott this way if I was Mafia with him. Literally never. But do as you please, as long as you read my scum reads and lynxh them after I flip Then if you're town stop being nonsensical, you've got absolutely no reason to town read Scott whatsoever, you acknowledge as much, you've got town reads on lots of other players thereby by process of elimination alone he's a decent chance of being mafia for you so you taking the stance "I've promised myself not to lynch him" doesn't add up. Again you're disregarding his actions as "null" for a meta reason that doesn't flow, what about his meta makes his really weak and incorrect reasoning for town reading Noon and myself null? What about his meta means that where he does focus doesn't look like scumhunting but rather quoting random sections? I've wrote it before. I've played with scott before and he is capable of doing that as town. I'm not lynching him over people I'm fairly confident are scum, simple as that. So with tensions running high and the vote drawing near... Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 06:21 GlowingBear wrote: ROFL I decided to give Diablo III another shot since a lot of people said it got better after some revamp Conclusion: I can't understand how someone can respect a game when a class' main attack is THROWING JARS WITH SPIDERS ON PEOPLE Or SUMMONING BELLS FROM THE HEAVENS AND SMASHING THEM ROFL And he's shitposting again. And now for the killing blow towards any faith I had left in this guy Show nested quote + On December 31 2015 06:48 GlowingBear wrote: On December 31 2015 06:47 scott31337 wrote: Im voting with Onegu instead Then I'm voting you Scott, sorry, but I have a stronger townread on him than you You wot m8? After so adamantly asserting that I'm scum and defending Scott's town status (based on some meta read) since day one, you completely flip the boat because you don't like how he's voting. So why am I telling you all of this? A townie has no reason to shitpost past the opening banter. GB repeatedly shitposts throughout the thread. A townie has no reason to avoid posting his own cases when prompted. GB deflects questions towards his reads twice now. A townie has no reason to derail someone else's analysis and arguments that could help solve the game. GB attempts to derail discussion and arguments multiple times while contributing nothing to said discussion. A townie with no information about the other players would have no reason to vehemently defend Scott's innocence without a case and then completely throw him under the bus at the last second. You know the rest And most of all A townie wouldn't make reads about players with virtually nothing to back them up, but have no hesitation posting them for everyone to see. Every read should be in support or against a lynch vote. Almost none of GBs reads contribute towards that goal. Unless of course GB had a reason to convince the thread that he's scumhunting without actually helping solve the game. That reason being the GB is a mafia player. If I'm not being clear or commital enough here: ##vote GlowingBear I'm off to bed. I'll respond with what I can in the morning. Wow what a GIGANTIC case. You may be town after all! | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 23:52 Onegu wrote: BWahahahaha I am a 30 YO with the mind of a 12 YO. GlowingBear = BlowingGear You want to blow my gear GB? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Yes, yes you are ![]() | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
His scum reads were kush/Giygas/Scott. Scott is dead, I think kush is more likely to be town. So I'm voting Giygas because I simply have no reason to town read him. That gigantic post from Kmatt probably makes him town. If I had a wrong scum read, it is him. I keep my scumread on mderg and Onegu, tho. To be fair, I'm pretty confident we hit a Mafia on mderg. But considering the night kill we should probably kill Giygas first. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 03 2016 00:37 NocturneMage wrote: Catching up on the rest of the thread, though I just read through that wall of text, my god that was painful. I disagree with the summary comment from GigyaS because that was anything but. I know people solely summarising is generally a scummy tactic, but he is providing interpretations. I'm looking most specifically at how KMatt portrayed some of GB's attacks on him. Some of his context IS off compared to the way a lot of us are seeing things, but I wouldn't expect a newbie to understand what reaction tests are for instance. I'm also going to say newb town on that. Just to clarify, it wasn't a reaction test per se. I didn't expect specific answers that could come from one or other alignment. I've just wanted to have more people dropping thoughts in the thread, and an unexplained vote is great for that | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 03 2016 00:50 Onegu wrote: GB not deciding to defend himself just saying it is a town case from kmatt is really telling. And yes I will be tunneled on to fword dude and GB until they are dead, I am dead or it is lylo then I will reevaluate in lylo. Tunnel for now. I never care for cases written on me when I'm town, simply because everything is automatically wrong. If Kmatt wishes that I comment anything about it, I will, but I've skipped it by default | ||
| ||
OSC
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
Nicoract vs MilkiCowLIVE!
LunaSea vs Babymarine
Mixu vs Moja
ArT vs INexorable
HiGhDrA vs Shameless
TBD vs ArT
OSC
Mid Season Playoffs
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
SteadfastSC129
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH266 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya ![]() • RyuSc2 ![]() • davetesta29 • HeavenSC ![]() • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • sooper7s • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
WardiTV Invitational
HiGhDrA vs Nicoract
MaNa vs HiGhDrA
HiGhDrA vs Reynor
Nicoract vs Reynor
MaNa vs Nicoract
MaNa vs Reynor
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs Spirit
OSC
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
Korean StarCraft League
SOOP
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
Cheesadelphia
CSO Cup
BSL: ProLeague
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
[ Show More ] GSL Code S
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL: ProLeague
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
|
|