|
On November 01 2014 14:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote:The dichotomy between lian/Circumstance is something I'm looking at. I really don't like how lian nitpicks at one of Circumstance's posts and then turns around and then says "hey, it reminds me of when I was new." When you're new, you end up leaving a ton of holes in your game that people can pick at, which is what I've seen in Circumstance's play. (not having enough scumreads, putting quite a bit of emphasis on setup, etc) You'd think that would mean you would put more effort into figuring that player out instead of just pushing a tiny thing like that, but I guess lian doesn't feel like doing that. I find it strange. Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 13:51 liancourt wrote:
misder is my top scum atm reasons are in my previous post
dont think he's posted anything since then. Where do you stand on Circumstance? Also, the analysis thing on Jay is a waste of time because he's town. I'm not going to elaborate on this because the cat is going to explain it for you. On the off chance that the cat is actually controlled by 3p or mafia, I can compare my read to whatever it gives us and see if it's actually a town entity or not by seeing if it agrees with me. ##Analyze: JBI kind of realized that I contradicted myself in that paragraph, but w/e it's fine don't think about it.
the post i quoted made me change my mind about him because it was reminiscent of my first time play here. I was hesitant to give strong reads and was apprehensive to make scum reads because I wasnt sure and was afraid of being wrong, kind of what I felt from that post because it was the emobodiment of hesitation and unsuredness. I can relate to that and understand it so I'm willing to give him more time to prove himself.
|
On November 01 2014 14:08 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 13:29 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 12:29 liancourt wrote:On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote:
VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting.
JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier....
Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon.
I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness.
2) still don't know if the cat does what it says
3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information?
I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke You must of missed this. Using this on a lurker (if you do plan to use it) would be a waste. On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:
I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.
Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.
This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow. Why do you trust and believe the cat before it has even done anything? Cuz no one has ever lied in a mafia game right? And how is it a waste? How do you know the cat doesn't have more information? If you use it on a lurker with nearly no content and the cat comes back with something more; it potentially has more info, if it says idk, then it is basically useless since it just distributes an opinion from a source who's motive we don't know. I don't see how that is a useless proposition in the slightest. The fact that you have 0 skepticism over this shit doesn't reflect a townie mindset.
Rofl How about you go read what my opinion about the cat is.
Also Liancourt made his decision to pick a lurker from what i saw as a false assumption that the cat had knowledge independent of the thread based on him not reading well or misinterpreting what the cat said. So I pointed out his mistake.
Again read what my actually opinion is about the cat your whole tirade is irrelevant.
|
On November 01 2014 14:36 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 14:08 ritoky wrote:On November 01 2014 13:29 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 12:29 liancourt wrote:On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote:
VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting.
JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier....
Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon.
I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness.
2) still don't know if the cat does what it says
3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information?
I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke You must of missed this. Using this on a lurker (if you do plan to use it) would be a waste. On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:
I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.
Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.
This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow. Why do you trust and believe the cat before it has even done anything? Cuz no one has ever lied in a mafia game right? And how is it a waste? How do you know the cat doesn't have more information? If you use it on a lurker with nearly no content and the cat comes back with something more; it potentially has more info, if it says idk, then it is basically useless since it just distributes an opinion from a source who's motive we don't know. I don't see how that is a useless proposition in the slightest. The fact that you have 0 skepticism over this shit doesn't reflect a townie mindset. Rofl How about you go read what my opinion about the cat is. Also Liancourt made his decision to pick a lurker from what i saw as a false assumption that the cat had knowledge independent of the thread based on him not reading well or misinterpreting what the cat said. So I pointed out his mistake. Again read what my actually opinion is about the cat your whole tirade is irrelevant.
i don't think your previously stated opinion matters in this case. you just quoted the cat and bolded it like it was fact to refute someone's reasoning. which to me, says you believe it. and if your previous opinion was any different, that just makes it worse. but i mean, we will see this cat analysis since apparently it's going on you w/e the thing posts.
|
|
|
On November 01 2014 14:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
##vote : Blazinghand
Tempted to roll with this tbh.
|
On November 01 2014 14:44 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 14:36 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 14:08 ritoky wrote:On November 01 2014 13:29 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 12:29 liancourt wrote:On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote:
VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting.
JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier....
Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon.
I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness.
2) still don't know if the cat does what it says
3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information?
I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke You must of missed this. Using this on a lurker (if you do plan to use it) would be a waste. On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:
I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.
Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.
This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow. Why do you trust and believe the cat before it has even done anything? Cuz no one has ever lied in a mafia game right? And how is it a waste? How do you know the cat doesn't have more information? If you use it on a lurker with nearly no content and the cat comes back with something more; it potentially has more info, if it says idk, then it is basically useless since it just distributes an opinion from a source who's motive we don't know. I don't see how that is a useless proposition in the slightest. The fact that you have 0 skepticism over this shit doesn't reflect a townie mindset. Rofl How about you go read what my opinion about the cat is. Also Liancourt made his decision to pick a lurker from what i saw as a false assumption that the cat had knowledge independent of the thread based on him not reading well or misinterpreting what the cat said. So I pointed out his mistake. Again read what my actually opinion is about the cat your whole tirade is irrelevant. i don't think your previously stated opinion matters in this case. you just quoted the cat and bolded it like it was fact to refute someone's reasoning. which to me, says you believe it. and if your previous opinion was any different, that just makes it worse. but i mean, we will see this cat analysis since apparently it's going on you w/e the thing posts.
If your too lazy to filter me and find what i said about the cat previously and insist on arguing from ignorance. I won't be responding to anything further on the matter.
|
On November 01 2014 14:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Tempted to roll with this tbh.
Get some dice DO IT FOR RNG.
|
Seriously that rng shit was such bullshit this time. Super cop out, and not at all like what he did before
|
On November 01 2014 14:53 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 14:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On November 01 2014 14:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
##vote : Blazinghand Tempted to roll with this tbh. Get some dice DO IT FOR RNG.
Get it! Cause he said roll and i said dice and RNG + Show Spoiler +
|
Tempted to rescind my townread on jb for his bad jokes.
Is it worth it? Probably.
|
On November 01 2014 07:01 Holyflare wrote:
Anyway going to get absolutely wasted and dress like a slutty witch cya
Also if this guy doesn't give us pics we lynch him.
Good night.
|
On November 01 2014 15:01 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Tempted to rescind my townread on jb for his bad jokes.
Is it worth it? Probably.
IT WAS WORTH IT!!!!!11111
|
On November 01 2014 14:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Seriously that rng shit was such bullshit this time. Super cop out, and not at all like what he did before
I'm having faith that Blazing will come back and actually do something.
|
Tolkien, is you getting lynched beneficial to town? Why post the way you are posting now?
Seems like some people still think I'm scum. I'll just look at
On November 01 2014 06:45 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 00:17 Misder wrote:
I realized that my vote to analyze Circumstance was a bit too vote happy, but I guess it doesn't make a difference now. First he comes out of the left field votes LT. Then tries to make something out nothing with the cat. Wants to analyze obi but votes for circumstance instead...whaaa? And then this post. I really dont get what his thought processes were. Number 1 scum atm.
Why do you think that voting for Tolkien in my first post was bad? It was nothing because no one wanted to analyze quickly with me. I changed my mind about Obi, and voted fo analyze Circumstance cause he was the one I wanted to analyze at the time. Not understanding thought processes is not an argument against me.
Since jaybrundage has so many votes to analyze him, everyone should just vote him, since once majority hits, the cat will speak (given correct info from cat).
Sorry, don't think I have time before I sleep tonight to talk about what's happened since I last posted. From the rough skim, I'm ok with a risk.nuke lynch for now.
|
On November 01 2014 15:05 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 14:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Seriously that rng shit was such bullshit this time. Super cop out, and not at all like what he did before I'm having faith that Blazing will come back and actually do something.
I don't.
You shouldn't.
|
On November 01 2014 15:11 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 15:05 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 14:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Seriously that rng shit was such bullshit this time. Super cop out, and not at all like what he did before I'm having faith that Blazing will come back and actually do something. I don't. You shouldn't.
I have faith that he'll do something. I won't say I have faith that it will be something useful or productive.
|
I really don't both ways.
|
##Analyze: JayBrundage
That makes sense, what Misder said. Honestly curiosity is more of a driving factor than any kind of desire for useful information from the Cat. It intrigues me, and JayBrundage makes a fine analysis.
|
On November 01 2014 15:07 Misder wrote:Tolkien, is you getting lynched beneficial to town? Why post the way you are posting now? Seems like some people still think I'm scum. I'll just look at Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 06:45 liancourt wrote:On November 01 2014 00:17 Misder wrote:
I realized that my vote to analyze Circumstance was a bit too vote happy, but I guess it doesn't make a difference now. First he comes out of the left field votes LT. Then tries to make something out nothing with the cat. Wants to analyze obi but votes for circumstance instead...whaaa? And then this post. I really dont get what his thought processes were. Number 1 scum atm. Why do you think that voting for Tolkien in my first post was bad? It was nothing because no one wanted to analyze quickly with me. I changed my mind about Obi, and voted fo analyze Circumstance cause he was the one I wanted to analyze at the time. Not understanding thought processes is not an argument against me. Since jaybrundage has so many votes to analyze him, everyone should just vote him, since once majority hits, the cat will speak (given correct info from cat). Sorry, don't think I have time before I sleep tonight to talk about what's happened since I last posted. From the rough skim, I'm ok with a risk.nuke lynch for now.
can u explain why you changed your mind and why you wanted to analyze circ?
ur vote entry didn't seem natural.
|
First to analyze jaybrundage, I am hipster yo
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SZmUSix.gif)
