• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:53
CEST 13:53
KST 20:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy1uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event12Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple5SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Lambo Talks: The Future of SC2 and more... uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event Serral wins EWC 2025
Tourneys
SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Global Tourney for College Students in September RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September StarCon Philadelphia
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 612 users

Golden Sun: The Lost Age Mafia Djinn Edition

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 17 2014 01:16 GMT
#120
/in

for my tambo fake claims
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 02:29 GMT
#751
hello everybody. how are you this evening?

o wait....like 6 hrs in and 30 pages? oh god....time to start reading.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 04:38 GMT
#959
holy crap that was a long read. i felt like i was never going to catch up to it.

i feel like there is a lot of jokes and interactions between people who have played together a lot that went wayyyyy over my head in the first few pages.

right now I am having a little bit of trouble organizing my thoughts because there is just a lot of stuff.

the two largest things that i noticed are:

1) 27ninjabunnies talks a whole lot about herself. I am kinda gonna sheep tamburini's reads on bunnies. I read a post and I am neutral, then I read the next one and I find it defensive and with 1 million I's in it, which puts me off. Then I read the next one and I am back to neutral. Idk, it just leaves me a bit skeptical because last game I played with her she was oozing town out of her pores it was so obvious, and the fact that I don't have that feeling right now gives me pause and concern. That said, she is contributing and typing seriously which is significantly more than most people (including myself) have done thus far.

2) I find the people who were highly opposed to the RNG lynch on day 1 questionable. Especially those who said things along the lines of "I think I am better than RNG". I think if you say that on day 2 you can sell me quite a bit on it, as I would not be in favor of an RNG lynch on any day after day 1. Usually there is enough information to make singinifcantly informed guesses by that point in the game. But when you say something along the lines of being "better than RNG" on day 1, it makes me think that you have more information than I do. Which very likely means that you are scum.

I have to do a couple things unexpectedly now and should be back in an hour or so to contribute more, but for now my I will at least leave my top town and scum read.

Top town: Meapak
Top scum: waveofshadow
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 06:15 GMT
#1075
On May 21 2014 14:58 Tehpoofter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 14:57 Alakaslam wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:49 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:48 Alakaslam wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote:
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita


IS geript right? Why is he wrong?

Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?

He isn't because I am town and sometimes I feel like reading the game to further enhance my trolling/joking around and because I do actually enjoy thinking about whether or not something is alignment indicative.



KK can you answer the other stuff if you're reading

What other stuff?



Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote:
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita


IS geript right? Why is he wrong?

Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?


This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well.

re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on.

re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say.

re Austin: null

re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area.

re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes.

And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 06:36 GMT
#1081
On May 21 2014 15:23 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 15:15 ritoky wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:58 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:57 Alakaslam wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:49 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:48 Alakaslam wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote:
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita


IS geript right? Why is he wrong?

Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?

He isn't because I am town and sometimes I feel like reading the game to further enhance my trolling/joking around and because I do actually enjoy thinking about whether or not something is alignment indicative.



KK can you answer the other stuff if you're reading

What other stuff?



On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote:
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita


IS geript right? Why is he wrong?

Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?


This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well.

re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on.

re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say.

re Austin: null

re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area.

re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes.

And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy.

And your MZ read?


I liked Meapak's poking of bunnies on very good points. I also like how he called out jampidampi for regarding having people that you would never lynch on day 1. I thought it was an offhand comment that stood out to me when I read the thread and the only person who I noticed who also pinged it was Meapak.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 22:10 GMT
#1588
I am back now, sorry for my lack of posting recently, my dog got really sick and had to go to the vet.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 22:18 GMT
#1611
re Austin: I mean, I wish my reads were better too, but so far this game has been very confusing for me. Yesterday turned out to be a very busy day for me, so my attention wasn't at it's fullest in this thread, which is partially my own fault. However, nearly 25% of this thread seems to me to be a group of veterans who know eachother trolling and making inside jokes which I don't particularly get. Thus it is very hard to read a lot of people in this game.

I have only read about 10 pages from my last post so hopefully by the time I get caught up I will have better material. If you want my thoughts on particular people, then I will do my best to oblige.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 22:54 GMT
#1657
On May 22 2014 07:22 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 07:20 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 07:19 marvellosity wrote:
On May 22 2014 07:18 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 07:17 marvellosity wrote:
I even quoted and bolded it Hapa. Jeez man.


Wait who are you talking about? Tambo?

no, ritoky.


But I'm not advocating lynching ritoky over layabout. I'm advocating lynching Tambo over layabout >>
You were asking ritoky to respond to my case, and marv's comment about someone's MZ read was about ritoky.


Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 07:18 ritoky wrote:
re Austin: I mean, I wish my reads were better too, but so far this game has been very confusing for me. Yesterday turned out to be a very busy day for me, so my attention wasn't at it's fullest in this thread, which is partially my own fault. However, nearly 25% of this thread seems to me to be a group of veterans who know eachother trolling and making inside jokes which I don't particularly get. Thus it is very hard to read a lot of people in this game.

I have only read about 10 pages from my last post so hopefully by the time I get caught up I will have better material. If you want my thoughts on particular people, then I will do my best to oblige.
Can you start small then? Go with the people you've played with, pick like...2. Any 2 of your choice. Plox to read them and try to get a feel for them and actually conclude stuff.


Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 07:17 geript wrote:
Slam... Think about Scumeling and answer me my questions three mmmK.

1. On a scale of 4 to 36, how much scooby doo are you?
2. If you were forced into having a threesome, which two celebrities would you choose?
3. Beets or Brussel sprouts?
You got a long way to go, sir.


Well I think that in order to really read Yell0w, you have to read BH as well because their early posts are highly related. So I will start with BH, then move on to a couple people I played with before.

BH - Town - In the previous game I played, bunnies filled much the same role as BH is filling this game. Now I know he apparently has a thing for RNG lynches, and he thinks it's an even better scenario this game because the percentages are increased due to multiple factions; and you may or may not agree with that. What I liked about his post, was similar to bunnies prodding of yell0w last game. That it was the first real substantial and aggressive stance in the game and he forced people to both respond to and pick sides regarding it. It shows the me that he was aggressively trying to instigate conversation and gauge people's reactions.

Yell0w - Town - I think a lot of the hatred toward Yell0w is blowback for being closely associated with BH, and for his...idk...lack of self awareness sometimes? For example he said recently that he still doesn't understand why everyone hates on the RNG lynch so much and how no one told him why his different method of RNG lynch was wrong. To me that reads not as him fishing for how he can curry favor, but how he (like me to some degree) is feeling a high level of confusion. Personally I think that people pushing heavily on him are just going after low hanging fruit and want an easy ML; so that later in the game they can pass it off as an excuse and say "lulz, well he wasn't contributing much and was about that RNG lynch".

That said, I think that if either Yell0w or BH flips mafia, then the other is probably the same. Either Yell0w has been pocketed by BH or they are connected in my mind.

Sqrt - If I was forced to guess I would say he's leaning scummier? - Sqrt has been ML'd the past two games very early on as town both times for his style of play as town. This style of play is distinctly different than his last game. Whether that's trying to change what wasn't working, him being mafia, or the change in scope of the game; I am not really sure yet as I don't think he has provided anything SUPER alignment indicative yet.

Bunnies - No real comment that is different than before. I don't like her as much as I did last game, but I also don't like lynching people with 6 page+ filters on day 1.

mtamburini - leaning scum - As town last game he entered the thread disinterested and fakeclaiming vigi right away. He entered this thread obviously much different, which is understandable since you probably can't do that every game. However his long post near the beginning of the thread didn't really do much for me. It was a lot of space for basically not much content. And after that much of what he typed seemed very forced to me. When you're forcing things out rather than simply saying you have no idea when that is the truth, it reads scummy to me.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 22:57 GMT
#1659
On May 22 2014 07:40 austinmcc wrote:
So you'll totally sheep me, especially over that poser marv, but you'll sheep me on something you sort of entirely disagree with.

What I wrote about him included calling those things no bueno, the ones you seem to like.

Also let's talk about this:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 07:30 Koshi wrote:
1) 27ninjabunnies talks a whole lot about herself. I am kinda gonna sheep tamburini's reads on bunnies. I read a post and I am neutral, then I read the next one and I find it defensive and with 1 million I's in it, which puts me off. Then I read the next one and I am back to neutral. Idk, it just leaves me a bit skeptical because last game I played with her she was oozing town out of her pores it was so obvious, and the fact that I don't have that feeling right now gives me pause and concern. That said, she is contributing and typing seriously which is significantly more than most people (including myself) have done thus far.

This quote is either a lie, or it is town. Mafia is not able to feel like this. I wasn't in this newbie game nor did I read it but if they both were town and if it is true that rikoty was able to instant read her town than this read is pretty ok in my book. It isn't that wishy washy. There are maybe more sentences than needed but each sentence adds some more meaning.


Specifically:
  • HOLY BALLS CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHAT MTAMBURINI READ RITOKY IS SHEEPING RE: BUNNIES? Look at mtam's filter. mtam was SCUMMY on bunnies, then "moving towards neutral" because they agreed on something (moving towards neutral indicates....SCUMMY still), and later back to scummy again. Seriously, go look at mtam's bunnies stuff. Ritoky is "sheeping tamburini's reads on bunnies" which were "scummy --> moving towards neutral --> scummy".
  • READ THE ABOVE THING AGAIN. HE IS SHEEPING SOMEONE'S SCUMREAD. EXCEPT HE THINKS THE PERSON IS MAYBE TOWN OR MAYBE NEUTRAL. THESE ARE NOT THE SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAME.


##vote: Ritoky


I think you misread mtam's filter, I was moreso commenting on how I felt his movement back and forth from neutral to scummy, back to neutral was how I was feeling about bunnies.

However since then mtam has gotten a lot worse in my mind.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 21 2014 23:07 GMT
#1676
On May 22 2014 07:58 austinmcc wrote:
ritoky can you summarize how you think sqrt played as town, and then what specific changes you see in this game from those?


Well, I was one of the people that led the ML on him as town last game. People, including myself, didn't like his play because he was always demanding information from people without giving any back. He also actively avoided and ignored direct questioning on a few occasions. Outside of that he was not particularly giving any definite or strong reads and standing behind them with much reasoning. Or at least that was how I perceived him last game.

This game, most of his posts are him saying "this person - town". Then more recently some of his posts have been saying ask me for reasons if you want them, then providing the reasons upon request. Less so digging for information, moreso reacting to information. It still bugs me that he requests to be pinged for reasons instead of just including them with the reads themselves, but it is distinctly different.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 08:17 GMT
#2113
Geript, the more I read your impassioned posts the more I feel your read is sincere. However a lot of it seems to be predicated on previous play experience...which I don't have with steveling or you. So can you try to give me a solid example/comparison. You don't necessarily need to dig up quotes but like, idk something I can relate to. Because I feel like a lot of your interaction with steveling and a few others has gone so far over my head that I can't get a solid read of my own on it.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 09:21 GMT
#2141
On May 22 2014 18:09 marvellosity wrote:
I already did, and you ignored it, and you've been shitting up the thread ever since.

Yawn.


Overall I like a lot of what you have said so far in the game, but I have one question for you.

You are voting on layabout currently. And from my reading of your posts it is for being a shitter who is shitting up the thread. So my question for you is: am I wrong about your reason?

Cuz if not, it seems like you should be pushing equally as hard on a lot of other people, geript being one of them. If you're going to use that as your scum detector I feel like it should be applied universally; and it's strange that it isn't. But again, I might have not read your reasoning right.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 09:29 GMT
#2146
On May 22 2014 18:23 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 18:21 ritoky wrote:
On May 22 2014 18:09 marvellosity wrote:
I already did, and you ignored it, and you've been shitting up the thread ever since.

Yawn.


Overall I like a lot of what you have said so far in the game, but I have one question for you.

You are voting on layabout currently. And from my reading of your posts it is for being a shitter who is shitting up the thread. So my question for you is: am I wrong about your reason?

Cuz if not, it seems like you should be pushing equally as hard on a lot of other people, geript being one of them. If you're going to use that as your scum detector I feel like it should be applied universally; and it's strange that it isn't. But again, I might have not read your reasoning right.

yes, you're totally misreading my reasons for lynching layabout.


Okay so can you clarify it for me?

Cuz your reason says you are sheeping koshi. Koshi's reason says he has bad feels, and is contextualized with stuff about layabout refusing to participate and what he does say is generally thought of by people as useless.

I mean, that's different than shitter spam style, but to me that's still a vote based on someone being a shitter.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 09:31 GMT
#2147
On May 22 2014 18:27 marvellosity wrote:
Quite a weird question for you to make, ritoky, given I made a largeish post specifically saying how we aren't going to lynch the annoying, loud thread-shitters :/


I think maybe we have different definitions of shitters. I think there can be shitters in a thread who aren't necessarily spammers. Like if shitting was martial arts they would be the lurking shitter hidden dragon. That is how i feel about layabout.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 09:46 GMT
#2150
but if you post 10x in a thread and all of it is shit, that's a 100% shit rate, which makes you a shitter in my mind at least. guess it's more of a % useful material thing for me.

Since it seems like there is only 3 of us here, let's have a bit of a chat.

@Marv/geript

I am a little bit hung up on an odd interaction in the early game, that was part of the original reads I gave when I called MZ my top town. It was when he noticed Jampidampi supporting the people he would never lynch on day 1. I was actually a bit wrong on that when I went back and looked at it again. 27ninjabunnies was the one who said it, and she actually said "there is no way I would lynch meapak this game". Which meapak felt was very strange and then jampidampi hopped in to defend bunnies against that and a couple other accusations headed her way at the time.

What do you think of that interaction, because to me it seems very odd, or if you don't particularly think anything of it what do you think about those 3 people?

“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:00 GMT
#2154
Well I agree with meapak that having "never lynches" on day 1 in general seems sketchy as all hell to me and is a large reason of why I think he is town. But moreso I find jampidampi, who is not really a massive contributor so far at all in my mind, randomly jumping in to defend and on shaky points very strange. Like a scum inserting himself into an early convo to help a teammate and go unnoticed or to defend a town super early to try and earn himself points.

Regarding bunnies in that interaction...idk could go either way.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:02 GMT
#2155
On May 22 2014 19:00 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 18:46 ritoky wrote:
but if you post 10x in a thread and all of it is shit, that's a 100% shit rate, which makes you a shitter in my mind at least. guess it's more of a % useful material thing for me.

Since it seems like there is only 3 of us here, let's have a bit of a chat.

@Marv/geript

I am a little bit hung up on an odd interaction in the early game, that was part of the original reads I gave when I called MZ my top town. It was when he noticed Jampidampi supporting the people he would never lynch on day 1. I was actually a bit wrong on that when I went back and looked at it again. 27ninjabunnies was the one who said it, and she actually said "there is no way I would lynch meapak this game". Which meapak felt was very strange and then jampidampi hopped in to defend bunnies against that and a couple other accusations headed her way at the time.

What do you think of that interaction, because to me it seems very odd, or if you don't particularly think anything of it what do you think about those 3 people?


I am rereading that and to me it seems jampidampi started with questioning MZ about bunnies. MZ replies that bunnies made an "unguarded" comment and is likely town. jampidampi pressures MZ and is giving bunnies a scumread for being overly defensive. He is telling MZ that the way MZ clears Bunnies is wrong and that he should revisit that read. MZ doesn't do that and jampi gives MZ a light scumread for it.

This is pretty towny from Jampi tbh. quotes: ↓
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 07:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote:
Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess?

ehhhh
I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight.

Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here:

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:45 jampidampi wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:39 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:21 27ninjabunnies wrote:

--

It's also obvious who are going to jump out in the front and try and lead town one way or another. We definitely have a mafia or two in the first couple of pages.

You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be?


I may have my eye on a few people.

From my experience, there are two type of mafia people: the lurkers, and the ones who like to come out first day and take control of town.

I'm focusing on the latter because they are the ones to likely talk more, you can easily find their slips (if any), and they are also more likely to last longer than the lurker mafia.

Why are you avoiding my question? I asked you to name your suspicions, but instead you give an indefinite answear and then babble on about something that could reasonably be figured out from your earlier post.


If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why.
But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter.

But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game.

If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched.

So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk.

She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post?

+ Show Spoiler +
For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash.

On May 21 2014 07:56 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 07:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote:
On May 21 2014 07:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote:
Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess?

ehhhh
I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight.

Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here:

On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:45 jampidampi wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:39 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote:
On May 21 2014 06:21 27ninjabunnies wrote:

--

It's also obvious who are going to jump out in the front and try and lead town one way or another. We definitely have a mafia or two in the first couple of pages.

You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be?


I may have my eye on a few people.

From my experience, there are two type of mafia people: the lurkers, and the ones who like to come out first day and take control of town.

I'm focusing on the latter because they are the ones to likely talk more, you can easily find their slips (if any), and they are also more likely to last longer than the lurker mafia.

Why are you avoiding my question? I asked you to name your suspicions, but instead you give an indefinite answear and then babble on about something that could reasonably be figured out from your earlier post.


If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why.
But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter.

But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game.

If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched.

So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk.

She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post?

+ Show Spoiler +
For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash.

I agree that she made a terrible post there, my "unguarded" comment did not specifically relate to any one post in particular and more to her style of posting over all. My personal concern with her is actually her sudden clearing of me after I lightly defended her. It's waaaay too early in the game to say you won't lynch someone, even if you qualify it with D1.

It still kinda baffles me that you could ignore such a heavy contrast to your generalization about bunnies play. Makes me think that you didn't actually put that much thought into it, which makes me think you might be scum.

It's soon 2 AM here, so see you all tomorrow

______

From reading Jampi filter is goes like this:
Jampi: Hey Bunnies I think you are scum. Let's interact.
(interacting with scumread)
Jampi: Hey MZ, do you agree with my scumread on Bunnies.
(Interacts with MZ, gives MZ scumread for not seeing what he sees)

This shows that jampi had a strong read on Bunnies at that time. Town mindset.


Man...maybe me not sleeping much the past couple nights cuz my dog is super sick is killing my reading comprehension cuz I read Jampi as more defensive in regards to bunnies.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:07 GMT
#2158
Yeah I just re-read it, and the way I read the interaction is:
Jampi -> pokes bunnies reading her scummy
Bunnies -> responds to jampi
Jampi -> wants to see what meapak thinks
Meapak -> doesn't like the defensiveness
Jampi -> doesn't like meapak, because he liked what bunnies said

Maybe I should go to sleep, but it seemed like a very quick prod and flip.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:17 GMT
#2161
On May 22 2014 19:10 geript wrote:
I'm less feeling ritoky right now. Probly scum.


does it mean i have a problem with abusive relationships if i like you more for liking me less baby?
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:21 GMT
#2165
On May 22 2014 19:18 geript wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 19:17 ritoky wrote:
On May 22 2014 19:10 geript wrote:
I'm less feeling ritoky right now. Probly scum.


does it mean i have a problem with abusive relationships if i like you more for liking me less baby?

Mmm dirty. You know how to make a boy feel wanted.


You know what they say, ya ain't doin it right if ya can't hear the slapping.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:48 GMT
#2172
Well, I am going to sleep and I am not sure if I will make it back before the deadline.

For me it's between WOS and layabout.

WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says.

Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling.

Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 22:36 GMT
#2715
I only have a brief moment for now, so I only got to skim a couple things. BH's case on Odin looked long and full of substance, and the few things I read of tambo were all pretty trollzy. Thus, if I were going to look into vote swappers, I would look moreso into people who cited uneasiness toward tambo flipping town as a justification than BH's case as a justification.

Off to do some work.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 05:59 GMT
#2846
On May 22 2014 15:56 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2014 15:01 geript wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote:
WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town.

I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything.

Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment.

I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town.


Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time.

If by all the time, you mean his one game as town...
On May 22 2014 08:07 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote:
WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town.

I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything.

Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment.

I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town.


Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time.


Before we start arguing, I want to know what "genuine" is.


Genuine can be many things. What's "townie" about his filter is that he's constantly posting without thinking, getting into many fights, and is generally wearing his emotions on his sleeve. Contrast this with normal mafia instincts to hide, avoid conflict, etc.

Also, look at his past games and compare them to this one. If you haven't done that, then your analysis is meaningless.

I have. I pointed out that he's gotten in shit fights as scum before. As a matter of fact, as town, he got in far less shitfights AND his posting was far more full of actual content.
On May 22 2014 08:18 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:12 Cavalinho wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:07 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote:
WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town.

I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything.

Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment.

I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town.


Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time.


Before we start arguing, I want to know what "genuine" is.


Genuine can be many things. What's "townie" about his filter is that he's constantly posting without thinking, getting into many fights, and is generally wearing his emotions on his sleeve. Contrast this with normal mafia instincts to hide, avoid conflict, etc.

Also, look at his past games and compare them to this one. If you haven't done that, then your analysis is meaningless.


I've played with him before. He is doing the exact same thing he was doing in Cell, making people feel smart and getting people to ignore him. It's spammier than normal, but that's not the issue that I have with him.

Like some of the players right now are just calling it boring (Koshi) without trying to see if it's legitimately true or not. Why is this not an issue for you?


Nothing in this post describes why Steveling is scum. You compare his play in Cell to his play here, but they look very different at first glance to me. He is definetely active in Cell, but seems a lot more calm. Compared to this game, he's picking fights and is generally an attention-whore.

He was pretty whorish too. Plus for getting in as many fights as he's had, in all of those, he's been the calm one in them. He's the one who cares about whether or not he gets in trouble for it.
On May 22 2014 08:23 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:20 Cavalinho wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:18 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:12 Cavalinho wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:07 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote:
On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote:
WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town.

I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything.

Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment.

I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town.


Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time.


Before we start arguing, I want to know what "genuine" is.


Genuine can be many things. What's "townie" about his filter is that he's constantly posting without thinking, getting into many fights, and is generally wearing his emotions on his sleeve. Contrast this with normal mafia instincts to hide, avoid conflict, etc.

Also, look at his past games and compare them to this one. If you haven't done that, then your analysis is meaningless.


I've played with him before. He is doing the exact same thing he was doing in Cell, making people feel smart and getting people to ignore him. It's spammier than normal, but that's not the issue that I have with him.

Like some of the players right now are just calling it boring (Koshi) without trying to see if it's legitimately true or not. Why is this not an issue for you?


Nothing in this post describes why Steveling is scum. You compare his play in Cell to his play here, but they look very different at first glance to me. He is definetely active in Cell, but seems a lot more calm. Compared to this game, he's picking fights and is generally an attention-whore.


Then check my filter for the big, red-titled post on why I thought he was scum.



But that's the thing - those types of posts you point out "after the spam" really aren't present in Cell Mafia. He just seems as a whole so much more hyper and emotional in this game.

Anyway, talk to me about some other people. Layabout, tambo, ritoky, etc.

I agree that his play on face value looks different from Cell. But it also looks exceptionally different from Glory Hole. The trends in his play are far more reflective is his Cell game than his Gloryhole game.

Like I really don't get how you could meta a player so awfully. Mine explaining why you've protected Scumeling so many times on bad meta?


I really don't know how to say it any better than I have: the guy has a fucking 10 page filter in 24 hours. If you think mafia can do that, you're insane.

But then again, I really don't feel like arguing any more since...
a) There's no way I'm going to convince someone confirmation biased enough to call the guy "scumelling" over and overa gain.
b) Steveling isn't getting lynched. My target of choice is.
c) The "oats-whisperer" does not get to lecture me on how to interpret meta cases.


From my reading of the thread you were one of the people who switched votes onto Odin for not an outright stated justification in the thread. It seemed to me to be following behind Kush primarily, but even then you did a lot of hedging saying Val was probably a better target.

So I have two questions for you if you wouldn't mind obliging me.
1) Can you state clearly why you switched your vote onto Odin?
2) You made a very large deal about geript having confirmation bias blinding him about steveling, so where was that same concern about BH having confirmation bias against Odin in regards to the case he made? (see bolded part and convo above)
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 22:10 GMT
#3332
oh, i got warned for something. could a mod pm me what it was so i don't do it again?
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 22:26 GMT
#3364
My initial response to reading the night kills:
Koshi - Seemed pretty town last phase to me, there were a few people sheeping him, so I could see how he would be targeted...guess I was wrong about the town part.
BK - Was pretty null for me, but wasn't this guy a veteran smurfing? And didn't a few people take issue with the fact that he wouldn't admit who he was? Could have been a spite kill for that? Otherwise I don't particularly see a justification
MZ - Crap, there goes my top town read.

Going to read everything since the day phase post now.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 22:52 GMT
#3389
On May 24 2014 07:44 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2014 07:26 ritoky wrote:
My initial response to reading the night kills:
Koshi - Seemed pretty town last phase to me, there were a few people sheeping him, so I could see how he would be targeted...guess I was wrong about the town part.
BK - Was pretty null for me, but wasn't this guy a veteran smurfing? And didn't a few people take issue with the fact that he wouldn't admit who he was? Could have been a spite kill for that? Otherwise I don't particularly see a justification
MZ - Crap, there goes my top town read.

Going to read everything since the day phase post now.

what kind of approach is this?

Hay guys these are my reads on the people that are already dead! No one needs to know this and there is no real reason to post this as town. It does not do anything to further town goals.

However reading this makes me think that when ritoky wrote it he was thinking primarily about he would look in the thread when he wrote it instead of what he wants. It doesn't seem like a natural reaction. It looks constructed, fake.

Show nested quote +
"MZ - Crap, there goes my top town read."

Now when your town townread dies and you think that, at what part of your post would you put it? Here it reads like a bullet point not a curse! Typically I would expect this kind of comment at the start of a post since it's your immediate thought on seeing the flips.

Ritoky is mafia guys!


Well, I think that everyone should have a response to night kills....I don't see what's wrong about that. I think that you can derive things from who was killed. For example I legitimately think BK was killed out of spite by one of the couple people who took umbridge with him not sharing his alias.

As for my my MZ read, well my filter isn't very long and you can very quickly finding me calling him my top town early on and the justification for it shortly after. Why it was at the bottom, because I went in sequential order of kills.

I think you are just blinded by anger from my vote and reasoning behind my vote yesterday.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 23:03 GMT
#3401
On May 24 2014 07:54 Hapahauli wrote:
Ritoky, can you explain your read progression on tambo?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=169#3377


Someone didn't like my reads that I was giving, and how confused I was at the time that I was giving them. So they asked me to take baby steps and read the people I had played with in the newbie game. So I obliged them, and of the people I read tambo was the most scummy at the time. But that was from a sample size of 4 or 5 people. Of all the 32 players tambo wasn't as high up there as others, such as layabout and WOS. I said he got worse, and then I basically forgot about him for a while. His absolute and utter disengagement with the game and complete lack of resistance to a bandwaggon on him....well I just felt like if he had a role (town or scum) he would be more engaged and actually trying to get out of it rather than his lax approach. I ultimately arrived at the thought that it was probably bad VT play, much like I had for a lot of day 1.

That said, his doing just enough to get out of the lynch then disappearing bit, well I haven't really made heads or tails of it yet.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 24 2014 23:38 GMT
#3721
Alright, as I am watching the sounders game; hopefully I can get through this post on the current state of my reads:

Group 1 - People leaving things to be desired:
Tehpoofter - Pretty sure this guy was one of the towniest towns to ever town for a solid 6-8 hrs during D1, and since then he has mostly disappeared. I don't know if it's irl related, or too much reading, or intentional; but from what I understand he has certainly played enough mafia in his days for it to not just be him being overwhelmed by the volume of the thread. While he hasn't done enough of this for me to wash away his shiny town smell. He certainly is leaving things to be desired.

27ninjabunnies - This may sound a bit weird, but if I ignore your first 5 pages of your 9 page filter (the majority of which happened within the first 24 hours of the game starting); then I am highly underwhelmed. There's a lot of OGI irl posts, a lot of "hey catching up posts", and a lot of slight subtle commentary posts. It is clearly present that you are here a lot and reading the thread frequently; and yet you haven't pushed a case very strongly on anyone since the minor effort you put on tamburini. This was certainly not the town bunnies I was ride or die with on day 1 of the last newbie game. Your stock is plummeting for me and you are leaving things to be desired.

mtabmburini - You sure are making it hard to not push on you due to policy. Your level of disengagement from the game is astounding. My gut tells me it is because you rolled VT for the 2nd game in a row and are bored, but your play leaves things to be desired.

Group 2 - Where are you scooby doo?

mysterymeat1/errandor - you're in this game? coulda fooled me.

Group 3 - Dem townies

Layabout - I voted for you yesterday for lack of contribution, and boy did that make you mad. I stand behind what I said at the time, but since then you have picked it up. All of it has been angry and tunneled on me, which you are wrong about and is a bit of an OMGUS, but I like your response. You've got pluck kiddo, you be one of dem townies.

BlueyD - If you can't read that last long post and smell the innocence seeping off of it. I think we speak different languages. I speak 5 languages....so hopefully you don't speak enlgish, japanese, korean, spanish, or portuguese....he one of dem townies.

BH/Alakaslam (i think it was him?) - They claimed fairly prominent names from the Golden Sun series openly in the thread, have not been counterclaimed, and were not shot in the night as a result of claiming someone elses role. So until I have reason to disbelieve these claims or mathematical reason to be forced to lynch one in the event that they are lying. They go in the pile with dem townies.

Austinmcc/geript - Ya know, these two are probably my reads that have the least raisin. I mostly just enjoy and like most of what they type. They smell like the rest of dem townies.

Yell0w - He had a level of lack of self awareness that forced me to read him as town after a little bit during the last newbie game. His lack of awareness about the RNG thing and some of his other posts read much the same to me. So I would consider him one of dem townies for now

Group 4 - Pretty much scum

Hapahauli - Now I think this one will come as a bit of a shocker to a few, but quite frankly he has had warning signs on him for me for a while. So let us examine, in particular his scum reads currently:

On May 24 2014 03:25 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 05:00 ShiaoPi wrote:
VOTE COUNT:


mtamburini (8): Tehpoofter, Hapahauli, Alakaslam, mattisfoolish, Xatalos, Cavalinho, Holyflare, thrawn2112, BlueyD, marvellosity, jampidampi, 27ninjabunnies, bkqyrldp, austinmcc, layabout, Steveling, Meapak_Ziphh
Valenius (2): Meapak_Ziphh, Hapahauli, Tehpoofter, OnceKing, marvellosity, Hapahauli, Xatalos, kitaman27, sqrtofneg1
geript (0): Holyflare, Steveling
Koshi (0): Valenius
Steveling (0): Holyflare, Cavalinho, geript
Alakaslam (0): kushm4sta, kushm4sta
Hapahauli (0): kushm4sta
Yell0w (1): Tehpoofter, Tehpoofter, BlueyD
Xatalos (0): jampidampi, marvellosity, Koshi, thrawn2112, kushm4sta
jampidampi (0): sqrtofneg1, Xatalos, Xatalos
27ninjabunnies (1): Cephiro
sqrtofneg1 (0): kitaman27
bkqyrldp (0): marvellosity
OdinOfPergo (13): Blazinghand, Steveling, Xatalos, Yell0w, Alakaslam, Alakaslam, kushm4sta, Xatalos, Koshi, OnceKing, marvellosity, Hapahauli, thrawn2112, bkqyrldp, Cavalinho, Valenius, Holyflare
Holyflare (1): WaveofShadow, Xatalos, Steveling, Steveling, sqrtofneg1
WaveofShadow (0): kitaman27, bkqyrldp
Blazinghand (1): Tehpoofter, OdinofPergo, geript, marvellosity, geript
thrawn2112 (0): 27ninjabunnies
marvellosity (0): kushm4sta
layabout (1): jampidampi, Koshi, OnceKing, marvellosity, ritoky
ritoky (0): austinmcc, layabout
BlueyD (0): kitaman27
Tehpoofter (1): mtamburini

Not voting (2): MysterMeat1, OdinofPergo

OdinOfPergo was lynched with 13 votes!


I'm going to use the above votecount to structure my thoughts. By looking at the votes, we can get a better idea about the motivations of certain players, and it can help identify certain mafia tells that might be present in a multi-faction game. I'm dividing posters into 3 categories:
  • People off of the main wagons
  • People who voted Odin
  • People who voted Tambo



People off of the main wagons:

There's a good chance that certain mafia/faction members will want to "blend-in" and "hide", and one very instinctual way of doing that is to avoid the main course of discussion, take "non-controversial" stances, and avoid contributing by pursuing/voting someone who is not being talked about and has very little chance of getting lynched.

In this category of players, we have:
mtamburini
rikoty
geript
Cephiro
Tehpoofter
kitaman
sqrtofneg1
WaveofShadow

I'm going to start with Mafia Reads, move to Null Reads, and then to Townies:

Mtamburini
+ Show Spoiler +
Mtamburini's vote looks extremely bad by all accounts.
On May 23 2014 03:45 mtamburini wrote:
I Vote:: tehpoofter

why?
No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS

harharharhar


Tehpoofter had virtually no chance of getting lynched yesterday, and this is the definition of a wasted vote by all accounts. His reasoning for placing his vote where it was is also pretty suspect:
why?
No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS

On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote:
What was that vote, mtamburini...?


I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null.
...

On May 23 2014 04:59 mtamburini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 04:38 Holyflare wrote:
On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote:
On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote:
What was that vote, mtamburini...?


I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null.

Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear.

As the days go on my game will improve. With regards to my interactions with people Ive played with before I know I have a better chance of getting a read off them then smoeone I do not know so I will look at them first before anyone else.


hey i thought after your long post the ONLY read you had was that steveling was scummy/null to you and that was it? where did this first 45 page poofter read come from?


tehpoofter uses sarcasm as either allignment but you can usually tell by the tone of his sarcasm what allignement he is. From his initial posts Im reading the sarcasm as more scummy then towny

All of this is really strange. The first two quotes can be barely considered reads. The 3rd quote is extremely manufactured and makes very little sense - tambo had never mentioned tehpoofters "sarcasm" all game, and then it shows up in a very mystical and unexplained read (what is the difference between town/mafia sarcasm?).

Quote #2 is additionally strange - he voted a read (tehpoofter) that he felt was moving from Scummy to Null. Not only is this really weak, but he did so over Bunnies, who he's been seemingly tunneling most of the game, and has explicitly called her a strong scum-read in earlier posts. His rationale for not voting Bunnies is weak and makes little sense:
On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote:
What was that vote, mtamburini...?


...

Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear.

...


To understand why this makes so little sense, read this post...
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=45#896

...then read page 3 of his filter:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?user=mtamburini&page=3

He doesn't vote a scumread because he believes that scumread could be town, but then votes tehpoofter (his "scummy moving to null" read) because... man I don't even know.


sqrtofneg1
+ Show Spoiler +
His deadline behavior is pretty strange.

After he comes back a couple of hours before lynch deadline, he quickly establishes a town-read on Odin...
On May 23 2014 03:03 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Okay, looking at Odin's filter myself, I think he's just a vanilla townie.
Scum would try harder to get out of it. As a vanilla townie, he wouldn't care.

On May 23 2014 03:26 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
I recommend lynching Val.
Odin may seem scum, but I think he's VT.


It's a very poorly explained town-read. His point about "Odin not trying to get out of the lynch" doesn't make much sense either, since Odin had stated earlier he'd be gone until the deadline. Futhermore, Odin was under very little pressure at the time he said that. It seems more like he's trying to justify not voting for Odin as opposed to being sincere with his read.

Sqrt then pops down a very "clean" vote on Valenius...
On May 23 2014 03:12 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Okay, I've played games with both tambo and val, and here's what I've got so far.

Valenius's filter from NMM LIV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/445959-newbie-mini-mafia-liv?user=Valenius&view=all
He was vanilla town. He was much more active in scumhunting, he was much more direct, he was different.

Tambo's filter from NMM LV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447955-newbie-mini-mafia-lv?user=mtamburini
He was vanilla town. The filter is a bit more strange because he claimed vig, but it's more accurate of his play than when he was cop imo.

I've concluded that Valenius has been acting more strange, in comparison, rather than Tambo.
##Unvote
##Vote: Valenius


... then POOF! He's gone for the last two hours of shenanigans! Despite having a town read on Odin, he never seems to try and act on it to prevent it. He disappears... then instantly reappears at lynch deadline! This is a really suspicious 2 hours of absence.

Another *really* odd thing about his filter is how many town reads he gives out over the course of the game. He gives them out like candy, is seemingly confident in a lot of them, and... yeah. I'm not sure if this is a mafia tell in this particular setup, but it's something that definetely caught my eye on a readthrough.



Cephiro
+ Show Spoiler +
Given that Cephiro was AFK for the last half of the day, it's hard for me to get an accurate read on him. However the first half of his day 1 play seems like it would come from some sort of faction.

I won't talk much about the contents of his big case. What's more important is that he didn't talk about anything other than his case on bunnies at all. This lines up with the idea of a faction wanting to "hunt" for players, but not necessarily interested in contributing to town discussion.

Again, hard to make a complete read on him due to him being AFK for a while, but his play objectively fits pretty well with how I'd think a faction member hunting other faction members would approach this game: find a target, push him/her, and really not contribute to town discussion otherwise.


Ritoky
+ Show Spoiler +
Hard to say. His play is pretty short and straightforward. He believed layabout was scum, voted him, and then had to step out:
On May 22 2014 19:48 ritoky wrote:
Well, I am going to sleep and I am not sure if I will make it back before the deadline.

For me it's between WOS and layabout.

WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says.

Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling.

Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout


Nothing in his filter that screams his alignment one way or the other.


WaveofShadow
+ Show Spoiler +
Well he replaced out. This makes a lot of his lack of interest and activity in the latter half of the game pretty explainable. I wasn't altogether please with his play (especially his stuff on Holyflare), but it's better not to make judgements about an incomplete filter and let his replacement talk some.


Geript I believe to be town. Geript is extremely active and emotional this game. His tunnels seem very genuine, and while he ended up on BlazingHand, he definitely was very involved in the chaos and discussion of the day. He's drawn a ton of attention to himself, and really isn't someone I'm concerned about.

Tehpoofter I'm less sure about, but I think he's town. He's playing extraordinarily different from his scum-game in You Only Shoot Once, and was fairly active/involved early on. He was afk for the last ~24 hours of the day (not changing his vote or posting at all), which leads me to believe his vote being off of one of the main wagons is a null-tell. Based on his early day behavior, I give him a moderate town read, with the expectation that he continues that in future days.

On May 24 2014 04:35 Hapahauli wrote:
This post was supposed to be a bit longer, but I'm running out of time until the deadline, and I need to talk to austin apparently.

Might be bombing more reads as I go through filters.

Yell0w
+ Show Spoiler +
Pretty simple:
Votes Odin pretty early in the game in support of the "RNG lynch" thing.
On May 21 2014 08:55 Yell0w wrote:
Okay so I'm behind an RNG lynch, I understand my idea wouldn't work since people don't want to random their vote and if most don't do it it'll never work, so I'll just vote Odin. I was willing to wait for people to say why they were against it, but nobody gave a good reason not to do it, in my opinion.

##Vote: OdinofPergo


13 hours later, he has scumreads! He very specifically has a STRONG scumread on tamburini and has seemingly a very good reason to vote him right away.
On May 22 2014 00:19 Yell0w wrote:
...

ritoky: leaning scum, he hasn't posted enough for me to think he isn't, just made big posts to make it seems like he's contributing to town instead of actively participating in the thread like he did last game.

tamburini: scum, I didn't like the big post he made, it all seemed like fluff, he was basically just giving his gut reads on people as he was reading the thread, which is pretty much useless to anyone but him. He's been very different from the game I played with him where he was town.
...


But he doesn't vote tamburini... or anyone. Despite being active ~5 hours before lynch deadline. He comes back in the thread, makes several posts that provide very little content, then is gone.

I realize that Yell0w has been considered lynchbait in the past, but goddamn voting RNG over a very clear scumread (tambo) is a pretty glaring scumtell.


Alakaslam
+ Show Spoiler +
I put Alakaslam next because he's in an identical situation to Yell0w: voted to RNG lynch Odin and pretty much stuck with it.

The problem is, I can't read Alakaslam for shit and my mind melts when I read his filter. I'm biased to interpret everything he says as genuine, so yeah. I'd need some second opinions here.


Kushm4sta (Shoot him!)
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 23 2014 05:50 kushm4sta wrote:
to be fair i switched to odin purely for the lolz of bh retardation

On May 23 2014 05:50 kushm4sta wrote:
i switched before bh made his shit case


Posted after the lynch. People who vote for reasons *other* than lynching mafia are mafia themselves and should die. I really don't think this is simply kush being kush either. When he's town, he trolls the shit out of people but atleast has town objectives in his heart.

There's also some weird stuff in his filter. When marv posts that "all vets who sheeped the Odin lynch are suspicious", Kush INSTANTLY re-activates and defends himself:
On May 23 2014 05:49 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 05:41 marvellosity wrote:
the vets who sheeped the Odin case look the worst


like me?

btw i think wos requesting replacement means he is town


... posting this, followed by two other posts (quoted above).

He's just very angry this game in general. I don't get any sense of playful trolling that I've seen in other of Kush's less-active town games.


Valenius
+ Show Spoiler +
I've said all that I need to about him really. There are several posts in my filter about him.

tl;dr, he's shitposting and +1'ing people a lot. It feels like mafia having a hard time contributing. He has two analysis pieces, one that I covered earlier...
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=118#2356

... and another that's pretty simply an OMGUS case against me.

He feels like mafia trying to hide. His contributions have been weak, and good portion of his filter are pointless one-liners.

That being said, I think there are other priorities over him right now. It is possible that he's just a newbie with severe self-confidence issues, and I think I have stronger reads on Tambo, Yell0w, and kush.


If you ignore kush, who I believe is a bit of a different case, especially now. The rest of his scum and leaning scum reads are on people with 2 page to 4 page filters at best and tend to be newer players. And most of his town reads throughout the game are on people who have very large filters and have played a lot of games. To me he reads like scum trying to push MLs on people who will offer not as much resistance or who he feels he can get a policy lynch on. Outside of that, he has very inconsistent criticism. As I pointed out earlier, he criticized geript for having confirmation bias on Steveling, yet he didn't criticize BH for having confirmation bias on Odin; and his reason? Because he says BH's case was good. So confirmation bias doesn't apply when you think the person has a good case?

Then later he is critical of people who did sudden vote swaps late in the phase, especially those without reason. Yet his hypocrisy is on full display as he is one of the people who did this. Hell, his filter even has a nice "I told you so" post after he switched off of Val onto Odin, even after Val posted something that was pretty much garbage late in the phase that wouldn't have made me switch votes.

Lastly, this is just a gut read, but I get the read that a lot of his posts are sending out feelers. He doesn't ever go all-in or really push. He sends out feelers to see if there's support. Then later he pushes if there is or drops it if there is not. For example I am a neutral read in his reads above, but as soon as layabout starts getting angry at me, Hapa is behind him giving him a little boost. He is pretty much scum in my mind.

jampidampi - I have found him strange for a while. He was very supportive of 27ninjabunnies after what I thought was a poor defense at the time. He even was supportive of her strange comment of having absolute non-lynches day 1. He also found my former #1 town MZ scummy for finding bunnies odd for that comment. Austin's case on him just further drives me down the path that I think he is pretty much scum.

Group 5 - I can't read this guy

Sqrtofneg1 - Yo, I got this guy completely wrong last game, and he is acting completely different this game. And I am not confident in my read again. I just think I can't read this guy

Group 6 - No strong opinions

Everyone Else
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 00:09 GMT
#3729
On May 25 2014 08:51 marvellosity wrote:
ritoky - a question if I may.

Why is Hapa particularly suspicious because he finds people with low filter length scummy, when the large majority of the game is doing the same thing? All the main wagons/suspicions are generally on low filter-length people, so why is Hapa doing so particularly egregious, but not anyone else?
Show nested quote +
Lastly, this is just a gut read, but I get the read that a lot of his posts are sending out feelers. He doesn't ever go all-in or really push. He sends out feelers to see if there's support. Then later he pushes if there is or drops it if there is not. For example I am a neutral read in his reads above, but as soon as layabout starts getting angry at me, Hapa is behind him giving him a little boost. He is pretty much scum in my mind.

Could you elaborate on this at all? Some more examples with quotes?


Well, I think that a lot of the main wagons/suspicions are not very good as you can see by my reads. And I think the people pushing on them deserve to be examined in regards to if you feel they are just trying to get a ML on someone they perceive to be an easy target or if there is real grounds there. Outside of jampidampi, I personally am not really sold on any of the other low filter count cases. I guess I could be convinced on sqrt, but that's cuz I have no clue about that guy.

However the difference is that most people pushed on 1 or 2 of those guys. Hapa pushed on ALL of them. His scum/leaning scum reads above are basically all of those people, and then when one or the other sticks (like with layabout pushing on me) he starts pursuing that one further. It just looks like fishing for an easy ML with a shotgun imo.

As for examples with quotes. If you still want those then I will be happy to oblige in about an hour after the 2nd half of the sounders game.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 00:26 GMT
#3737
On May 25 2014 09:24 geript wrote:
Ritoky, could you explain where and how your tambo scumread disappeared into Laya and Wave?

@Snooglewoogle. How Jampi jumps around seems really towny to me honestly. Like he's jumping around but all of the thoughts are connected in a natural way. Considering the time between the reads, it seems odd but not damning to me.



I already did.

On May 24 2014 08:03 ritoky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2014 07:54 Hapahauli wrote:
Ritoky, can you explain your read progression on tambo?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=169#3377


Someone didn't like my reads that I was giving, and how confused I was at the time that I was giving them. So they asked me to take baby steps and read the people I had played with in the newbie game. So I obliged them, and of the people I read tambo was the most scummy at the time. But that was from a sample size of 4 or 5 people. Of all the 32 players tambo wasn't as high up there as others, such as layabout and WOS. I said he got worse, and then I basically forgot about him for a while. His absolute and utter disengagement with the game and complete lack of resistance to a bandwaggon on him....well I just felt like if he had a role (town or scum) he would be more engaged and actually trying to get out of it rather than his lax approach. I ultimately arrived at the thought that it was probably bad VT play, much like I had for a lot of day 1.

That said, his doing just enough to get out of the lynch then disappearing bit, well I haven't really made heads or tails of it yet.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 01:50 GMT
#3777
On May 25 2014 09:14 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 09:09 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 08:51 marvellosity wrote:
ritoky - a question if I may.

Why is Hapa particularly suspicious because he finds people with low filter length scummy, when the large majority of the game is doing the same thing? All the main wagons/suspicions are generally on low filter-length people, so why is Hapa doing so particularly egregious, but not anyone else?
Lastly, this is just a gut read, but I get the read that a lot of his posts are sending out feelers. He doesn't ever go all-in or really push. He sends out feelers to see if there's support. Then later he pushes if there is or drops it if there is not. For example I am a neutral read in his reads above, but as soon as layabout starts getting angry at me, Hapa is behind him giving him a little boost. He is pretty much scum in my mind.

Could you elaborate on this at all? Some more examples with quotes?


Well, I think that a lot of the main wagons/suspicions are not very good as you can see by my reads. And I think the people pushing on them deserve to be examined in regards to if you feel they are just trying to get a ML on someone they perceive to be an easy target or if there is real grounds there. Outside of jampidampi, I personally am not really sold on any of the other low filter count cases. I guess I could be convinced on sqrt, but that's cuz I have no clue about that guy.

However the difference is that most people pushed on 1 or 2 of those guys. Hapa pushed on ALL of them. His scum/leaning scum reads above are basically all of those people, and then when one or the other sticks (like with layabout pushing on me) he starts pursuing that one further. It just looks like fishing for an easy ML with a shotgun imo.

As for examples with quotes. If you still want those then I will be happy to oblige in about an hour after the 2nd half of the sounders game.

Honestly the more you post the better, so yes I'll take you up on the examples when you have time. No rush ^^

Again when you're ready, could you pick out the suspicions that Hapa made that you don't think are logical or genuine? Because you can disagree with someone's reads but that doesn't mean that person is faking it.

With regards to jampidampi, do you take into the account any of the past games/history with him that I talked about recently? Does that affect your read, if not, why?



I will start with the jampidampi stuff because it is shorter: does it affect my read? Not really unfortunately. The problem with past games that I wasn't a part of as evidence is that it is really hard for me to connect with them. I have played a lot of mafia outside of TL, and in those games there's a level of emotional connection/investment that isn't there when you read/observe a game that you're not part of. Also, the information you're provided at the start of the game colors your perspective on the game substantially. So basically what I am saying is that I wasn't a part of the game, and while I appreciate the information and it helps in regards to tone and posting style; it won't help with the feelings part of the read because I wasn't emotionally invested in that game at all.

This is kinda related to both Hapa and jampidampi, but you said look for things that don't look logical. I guess this may just be a difference in gameplay perspective, but I think often times the people who try to be the absolute most logical all the time tend to be a bit scummier for me. I like to moreso look for things that are odd or don't make a lot of sense, things that are predicated on people having more info than me, and things that just don't feel right. That's how I feel about jampi. Bunnies said "I will never lynch MZ this game", MZ was like "WHAT? thats scummy" which felt genuine and made him my #1 town, and jampi said "You're scummy for finding that scummy MZ", which to me feels just completely weird and that feeling overrules your past game stuff. Call me an emotional dude if you want.

So then, what's odd or feels off about Hapa. Well geript was critical of my tambo read and wtf happened to it, and I personally think that Hapa's is even weirder.

On May 22 2014 07:02 Hapahauli wrote:
Alright finished reading the thread, and my thoughts haven't changed too much.

mtamburini's still my lynch of choice today.

I've already made some thoughts on her larger quote-bomb post...
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=38#745
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=40#787

...and foolishness has a post on her as well...
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=55#1087

Just to add to this though, I found this post which is all sorts of WAT:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 12:39 mtamburini wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 21 2014 11:45 Cephiro wrote:
First up, the thoughts behind my questioning. While initially reading the thread I noticed 27ninja is a very cooperative person. Which is why I started the whole exchange with her.

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote:
If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why.
But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter.


She takes part in the discussion a lot and actively, aiming to contribute (or look like contributing.)

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 07:30 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 07:28 jampidampi wrote:
Before I continue, were you annoyed with my guestions?


No, questions are good. They get reads. Reads are good.

So the questions were not annoying. I was more annoyed by the fact you said I was avoiding what you were asking.

I think I had made it clear as to why. But please continue. I want to hear more.


Her intention is to try and play as honestly as possible. Which again, is not a bad thing from a town perspective, but if you roll scum and try to play with the least amount of lies possible, it will be hard. The point of interest here is her admitting her annoyance to being called out on her play. She encourages others to share the reasons on hers, yet withholds her own for "reasons", are excused as:

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote:
But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game.

If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched.

So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk.


While I definitely agree with the logic behind it, her reasoning doesn't seem sincere. It's as if she wants to put content into the thread, but avoid (for now), making any decisions that may come to haunt her play later. Specifically: She doesn't want to be read as scum. Obviously, no town player does, but her play is (even self-admittingly) aimed at not being read as scum. Even if you are read as scum as a townie, it doesn't mean you can't manage to prove your town-ness. Surely, it's an uphill battle, but for someone putting as much effort as her in the game seems unlikely to be _that_ scared of being a misread as a town. Rather, I feel the fear comes from other players correctly reading her as scum.

Analysis break: My questions, the reasons behind it, and my conclusions of her replies.

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 10:28 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 10:27 Cephiro wrote:
Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for:

1) Why I'm reading you as mafia?
2) Why I'm voting on you?


Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia.

So, why are you reading me as mafia?


The first exchange. My question here aims at finding the natural level of her thought process. It may not be the best comparison, but think about chess. What I'm aiming to find here is whether she thinks about:

1) The current move
2) The reasons behind the current move
3) The follow-up to the current move

Or a multitude of the above. As you can see, she instantly jumps into an assumption that I vote her because I read her as mafia. She doesn't take her thought process further (into different possibilities), into questions such as:

"Would he vote for me for a reason other than suspecting me as mafia?"

Instead, she takes it for granted that I suspect her to be mafia. It fits well with her wanting to play as honestly as possible, trying not to doubt the claims of others. This I feel is a trait belonging to the person.

So here I establish the fact that she doesn't think things ahead. Her thought process is not zero though, but considering the current step with the information given to her comes more naturally. (There are people who naturally start thinking multiple steps ahead.)

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 10:46 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 10:39 Cephiro wrote:
I will have to respond to your question with another to stay true to my motives.

If I didn't consider you as mafia, why would I be voting for you?

Even if my replies seem very off to you, please do respond. You're under evaluation.


If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me.

The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted.

This can also lead to reads from other people if they begin questioning you or agreeing with you.

So again, why are you reading me as mafia?


Here is my followup. My question is intentionally aimed to hint at a possibility of thinking outside the box. As I came into the conclusion that she doesn't naturally by instinct start thinking things too many steps ahead, I wanted to see the reaction that would come after hinted towards doing such.

Her response is quite interesting. She does correctly analyze on scenario, that is, if I didn't have a proper read and wanted to gain more information on her. There are many others she does not think about however. What I'm most interested in, is this crucial miss: She does not at all consider a possibility where I am scum. Ding ding, alarm bells anyone?

Note how she points out that if I don't really consider her as mafia, I shouldn't be voting for her. Yet at the end of her post, she asks why I'm reading her as mafia. This means that she thinks (knows?) of me being a town player suspecting her, rather than any other possibility. Why could I not be a scum player trying to start a wagon on her? She doesn't even go through this option at all, even after being hinted to think outside the box. It's as if she knows I'm town. That's not possible unless she's scum.

On to my third question:

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 11:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 10:54 Cephiro wrote:
One last question before I will answer your question.

I already know you read me as town. If you had a strong scumread on me however, would you go all-out to make me the lynch of the day right away?


I like how confident you are in yourself. As for reading you as town, that's yet to be determined.
If I had a strong scumread on you, yes, I would probably push on you to get you lynched. As for right away, it depends. If I think I can have support, I'll push right away. If I don't think I'll have any support, I'd need t find evidence that can prove or atleast put into speculation that you are mafia.

So, your answer?


This question was mainly to confirm. I was fairly certain that she does not intentionally downplay her ability to mislead her opponent. Combined with the logical deduction of her naturally not thinking ahead, and with her honest tendency to answer questions, I have no reason to believe she'd be lying about this one either. It would be possible to downplay or not reveal your scumread to try and trap a person into a situation which essentially confirms them as scum to other players, or many shenanigans of the kind. Her response however is strictly related to her own confidence about her read. If she's sure about her read, she'll go for it (no downplaying). If she's unsure, she'll work to be able to trust her read enough to convince others. (Upping her own play.)

With this I come into the conclusion that she is not downplaying her abilities when responding to others, or in any questions that she replied to me. This is exactly why I consider the 2nd question where she does NOT EVEN CONSIDER ME AS POSSIBLE SCUM extremely alarming. Also take in consideration how interested in she is in the reasons why I suspect her to be mafia. She doesn't just ignore and wait for me to actually provide something, but she actively asks for it again and again. If not combined with the above, I would see this as a townie trait, but I feel she is trying to get to know her mistakes/flaws in early play so she doesn't make the same mistakes later on.

TLDR:

1) Is afraid of being seen as scum
2) Extremely co-operative due to not wanting to be looked upon badly, refer to point 1.
3) Ignores the possibility of the player questioning her being scum.
4) When suspected, wants to know the flaws in her play to not repeat the mistake later

Like literally, for one moment she doesn't think I could be scum trying to push her for mislynch.

27ninjabunnies is mafia, and needs to be lynched. My vote stays where it is.

Opinions?


Goddamn bunnies back to scummy now, I need you to pretend your formaled and defend yourself. He brings up all the points I wanted to kill yellow in other game. Do I need to claim Bird Jesus again and say im going to shoot you and see if I get roleblocked?


She quote's ceph's giant case on Bunnies and basically blindly agrees with it. There's no indication in this post that she's actually read the damn thing - it's almost like she looks at the case, sees it's big, and just sheeps it.

Furthermore, the bolded comment is incredibly strange, given that yellow flipped town in the game in-question. You'd think she would exhibit more pause after wanting to lynch a townie for similar rationale, but instead she bolsters her suspicions with it... that just makes very little sense from a town perspective.

Of all the points against her, I think this is the most compelling.


Ritoky/Valenius

I've seen these two mentioned as possible scum candidates. Austin's case on Ritoky is somewhat compelling, however I don't think it takes into account the sheer difference between a mini-newbie game and a 32-person monster-spamfest. The wishy-washiness to me could be explained by how intimidating/confusing this thread is to a newer player. Hell I'm having problems keeping track of this myself, and I'm considered a "vet."

All and all, I agree that they're playing differently than their town metas have shown in the past, but I think that it could be explained by the difference in gametypes.



This is the beginning of it.

Then tambo starts to come back and they have some exchanges, all of which it seems like hapa comes out on the negative side of.

On May 23 2014 01:13 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 01:08 mtamburini wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 23 2014 00:57 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 00:53 mtamburini wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 23 2014 00:51 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 00:45 mtamburini wrote:
Fuck me i gotta read 50 pages since I was last online how the fuck did I get put up for a lynch!


I'd like your explanation to this:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 12:39 mtamburini wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 21 2014 11:45 Cephiro wrote:
First up, the thoughts behind my questioning. While initially reading the thread I noticed 27ninja is a very cooperative person. Which is why I started the whole exchange with her.

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote:
If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why.
But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter.


She takes part in the discussion a lot and actively, aiming to contribute (or look like contributing.)

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 07:30 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 07:28 jampidampi wrote:
Before I continue, were you annoyed with my guestions?


No, questions are good. They get reads. Reads are good.

So the questions were not annoying. I was more annoyed by the fact you said I was avoiding what you were asking.

I think I had made it clear as to why. But please continue. I want to hear more.


Her intention is to try and play as honestly as possible. Which again, is not a bad thing from a town perspective, but if you roll scum and try to play with the least amount of lies possible, it will be hard. The point of interest here is her admitting her annoyance to being called out on her play. She encourages others to share the reasons on hers, yet withholds her own for "reasons", are excused as:

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote:
But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game.

If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched.

So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk.


While I definitely agree with the logic behind it, her reasoning doesn't seem sincere. It's as if she wants to put content into the thread, but avoid (for now), making any decisions that may come to haunt her play later. Specifically: She doesn't want to be read as scum. Obviously, no town player does, but her play is (even self-admittingly) aimed at not being read as scum. Even if you are read as scum as a townie, it doesn't mean you can't manage to prove your town-ness. Surely, it's an uphill battle, but for someone putting as much effort as her in the game seems unlikely to be _that_ scared of being a misread as a town. Rather, I feel the fear comes from other players correctly reading her as scum.

Analysis break: My questions, the reasons behind it, and my conclusions of her replies.

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 10:28 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 10:27 Cephiro wrote:
Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for:

1) Why I'm reading you as mafia?
2) Why I'm voting on you?


Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia.

So, why are you reading me as mafia?


The first exchange. My question here aims at finding the natural level of her thought process. It may not be the best comparison, but think about chess. What I'm aiming to find here is whether she thinks about:

1) The current move
2) The reasons behind the current move
3) The follow-up to the current move

Or a multitude of the above. As you can see, she instantly jumps into an assumption that I vote her because I read her as mafia. She doesn't take her thought process further (into different possibilities), into questions such as:

"Would he vote for me for a reason other than suspecting me as mafia?"

Instead, she takes it for granted that I suspect her to be mafia. It fits well with her wanting to play as honestly as possible, trying not to doubt the claims of others. This I feel is a trait belonging to the person.

So here I establish the fact that she doesn't think things ahead. Her thought process is not zero though, but considering the current step with the information given to her comes more naturally. (There are people who naturally start thinking multiple steps ahead.)

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 10:46 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 10:39 Cephiro wrote:
I will have to respond to your question with another to stay true to my motives.

If I didn't consider you as mafia, why would I be voting for you?

Even if my replies seem very off to you, please do respond. You're under evaluation.


If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me.

The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted.

This can also lead to reads from other people if they begin questioning you or agreeing with you.

So again, why are you reading me as mafia?


Here is my followup. My question is intentionally aimed to hint at a possibility of thinking outside the box. As I came into the conclusion that she doesn't naturally by instinct start thinking things too many steps ahead, I wanted to see the reaction that would come after hinted towards doing such.

Her response is quite interesting. She does correctly analyze on scenario, that is, if I didn't have a proper read and wanted to gain more information on her. There are many others she does not think about however. What I'm most interested in, is this crucial miss: She does not at all consider a possibility where I am scum. Ding ding, alarm bells anyone?

Note how she points out that if I don't really consider her as mafia, I shouldn't be voting for her. Yet at the end of her post, she asks why I'm reading her as mafia. This means that she thinks (knows?) of me being a town player suspecting her, rather than any other possibility. Why could I not be a scum player trying to start a wagon on her? She doesn't even go through this option at all, even after being hinted to think outside the box. It's as if she knows I'm town. That's not possible unless she's scum.

On to my third question:

Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 11:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 21 2014 10:54 Cephiro wrote:
One last question before I will answer your question.

I already know you read me as town. If you had a strong scumread on me however, would you go all-out to make me the lynch of the day right away?


I like how confident you are in yourself. As for reading you as town, that's yet to be determined.
If I had a strong scumread on you, yes, I would probably push on you to get you lynched. As for right away, it depends. If I think I can have support, I'll push right away. If I don't think I'll have any support, I'd need t find evidence that can prove or atleast put into speculation that you are mafia.

So, your answer?


This question was mainly to confirm. I was fairly certain that she does not intentionally downplay her ability to mislead her opponent. Combined with the logical deduction of her naturally not thinking ahead, and with her honest tendency to answer questions, I have no reason to believe she'd be lying about this one either. It would be possible to downplay or not reveal your scumread to try and trap a person into a situation which essentially confirms them as scum to other players, or many shenanigans of the kind. Her response however is strictly related to her own confidence about her read. If she's sure about her read, she'll go for it (no downplaying). If she's unsure, she'll work to be able to trust her read enough to convince others. (Upping her own play.)

With this I come into the conclusion that she is not downplaying her abilities when responding to others, or in any questions that she replied to me. This is exactly why I consider the 2nd question where she does NOT EVEN CONSIDER ME AS POSSIBLE SCUM extremely alarming. Also take in consideration how interested in she is in the reasons why I suspect her to be mafia. She doesn't just ignore and wait for me to actually provide something, but she actively asks for it again and again. If not combined with the above, I would see this as a townie trait, but I feel she is trying to get to know her mistakes/flaws in early play so she doesn't make the same mistakes later on.

TLDR:

1) Is afraid of being seen as scum
2) Extremely co-operative due to not wanting to be looked upon badly, refer to point 1.
3) Ignores the possibility of the player questioning her being scum.
4) When suspected, wants to know the flaws in her play to not repeat the mistake later

Like literally, for one moment she doesn't think I could be scum trying to push her for mislynch.

27ninjabunnies is mafia, and needs to be lynched. My vote stays where it is.

Opinions?


Goddamn bunnies back to scummy now, I need you to pretend your formaled and defend yourself. He brings up all the points I wanted to kill yellow in other game. Do I need to claim Bird Jesus again and say im going to shoot you and see if I get roleblocked?


Regarding the bolded, Yell0w flipped town in the game in question - how does it make sense for you to want to kill bunnies for those reasons?

Also, your post here gives absolutely no indication that you actually read or thought about Cephrio's case, which just rubs me all sorts of wrong ways.



For me it felt like bunnies was contradicting herself from the way she was putting pressure on yellow on that game. Her play style from that game to this game looks different to me and the way she conducted herself early on this game made me want to question and put pressure on her.


You didn't really answer either of my questions. I know the reason for your bunnies reads.

What I want to know is...
a) Why you claim that bunnies is scummy for reasons you thought that yell0w was scummy in the other game, despite yell0w being town in said game, and...
b) Why there's nothing in your filter that indicates that you even read Cephiro's case. It seems as if you saw a giant post on bunnies and mindlessly sheeped it without even considering the contents.



A) I know bunnies probably the mostest out of everyone here so my read on her goes back to more games then just the last one. Yellow and bunnies are different players. Because yellow did something scummy in one game and someone else does the same thing does not imply that the new person is also town. What Im trying to say is P does not always imply Q,
having know bunnies and her playstyle and not know yellows I think bunnies is more likely scum for her reactions then yellows reactions in that game.

B) I read his post, im going to have to re read it again but Im pretty sure I quoted it and said something along the lines of Im gonna claim bird jesus and shoot you in the night.


Ok I have no idea what you mean by the bolded.

Show nested quote +
My reads are vauge and inconclusive, with day 1 starts I do not have any information to go on so I have to try and figure shit out on my own until Power Roles come out with useful information and then I can apply my reads to them and look back at peoples filters as days go on.

Im not a strong day1 player which is my downfall and gets me mislynched a lot because I like posting long as posts with lots of quotes and small notes on them because I find that much more efficient then posting 100 smaller posts.


Regarding your Day 1 play, one thing that makes me fairly suspicious of you was your entirely different approach to Day 1 in the recently concluded newbie game. In that game, you came out extremely confident with very straightforward pressure/reads. This is in complete contrast to this game, where your approach has reflected your "vague and inconclusive" self-descriptor.


Then suddenly after saying a lot of things don't make any sense by tambo and tambo being dodgy at first, suddenly he believes he missed. Not particularly for any reason either.

On May 23 2014 01:20 Hapahauli wrote:
##Unvote

I'm starting to think I missed on tambo. Going to re-read and re-evaluate.


He then goes on valenius primarily on a sheeped read by OnceKing, and says he is 100% the best lynch for the day. But wait!

On May 23 2014 03:02 Hapahauli wrote:
I'll consider switching to Odin depending on what Valenius comes up with in the next few hours. Can't do much on my phone, but I can and will be reading.


Then he votes on Odin. His next post is accusatory toward those who swapped votes at the last moment without any reason. Hypocrisy thy name is Hapa. But this much is off topic from my main point, which is the strangeness of his tambo read. So what did happen to that?

On May 24 2014 03:25 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 05:00 ShiaoPi wrote:
VOTE COUNT:


mtamburini (8): Tehpoofter, Hapahauli, Alakaslam, mattisfoolish, Xatalos, Cavalinho, Holyflare, thrawn2112, BlueyD, marvellosity, jampidampi, 27ninjabunnies, bkqyrldp, austinmcc, layabout, Steveling, Meapak_Ziphh
Valenius (2): Meapak_Ziphh, Hapahauli, Tehpoofter, OnceKing, marvellosity, Hapahauli, Xatalos, kitaman27, sqrtofneg1
geript (0): Holyflare, Steveling
Koshi (0): Valenius
Steveling (0): Holyflare, Cavalinho, geript
Alakaslam (0): kushm4sta, kushm4sta
Hapahauli (0): kushm4sta
Yell0w (1): Tehpoofter, Tehpoofter, BlueyD
Xatalos (0): jampidampi, marvellosity, Koshi, thrawn2112, kushm4sta
jampidampi (0): sqrtofneg1, Xatalos, Xatalos
27ninjabunnies (1): Cephiro
sqrtofneg1 (0): kitaman27
bkqyrldp (0): marvellosity
OdinOfPergo (13): Blazinghand, Steveling, Xatalos, Yell0w, Alakaslam, Alakaslam, kushm4sta, Xatalos, Koshi, OnceKing, marvellosity, Hapahauli, thrawn2112, bkqyrldp, Cavalinho, Valenius, Holyflare
Holyflare (1): WaveofShadow, Xatalos, Steveling, Steveling, sqrtofneg1
WaveofShadow (0): kitaman27, bkqyrldp
Blazinghand (1): Tehpoofter, OdinofPergo, geript, marvellosity, geript
thrawn2112 (0): 27ninjabunnies
marvellosity (0): kushm4sta
layabout (1): jampidampi, Koshi, OnceKing, marvellosity, ritoky
ritoky (0): austinmcc, layabout
BlueyD (0): kitaman27
Tehpoofter (1): mtamburini

Not voting (2): MysterMeat1, OdinofPergo

OdinOfPergo was lynched with 13 votes!


I'm going to use the above votecount to structure my thoughts. By looking at the votes, we can get a better idea about the motivations of certain players, and it can help identify certain mafia tells that might be present in a multi-faction game. I'm dividing posters into 3 categories:
  • People off of the main wagons
  • People who voted Odin
  • People who voted Tambo



People off of the main wagons:

There's a good chance that certain mafia/faction members will want to "blend-in" and "hide", and one very instinctual way of doing that is to avoid the main course of discussion, take "non-controversial" stances, and avoid contributing by pursuing/voting someone who is not being talked about and has very little chance of getting lynched.

In this category of players, we have:
mtamburini
rikoty
geript
Cephiro
Tehpoofter
kitaman
sqrtofneg1
WaveofShadow

I'm going to start with Mafia Reads, move to Null Reads, and then to Townies:

Mtamburini
+ Show Spoiler +
Mtamburini's vote looks extremely bad by all accounts.
On May 23 2014 03:45 mtamburini wrote:
I Vote:: tehpoofter

why?
No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS

harharharhar


Tehpoofter had virtually no chance of getting lynched yesterday, and this is the definition of a wasted vote by all accounts. His reasoning for placing his vote where it was is also pretty suspect:
why?
No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS

On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote:
What was that vote, mtamburini...?


I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null.
...

On May 23 2014 04:59 mtamburini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 04:38 Holyflare wrote:
On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote:
On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote:
What was that vote, mtamburini...?


I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null.

Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear.

As the days go on my game will improve. With regards to my interactions with people Ive played with before I know I have a better chance of getting a read off them then smoeone I do not know so I will look at them first before anyone else.


hey i thought after your long post the ONLY read you had was that steveling was scummy/null to you and that was it? where did this first 45 page poofter read come from?


tehpoofter uses sarcasm as either allignment but you can usually tell by the tone of his sarcasm what allignement he is. From his initial posts Im reading the sarcasm as more scummy then towny

All of this is really strange. The first two quotes can be barely considered reads. The 3rd quote is extremely manufactured and makes very little sense - tambo had never mentioned tehpoofters "sarcasm" all game, and then it shows up in a very mystical and unexplained read (what is the difference between town/mafia sarcasm?).

Quote #2 is additionally strange - he voted a read (tehpoofter) that he felt was moving from Scummy to Null. Not only is this really weak, but he did so over Bunnies, who he's been seemingly tunneling most of the game, and has explicitly called her a strong scum-read in earlier posts. His rationale for not voting Bunnies is weak and makes little sense:
On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote:
What was that vote, mtamburini...?


...

Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear.

...


To understand why this makes so little sense, read this post...
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=45#896

...then read page 3 of his filter:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?user=mtamburini&page=3

He doesn't vote a scumread because he believes that scumread could be town, but then votes tehpoofter (his "scummy moving to null" read) because... man I don't even know.


sqrtofneg1
+ Show Spoiler +
His deadline behavior is pretty strange.

After he comes back a couple of hours before lynch deadline, he quickly establishes a town-read on Odin...
On May 23 2014 03:03 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Okay, looking at Odin's filter myself, I think he's just a vanilla townie.
Scum would try harder to get out of it. As a vanilla townie, he wouldn't care.

On May 23 2014 03:26 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
I recommend lynching Val.
Odin may seem scum, but I think he's VT.


It's a very poorly explained town-read. His point about "Odin not trying to get out of the lynch" doesn't make much sense either, since Odin had stated earlier he'd be gone until the deadline. Futhermore, Odin was under very little pressure at the time he said that. It seems more like he's trying to justify not voting for Odin as opposed to being sincere with his read.

Sqrt then pops down a very "clean" vote on Valenius...
On May 23 2014 03:12 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Okay, I've played games with both tambo and val, and here's what I've got so far.

Valenius's filter from NMM LIV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/445959-newbie-mini-mafia-liv?user=Valenius&view=all
He was vanilla town. He was much more active in scumhunting, he was much more direct, he was different.

Tambo's filter from NMM LV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447955-newbie-mini-mafia-lv?user=mtamburini
He was vanilla town. The filter is a bit more strange because he claimed vig, but it's more accurate of his play than when he was cop imo.

I've concluded that Valenius has been acting more strange, in comparison, rather than Tambo.
##Unvote
##Vote: Valenius


... then POOF! He's gone for the last two hours of shenanigans! Despite having a town read on Odin, he never seems to try and act on it to prevent it. He disappears... then instantly reappears at lynch deadline! This is a really suspicious 2 hours of absence.

Another *really* odd thing about his filter is how many town reads he gives out over the course of the game. He gives them out like candy, is seemingly confident in a lot of them, and... yeah. I'm not sure if this is a mafia tell in this particular setup, but it's something that definetely caught my eye on a readthrough.



Cephiro
+ Show Spoiler +
Given that Cephiro was AFK for the last half of the day, it's hard for me to get an accurate read on him. However the first half of his day 1 play seems like it would come from some sort of faction.

I won't talk much about the contents of his big case. What's more important is that he didn't talk about anything other than his case on bunnies at all. This lines up with the idea of a faction wanting to "hunt" for players, but not necessarily interested in contributing to town discussion.

Again, hard to make a complete read on him due to him being AFK for a while, but his play objectively fits pretty well with how I'd think a faction member hunting other faction members would approach this game: find a target, push him/her, and really not contribute to town discussion otherwise.


Ritoky
+ Show Spoiler +
Hard to say. His play is pretty short and straightforward. He believed layabout was scum, voted him, and then had to step out:
On May 22 2014 19:48 ritoky wrote:
Well, I am going to sleep and I am not sure if I will make it back before the deadline.

For me it's between WOS and layabout.

WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says.

Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling.

Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout


Nothing in his filter that screams his alignment one way or the other.


WaveofShadow
+ Show Spoiler +
Well he replaced out. This makes a lot of his lack of interest and activity in the latter half of the game pretty explainable. I wasn't altogether please with his play (especially his stuff on Holyflare), but it's better not to make judgements about an incomplete filter and let his replacement talk some.


Geript I believe to be town. Geript is extremely active and emotional this game. His tunnels seem very genuine, and while he ended up on BlazingHand, he definitely was very involved in the chaos and discussion of the day. He's drawn a ton of attention to himself, and really isn't someone I'm concerned about.

Tehpoofter I'm less sure about, but I think he's town. He's playing extraordinarily different from his scum-game in You Only Shoot Once, and was fairly active/involved early on. He was afk for the last ~24 hours of the day (not changing his vote or posting at all), which leads me to believe his vote being off of one of the main wagons is a null-tell. Based on his early day behavior, I give him a moderate town read, with the expectation that he continues that in future days.




Wait what? You thought we missed on him? Now he is not only red, but BOLDED red compared to val who isn't and me who is black? For having a throwaway vote and being generally disengaged/sarcastic? Your outlook on scum defending themselves from being BW'd sure is different than mine.

Generally I think his tambo read progression is just non-committal, weird, and doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I feel as if he is trying to push what he feels are easy MLs on targets that don't post much and are new to the game. But the strangest thing for me, or the thing I find the most odd, is that his criticism is uneven. He calls out geript for confirmation bias then sits idly by while BH pushes a case full of confirmation bias. He swaps his vote to odin for no stated reason and because others are doing it, then criticizes those who swapped their vote for no reason. He doesn't like how people aren't pushing cases, but his two largest cases are against val (a case mostly made by onceking imo) and me (a case mostly made by layabout imo). He is criticizing people for things he himself is doing. Maybe it is just bad play and I am being a stick in the mud about it. Something here is just off, I can feel it.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:29 GMT
#3785
On May 25 2014 11:21 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 11:18 layabout wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:02 marvellosity wrote:
On May 25 2014 10:09 layabout wrote:
On May 25 2014 10:06 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
What do you suggest?

actually playing mafia for cool points to counterbalance those lost from your name in the eyes of some?

hey you.

I think ritoky's recent posts (and especially the last one) is pretty good.

why don't you?

Marv just said this
My heuristic is - long walls of text - not alignment indicative

are the long walls of text eminently reasonable? -> mafia
are the long walls of text not that reasonable, tunnelly, hammering away at a certain point, convoluted -> town

marv you asked him stuff and he responded with a wall that you think is good by your own metric that makes him more likely to be maifa.

i think his earlier play very much suggests that he is mafia and a few reasonable looking walls doesn't change that. What are his priorities when he is posting? His recent posts still look like his image is at the top of his agenda.

no, that was my cephiro metric my friend


hey marv, i have a question for you!
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:35 GMT
#3788
On May 25 2014 11:33 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 11:29 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:21 marvellosity wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:18 layabout wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:02 marvellosity wrote:
On May 25 2014 10:09 layabout wrote:
On May 25 2014 10:06 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
What do you suggest?

actually playing mafia for cool points to counterbalance those lost from your name in the eyes of some?

hey you.

I think ritoky's recent posts (and especially the last one) is pretty good.

why don't you?

Marv just said this
My heuristic is - long walls of text - not alignment indicative

are the long walls of text eminently reasonable? -> mafia
are the long walls of text not that reasonable, tunnelly, hammering away at a certain point, convoluted -> town

marv you asked him stuff and he responded with a wall that you think is good by your own metric that makes him more likely to be maifa.

i think his earlier play very much suggests that he is mafia and a few reasonable looking walls doesn't change that. What are his priorities when he is posting? His recent posts still look like his image is at the top of his agenda.

no, that was my cephiro metric my friend


hey marv, i have a question for you!

gogo


you town bro? *looks into eyes*
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:40 GMT
#3790
aight, well i think this game has gotten a tad on the slow side, so let's try to add some to it. i don't really understand my roles usefullness, and i would like you to help me with it if you would be a doll.

i have the ability to tell if people have been "touched by magic", from what i understand this means that i can tell if people are magical, have been targeted by magic, or have magical abilities. so, i don't really think my info is extremely helpful, but it is info at least.

what i know is that 27ninjabunnies has been touched by magic. what do you think of that?
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:46 GMT
#3794
On May 25 2014 11:42 marvellosity wrote:
"from what i understand that means i can tell if people are magical" - what are you basing that on?


well i have been warned in the thread for behavior before, so i don't really wanna get too close to my role description for fear of being removed. but in the description it leads me to believe that magical entities such as djinni will result in a "touched by magic" check rather than a "not touched by magic" check
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:52 GMT
#3796
well i know that bunnies is either a magic role, targeted by a role, or is a djinni
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:54 GMT
#3797
my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario?
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:00 GMT
#3799
On May 25 2014 11:57 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 11:54 ritoky wrote:
my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario?

that encompasses such a massive range of things :/

are you sure it's that unspecific?


yes, unfortunately i think it is that unspecific, thus why i don't find it particularly useful. and why i am willing to be open with the info
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:09 GMT
#3801
On May 25 2014 12:06 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 12:00 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:57 marvellosity wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:54 ritoky wrote:
my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario?

that encompasses such a massive range of things :/

are you sure it's that unspecific?


yes, unfortunately i think it is that unspecific, thus why i don't find it particularly useful. and why i am willing to be open with the info

well i don't think bunnies was a very likely night target for anything, so i guess that probably rules that one out


so do you have more of a power role or scum read on her then?
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:36 GMT
#3810
On May 25 2014 12:33 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 12:09 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 12:06 marvellosity wrote:
On May 25 2014 12:00 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:57 marvellosity wrote:
On May 25 2014 11:54 ritoky wrote:
my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario?

that encompasses such a massive range of things :/

are you sure it's that unspecific?


yes, unfortunately i think it is that unspecific, thus why i don't find it particularly useful. and why i am willing to be open with the info

well i don't think bunnies was a very likely night target for anything, so i guess that probably rules that one out


so do you have more of a power role or scum read on her then?

I don't have either particular read, I just can't see why any faction would visit bunnies.


Well, let's just say we are in a hypothetical world where there is 0% chance she was a target of anything last night. Gun to your head you have to say power role or scum. Which do you say?
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:39 GMT
#3813
On May 25 2014 12:16 Hapahauli wrote:
@ ritoky

I don't have time to read your entire case on me in detail, but I skimmed it briefly and it seems to be pretty similar to the one that Austin made on me Night 1. I spent quite a bit of time/sanity replying to that, so just read my replies. Even I had the time to defend myself, I'm not keen on repeating everything I've said last night, and I have no intention of wasting my time and effort like that again.

Also, please read my cases and tell me if you agree/disagree with them, because blanketing all my analysis as "going after low-postcount people" is a horseshit generalization of my posts.


I think my case about your uneven criticism/hyprocrisy is fairly unrebutted. I also think your tambo read and its progression is very weird and unrebutted.

Also, again you criticize yell0w for wanting to lynch people but not voting/pushing on them. You kinda did that with me...so that just kinda furthers that.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:53 GMT
#3821
On May 25 2014 12:47 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 12:39 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 12:16 Hapahauli wrote:
@ ritoky

I don't have time to read your entire case on me in detail, but I skimmed it briefly and it seems to be pretty similar to the one that Austin made on me Night 1. I spent quite a bit of time/sanity replying to that, so just read my replies. Even I had the time to defend myself, I'm not keen on repeating everything I've said last night, and I have no intention of wasting my time and effort like that again.

Also, please read my cases and tell me if you agree/disagree with them, because blanketing all my analysis as "going after low-postcount people" is a horseshit generalization of my posts.


I think my case about your uneven criticism/hyprocrisy is fairly unrebutted. I also think your tambo read and its progression is very weird and unrebutted.


Haven't read that, but I suspect a good portion of that read can be explained by the fact that I don't give a shit about pushing any scumread other than yell0w right now.

Show nested quote +
Also, again you criticize yell0w for wanting to lynch people but not voting/pushing on them. You kinda did that with me...so that just kinda furthers that.


Errr no? My case on yell0w is completely different.

I'm not voting you because I have far bigger scumreads than you. Compared to yell0w, I don't give a flying fuck about lynching you. My top scumread is yell0w and I want him dead.

The difference with yell0w is that...
  • His only stated scumread was on mtamburini.
  • He kept his vote on Odin despite it being an RNG vote.
  • He indirectly admits to wanting to lynch mtamburini.
  • There is *nothing* in his filter that suggests he was afk or forgot to change his vote to mtamburini - in fact, he was active 5 hours before the lynch deadline and did not do jack shit with his vote despite having a stated scumread on mtamburini for 12 hours.


Like if you think for two seconds, you can understand why those two scenarios are completely different. I will not defend myself until you can provide me an explanation of how yell0w does this as town.


I have been pretty sold on yell0w as town because of this

On May 21 2014 09:59 Yell0w wrote:
I suck at quoting and tamburini was way too long so it's confusing for me but anyways.

Show nested quote +

Again this post made my brain bleed. Yellow if this is your town play and how you scumhunt then I for towns sake I hope you are the cop so you can get some REAL information and dont have to try these unrealistic tactics to catch scum.


I don't get what was wrong with my post or how what you said is relevant to it, someone talked about a situation and I said if that situation happened, we would easily be able to catch scum. Obviously that situation is not going to happen, but I'm not the one who brought it up, so I don't really know what the issue is.


Compared to this from the newbie game I played with him:

On April 29 2014 11:55 Yell0w wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 29 2014 11:50 Amiko wrote:
@Yell0w: What do you think of ninjabunnies voting for you? As in, do you see that as a more town response by her? A more mafia response by her? Neutral?


I don't really know, she has a reasoning for it, she played with people who claimed mafia like that and ended up actually being mafia, but obviously it's flawed logic and anecdotal evidence, it's not because someone did it that me making a joke about being mafia means I'm mafia.

But that fact that she has that reason makes me think she's not doing it as a mafia play, but obviously she might just have come up with it to make it seems that way, so I don't know.


For me he just has similar levels of lack of self awareness in his play. It's a gut read from the start, so I probably can't communicate it to you that well.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:58 GMT
#3824
On May 25 2014 12:54 marvellosity wrote:
ritoky: in all fairness, that doesn't answer Hapa's query.


about the cases being different?

yeah he is mostly right about it, i mostly wanted to prod him a bit more so he would go back and actually read through my stuff and give me a solid response.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 04:07 GMT
#3833
On May 25 2014 12:58 Hapahauli wrote:
I could not care less about your incomplete meta read, nor do your "gut" reads explain away his behavior.

Once again, read this, and tell me how it makes sense.
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 12:47 Hapahauli wrote:

The difference with yell0w, is that...
  • His only stated scumread was on mtamburini.
  • He kept his vote on Odin despite it being an RNG vote.
  • He indirectly admits to wanting to lynch mtamburini.
  • There is *nothing* in his filter that suggests he was afk or forgot to change his vote to mtamburini - in fact, he was active 5 hours before the lynch deadline and did not do jack shit with his vote despite having a stated scumread on mtamburini for 12 hours.


If you do not understand how I am drawing these bullet points, I will lay it out for the thread yet again. Like I'm not even asking for a lot - all I ask you to do is give me any *plausible* town explanation for how town-yell0w does those actions.


I mean he clearly states in his very small filter that he is sold on BH's RNG = 40% chance to hit scum argument. He gets on board early and never gets off. He made a call and went with it. I don't know what you want me to say. I can't speak for the guy cuz I don't know what he was thinking. Is it strange that he doesn't push one of his two scum reads (oh yeah he had two, 1 on me and 1 on tambo)? Yes it is. Is it a valid criticism that needs to be responded to? Yes it is. Is this outside of some of the wonky things I saw him do in the last game? No it isn't.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 04:12 GMT
#3842
On May 25 2014 13:08 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 13:07 austinmcc wrote:
ATTENTION HAPA

YOU WANT A REASON

IF SOMEONE ACTUALLY THINKS THAT AN RNG LYNCH IS A GOOD IDEA, A POSITIVE, WHATEVER

THEN THEY HAVE A REASON TO RNG LYNCH


I see nothing in Yellow's filter that says "AN RNG LYNCH IS A BAD IDEA LET'S NOT DO THAT." I see multiple posts basically plotting the best way to RNG lynch.

If Yellow actively thinks RNG lynching is good, then I can understand what up.


HE ADMITTED TO WANTING TO LYNCH TAMBO ON DAY1. GOOD LORD.


Maybe he thought RNG being a 40% chance, which you clearly didn't buy into but he did, was a better shot than his read on tambo.

Hard to say without him to defend himself.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 04:15 GMT
#3845
Hey there's more people here, if you could please post your thoughts on this:

On May 25 2014 11:40 ritoky wrote:
aight, well i think this game has gotten a tad on the slow side, so let's try to add some to it. i don't really understand my roles usefullness, and i would like you to help me with it if you would be a doll.

i have the ability to tell if people have been "touched by magic", from what i understand this means that i can tell if people are magical, have been targeted by magic, or have magical abilities. so, i don't really think my info is extremely helpful, but it is info at least.

what i know is that 27ninjabunnies has been touched by magic. what do you think of that?


Thank you.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 11:51 GMT
#4012
On May 25 2014 19:55 layabout wrote:
I refuse to work on the assumption that there are multiple recruiting factions

Ritoky sounds like a rolechecker. I don't understand the timing of his claim nor the fact that he doesn't appear to understand the mechanics of his role. Rito pls, can you clarify?

We need to decide if we are banking on winning with 3p which seems dumb or just killing slam/bh/austin.

Also, congratulations to anybody aligned to the adepts with a non-vanilla role that hasn't claimed halfway into day 2.


I am getting ready for work, so I have about 15 minutes to vote and clarify things for anyone if they want it. Won't be back at deadline time.

Yes I think in general my role is basically a rolechecker, with a slight variation. As for why I claimed...I thought it was a good time to claim given the state of the game at that time. There wasn't a whole lot of reliable information or stuff in general going on at that point in the phase.

Currently I am leaning toward voting austin cuz he hasn't convinced me that his faction's win condition isn't exclusive from town's.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 12:08 GMT
#4015
On May 25 2014 21:01 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2014 20:51 ritoky wrote:
On May 25 2014 19:55 layabout wrote:
I refuse to work on the assumption that there are multiple recruiting factions

Ritoky sounds like a rolechecker. I don't understand the timing of his claim nor the fact that he doesn't appear to understand the mechanics of his role. Rito pls, can you clarify?

We need to decide if we are banking on winning with 3p which seems dumb or just killing slam/bh/austin.

Also, congratulations to anybody aligned to the adepts with a non-vanilla role that hasn't claimed halfway into day 2.


I am getting ready for work, so I have about 15 minutes to vote and clarify things for anyone if they want it. Won't be back at deadline time.

Yes I think in general my role is basically a rolechecker, with a slight variation. As for why I claimed...I thought it was a good time to claim given the state of the game at that time. There wasn't a whole lot of reliable information or stuff in general going on at that point in the phase.

Currently I am leaning toward voting austin cuz he hasn't convinced me that his faction's win condition isn't exclusive from town's.

Rolechecker is traditionally a mafia power. But if we work with the assumption that you are town:

Have you asked what happens if you were to target a non-town vanilla role?

When you got the result surely ninja would either be a town blue or scum. The response to this is to stay quiet (you think she is blue) or try to pressure/build a case etc (you think she is mafia).

So why tell us you are unsure about her and then share the check? You are potentially exposing two town blues to mafia, and you haven't used your check to try to influence the lynch, or any other clear town oriented benefit.


Well, because the variation is that it tells me if someone has been targeted by an action as well. Which is ridiculously unspecific information. I also gave out the info with, what? 20 hours left in the phase. And expected to get a reaction from her regarding the info. But she has been mia from the thread this entire phase. If you read my very large post earlier it says "her stock is plummeting"; it continues to plummet, but due to the unspecific nature of my information and her lack of response at all to it. I don't know if there's very much I can do to try and push it any further than I don't think she was a likely target for an ability last night.

Outside of that, there is a confirmed non-townie in the thread who has done nothing imo to convince me that he isn't lying about his "I can win with the town" claim. So uhhhh, sorry if I am a bit more concerned on the guy who admits he isn't town.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 21:42 GMT
#4400
On May 26 2014 05:37 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Finally caught up on reading!!! Wooooo

Okay... So should there be much night discussion?

Im kinda confused on the recruitment stuff...

So austin said only he had kp right, not the person he recruited?


So you have caught up, and you still haven't commented on what I said about you?

mhmmmmmm
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 26 2014 00:55 GMT
#4514
On May 26 2014 09:46 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 26 2014 09:41 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:40 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:35 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:34 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Allow me to ask you a question or 2.
What do you think of errandor?
Who is tryharding the most right now?


Who are you asking this to?

Originally meant for you, but if anyone else wants to answer, feel free.


Ehhh, i don't like errandor's big soapbox thing. Most people prob call him town for it.

I think its a load of bullcrap. I went through a lot of filters myself, sifting through replies, read 200+ pages. I feel he is just complaining to complain.

I want to see more from him in the upcoming days. If he doesnt feel like reading through 200 pages, fine.
Start from here, make reads. But dont come into the thread, say you are going to give reads and read through everything, and then dont contribute much but a couple of paragraphs complaining...

As for tryharding.... Explain what you mean by that?

Who's doing the most work? Who's the most towny?


Hmmm. I like HF this game. As for most work, not sure.

Austin was doing a lot of work, but we lynched him.
Im going to read vale's thing on onceking.

I think a lot of trolling is going on, and not any solid cases being pushed.

But my town is pretty decent atm.

Hf, bh, slam, and steve.


I think these have been contributing the most, even if bh was just pushing his rng thing, atleast he was doing something.

If geript is actual vigi, he will be placed in my list.

I also liked tehpoofter d1, but he hasnt done much since then.

I dont like eran, you, thrawn, tamburini or ceph this game.

Those are the ones im going to look into.



Yeah I am pretty much sold on you as scum now.

I don't think you were targeted last night, and nothing you're doing or saying is exuding town at all, so that doesn't make you a power role; 1 option left..

This town circle is absolute crap. HF is a PROVEN investigative role, austin basically 100% confirmed it, and 2 of the other 3 have claimed blue roles for 3 phases and been uncontested in their claims. You're not actually pushing forward any new cases or doing anything for town's benefit. You're just sheeping tons of information and acting like you're doing stuff by giving a plethora of not very useful content.

You seriously don't have a town read outside of 3 basically proven townies at this point and a spammer? This is not town bunnies, I am sorry.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 26 2014 01:05 GMT
#4528
On May 26 2014 10:01 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 26 2014 09:55 ritoky wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:46 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:41 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:40 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:35 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:34 27ninjabunnies wrote:
On May 26 2014 09:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Allow me to ask you a question or 2.
What do you think of errandor?
Who is tryharding the most right now?


Who are you asking this to?

Originally meant for you, but if anyone else wants to answer, feel free.


Ehhh, i don't like errandor's big soapbox thing. Most people prob call him town for it.

I think its a load of bullcrap. I went through a lot of filters myself, sifting through replies, read 200+ pages. I feel he is just complaining to complain.

I want to see more from him in the upcoming days. If he doesnt feel like reading through 200 pages, fine.
Start from here, make reads. But dont come into the thread, say you are going to give reads and read through everything, and then dont contribute much but a couple of paragraphs complaining...

As for tryharding.... Explain what you mean by that?

Who's doing the most work? Who's the most towny?


Hmmm. I like HF this game. As for most work, not sure.

Austin was doing a lot of work, but we lynched him.
Im going to read vale's thing on onceking.

I think a lot of trolling is going on, and not any solid cases being pushed.

But my town is pretty decent atm.

Hf, bh, slam, and steve.


I think these have been contributing the most, even if bh was just pushing his rng thing, atleast he was doing something.

If geript is actual vigi, he will be placed in my list.

I also liked tehpoofter d1, but he hasnt done much since then.

I dont like eran, you, thrawn, tamburini or ceph this game.

Those are the ones im going to look into.



Yeah I am pretty much sold on you as scum now.

I don't think you were targeted last night, and nothing you're doing or saying is exuding town at all, so that doesn't make you a power role; 1 option left..

This town circle is absolute crap. HF is a PROVEN investigative role, austin basically 100% confirmed it, and 2 of the other 3 have claimed blue roles for 3 phases and been uncontested in their claims. You're not actually pushing forward any new cases or doing anything for town's benefit. You're just sheeping tons of information and acting like you're doing stuff by giving a plethora of not very useful content.

You seriously don't have a town read outside of 3 basically proven townies at this point and a spammer? This is not town bunnies, I am sorry.


He asked who Im finding MOST townie. Not all who are in my town circle. And if you read my filter, you will see that HF, BH, and Steve have been in my town since day 1 before their claims. So their claims for me are basically moot at this point.

I prob wasnt targeted last night and you are thinking you can get an easy lynch on me tbh. I dont really see what you have done this game.... Ill read your filter eventually.

If i was targeted, not sure what happened tbh. A town watcher? A mafia stalker?

Maybe ill die in the night. Who knows. I could have been poisoned. Im not sure what got your check back on me. Or whatever it was.

Which btw: did you read what i wrote? Apparently not.



"I don't see what you have done, but I haven't read your filter"

That's and OMGUS right there. You're selling me further.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 26 2014 20:48 GMT
#4831
On May 27 2014 05:33 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 27 2014 05:28 27ninjabunnies wrote:
It was a pretty good game all in all.

I dont necessarily understand the spreadsheet, so not sure who all was scum...


And what was with the whole "touched by magic" stuff?

riotky's role is actually really cool

if someone is touched by maigc it's a bit complicated but anyone that isn't is conrfirmed vanilla town which would make it powerful. On the other hand recruiter mechanics fuck it up, but hey if he announces someone it's likely that multiple factions would target them and cancel out


Lol, I made that crap up. I was VT, and I had a growing scum read on bunnies, wanted to reaction test her. I also had a doctor read on someone and wanted to eat a bullet for them.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
ritoky
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6851 Posts
May 26 2014 20:55 GMT
#4851
On May 27 2014 05:54 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 27 2014 05:48 ritoky wrote:
On May 27 2014 05:33 layabout wrote:
On May 27 2014 05:28 27ninjabunnies wrote:
It was a pretty good game all in all.

I dont necessarily understand the spreadsheet, so not sure who all was scum...


And what was with the whole "touched by magic" stuff?

riotky's role is actually really cool

if someone is touched by maigc it's a bit complicated but anyone that isn't is conrfirmed vanilla town which would make it powerful. On the other hand recruiter mechanics fuck it up, but hey if he announces someone it's likely that multiple factions would target them and cancel out


Lol, I made that crap up. I was VT, and I had a growing scum read on bunnies, wanted to reaction test her. I also had a doctor read on someone and wanted to eat a bullet for them.


Well you were freaking wrong... Like seriously...


Yeah, i figured as much when you started getting angry, and was gonna rescind. But then other people started having odd reactions to the claim on you, so I was gonna leave it out there until the day phase then rescind.
“When interest is at variance with conscience, any distinction to make them friends will serve the hollow-hearted.” -Henry Home
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
11:00
Group Stage 1 - Group A
WardiTV526
IndyStarCraft 100
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko253
Harstem 229
IndyStarCraft 100
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 59417
Sea 6133
Rain 4016
Calm 3333
Horang2 2321
Bisu 1794
Jaedong 1235
ZerO 894
Mini 760
Soma 420
[ Show more ]
Flash 420
BeSt 322
actioN 308
ggaemo 280
Snow 234
EffOrt 220
Mong 197
Barracks 155
ToSsGirL 88
Soulkey 82
Hyun 78
Hyuk 76
hero 65
Mind 63
Backho 45
Rush 45
Sexy 38
sSak 36
Aegong 33
Movie 29
[sc1f]eonzerg 26
Sacsri 25
TY 25
sorry 25
soO 25
JYJ23
Shine 22
Sea.KH 20
SilentControl 17
HiyA 17
Icarus 14
Yoon 13
Bale 5
Terrorterran 2
Dota 2
qojqva974
Cr1tdota586
XcaliburYe272
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2568
x6flipin838
flusha235
Super Smash Bros
Westballz28
Other Games
FrodaN4021
singsing2067
B2W.Neo1063
crisheroes352
DeMusliM345
XaKoH 289
RotterdaM272
Hui .190
SortOf86
Fuzer 84
Mew2King71
ArmadaUGS24
rGuardiaN21
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1034
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 43
• davetesta17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV499
League of Legends
• Jankos834
• Stunt707
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
5h 8m
PiGosaur Monday
12h 8m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
23h 8m
The PondCast
1d 22h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 23h
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
SC Evo League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Contender
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
SC Evo League
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

StarCon 2025 Philadelphia
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.