TL Mafia Ban List 2.0 - Page 57
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
We should not censor people's play or what they do in order to fulfill their win condition. Moderating play style based on what is appropriate/ not appropriate is purely subjective. People should not rage quit the game. People should not cheat. People should always try their best to play to their win condition. These are objective standards that we can all agree with. Anything further than that becomes subjective. If you follow all of those things I am sure you will rarely get into problems with the ban list. AS for behaviour. That is part of the game. The game is argumentative and adversarial by nature. Abuse is a tool in the mafia players arsenal and can be used to discredit the person you are arguing against, their argument or both. It can also be used to make them doubt themselves and their reads. Matyring and raging are legitimate tactics as scum because it emulates a natural town reaction to being falsely accused. They are also a natural and expected reaction from wrongfully being called a liar repeatedly as town. If people don't like the adversarial nature of the game, don't like the way the game has evolved etc. then the simple answer is to take a break. If that break is permanent then that is fine. If you don't find the game fun you should not play it. But it is my belief that the game is the way it is by it's very nature. The meta on TL has caused mafia to be played at a very high level, much higher than on various other sites I have played on and what we are discovering is the natural progression of the game of mafia. Once again, we cannot change the nature of how to play mafia, nor should we try to. If it ceases to be a game some people enjoy playing that is fine. Stop playing. | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
@Gonzaw you appear to addressing a non existent (to my knowledge) question (actually maybe not, I think i misread you sorry) On April 14 2014 07:56 gonzaw wrote: Well BH, I guess you are the exception then. But at least we know we can ignore you if you do that kind of stuff, but we don't know if we should ignore it or not when random dude X does it. So BH, imagine you are scum getting lynched, and to avoid suspicion you have to come up with a story about how you were cooking porkchops the entire time. At what lengths would you go to make us believe that story? How would you crack the porkchop defense? (hint I'm hungry) Anyways, how about this: We all agree to silently abide by that rule (don't do weird "unethical" mafia plays). Yet, if you don't believe in those rules, and believe you should be able to use those tactics in games, then you should be like BH and tell everybody that you will use those tactics at any time you see fit clear and loudly, so we all know about it. I am pretty sure I have not seen anyone complain about the plays of anyone that was scum. Even after LVIII I dont recall people saying 'gee wiz scum should not do that'. I for instance cant recall a single tactic that a scum player used in any game I played in that troubled me. (well only one and only a little... and I think I might have been wrong to be troubled, and i suppose I was only troubled in that I thought perhaps no towny should do that... and no towny did. Hardest part was working do townies do that in this game(I was pretty sure I wouldn't as it would not be constructive).) In games I watched I don't recall a single scum tactic (that wasn't modkilled outright) that I had problem with. | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On April 14 2014 13:55 DarthPunk wrote: But it is my belief that the game is the way it is by it's very nature. The meta on TL has caused mafia to be played at a very high level, much higher than on various other sites I have played on and what we are discovering is the natural progression of the game of mafia. In the recent game of champions, large swathes of champions all knew the way they played mafia on their site was best... or claimed to. (as some part of some high level tactic where townies pissing everyone else resulted in scum stomping them ....) Not sure Id characterise a number of the games on TL of late as 'very high level'. perhaps I am just stupid and dont even understand the game you guys are playing. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On April 14 2014 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote: In the recent game of champions, large swathes of champions all knew the way they played mafia on their site was best... or claimed to. (as some part of some high level tactic where townies pissing everyone else resulted in scum stomping them ....) Not sure Id characterise a number of the games on TL of late as 'very high level'. perhaps I am just stupid and dont even understand the game you guys are playing. I've played and read games on several other sites. I don't think it's close. | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On April 14 2014 14:24 DarthPunk wrote: I've played and read games on several other sites. I don't think it's close. I agree I have read number of games in a number of places that I would not even characterise as being the game of 'mafia', that is different to regarding a number of recent games on TL as very high level. (also I am pretty sure at least some people in the last champions games would rate different games when compared with you, and different games when compared with me, as being high level.(nio surpises their own sites and styles of play would be favoured...)) I have read games on TL that were of high level and good to read and I wished I had played in them, not so much lately. (and that is both on the level of intellectual content(scum hunting) , would be fun to be in, as separate things ) Its cool, as I said I am not angry, bored, uninterested, not entertained, not seeing a place where fun is being had either by the people playing the game or by me if I was there, those, or things like them I am. If that changes I remember how to in, if it changes the other way, I also know where the active games list thread is. Metas evolve perhaps in few years TLs meta will evolve to place where the game would be fun... As for not liking adversarial.... that'll be the day... Its pissing in my pocket that annoys me. (note thats not what your doing, but its what annoys me when townies do that in game.) TKDR: no lamas here | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On April 14 2014 14:57 Blazinghand wrote: I really don't care where we discuss it, but GM's life is bad enough without seeing the ban list thread blow up with like 80 posts, get a migraine headache from impending drama, only to find we're discussing something else. So he will be pleasantly surprised. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
![]() Here's my picture of me and GMarsh. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
There's been some talk in the Ban List 2.0 Breakout Discussion thread about two incidents of people talking to other people outside of the thread. First was Toadesstern/Foolishness in Doctor Who Mafia 2. Toadesstern pretty much casually said in that him and Foolishness agreed on a read. Foolishness wasn't in the game though. Second is marvellosity PMing raynpelikoneet about his own reads in games he's not in. I think it was in Titanic but what do I know, I'm just some guy. marvellosity had access to observer QuickTopic in this game and it seems like people generally agree that this is somewhat aggravating. I personally don't think it matters much, marv gonna marv no matter if he has obsQT or not. I don't think any of this warrants a ban to anyone because I don't think any of these guys had any bad intentions and because there's no rule in the OP that you cannot do this. I don't think any of them thought they were cheating when they did what they did. That doesn't mean that it shouldn't be cheating though and I propose that we take it up in the OP thread to add a rule along the lines of "You cannot talk about a game to anyone outside of the game". There's also been some talk about Foolishness threatening to request a permanent ban on raynpelikoneet. Again, I think the proper response to this would be to laugh in his face but apparently it's an issue. I don't think anything of it other than it's pretty poor style from Foolishness, especially since, as far as I understand, it was about an ongoing game. So in conclusion what I propose is: nothing. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On April 15 2014 11:53 gonzaw wrote: DarthPunk, I'd say prphlz =/= all of TL Mafia I agree, this is cheating, both from Fool and Toad and marv. Should this go back to the Ban thread? Anyways, I guess bans are in place in this case. More info from every party should be posted in that thread. Do you have more PMs from marv rayn? From those other games? From that IRC topic you posted it wasn't that clear what marv's intentions were (though it was still cheating) From what I gather, this is what happened: Toad & Foo: Either nobody noticed it, or people noticed it and nobody paid attention. Rayn did pay attention, but apparently never said anything until now? If you haven't talked about this before rayn, then your rage at "TL Mafia not caring" is unfounded, in the sense that....well, if the community doesn't know what is happening, then how can they do anything about it? (for instance I didn't play nor read Dr Who 2 so I have no idea what happened there). Still, the fact that nobody noticed that breach of the rules, not even hosts or co-hosts, does indicate some kind of apathy for that kind of cheating. Either nobody really cared about it since it wasn't that much of a deal (until now), thus they were like "desentisized" to it in a way, or maybe it's like you said, and "some people are beyond the rules". Either way, I don't think it's a 9/11 conspiracy, rather than a general attitude in the community that needs to be addressed and made clear (that it is in fact cheating and such situations should be noticed, notified, and dealt with accordingly) marv: Did you mention this before at any time as well? Because it seems that you haven't posted the PMs and chat with marv until now. If so, well, you could have posted something before getting all hulk on us ![]() Make a clear statement about exactly what marv posted every time, with a transcript of the PMs. The PMs are important too, because we can't know if marv was the only infractor here, "telling" you who to lynch, or if it was a back and forth like the case with Foo and Toad (in which case you are to blame as well rayn). We need more info, and more chiming in from other people and discuss and shit. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On April 15 2014 12:07 DarthPunk wrote: I thought it was common knowledge that discussing the game with people not in the game/ in the obs qt was cheating. I felt that it was borderline ok to talk about stuff not directly about the game. Such as: Oh it was really fun playing with you, why do people always think I am scummy. But talking about or directing lynches when you have access to the obs qt is fucking cheating. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On April 15 2014 11:43 DarthPunk wrote: He had information outside of the game, and then spoke outside of the game with someone and told them who to lynch. Cheating. 100% He is not in the game. He should not provide reads. He had fucking heaps of additional information revealed due to having obs qt and god knows who else he spoke to. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Anyways, I think I kind of get rayn's frustration. Dunno how we should proceed with this though. Waiting for stuff to happen is the safest option. But well...if nobody shows up then like...nothing will happen. Either way, bans seem appropriate for these situations. Still we need some more general awareness of these issues, so it's not just a "ban dude, forget about it" situation, if not it'll keep happening. This specific rule is indeed "unenforceable", and it's harder for stuff like this to surface. We need to increase awareness to: 1)Any time you talk with someone outside the game, pay attention to this kind of stuff. Don't spout anything that comes from your mouth just because, which may mean you'll talk sensitive info of the game with that someone else. Talk responsibly 2)It should be imperative to report any kind of these issues as well. Hopefully, just by making people aware of (1) would be enough for people to not do it, and hopefully people are good enough people to not purposefully cheat even when they know (1). Still, people should keep an eye out for this stuff. If someone is trying to tell you something about the game, first of all tell him to shut up about ongoing games (this would deter some people from randomly talking about games). If he still presses on, then it becomes clear it's purposeful so it should be noted in the Ban thread to be dealt with. Still, these are just ideas I have, we can handle it better I suppose. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
Cheating includes (but is not limited to):" It is obviously cheating use some common sense. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
| ||
| ||