EPTI'm a cop you idiot mafia 2 - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
INPUT ON SHARING SCUMREADS GO | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:37 Blazinghand wrote: It's fine, just don't go naming townreads unless they're people you're okay with them dying On reflection I feel the same way. Good way to get reads out before you die too, given there's a 20% chance for all of us dying. What do you make of Xatalos? I'm actually a bit worried with how easily he posted the list giving townreads. Could get other people to comment/address them which would give scum a better picture of whom to shoot (if they're not bluesniping) or try to lynch. He pretty much had to townread me or I'd know he's scum from our previous game. The reasoning he gave for calling you scum was something that makes me doubt it though. Doesn't seem like the kind of justification scum would use. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
 Perhaps later you may win over my companionship. Also turns out I'm really bad at following my own policy. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:51 Xatalos wrote: By the way, why wouldn't scum use an argument like that on BH? Because on a superficial level it looks really bad. Scum would want to pad it with something more substantial. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
Presuming you're not going to claim scum would you have done anything differently if you were scum? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 09:04 JarJarDrinks wrote: Yes, if scum is about to be lynched, he WILL claim doctor. Do you disagree? Yes I disagree because the D1 lynch will be between two 'cops', so the guy we're lynching has already claimed something else. No reason for doc to claim before D2. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 09:08 JarJarDrinks wrote: This entire conversation is based on if the cop is shot N0. Oh right. In that case doc should probably claim. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 11:26 Blazinghand wrote: 1. No, not all of it. 2. Yes I had long snarky responses about how phenomenally terrible your questions were but you don't deserve to be educated. I would type long snarky responses to those long snarky responses if you had written them. You made the right decision, punk. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/hbdfaeC.png) | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 12:04 Blazinghand wrote: so do you have any thoughts based on my answers, or have you too realized how vapid and irrelevant the initial questions were? I got what I wanted out of it. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 27 2014 14:05 Oatsmaster wrote: I think that its far more advantagous to just play normally rather than be scared of a townie being killed because scum know who the good townies are and they are gonna die anyway regardless of how we feel. I think this is awful. If they can't find blues they're going to shoot at the strongest townies and if no one actually shares their strongest townreads scum could have no idea who they are. I also don't like how you bring this up after we've already discussed why it's bad. Also BH advocating "mass claims" as scum when this setup excludes the doc from saving anyone N0 is pretty pants on head. Oats #1 scum SEA | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:22 Xatalos wrote: Or it could be that I'm trying not to share all my reads and observations yet. We concluded that sharing scumreads is probably a good idea. Are you saying you observed what I did but purposefully didn't share it? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 28 2014 02:40 Xatalos wrote: We never came to any clear conclusion about how we should handle our reads before N0 deadline. I still don't think it's the correct action to share everything unless it's RIGHT before the deadline that you want to do that. Actually Oats did share his reason, but the reason was just plain bad. So I concluded that A) he's scum and trying to justify a read without any true reasoning B) there's more to it (a blueread or something else that he doesn't want to share yet). I felt we reached a conclusion here. On February 27 2014 08:43 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On reflection I feel the same way. Good way to get reads out before you die too, given there's a 20% chance for all of us dying. You didn't disagree with that conclusion at the time, so I presumed you agreed to it. And if you felt that Oats already shared his reason, why did you ask him the same question again? On February 27 2014 15:14 Xatalos wrote: How come BH is the towniest of town, Oats? Clearly you still didn't find his answer until that point satisfactory. I'm not following you. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 28 2014 02:52 Xatalos wrote: Oats only shared his reason after I asked him that question...? That's pretty much the point. I think it's fine to post some reads and maybe infodump at the deadline. But I don't think it's best to share EVERYTHING freely right now. Okay, you're right. I got the order wrong. Carry on. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 28 2014 03:04 Xatalos wrote: I hope they try to bluehunt and hit someone like Sn0_Man (no offense SnO_Man). Apologetic tone. Scummus confirmus. | ||
| ||
