TL Mafia LXXI: Gaiden - Page 22

On July 17 2015 06:44 rsoultin wrote:
okay i'm behind

catch me up

we're lynching hf but from this page clearly y'all have some reason to doubt it, so what's going on?

On July 17 2015 06:56 Holyflare wrote:
you should want mafia to switch off and no lynch because then you get free mafia tbh

On July 17 2015 07:15 rsoultin wrote:


how is it bs? lol...like seriously i'm just saying it's not gonna happen. if you want to make it bs by trying to lynch me, be my guest

anyway, i'm out for awhile. sucks that i was wrong, but frankly, i'm kind of glad to not have him sniping at me every turn even if he was town

also, ruxx looks super bad for the hard defend, just sayin

On July 17 2015 07:23 rsoultin wrote:


maybe? i didn't read that game

your explanation is basically frills and whistles -shrugs- feels and generic comments with little in the way of actual evidence to back it up

you basically said he looked town because he looked town

On July 17 2015 07:26 LightningStrike wrote:
Honestly there was like 4-5 votes outside of the HF wagon I think at least 1 is scum in those and at least 2 on the main wagon I will try to put up some work tonight on vote analyses up to this night phase.

On July 17 2015 07:07 Trfel wrote:
I support this scum team.

Reason being that they are my townreads, thus they have to be mafia.

You think I'm kidding, but I'm 100% serious.

On July 17 2015 08:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
Unless you can give me a really good reason why you didnt consolidate onto HF when there is 1 vote away from being a nolynch.

On July 07 2015 23:46 Damdred wrote:
Good morning guys, i've caught up to the thread and would like to push you all to kill clarity today.

I'm not going to bother posting tons of quotes so you should fact check yourself after you get done reading.

The first thing of note to look at when it comes to clarity is his weird way of reading HF at the start of the game. Something that is really Non alignment indicative gets him to totally town read HF and say that in no way would he lynch HF today and he would totally fight against his lynch today. To me this is extremely odd, openings are usually not really that important and when informed that HF is the best (arguably) scum player on this site, the stance never changed and no fear is shown at all towards HF.

The next thing that really bugs me about Clarity is lack of follow up and ignoring of questions. I think that is extremely scummy behavior, if you look in his filter you will see that multiple times I asked him questions about the town read he gave HF, any more reads and his reasoning behind voteing wave and open ended questions. He ignores them until I continue to push them down his throat. He has no real follow up which I think is damning.

The weird vote and unvote has been talked about a bit by Marv as being really strange. Wave really really hasn't done jack all this game so not sure why he would unvote as it feels sorta like hes just going with thread sentiment to an extent and going where its safe. HF pushes wave goes to wave, thread goes against ritoky jumps to ritoky. Now is trying to get marv to tell him where to go. And has no real reads at this point.

TLDR
Has no fear of people he says are town, ie HF after one post
Lacks follow through on some posts/questions
Lacks scum reads
Follows thread sentiment and jumps to another when its available instead of pushing what he thinks.

This guy is scum vot ehim.

On July 18 2015 03:45 Vivax wrote:


He did so veeeeery late. And dropped that as well in his later reads. Making one case that doesn't have any conviction throughout the game doesn't exclude it's a bus, it only means he made a well written case on a teammate for the reason you bring that up now.

On July 18 2015 04:10 Vivax wrote:


So what's the point of pointing out that he did push clarity if to you it should be meaningless?

On July 18 2015 04:11 Vivax wrote:
I don't even care what you say past this point tbh, you're mafia for that bs.

On July 18 2015 04:13 Vivax wrote:
Also nice to see how rso was your scumread all along and now you're both holding hands and singing kumbaya.

On July 18 2015 04:25 Vivax wrote:


Can anyone tell me how a guy with such a list of possible scummers shouldn't be drooling at my analysis?

Instead he opposes everything I say? I wonder what his own arguments are for these people being scum, cause he sure didn't care to present them. Instead what we get is emotional, contradictory gibberish.