Well I slept on it. So have a fresh mind.
Those two make sure sense for a lot of intervals in the game.
Everyone agrees eccleston at numerous points has not been bad town, but extremely scummy.
Read over pt2000 and the tom lynch where he tries to constructively argue with me. I don't think scum had reason to oppose this lynch so vehemently. Pt also tried to paraphrase so I understood his point of view. This is unlikely to come from scum who don't care about free lynches on town.
If he was scum trying to score town cred then what was the point? He knew about the wedding before replacing and lurked between tom death and wedding anyway. Twas all effort for a guaranteed nothing..and that's something scum never do!!
Baker is interesting and satisfies disinterested scum. Some parts of the story don't add up though. For example, he provided REAL support to the Dr.t case BEFORE it became a fully fledged case. And then there is Dr.t throwing out the sheeping argument.
I will be honest, when I replaced in and commented on baker being a sycophant. I did not read/remember Dr.t called baker a sheep.
This is important as I found it to be a scummy point for baker so raised it.
It appears Dr.t did the same thing. To me, for a bus that's a little authentic because if you are scum and truly think something about your Teammate is scummy, its very hard to throw that into the thread because you think they can't talk themselves out of it due to the guilt.
That leaves the beloved h3, due solely to the point he has contradictions with eccleston. Did u actually read the post I made regarding that? I think the contradictions are superficial at best and distancing at worst.
I had him as scum day3 and The only reason I listened to him day4 was because he was the only one present, and this game is so fucked with lurkers we need a sounding board + you kept saying he was town which made me doubt my conclusion.
Aside from derailing Dr.t and eccleston etc, consider this about h3.
1. He comes in to just post..,"lol.. Someone thinks I'm scum".
This is how he tried to derail eccleston + Dr.t. he just laughs at you, implying you are bad...but never actually responds to the argument!!!
This recycled throughout his filter.
2. Since this night cycle, Pt and baker both tried to offer something, whether big or small.
What has h3 done? He's clearly up to date.
Eccleston has again fucked off hoping we continue the.. Too scummy to be scum argument, originated by yours truly. Mr h3.
Mate. If I die tonight you need to kill eccleston full stop.
I think evidence points to h3 as #2. If he is scum it makes sense for all phases of the game.
Personally I would kill h3 first as he is slippery and has an higher chance of weaseling his way out.
Best of luck!!
I have faith in you, pt2000 and baker!
Please remember my dying words if it is me this cycle.