EPTNewbie Student Mafia X - Page 64
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
On May 27 2015 07:42 batsnacks wrote: I think the optimal play would have been to wait until day to post that but... okay plotspot is confirmed town and there is a confirmed town roleblocker. How does this make plots confirmed town? Mafia role blocker died day 1. If he got blocked n1 its a town sided roleblock Therefore it doesnt confirm him as town, just states he got clocked | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
On the other hand, BM didnt seem to give a shit about this game so I'm not too bothered to have lost a useless town. Clearly stuff like "only play if you can read the whole thread" and "play to win" are just a formality in these games. (excuse me if I'm cross, it's been a shitty day for me) | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
Dude why are you blowing this way out of proportion? Your spending an inordinate amount of time talking about how I'm not reading or misreading what you said. Prob would be easier to simpler explain what you DID mean rather than attack me for how I interpreted it. | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
You posted On May 26 2015 11:04 plotspot wrote: I see SL is getting scumrpoints for some strange suggestions about how to handle Scott’s case to which Barakos and Breshke replied and I would have to agree to their opinion. It’s simply the more plausible way to do things, rather than risking it. Starting here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=24308265 I read this and it tells me that you agree with SL's point you linked On May 24 2015 18:59 sicklucker wrote: If i was mafia partners with scott heres what I would do. I would come into the thread near the vote, tell everyone that scott did not vote and will probably be mod killed ( which is acualy something that would have happened) and pushed the vote on a town 1) You say you like SL's reasoning because It’s simply the more plausible way to do things, rather than risking it. 2) You also say Barakos and Breshke replied and I would have to agree to their opinion. Correct? + Show Spoiler + If so, please reread what I said again. On May 27 2015 04:03 Tictock wrote: He starts by taking about a post SL make, says he likes Bre's and Barak's reaction to it, but still seems to support. Here are the reactions he likes even though he seems to be supporting SL's point. Says SL's point is the plausible way of doing things without risk. My point? You cannot agree with SL Bre and Barak here. Bre and Barak are clearly against SL'd logic. If not please explain where my reading comprehension falls apart. | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
Plots reaction to my suspicions mixed with the departed BM stating this On May 26 2015 01:14 Bill Murray wrote: omg tictock may have broken the game on page 46 hes so smart i didnt want to say anything though, ive been kind of wanting to watch how this plays out Has me thinking I might be onto something here... | ||
|
Sulfurus
United States166 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On May 27 2015 14:04 Sulfurus wrote: @Batsnacks please go in depth on why you changed your vote to Bill Murray. sulf are you still around? | ||
|
Sulfurus
United States166 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
Were still killing bunnies next. She should already be dead its not like her defense was very good she just got a free life out of bm. Like if I were mafia I would have got the lynch on bill murray too. Its not very hard to do but instead I tried for bunnies and barakos | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
Can you make it the first thing you do when you come back please or have time or w/e | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On May 23 2015 06:13 disformation wrote: I think there are two votes on me. Barakos and Breshkia. Okay... list post time. *ugh* I will keep this short, if you want to know more details and why, please ask.  top town: rels, ticktock town lean: breshkia, batsnacks please start doing stuff soon: plotspot, scott scum lean: sulfurus (until he answers my question at least), BM (super defensive and aggressive when Sulfurus voted on him) rethinking: bunnies: scum lean (hence the case) -> slight town lean of the answers -> rethinking right now (was probably to easily swayed) barakos: he is a bit tunnely towards me, but that is okay, need to look at his other reads/interactions sicklucker: you are trying a lot harder than last game, not sure if that is a good or bad sign for you, so I have you kinda nullish. Your current interactions with me make me lean town towards you. boxerfred: not sure if new scum or new town one of the rethinkers right? boxer and me are less likely mafia for not voting bm.That leaves just barakos maybe bats as his partners. Not sure if he pushes his partner bunnies but its possible | ||
| ||
