EPTRoulette Mini Mafia - Page 73
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
On June 15 2013 06:59 prplhz wrote: i think today's lynch is a crapshoot I agree, let's start a bandwagon on st-t-t-tutters | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
On June 15 2013 07:03 kitaman27 wrote: It makes so much more sense to lynch vivax so we can resolve the Vivax/prpl than blindly lynch into the green check. Not sure why I'm being ignored. Kita, since you're eager to lynch me for information, could you tell me how you plan to draw conclusions about prplhz from my flip? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On June 15 2013 00:46 Vivax wrote: At first glance it looks good for stutters cause ace is being inquisitive with him and I see that as unlikely between sbuddies, but what matters more is the answer: That he doesn't deliver town points doesn't really matter, he could also have been lazy and ace was dead anyway. The answer regarding ace's "what if" however is in contrast to an earlier statement: Stutters gave ace leeway cause he said he wouldn't pull that stunt as scum, but afterwards, when ace was doomed, he said he could also see it coming from scum. Going to be a couple posts on this so I can quote everything of relevance to vivax. First is this lovely post. Vivax is painting my stance on the Ace/Oats situation as I was indecisive on it, which simply isn't true. Before we lynched Oats I expressed that Ace was more believable to me but was very clear that if Oats flipped town that Ace had to die. It was a poor play for Ace to sacrifice himself as a strong scum player(from my understanding) to get oats lynched. A super town Marv I could understand making that trade for but not Oats. He is also trying to use my conversation with Ace as a misrepresentation. In the context of the conversation I was saying I would do that as scum to point out how his question to me was a null tell and although town would obviously claim as the cop there, that wasn't a point towards him being town. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On June 15 2013 07:05 Vivax wrote: Kita, since you're eager to lynch me for information, could you tell me how you plan to draw conclusions about prplhz from my flip? You're his super duper mafia read, he roleblocks you, he writes a case against you, and then votes sent. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 15 2013 07:07 kitaman27 wrote: You're his super duper mafia read, he roleblocks you, he writes a case against you, and then votes sent. so why dont we kill prp then? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
i don't follow you | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
On June 15 2013 07:06 Stutters695 wrote: Going to be a couple posts on this so I can quote everything of relevance to vivax. First is this lovely post. Vivax is painting my stance on the Ace/Oats situation as I was indecisive on it, which simply isn't true. Before we lynched Oats I expressed that Ace was more believable to me but was very clear that if Oats flipped town that Ace had to die. It was a poor play for Ace to sacrifice himself as a strong scum player(from my understanding) to get oats lynched. A super town Marv I could understand making that trade for but not Oats. He is also trying to use my conversation with Ace as a misrepresentation. In the context of the conversation I was saying I would do that as scum to point out how his question to me was a null tell and although town would obviously claim as the cop there, that wasn't a point towards him being town. Alright, let me understand this. You meant to say that you didn't see ace being scum cause it would have been poor play for him to trade himself for Oats. But once Oats flipped, you said you would have done the same in his position as scum, but also as town with a legit dt check. I still see the same inconsistency I addressed cause you used two different justifications pre- and post-flip. I mean, preflip you argued with the unlikelyhood of ace doing that to lynch oats, post-flip you argued that you'd have done it as scum. You've still missed to point out why you found Rayn scummy but didn't follow up with anything until he was up for lynch. It's more of a fact but if you have thoughts to offer about that time then maybe it'll tell us more about your mindset back then. Aaaand finally you still didn't give reasons for me being scum since you've joined my wagon for no reason at the start of the day. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
and there's no discussion | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On June 15 2013 02:51 Vivax wrote: Which means that even after I flip town you have an out to still lynch Sentinel, hence your reasoning for lynching me is flimsy since it doesn't solve a damn thing. Instead of doing analysis you prefer to give reasoning that doesn't lead anywhere. You never gave any reasons for voting for me. That no one picks up on that is outrageous. I asked you to deliver any reason at the start of the day and you did nothing. All you are doing is following thread sentiment. I did give a reason for voting you. I liked Vaynes vote since you weren't just saying it so I figured a pressure vote would get you to say it(as I was typing you obviously revealed it, but it wasn't worth removing the vote when there was plenty of time in the day). What made me decide to keep the vote as a serious one was your reaction to my vote and Vaynes analysis. You reacted by pushing me as a suspect on a meta argument when I HAVE NEVER PLAYED SCUM. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I have a stronger scum read on Vivax. | ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
On June 13 2013 09:54 Stutters695 wrote: Trying to make up a case on me again? Didn't work in yanmm Do you see the "even if one of them is scum"? That actually implies that your activities are kinda townie, regardless of meta. But a crass difference between early tryharding and later laziness is a scum-tell I see as generalized, not meta. Now we can start arguing on what is meta and whatnot, but that won't led anywhere. Now I'm interested to hear why you've been holding this explanation back all the time though. I'm not sure if you're just clinging on some feeble explanation to keep your vote on me or if you're a paranoid townie who misread things (I've been there). And of course illustrating your thought process after you voiced your suspicion against Rayn would be helpful. | ||
| ||
