EPTTL Mafia Ban List 3.0 - Page 27
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message Blazinghand if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On December 23 2015 13:54 Half the Sky wrote: [N] TL Mafia LXXIII: The Nutcracker Bill Murray has completed the second of his three game ban. There will be no ban list actions necessary for this game. On January 19 2016 07:05 Rels wrote: [M][T] Assassin In The Palace 2 has begun. marvellosity is sitting out the game. Bill Murray also /sitouted, but I think he's sitouting the unoriginal name mafia already. 2nd... and 3rd... why am i on the list still? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/QzqMjMQ.jpg) | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On August 04 2015 11:13 Blazinghand wrote: I will note that you are sitting out that game once it starts. At the end of that game, your Banned Game Count will be reduced by 1 and you will be removed if if is 0. You cannot sit out two games which run concurrently. Your name will be added to the "People taken off the list" category so I can keep track of you in case you are banned again in the future. You cannot play in other games which follow the Ban List until the last game in which you are sitting out has finished. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On January 29 2016 09:26 Blazinghand wrote: Uh, didn't the nutcracker end before assassins, right? So Bill Murray should be done with Bans, unless I'm missing something here. Rels, please advise The issue isn't Nutcracker, that game ended Christmas Eve. The issue is that Artanis' Unoriginal Mini Mafia and Rels' Assassins' games were concurrent and IIRC Bill Murray sat out for those two games where at some point they were concurrent. I believe that is the argument he is trying to make. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 29 2016 15:52 Half the Sky wrote: The issue isn't Nutcracker, that game ended Christmas Eve. The issue is that Artanis' Unoriginal Mini Mafia and Rels' Assassins' games were concurrent and IIRC Bill Murray sat out for those two games where at some point they were concurrent. I believe that is the argument he is trying to make. doesn't make sense anyway, he'd have sat out 4 (if Nutcracker was #2), of which the last 2 were concurrent, so it's 3 anyway | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On January 29 2016 19:44 marvellosity wrote: doesn't make sense anyway, he'd have sat out 4 (if Nutcracker was #2), of which the last 2 were concurrent, so it's 3 anyway >_< I made the assumption that Nutcracker was the first sitout, not the second based on the posts. If he sat out anything before Nutcracker then chalk it up to me being an idiot. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
Unoriginal Name Mafia: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/501039-unoriginal-name-mini-mafia Jan 8 - Jan 19 Assassins in the Palace: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/501042-assassin-in-the-palace-2 Jan 18 - Jan 22 Although there's a 1-day overlap between his sitouts they count, cause I see no reason for them not to really. Let me know if anyone objects. In the future, please try to say which games you're sitting out in so I don't have to go looking for them. Welcome back, Bill Murray! | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On January 29 2016 09:26 Blazinghand wrote: Uh, didn't the nutcracker end before assassins, right? So Bill Murray should be done with Bans, unless I'm missing something here. Rels, please advise As long as BM sitouted one of unoriginal and assassin, he's done with sitouts right ? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 31 2016 12:52 Blazinghand wrote: So Bill Murray sat out Nutcracker Mafia, http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/499399-tl-mafia-lxxiii-the-nutcracker Dec 13 - Dec 22 Unoriginal Name Mafia: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/501039-unoriginal-name-mini-mafia Jan 8 - Jan 19 Assassins in the Palace: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/501042-assassin-in-the-palace-2 Jan 18 - Jan 22 Although there's a 1-day overlap between his sitouts they count, cause I see no reason for them not to really. Let me know if anyone objects. In the future, please try to say which games you're sitting out in so I don't have to go looking for them. Welcome back, Bill Murray! | ||
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
"When I am dead I do not post in the game anymore". | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On February 01 2016 20:24 Palmar wrote: Repeat after me Bill Murray: "When I am dead I do not post in the game anymore". "Unless people are whining about my personal life and making baseless accusations with reference to my particular choices of play" In that case, more power to ya m8  | ||
|
justanothertownie
16325 Posts
On February 02 2016 00:54 Alakaslam wrote: "Unless people are whining about my personal life and making baseless accusations with reference to my particular choices of play" In that case, more power to ya m8 In that case - pm or ignore them. There is no reason to post in the game thread. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 02 2016 00:54 Alakaslam wrote: "Unless people are whining about my personal life and making baseless accusations with reference to my particular choices of play" In that case, more power to ya m8 yup, still 100% unacceptable | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On February 03 2016 11:54 Stutters695 wrote: Sitting out star wars mafia. Apologies to BH and HtS for disappearing during witchcraft. Noted. Star Wars starts tonight if there's anyone else needing to get a sitout in, get a note here or a PM to me by 2300 GMT. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I would like to request a warning for Keirathi and The Shining. Keirathi posted a link to a google spreadsheet which he was capable of editing, indirectly violating the no editing and no out of thread communication rule. The Shining violated my behavior policy after warnings by me to the thread. However, I would like to request that their warnings be removed after only 1 game, instead of the usual 3. If this is not possible to keep track of then do not issue a warning. Their conduct did not have enough of an adverse impact and they corrected the issues immediatly. | ||
| ||
