|
On November 01 2014 09:31 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:03 Lord Tolkien wrote:On November 01 2014 08:35 jaybrundage wrote:
I would join a risk.nuke lynch. He is a coinflip and always a liability late game. Add the fact that he always lurks.
And not much reason to keep him around.
Also LT I don't believe I have seen you contribute yet still waiting. BUT MOOOOOM, I got TLLOLOTGDTGN tonite, can't I wait till LATER to contribute? I was gonna respond with a parody of your post asking the thread to lynch you. But I am actually curious at what point does your posting of only joke posts, videos, and exclamations of "LOL" become unacceptable to the thread. Granted your cavalier attitude makes you almost appear townie. But the main issue is that a there is no content spread thru your jokes and "LOL's a townie would want to scumhunt and you have done nothing of the sort. Do you plan to contribute or you do you plan to keep stalling?
+1
Yooper
|
Lord bh has spoken the insufferable ones wipl must be done
|
On November 01 2014 09:33 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications
Except hitting scum more than day1 analysts
|
On November 01 2014 09:23 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? This is a fair question. The fact of the matter is, every rng lynch discussion that doesn't roll the dice goes like this. People basically vaguely talk about how rng is not great, or talk about stats about historical rng, or whatever. Nobody gets invested, nobody cares, nobody gives away reads, nobody is under pressure, and nobody gets lynched. Take a look at the low tier policy talk in ANY game. What makes me, and my RNG, different, is that it selects a target before people discuss whether it's good or not. Now scum are on the line. Now they suddenly feel a need to justify or NOT justify voting for or not voting for GB, who is probably their scumbuddy. They're in a tough spot and it absolutely wrecks scumteams. I'm different than most people, jrkirby. Most people don't policy. Most people don't have the rock-hard, cast-iron BALLS to push policy like I do. Policy isn't REAL unless you're willing to go balls to the wall to lynch your policy target. And by jove, I WILL lynch GB, just as I've lynched so many others with the power of RNG. It is inevitable.
I guess this is fair enough to me. I have a slight town-lean read on GB, but I think RNG can be very powerful day 1. If anyone trys RNG after day one, I will want to lynch you though.
So I'm going to drop my slight town read on GB and my vote on the unproductive LT in favor of the power of RNG. This is a hearthstone flavored game here.
Just so everyone knows, this is a vote for RNG, not for GB in particular.
BY FIRE BE PURGED. + Show Spoiler +Cause Ragnaros has a random target, yeah?
##Unvote: Lord Tolkein
##Vote: GlowingBear
|
On November 01 2014 09:34 Damdred wrote:
Lord bh has spoken the insufferably great one's will must be done
+1 and fixed
|
Plus GlowingBear is not like OO
He will not quit
|
So, we have GB as a call for the D1 backup, and some people seem to be jumping onboard for risk.nuke. I've read the case for lynching risk.nuke, and I'm not yet completely sold. I don't have a solid read on him yet, so can anyone give me a reason we should lynch someone else INSTEAD of risk.nuke?
|
On November 01 2014 09:35 jrkirby wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:23 Blazinghand wrote:On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? This is a fair question. The fact of the matter is, every rng lynch discussion that doesn't roll the dice goes like this. People basically vaguely talk about how rng is not great, or talk about stats about historical rng, or whatever. Nobody gets invested, nobody cares, nobody gives away reads, nobody is under pressure, and nobody gets lynched. Take a look at the low tier policy talk in ANY game. What makes me, and my RNG, different, is that it selects a target before people discuss whether it's good or not. Now scum are on the line. Now they suddenly feel a need to justify or NOT justify voting for or not voting for GB, who is probably their scumbuddy. They're in a tough spot and it absolutely wrecks scumteams. I'm different than most people, jrkirby. Most people don't policy. Most people don't have the rock-hard, cast-iron BALLS to push policy like I do. Policy isn't REAL unless you're willing to go balls to the wall to lynch your policy target. And by jove, I WILL lynch GB, just as I've lynched so many others with the power of RNG. It is inevitable. I guess this is fair enough to me. I have a slight town-lean read on GB, but I think RNG can be very powerful day 1. If anyone trys RNG after day one, I will want to lynch you though. So I'm going to drop my slight town read on GB and my vote on the unproductive LT in favor of the power of RNG. This is a hearthstone flavored game here. Just so everyone knows, this is a vote for RNG, not for GB in particular. BY FIRE BE PURGED. + Show Spoiler +Cause Ragnaros has a random target, yeah?
This guy is scum. Props to me for pointing him out so early in the game.
|
On November 01 2014 09:42 Circumstance wrote:
So, we have GB as a call for the D1 backup, and some people seem to be jumping onboard for risk.nuke. I've read the case for lynching risk.nuke, and I'm not yet completely sold. I don't have a solid read on him yet, so can anyone give me a reason we should lynch someone else INSTEAD of risk.nuke?
You can start by telling who you think is scum.
|
need an analyze target from everyone here if you haven't put one in. the cycle ends soon.
current leader is jayb i believe. i think he is an alright enough target as of now.
|
On November 01 2014 09:35 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:33 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications Except hitting scum more than day1 analysts
This is why I'm following the RNG. Sure it might disagree with my reads, but what real use are day 1 reads anyway? They've been shown historically to almost never lynch scum.
|
On November 01 2014 10:05 jrkirby wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:35 Alakaslam wrote:On November 01 2014 09:33 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications Except hitting scum more than day1 analysts This is why I'm following the RNG. Sure it might disagree with my reads, but what real use are day 1 reads anyway? They've been shown historically to almost never lynch scum.
what statistics are you using for this?
can we lynch this guy? like srsly. he doesn't give reads, he talked incessantly about the cat, does more nothing, now he wants rng because d1 reads suck? you haven't even tried to develop strong reads or push for information in any way. you're just looking for easy shit to talk about to appear active and involved, and when it doesn't work out you have an excuse. welcome to my scum list.
|
w/e we will just start with this, since who knows what the fuck it does:
analyze: jrkirby
|
On November 01 2014 10:10 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 10:05 jrkirby wrote:On November 01 2014 09:35 Alakaslam wrote:On November 01 2014 09:33 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications Except hitting scum more than day1 analysts This is why I'm following the RNG. Sure it might disagree with my reads, but what real use are day 1 reads anyway? They've been shown historically to almost never lynch scum. what statistics are you using for this? can we lynch this guy? like srsly. he doesn't give reads, he talked incessantly about the cat, does more nothing, now he wants rng because d1 reads suck? you haven't even tried to develop strong reads or push for information in any way. you're just looking for easy shit to talk about to appear active and involved, and when it doesn't work out you have an excuse. welcome to my scum list.
Of course we can and I'm certain he is scum.
|
|
|
On November 01 2014 09:42 Circumstance wrote:
So, we have GB as a call for the D1 backup, and some people seem to be jumping onboard for risk.nuke. I've read the case for lynching risk.nuke, and I'm not yet completely sold. I don't have a solid read on him yet, so can anyone give me a reason we should lynch someone else INSTEAD of risk.nuke?
This post is also bad.
|
On November 01 2014 10:16 Damdred wrote:
analyze jrkirby
OH HERE YOU ARE!
Geev reeds.
|
Hmmm... I could have sworn I'd read somewhere that day one lynching was worse than random, perhaps I was a bit quick to jump the gun. I searched for my source, and found this:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/390080-tl-mafia-database?page=10#185
> The day one lynch percentage is still slightly below random, but not if you exclude newbie games.
And I guess this isn't a newbie game. So perhaps I was wrong.
|
On November 01 2014 10:16 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:42 Circumstance wrote:
So, we have GB as a call for the D1 backup, and some people seem to be jumping onboard for risk.nuke. I've read the case for lynching risk.nuke, and I'm not yet completely sold. I don't have a solid read on him yet, so can anyone give me a reason we should lynch someone else INSTEAD of risk.nuke? This post is also bad.
what strikes me as odd is that wasn't it circ who came in to hard defend jrkirby early on when he was being pressured? then once again jrkirby starts to take interest in a gb lynch and now circ is suddenly around and interested? there's something funky goin on between these two.
|
Ritoky, Kirby thought I was suspicious because I quickly jumped into conclusions, and that circumstance was town because he was thinking logically and wasn't jumping into conclusions.
Now he thinks I'm town mean but he is okay with RNGing me?
When did I get townie to his eyes?
But this is unflipped association. Not good yet.
I just don't think he would instantly call his scum partner town that early. But his is WIFOM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
