|
On May 27 2015 16:51 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2015 16:12 sicklucker wrote:Who would disinofs partner be? On May 23 2015 06:13 disformation wrote:On May 23 2015 06:01 sicklucker wrote:
vote count? anyone voting disinfo? I might
disinfo can you list your read. I have no idea what your reads are and you posted alot not a good sign I think there are two votes on me. Barakos and Breshkia. Okay... list post time. *ugh* I will keep this short, if you want to know more details and why, please ask.  top town: rels, ticktock town lean: breshkia, batsnacks please start doing stuff soon: plotspot, scott scum lean: sulfurus (until he answers my question at least), BM (super defensive and aggressive when Sulfurus voted on him) rethinking:bunnies: scum lean (hence the case) -> slight town lean of the answers -> rethinking right now (was probably to easily swayed) barakos: he is a bit tunnely towards me, but that is okay, need to look at his other reads/interactions sicklucker: you are trying a lot harder than last game, not sure if that is a good or bad sign for you, so I have you kinda nullish. Your current interactions with me make me lean town towards you. boxerfred: not sure if new scum or new town one of the rethinkers right? boxer and me are less likely mafia for not voting bm.That leaves just barakos maybe bats as his partners. Not sure if he pushes his partner bunnies but its possible Your logic is flawed: if 27nb and BM are both town, the vote on bunnies is not containing any proof for the voters being townies. I hate to potentially put a bad light on myself but that's how it is.
not at all townies shouldnt care. They should want there vote to matter the most and influence the game the most in who they think is mafia.
Not hide behind wasted votes
|
|
|
Breske you were also in that game do you remember much?
|
Australia3749 Posts
Nah dude was my first game and literally played like shit read my flter if you want a laugh was dead weight.
I do kinda rememebr the inactive thing though. Except i don't think the first lynch was an inactive i think it was some townie that got hella mad
|
On May 27 2015 16:59 boxerfred wrote:
Barakos, if you're so worried about not lynching inactives, why didn't you push on someone more actively and stayed in your lurker role?
I did?
I made a case against disformation, who was the other wagon D1 and I gave plenty reason to vote SL day two at the time, when the wagons were bunnies and sl. Then I returned to a thread, where all the votes were gone from SL and the wagons were BM and 27nb and when people were talking about doing voteswitches to sulfurus, I once again tried and said i would highly prefer a SL-lynch.
@SL: game was disney princess mafia...
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/464494-newbie-lviii-disney-princess-mafia
|
On May 27 2015 17:08 Breshke wrote:
Nah dude was my first game and literally played like shit read my flter if you want a laugh was dead weight.
I do kinda rememebr the inactive thing though. Except i don't think the first lynch was an inactive i think it was some townie that got hella mad
First lynch was gobbledydook, who was inactive except for two intervals of 30 minutes, in which he started a scream-fight, which made him even easier to lynch, yeah.
|
Australia3749 Posts
What if a mafia member is inactive though barakos how will you lynch them?
|
Of course you wouldn't want to go into lylo with someone, who has almost no filter, so at some point, you would have to start lynching into them, sure... but as long as there are valid other suspects and there is enough time, I don't see the point in lynching into them.
Especially if you already caught one. (Not thanks to me, but our first lynch was scum, so how high are the odds of 2 out of 3 scum being this inactive?)
|
Australia3749 Posts
On May 27 2015 17:25 Barakos wrote:
Of course you wouldn't want to go into lylo with someone, who has almost no filter, so at some point, you would have to start lynching into them, sure... but as long as there are valid other suspects and there is enough time, I don't see the point in lynching into them.
Especially if you already caught one. (Not thanks to me, but our first lynch was scum, so how high are the odds of 2 out of 3 scum being this inactive?)
idk probably higher after the scott lynch. A D1 lynch on the mafia RB would probs demotivate you.
If you were to pretend SL, Disfo were town could you give me any scumreaads?
|
Bunnies would be not looking good, that's for sure...
promising a big push "in the next two hours" and not following it up, that weird "you activated my trap"-play during D1 which looked off...
I have to admit, i haven't looked into boxerfred and sulfurus at all, so I would have to go looking into them, too.
If SL isn't scum, that would kinda clear batsnacks (who atm is also a suspect for me) in my eyes, since my read vs him is mainly based on that weird discussion I had with him and sl early-eod2.
|
Bah Bre where were you EoD?
I've seen several posts you made since I swapped to him that prob would have made me stay on 27nb.
@Barak
Inactive Mafia teams do happen.
Last newb game was over D3 kus town lynched an inactive mafia then our Vig shot another mostly inactive mafia. Ended up being just eh GF left D3 and he was a newb in his first game.
I felt pretty bad for y0su that game. Imagine your first mafia experience is being scum with mates who are mostly not there.
Still I like your point about giving better scum players being able to stay active and ride out the people who just don't give a shit.
I feel like at this stage of the game I'm willing to rethink anyone's position even if I was sure of my thinking before. Prob best move going forward.
|
I realise, I am contradicting myself here a little, saying I don't like a lynch on bunnies before EoD2 and now saying she would be a prime suspect... but you kinda took my 3 prime suspects away from me... ^^
|
@ Barak
Nah 27nb is still super likely scum. Shows me your willing to reevaluate.
Her starting a ML wagon in the last ~6 hours of a day is pretty bad. I wouldn't have waffeled so hard about it and hammered BM if not for his shitty posting, I think his comment "hes so smart" about me really rubbed me the wrong way as well since he wasn't offering any thoughts.
BM set himself up as perfect ML bait.
|
Australia3749 Posts
On May 27 2015 17:39 Tictock wrote:
Bah Bre where were you EoD?
I've seen several posts you made since I swapped to him that prob would have made me stay on 27nb.
@Barak
Inactive Mafia teams do happen.
Last newb game was over D3 kus town lynched an inactive mafia then our Vig shot another mostly inactive mafia. Ended up being just eh GF left D3 and he was a newb in his first game.
I felt pretty bad for y0su that game. Imagine your first mafia experience is being scum with mates who are mostly not there.
Still I like your point about giving better scum players being able to stay active and ride out the people who just don't give a shit.
I feel like at this stage of the game I'm willing to rethink anyone's position even if I was sure of my thinking before. Prob best move going forward.
soz i was enjoying my bed far too much and slept through my alarm.
|
Australia3749 Posts
On May 27 2015 17:40 Barakos wrote:
I realise, I am contradicting myself here a little, saying I don't like a lynch on bunnies before EoD2 and now saying she would be a prime suspect... but you kinda took my 3 prime suspects away from me... ^^
SL, disfo. Who was the third?
|
bats.
but in a world where sl isn't scum he is cleared imho, as i explained in the earlier post.
|
Australia3749 Posts
On May 27 2015 17:54 Barakos wrote:
bats.
but in a world where sl isn't scum he is cleared imho, as i explained in the earlier post.
yeah sorry probably could have put two and two together.
Does it not cross your mind that all three of your main suspects voted for the mafia D1? If two of them are mafia why didn't they just switch to disfo? This is mainly about bats/SL being possible partners.
But moving on. Bunnies being a prime suspect. What conclusions could you get from that?
|
On May 27 2015 17:25 Barakos wrote:
Of course you wouldn't want to go into lylo with someone, who has almost no filter, so at some point, you would have to start lynching into them, sure... but as long as there are valid other suspects and there is enough time, I don't see the point in lynching into them.
Especially if you already caught one. (Not thanks to me, but our first lynch was scum, so how high are the odds of 2 out of 3 scum being this inactive?)
pretty high... when one of your mafia team mates gives up day 1 for no reason your gonna not try very hard as mafia..
|
@ SL
Ignoring my nonsense about SK theories.
What did you think about my case on 27nb?
|
Australia3749 Posts
On May 25 2015 05:56 27ninjabunnies wrote:
I did ask, and never received an answer.
Isnt there a possibility as EOD got closer, mafia voted in their partner to look townie as they new he would be killed?
Curious
On May 26 2015 02:44 27ninjabunnies wrote:
I'm not avoiding them, just ignoring them for the time being. I'm going to make a big post in the next two hours or so. Tbh, I'm not in such a big rush
I will address the scott thing.
I didn't vote scott not because we are partners (Cause im town) but because with scott af, and looking to still be afk, we could have had a replacement or modkill. Im glad we did vote him, because hey, We got rid of mafia role, but I felt better information could have been gained outside of a scott lynch. Scott was a last minute bandwagon it seemed, and it didnt really gain us info, because that gave perfect timing for mafia to bus. I'm looking within the votes to see if a possible mafia could have jumped at the chance for town cred there.
bunnies looking at the scott voters never actually happend, at least not anywhere in the thread. Feel like mafia trying to stop people getting town cred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
