|
On June 02 2015 02:45 Tictock wrote: So explain to me SL.
How does tryhard Chart making Plots, think Rels is Scum?
How does tryhard super tunneled (like so many of us) plots give such bad reasons for RBing Bara?
How does ANYONE listen to you N3 and RB Bats?
|
Because I have evidence. I thought you would be happy bunnies
|
And yes, I know I'm attacking you a bit.
It's the only way you actually get motivated it seems.
|
On June 02 2015 03:07 Tictock wrote: Thats it SL?
They voted after you D1?
And then you ask us to proved cases on them?
Are you retarded, lazy, or just such an egomaniac your all 3 and don't know it?
I just solved the game for you. see you post game
|
God SL, you are useless.
You look at one vote and say you solve the game?
I at least had a case to backup my claims.
|
Are you that pleased with yourself that you voted scott D1?
I seem to remember we had to convince you a bit.
But now it's the only thing you bring up this game.
|
disin/bf get me lynched today and you win the game thats your only play
|
So you think that both mafia jumped on the bw for Scott?
I mentioned atleast one mafia could have been on the scott vote, and if im not mistaken didn't you say that its unlikely?
Why does it seem like you are just trying to get a mislynch some where?
|
Speaking of the scott vote.
Anyone recall Bara making posts like this?
On May 23 2015 19:56 Barakos wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2015 19:10 Tictock wrote:On May 23 2015 18:48 Barakos wrote: TicTock: Since you are hopefully still here and one of my townreads: Do you really think lynching into the inactives is a good thing? Of all the cases, that are floating around, don't you think there is one on one of the active players, that has a higher chance than voting a coinflip? I am still lurking though I should be asleep... I understand your conflict here, I've seen a lot of argument in these games against lynching inactive people and your notion of it being a coinflip makes sense from a theory standpoint. My problem is that reality does not match theory. In reality this notion makes it a good scum play to stay inactive D1. Town is likely to jump on each other early on and mafia can stay away while accusations are made and people build cases for them. In my last game there was a clearly inactive guy I voted for D1 and he did in fact flip scum when town followed through D2. So my advice, and what I am trying to do here, is to not focus on the fact that there is little content by the inactive players and instead focus on what they HAVE posted. Is there enough in the ~5 posts by those players to convince you they are town? I get that logic... what i am/was asking was just, if there isn't any case on the more active people, that looks more convincing than the case on for example scott... since you know - variance... looking not good in 5 posts is not as telling as looking not good in 5 pages.
He is just lightly implying that it is a bad vote kus it's "coinflippy" but wouldn't the same logic apply to Sul? Yet Bara had no issues sheeping bats D3 on that one.
|
@27nb
Sl being useless isn't evidence of him being scum
SL is useless as town too.
|
EBWOP
Sorry wrong quote >.<
On June 02 2015 03:18 Tictock wrote:Speaking of the scott vote. Anyone recall Bara making posts like this? Show nested quote +On May 23 2015 18:48 Barakos wrote: TicTock: Since you are hopefully still here and one of my townreads: Do you really think lynching into the inactives is a good thing? Of all the cases, that are floating around, don't you think there is one on one of the active players, that has a higher chance than voting a coinflip? I get that logic... what i am/was asking was just, if there isn't any case on the more active people, that looks more convincing than the case on for example scott... since you know - variance... looking not good in 5 posts is not as telling as looking not good in 5 pages.
He is just lightly implying that it is a bad vote kus it's "coinflippy" but wouldn't the same logic apply to Sul? Yet Bara had no issues sheeping bats D3 on that one.[/QUOTE]
|
On May 25 2015 08:07 sicklucker wrote: If im mafia whos my partner here? everyones voted me at some point of the game now.
Me and bunnies would not be that obv.
I sapose I could be with bm? why dont you just vote him first
Okay, I was wrong. It was actually disinfo who said that, so that paints you in a good light.
I'm going through your filter and this jumped out on me.
Again, it seems like you're just trying to put lynches in random places.
Oh i could be with BM, so lets vote him first. It sounds like a "Once BM flips as town, you'll know I'm town too."
Any thoughts on this, SL?
|
Ugh idk why formatting failed there too.
Is that readable?
|
On June 02 2015 03:17 27ninjabunnies wrote: So you think that both mafia jumped on the bw for Scott?
I mentioned atleast one mafia could have been on the scott vote, and if im not mistaken didn't you say that its unlikely?
Why does it seem like you are just trying to get a mislynch some where?
If I needed a "mislynch" why would I have to work for it? boxerfreds already getting lynched so why would I bring this up now. I was about to vote you before I saw this connection
|
On June 02 2015 03:19 Tictock wrote: @27nb
Sl being useless isn't evidence of him being scum
SL is useless as town too.
Which is why im questioning him.
He says he is giving evidence, but i want more evidence than just oh they voted after me on scott.
I want to see his thought process. I want to know if it cmes from a town perspective or a mafia perspective.
|
EBWOP Mark 2 - The final posting
On June 02 2015 03:18 Tictock wrote:Speaking of the scott vote. Anyone recall Bara making posts like this? Show nested quote +On May 23 2015 18:48 Barakos wrote: TicTock: Since you are hopefully still here and one of my townreads: Do you really think lynching into the inactives is a good thing? Of all the cases, that are floating around, don't you think there is one on one of the active players, that has a higher chance than voting a coinflip? He is just lightly implying that it is a bad vote kus it's "coinflippy" but wouldn't the same logic apply to Sul? Yet Bara had no issues sheeping bats D3 on that one.
|
My thought process is everyone but you and those two are town. And those two voted together at the same time as a mafia would vote. Its very simple but I dont need alot when I already narrowed it down to 3 people .Simply answers simple people
|
I go back to this post on that regard 27nb
On June 02 2015 02:43 Tictock wrote: I suggest SL is ignored the rest of the game for being unable to think. Or at least show his thinking.
Anyone agree?
|
Gah, ticktock is really making me rethink the bara check....
Could the game really be that difficult?!
lajglkqajglqkejg;lqer
|
@ SL Don't signor me please
On June 02 2015 02:45 Tictock wrote: So explain to me SL.
How does tryhard Chart making Plots, think Rels is Scum?
How does tryhard super tunneled (like so many of us) plots give such bad reasons for RBing Bara?
How does ANYONE listen to you N3 and RB Bats?
|
|
|
|