EPTHearthstone Mafia - Page 32
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:26 ritoky wrote: what strikes me as odd is that wasn't it circ who came in to hard defend jrkirby early on when he was being pressured? then once again jrkirby starts to take interest in a gb lynch and now circ is suddenly around and interested? there's something funky goin on between these two. No. GB lynch was not what I was interested in. Random lynch was. But after searching for the source on why RNG lynch is good, I'm actually rethinking whether it's a good idea. I'm going to put my vote back on LT so hopefully he becomes more serious and actually plays the game in a useful way. Or gets lynched as scum. ##Unvote: GlowingBear Vote: Lord Tolkein | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Gn. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: Ritoky, Kirby thought I was suspicious because I quickly jumped into conclusions, and that circumstance was town because he was thinking logically and wasn't jumping into conclusions. Now he thinks I'm town mean but he is okay with RNGing me? When did I get townie to his eyes? But this is unflipped association. Not good yet. I just don't think he would instantly call his scum partner town that early. But his is WIFOM. I never called you suspicious or scummy. I just thought the conclusions you jumped to were unfounded. Townies make unfounded conclusions all the time. | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:26 ritoky wrote: what strikes me as odd is that wasn't it circ who came in to hard defend jrkirby early on when he was being pressured? then once again jrkirby starts to take interest in a gb lynch and now circ is suddenly around and interested? there's something funky goin on between these two. Do you want me to explain my schedule to you? I will if you want. As for GB's question, my current reads aren't strong enough to lay out on the table right now, and frankly, I don't know how much it matters at this stage. We've got some clear targets that are slowly beginning to get multiple votes placed on them. If we don't consolidate, we run the risk of a no-lynch, which doesn't benefit anyone. I don't WANT to lynch you right now, GB, because I'm not a fan of RNG and you keep discussions going. But before I place my vote on risk.nuke, I want to hear the argument against it, assuming there is one, to see if it holds water. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:47 Circumstance wrote: Do you want me to explain my schedule to you? I will if you want. As for GB's question, my current reads aren't strong enough to lay out on the table right now, and frankly, I don't know how much it matters at this stage. We've got some clear targets that are slowly beginning to get multiple votes placed on them. If we don't consolidate, we run the risk of a no-lynch, which doesn't benefit anyone. I don't WANT to lynch you right now, GB, because I'm not a fan of RNG and you keep discussions going. But before I place my vote on risk.nuke, I want to hear the argument against it, assuming there is one, to see if it holds water. It's plurality lynch. The player with most votes dies. There is no "no-lynch" | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:54 GlowingBear wrote: It's plurality lynch. The player with most votes dies. There is no "no-lynch" Well, that eliminates that concern, at least. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
 | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:47 Circumstance wrote: Do you want me to explain my schedule to you? I will if you want. Could be mere coincidence, I am mostly just making a note in the thread to myself and others about the topic; I really have no idea where your head is at....neither with kirby as he doesn't really talk about reads either. But at least you don't have the breadth of posts with negligence like he has. | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
jaybrundage (0): Holyflare (0): LordTolkien (4): Misder, jrkirby (0): Glowingbear (2): Seuss, Blazinghand, Misder (1): Alakaslam (0): risk.nuke (2): VisceraEyes, Glowingbear Not Voting (9): ObiWanShinobi, LordTolkien, ritoky, risk.nuke, Oatsmaster, Alakaslam, Damdred, liancourt, Circumstance Currently Lord Tolkien is set to be lynched Day 1 ends at Sunday, Nov 02 2:00am GMT (GMT+00:00) (in ) Voting is mandatory | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
You bring up risk.nuke what's your reasoning for wanting to lynch him? How do you feel about Oats? Do you still think hes worth analyzing? What's your read on him? LT has quite a bit of votes on him but you haven't mentioned him as a candidate. Why is that? Who is your ideal lynch candidate? | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
| ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On November 01 2014 07:31 ritoky wrote: What happened to this read? I mean, I don't necessarily disagree with your conclusions; but earlier you said he doesn't look awkward and is answering everything seriously. Now you criticize him for being serious and say he has no content. But he was answering everything, how does that make sense? Also, you were posting at the same time when he made that post and didn't respond to it in any way; yet waited until now to bring it up. Why would you do that if you find it so odd? reads evolve, i evolved my read on him because he didn't deliver. I don't think I'm criticizing him anywhere in my post, I merely state a fact that he's being serious, there's nothing wrong with being serious, but I assumed being serious meant giving some content and decent scum reads. I'm not a perfect man. I miss things and just skim the the thread and try to focus on the big picture and not tunnel on 1 person because I've had bad experience regarding tunneling and when I get time or when the thread seems stagnant i go back and re read the thread or go filter diving like i was doing previously. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On November 01 2014 08:20 VisceraEyes wrote: I've given plenty of insights. The following are insights I've made in the thread: HF and Misder seem to be thinking critically about the game > town GB seems genuinely aggressive > town JayB seems to be buddying me > mafia? risk.nuke seems to be third-party hunting > mafia! That's like four more insights than like 3/4 of the players in the game! How about you define "insightful" for me if inactivity isn't your beef? can u point me to a post you think misder has been thinking critcally about the game? | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On November 01 2014 11:31 jaybrundage wrote: Circumstance giving that your reason for holding on to your reads isn't necessary there can not be a No-Lynch. I would like you to put who you suspect on the table. Echoing GB Even if your reads are half baked it helps to see your thought process and how you arrived there. I do have some questions for you as well. You bring up risk.nuke what's your reasoning for wanting to lynch him? How do you feel about Oats? Do you still think hes worth analyzing? What's your read on him? LT has quite a bit of votes on him but you haven't mentioned him as a candidate. Why is that? Who is your ideal lynch candidate? I'll go over the questions first, since I need to do a proper filter runthrough before I go on with reads. I've been going mainly on instinct since I went to bed last night. I brought up risk.nuke because I noticed a push towards him, and given that I was assuming a majority requirement, I figured it would be pertinent to nail someone down quickly. Oats still feels like he's not really helping move things along. Holyflare's assessment of him mimics my thoughts to a certain extent. I think he's definitely worth an analysis, because he just doesn't seem to make sense right now. LT seemed like a placeholder more than anything - the rationale of voting seemed to be mainly "eh, no big loss if we're wrong." And I did see a few posts indicating that people were planning on unvoting him (though that evidently didn't wind up happening in the thread itself). If it were up to me, I had the power to off one player straight away, I wouldn't be prepared to do so just yet. I'm not seeing something I can put together and say "Yes, this player is definitely ideal to lynch today", so with the time we have, I'd like for us all to get a stronger case put together on someone. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote: VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting. JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier.... Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon. I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness. 2) still don't know if the cat does what it says 3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information? I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
LT seemed like a placeholder more than anything - the rationale of voting seemed to be mainly "eh, no big loss if we're wrong." And I did see a few posts indicating that people were planning on unvoting him (though that evidently didn't wind up happening in the thread itself)./QUOTE] By this, I meant multiple people. Apparently, Kirby did actually unvote him, but then re-voted him for some reason. | ||
| ||
