|
ye, no reaction really at all to gb's claim? just a fight with md over him reading gb scum?
i dunnae rels...like i was mason in a recent game and hf, who has fake-claimed mason before as town, fake-claims, and he was immediately in my line of sight as i tried to figure out if that was coming from town or not. even with good reason to think he'd fake-claim i couldn't help but be suspicious
a complete lack of reaction seems unlikely
|
also i don't see why, if you're so convinced you're the only rb'er, you're bothering saying shining is scum! too
it's like...eh. you should be pushing hard for an md lynch if you're that convinced? you could be wrong on shining but in your mind you've completely dismissed the possibility that there could be a second roleblocker so md is 100% scum to you and should 100% be the only person you want lynched today rather than rolling the dice with an afker
he says there could be two, and i'm actually inclined to believe your assessment that this is too town-favored even though you're only claiming 1-shot and had the detectives not outed each other you could be interfering with them as well, so at least in his mind i can see not pushing you but you don't believe that
shining's still a good lynch to you?
|
okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory!
|
psst >> that's your signal >>
|
On October 06 2015 21:07 LightningStrike wrote: Morning I see you cased Rels and why should I sheep you here Tina?
the case speaks for itself. also i'm confirmed town due to pitiful blow-up at rayn :/ so you know i'm town. or you should. i'm confirmed in the same way you are
read the case
then follow me! rels is not the real roleblocker because he doesn't react to gb or md properly. 1-shot roleblocker always always always instantly counterclaims if he's already used his rb. and frankly he should instantly cc in lylo regardless but we'll ignore that for now
vote rels for glory!
|
On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote: okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory!
#bestcase2015
|
On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote: okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory!
#best case 2015
no he didn't. he was real cop. fake green check with a real purpose. get rekt scum
|
On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote: okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory!
#bestcase2015
|
[QUOTE]On October 06 2015 21:30 rsoultin wrote: [QUOTE]On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote: okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory![/QUOTE]
#stillbestestcaseevar!
[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlqgrQky6tE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlqgrQky6tE[/url]
|
[QUOTE]On October 06 2015 21:30 rsoultin wrote: [QUOTE]On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote: okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory![/QUOTE]
#stillbestestcaseevar!
aww :/ won't load my video cause i fail
|
On October 06 2015 21:36 MoosyDoosy wrote: rsoultin you're dumb. We still kill Shining here 100%
grow some balls! fight for the ultimate glory! no rbr reacts like rels did
onward my lovely soldiers!
|
i dunnae i still kinda think i'm right, rayn, tbh. like rels is super logical it's true and that alone makes it hard to think he's mafia but his reactions don't seem like a roleblocker with his role claimed twice they do not
i'll vote with you and just blame you if you're wrong post-game, though xP just please read rels' responses around both claims for me first? you have more time to solve this today than i do
|
On October 06 2015 23:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: none of the people voting for shining have actually presented any reasons for him to be mafia. if that was a bus i would assume mafia would make a case for towncredit later. noone does that. So there literally MUST be mafia there. More than one.
agreed that if shining's scum here it's definitely a buss though; like pretty much everyone who could be scum is happy voting for shining. makes me twitch
gb being scum with md makes sense if md is scum. gut says he's not? but...eh
like i said, please just check his responses and reads surrounding the two claims and if you still think md is fake-claiming i'll sheep you and just say it's your fault if you're wrong ^^ teehee
|
On October 06 2015 23:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Rels is being logical around the claims. I don't see a reason why he couldn't - as town - wait for people's reactions before he counter-claims. Like it makes sense to me.
that's not exactly how it happened...man i'd have to look up the pages just like you @.@ fine fine i'll find you the pages lol
|
On October 06 2015 00:54 Rels wrote:What makes you say that ? Will check by myself the GB's claim rescind while you answer
pg 222 is md claim pg 223 rels returns to the thread, jabbers about other shit regarding md then posts this in response to you
|
like he makes all these cases on moosy afterward based on what he found in his filter and doesn't claim until way later
it's almost like he wanted to see if there was a weakness to exploit, tbh
in lylo this does not make sense, rayn. he can claim he's looking for reactions if he wants to, but frankly, the voting should be proof enough shouldn't it, if we lynch md and he's scum? unless scum busses him in which case reactions are still meh
|
plus the non-response to gb...i skimmed n1 by ctrl-fing "roleblocker" in gb's filter and reading what md, gb and rels wrote through the night phase
md is asking all kinds of people their reads on gb and clearly suspects him, which is very much in line with his story and the natural response to having someone claim your role
rels doesn't react at all, but later attacks moosy for his gb reads...like even if he didn't want to respond to keep a low profile, i don't see why he'd defend the player claiming his role if he really is roleblocker. there should be some doubt there, if only a little
|
On October 06 2015 23:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: - Okay so moosydoosy claims. - I ask for his actions. - First GB N1. He says he didn't read where GB rescinds (N1). later on he says GB rescinded on D2, which is a lie, and he has ACTUALLY read where GB rescinds. That is a red flag. - On N2 he says he did block LS because "i think i did something good night 1 with GB because i'm pretty sure the Trfel shot was an attempt at blue hunting.". what the hell does this even mean???? also he has said "okay on D2 i thought maybe GB's fakeclaim is not alignment indicative". but it was a REASON (GB = mafia) he blocked LS on N2??????
okay i stopped there, the actions itself don't make any sense. lol
hey rayn that's not what he said dude
i <3 you but you're englishing weird again
MD said the truffle kill made him think he did something good N1...i.e. scum is role-hunting because the RB interfered with something N1 so actually believed the blue claims enough to kill truffle; he didn't say that's why he blocked LS
GB rescinds again on D2? if md missed the first one that's plausible
these things are both not outside the realm of possibility at all rayn
read rels' responses to the claims please >< don't stop here
|
On October 02 2015 08:11 GlowingBear wrote: I'm not the Roleblocker, as I said
It's useless to discuss Damdred at this point. We just need him to say who he tracked.
^ when he rescinded again on D2
|
rayn rayn rayn
read please read and focus on rels
as long as you do that i'll sheep you but i won't if you refuse to consider it at all ><
don't be a bad biased rayn. be a good unbiased rayn who looks at both sides who i can trust to sheep
kthanx! <3
i'm out again until like an hour prior probably ^^
|
|
|
|