On January 25 2014 01:40 kitaman27 wrote: On a side note, I hate the fact that the name Foolishness can't be easily shortened. I suppose I could start calling him Fool, but then people wouldn't know if I'm referring to him or VE.
He's Foo. Or Fooly if you want. Hmm, what about Nessy?
On January 25 2014 01:44 gonzaw wrote: WOS, what worries me is your lack of doubt. You are just assuming VE is town. The stuff you posted is not alignment indicative at all basically, but you attribute subjective value to it. Your wording shows that basically. Then you have lots of people with cases on VE, posting stuff about him, telling you "Hey, maybe VE is not town". I'd think you'd reconsider VE, take into account town sentiment, etc. But you straight up jump to "VE is so so town" (even if you aren't saying it, you are heavily implying it). I don't understand how you don't even leave the possibility of VE being scum open, again, considering how unconvincing most of your defense of VE was.
Your defense on VE is based on nitpicking some posts of his, and showing in a contrived manner how, maybe, perhaps, in your opinion, from your own experience, can come from town VE. Every single one of your points is like that.
I find it kind of hard to believe WOS, unless you are having some of weird anxiety attack or something? Dunno
lol. I ALWAYS have doubt. Always. But apparently when I have doubts and show them in thread I'm being wishy washy. When I don't it's 'contrived, nitpicky and forced.'
I am not certain of VE's alignment; I have talked about how I certainly don't like what he did around the lynch, but his behaviour for the rest of the game is what convinces me--- town is what I'm going with right now. Even were I to change my mind, reconsider, do all of the above, I would STILL find the other people I have mentioned scummier.
Alright actually thinking about it now we need to stop talking about me. If you're going to lynch me, whatever, let's at least talk about other subjects so you'll have what to go on when you realize you haven't already won the game. Reading Toad/Holy atm.
On January 25 2014 01:28 WaveofShadow wrote: Nope, it's the reason I've been considering him town. Go ahead and tell me your post is not bias right now.
Tell me how likely it is that as scum I'd take the difficult way out here, hard defend my scumbuddy ALL GAME rather than acquiesce quietly. It's waaaayyyyy more likely that I am wrong about VE than we are both scum.
That's misdirection. The current discussion has nothing to do with you defending VE or whatever, it's you pushing that ridiculous scumteam.
Anyways, you still think those 3 are scum? Did my "reality check" make you try to rethink it or anything?
I'm actually pretty pumped now tbh. And I remembered something I should have remembered a while ago. I feel pretty damn good about this right now, fuck the conspiracy theory for now, fuck VE, this is where we go today. ##Vote: Foolishness
On January 25 2014 01:56 WaveofShadow wrote: Austin what happened to you? Thought you wanted to talk?
I do but I also need to get brussels sprouts. So I run errands.
Also, you're doing a lot of talking and a lot of "this is too much talking."
If you want to chat about hypothetical Gonzaw-scum world, yippee. If you want to pick marv or kita, and read a little of them, or grill ME about them/one of them, mostly yippee. I've come up with some topics, promise, you just think they silly/too much work.
On January 25 2014 01:56 WaveofShadow wrote: Austin what happened to you? Thought you wanted to talk?
I do but I also need to get brussels sprouts. So I run errands.
Also, you're doing a lot of talking and a lot of "this is too much talking."
If you want to chat about hypothetical Gonzaw-scum world, yippee. If you want to pick marv or kita, and read a little of them, or grill ME about them/one of them, mostly yippee. I've come up with some topics, promise, you just think they silly/too much work.
Because you're picking topics that are less/not important in my opinion. I can get to those with you, but not until I'm finished doing what I believe needs to be done, and right now that's determine if Holy/Toad is scum.
Basically being petulant :p kita is more interesting, if Wave has things to do first then that'll probably line up with when I get around to looking at kita again. Although I kinda want to wait until kita has done his latest round of posting.
On January 25 2014 02:26 marvellosity wrote: Be more interesting if he did you tbh.
I think that would be pretty boring honestly. Activity is real good, analysis at important points in the game and is relevant, stuff like this:
On January 23 2014 04:01 austinmcc wrote: WoS, you around?
Gonzaw, I don't think we can be sure what nobody defending HolyFlare means, but I think in the bigger context of this game, we can't get too much from that. Nobody is defending Foolishness either (I might, yeah, think I will), nobody really popped up to defend WoS or Prome while they were getting more attention, and for the most part it's people dropping off "x is scummy" after they've posted more, not actively pushing "WoS or Prome super town."
Just not a ton of defending this game in general, imo.
Gonzaw, 2 question to start off since you're active right now.
On January 23 2014 03:10 gonzaw wrote: You know, I'm kind of serious with this Foolishness stuff. Does any one of you have anything to say about him? Basically:
1)Voting WOS, wanting to lynch other guys, but never change his vote and goes AFK 2)Seeming contradiction, since he almost thought I was scummy scum because I "did" something similar 3)People seemed to find him town because they agreed with him. But right now, apparently town sentiment against WOS and Prome dropped, so what makes that post of him townie now? 4)Remember the time he made a horrible entrance to the game making a scummy vote, pointless post and unfounded reads?
You keep poking at Foolishness's past games. Do these things, dinky votes, horrible entrances, pointless posts, fit with scum Foolish? Also, honest question, if someone did these things vs did NOTHING, no votes, no real posts to be scummy or townie, etc, which player would you find scummier?
that draw attention to those not under scrutiny and effectively and without bias pick apart those reads that may not be the best.
On top of that I find it fairly unlikely that a scum austin would hop aboard the sandroba wagon in the way that he did and as quickly as he did---I'm trying to keep conspiracy theory comparisons out of this one, but to jump on an town-led wagon as quickly as he did there was no way he could be sure sandroba wasn;t getting lynched---on top of that he very lightly says just before that he could vote sandroba wihtout any hesitation and not when it seems unlikely either.
Like, I would contribute, but I've been told that my suspects are off limits so I'm kinda at a loss as to what I even CAN do to prove my innocence. Maybe a story?
On January 25 2014 02:32 VisceraEyes wrote: Like, I would contribute, but I've been told that my suspects are off limits so I'm kinda at a loss as to what I even CAN do to prove my innocence. Maybe a story?
VE am I going to be vindicated or very cross with you for making me look rl dumb?
On January 25 2014 02:32 VisceraEyes wrote: Like, I would contribute, but I've been told that my suspects are off limits so I'm kinda at a loss as to what I even CAN do to prove my innocence. Maybe a story?
You can sing me a song If it's good, I'll totes unvote you. Pinky promise
On January 25 2014 02:32 VisceraEyes wrote: Like, I would contribute, but I've been told that my suspects are off limits so I'm kinda at a loss as to what I even CAN do to prove my innocence. Maybe a story?
VE am I going to be vindicated or very cross with you for making me look rl dumb?
You're going to look scummy for being the only person who's right. Sorry bruh.