EPTsounds reasonable, i agree
Hearthstone Mafia - Page 30
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
sounds reasonable, i agree | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
| ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:08 Blazinghand wrote: The Post count for my RNG declaration post was 23206369 23206369 mod 17 = 9 9th player is glowingbear ##vote GlowingBEAR GB, your lynch has been determined by RNG. SUBMIT YOURSELF UNTO DEATH. LOL | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
THE GODS HAVE SPOKEN. LET THEIR WILL BE DONE. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:09 Blazinghand wrote: heh, GB, of course you disagree with RNG, you are scum-- RNG has proven it. now DIE. I'm scum with the largest filter day1. Try again BH lol | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Because I'm a good player and I will find scum when I get the chance to be active. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:08 Blazinghand wrote: The Post count for my RNG declaration post was 23206369 23206369 mod 17 = 9 9th player is glowingbear ##vote GlowingBEAR GB, your lynch has been determined by RNG. SUBMIT YOURSELF UNTO DEATH. I don't even know how you find the post count of a post. As far as I can tell, you're pullig numbers out of your ass. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:12 jrkirby wrote: I don't even know how you find the post count of a post. As far as I can tell, you're pullig numbers out of your ass. Trust me, he isn't. It doesn't make RNG less horrible. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:10 GlowingBear wrote: I'm scum with the largest filter day1. Try again BH lol HE ADMITS IT | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
No I am not sure lol. It appears that I got you mixed up with Coagulation. I made that first post about you thinking back on my experiences from the Shadowed Mini Mafia: The Reboot. So err sorry about that. However, If Coagulation was in this game I would totes be down to vote him. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
BH IF YOU ARE TOWN YOU'RE MESSING THE THREAD. DISCUSSING RNG WON'T GET US ANYWHERE AND IT WON'T GENERATE CONVERSATION MORE THAN BRINGING READS TO THE THREAD. COME ON! | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:16 GlowingBear wrote: BH IF YOU ARE TOWN YOU'RE MESSING THE THREAD. DISCUSSING RNG WON'T GET US ANYWHERE AND IT WON'T GENERATE CONVERSATION MORE THAN BRINGING READS TO THE THREAD. COME ON! mmhmm, "rng is disrupting scumhunting", a historically common scum response to rng. Like, I know i've been kinda joking a bit, but literally the most common scum response to rng is to claim that rng is disrupting the thread somehow (rather than just calling it bad or ignoring it) | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote: BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? This is a fair question. The fact of the matter is, every rng lynch discussion that doesn't roll the dice goes like this. People basically vaguely talk about how rng is not great, or talk about stats about historical rng, or whatever. Nobody gets invested, nobody cares, nobody gives away reads, nobody is under pressure, and nobody gets lynched. Take a look at the low tier policy talk in ANY game. What makes me, and my RNG, different, is that it selects a target before people discuss whether it's good or not. Now scum are on the line. Now they suddenly feel a need to justify or NOT justify voting for or not voting for GB, who is probably their scumbuddy. They're in a tough spot and it absolutely wrecks scumteams. I'm different than most people, jrkirby. Most people don't policy. Most people don't have the rock-hard, cast-iron BALLS to push policy like I do. Policy isn't REAL unless you're willing to go balls to the wall to lynch your policy target. And by jove, I WILL lynch GB, just as I've lynched so many others with the power of RNG. It is inevitable. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:20 Blazinghand wrote: mmhmm, "rng is disrupting scumhunting", a historically common scum response to rng. Like, I know i've been kinda joking a bit, but literally the most common scum response to rng is to claim that rng is disrupting the thread somehow (rather than just calling it bad or ignoring it) This is WIFOM, BH. If we are heading away from productive discussion, it's town's duty to get it back on track. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:03 Lord Tolkien wrote: BUT MOOOOOM, I got TLLOLOTGDTGN tonite, can't I wait till LATER to contribute? I was gonna respond with a parody of your post asking the thread to lynch you. But I am actually curious at what point does your posting of only joke posts, videos, and exclamations of "LOL" become unacceptable to the thread. Granted your cavalier attitude makes you almost appear townie. But the main issue is that a there is no content spread thru your jokes and "LOL's a townie would want to scumhunt and you have done nothing of the sort. Do you plan to contribute or you do you plan to keep stalling? | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote: BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications | ||
| ||
