|
On November 01 2014 14:12 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 00:50 Seuss wrote:On October 31 2014 22:47 Holyflare wrote:On October 31 2014 15:08 Seuss wrote:
He basically jumped hard on the first person to post anything remotely suspicious. The post in question wasn't fantastic but it seemed really opportunistic to me. so you admit that it's at least remotely suspicious and that he drove the discussion forward on this point, why is it scummy then? Emphasis on remote, and emphasis on the opportunism. jrkirby's post was pretty useless and as part of a larger case I'd accept it as a point against him, but on it's own it's the sort of thing I see Town players do all the time when the rest of the game is still joking around. It's an easy pitch to swing at to try and grab some town cred if you're scum. this is monte regarding his opinion on gb. It's the only content worthy thing in his filter. I can see where he's coming from, but gb has done much more so I'm hoping monte posts if he still thinks of gb this way still.
I'm not sure you could have worded this more awkwardly.
GlowingBear has been active but pretty neutral on his own. However, jrkirby has been extremely self-conscious since then. Example:
On November 01 2014 09:35 jrkirby wrote:
Just so everyone knows, this is a vote for RNG, not for GB in particular.
Too much focus on what people think of him rather than who is actually scum.
In other news I was kind of hoping Damdred would respond to me as I'm not impressed with his contributions thus far. He's saying he has town/scum reads but they're just thrown out there without any context.
|
1563 Posts
|
Can you explain why damdred is scummier than jrkirby I Seuss?
|
alright, back from long series of cancer inhouses
wheeeeeeee~
I'm tired and actually want to sleep, but I SUPPOSE I should help lead town to victory.
...when I'm not about to pass out.
First,
I really want to analyze JB. But whatever town wants, I guess. I'll consolidate because I'm a conformist and not mafia trying to waste muh votes.
Two,
Misder, I find it very enlightening to see how people reacted to my blatant trolling. Very enlightening indeed. It's how I garner early reads: looking at the wagons that always form on me D1. :D
Plus no one ever lynches me D1, so why should I be concerned.
Three,
Holyflare, VE, and GlowingBear are probably town. Compare the cancer mafia Glowing to current Glowing. Much more wililng to take a stance and much less passive. Will peg him as town for now. Would also sort of like to say OWS is slightly leaning town, but much less to go on.
I've heard people say that Oats is hard to read, but idk, he's leaning town in my reading.
Everyone else are scummerdawgs, or I can't read them based on past experience. Id actually have to, like, put in effort and nitpick their filters.
Four,
as much lulz and hilarity BHs RNG lynch turned out in FFL mini-mafia, I'm not quite ready to take one on yet. At least, not when I've good a semi-decent read on Glowing. Won't vote for what I suspect is a sure mislynch.
Also again, lynching (one of?) the most active player is lelelelel
Five,
Zzzzz, Giving risk.nuke some time to do his IRL shit. But if he dont post D2, we post lynch him then. If we lurker lynch someone, we should totes lynch Monte Seuss lel.
jrkirby: who are you mafia reads? You made it clear that I'm only your vote because you want me to post stuff and not troll.
I'll post moar, but can't promise not trolling on occasion. But in any event, you've given no real stance on possible mafia, instead sheeping onto a silly RNG vote.
I'll be awake sometime before ~12PM EDT to carry town to victoryyyyyyy.
For now,
#Vote Seuss
But i'll consolidate when the time cums
|
Hmm, no, I like that new post.
#Unvote Seuss
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
I disagree that it's different. Admittedly, I had not originally planned to use it but due to special reasons it became necessary to have a decisive vote. Why does this make me scum? I lynched scum last time with RNG so why oppose it now that it us proven to work
|
That's a horrible fucking reason and a horrible fucking post.
If I could shoot you I would.
|
It literally figuratively gave me cancer
|
Ok, I think Alakaslam was being deliberately misleading here. I certainly fell for it.
On November 01 2014 09:35 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:33 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications Except hitting scum more than day1 analysts
He says that RNG is better than town at lynching scum d1. I thought I'd read this elsewhere, so I immediately took it at face value.
After looking for my original source, and getting something that contradicted it, I looked in further to what Alakaslam said about RNG in previous games. I found this from a couple months ago:
On July 11 2014 11:27 Alakaslam wrote:
Actually
RNG has a higher chance of hitting scum than TL's recent met-
(Looks at recent game scum d1 lynch statistics)
Foget RNG what we gonna do
He knows RNG is not the best option. He's looked it up before. But he's pushing it anyway? And making claims about it that are false?
My scum-sense is on tingling.
And since LT has posted good content now, this is a perfect time to move my vote over to him.
##Unvote: Lord Tolkein
##Vote: Alakaslam
Also, the way that he pushed the jay analysis is kinda weird. But that might just be how he plays.
|
Ok. I know for a fact that BH likes RNG.
I also know for a fact that sometimes he uses this to generate discussion.
But there are two problems here:
1) He came to the thread late when discussion was already generated. There is plenty of information to have reads now. So this excuse to use RNG is off
2) It rolled one of the most active and prolific player in the game, so the chance of a mislynch is very high. But he insists to use RNG.
It looks like he is trying to get town off the right track, because he is insisting on a mechanic that is going to lead on a mislynches. He is not reading the game and he is not caring for the game. You can see that he refuses to talk about anything else.
Who BH thinks is scum? Nobody knows.
Who BH thinks is town? Nobody knows.
Passivity and creating confusion. Mafia traits.
BH is mafia.
|
On November 01 2014 19:12 jrkirby wrote:Ok, I think Alakaslam was being deliberately misleading here. I certainly fell for it. Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 09:35 Alakaslam wrote:On November 01 2014 09:33 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 09:20 jrkirby wrote:
BH why didn't you let us discuss rng lynch before culculating the rng so we can tell if anybody changes their mind about rng based on the outcome of it? Why even discuss it. Its dumb. At best its a first post conversation starter. This late in the day it has no useful applications Except hitting scum more than day1 analysts He says that RNG is better than town at lynching scum d1. I thought I'd read this elsewhere, so I immediately took it at face value. After looking for my original source, and getting something that contradicted it, I looked in further to what Alakaslam said about RNG in previous games. I found this from a couple months ago: Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 11:27 Alakaslam wrote:
Actually
RNG has a higher chance of hitting scum than TL's recent met-
(Looks at recent game scum d1 lynch statistics)
Foget RNG what we gonna do He knows RNG is not the best option. He's looked it up before. But he's pushing it anyway? And making claims about it that are false? My scum-sense is on tingling. And since LT has posted good content now, this is a perfect time to move my vote over to him. ##Unvote: Lord Tolkein##Vote: AlakaslamAlso, the way that he pushed the jay analysis is kinda weird. But that might just be how he plays.
except the last time we had RNG, we lynched scum. Humans are biased to only remember good things.
Not a point.
|
On November 01 2014 21:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok. I know for a fact that BH likes RNG.
I also know for a fact that sometimes he uses this to generate discussion.
But there are two problems here:
1) He came to the thread late when discussion was already generated. There is plenty of information to have reads now. So this excuse to use RNG is off
2) It rolled one of the most active and prolific player in the game, so the chance of a mislynch is very high. But he insists to use RNG.
It looks like he is trying to get town off the right track, because he is insisting on a mechanic that is going to lead on a mislynches. He is not reading the game and he is not caring for the game. You can see that he refuses to talk about anything else.
Who BH thinks is scum? Nobody knows.
Who BH thinks is town? Nobody knows.
Passivity and creating confusion. Mafia traits.
BH is mafia.
nah point 2 isnt relevant because RNGing then deciding to push that person defeats the purpose of RNG.
So yeah these are mostly bad reasons why BH is scum.
If BH was town, he would do the RNG shit too. But he would do additional stuff like trying harder to convince people to jump on the RNG wagon.
|
There is no tongue-in-cheek
|
Slam, he had the chance to do it earlier. He came to the thread, someone sent him to dinner (lol) and he peace'd out.
Why he didn't start the RNG that time and not now?
|
I think he answered that
What is my voting history sson
|
No way. He didn't.
I'm sure he is mafia.
##Vote: Blazinghand
|
On November 01 2014 16:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
Can you explain why damdred is scummier than jrkirby I Seuss?
Not necessarily scummier, but he's scummy enough for a vote and in my experience votes are a decent incentive to get someone to respond.
|
Why make a post about how you don't like what I'm doing when I'm clearly not in the thread? That's cool though I'll give my reads better when I get on a comp
|
So that you can respond whenever you are around, and so that my vote has some context. Not exactly rocket surgery.
Question to the peanut gallery, what's liancourt's typical meta? He's been working hard to have an opinion on just about everything and everyone today and I'm not sure what to make of it.
|
On November 01 2014 22:44 Seuss wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 16:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
Can you explain why damdred is scummier than jrkirby I Seuss? Not necessarily scummier, but he's scummy enough for a vote and in my experience votes are a decent incentive to get someone to respond.
Why dont you vote the person you think is the scummiest?
Do you view the lynch as something other than a device to kill scum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
