Newbie Mafia XL - Page 2

On April 06 2013 21:40 Smancer wrote:
I def went to bed too early last night, before the shit hit the fan.

If you call whiskey and Advil PM going to bed, its more like passing out. With my huge fatness it is the only way to sleep :-)

Earlier I based my case on kirby voting Rainbows. I thought Rainbows was doing a good job of getting the ball rolling and I thought jkirbys vote on him was scumy. Then he thought Rainbows was talking to him

However based on the course of the night, between TRN, jamp and Rainbows I think we have a scum. The problem is to figure out who.

I actually don't like Rainbows case against TRN. My opinion is that his case boils down to TRN was lurking. TRNs reaction seemed normal.

What didn't make sense is jampidampi. His case against Rainbows really was bad.




I don't understand this. I want to find the scum, but, I also care about my image. I am town I want people to think I am town too.

In regards to your point about Rainbows thinking someone was town. I think Rainbows has had more scum reads in this game so far than anyone.

Lastly your demand for Rainbows to answer your questions is just silly.



So late in the game, when the focus has entirely shifted, you want him to go back and answer questions on policy?




And your other big question you demand answered is why he made this comment:



Those are your big questions? That has nothing to do with the current case he made against TRN. Or any of the recent pages for that matter.
##Unvote

##Vote:jampidampi


Rainbows why are you sticking to your TRN vote and not voting for jampidampi after you saw how bad his case was.

On April 06 2013 10:50 Moloch wrote:
I've been away for a while, so I'll give general impressions of what I think of people so far.

Jarjar - He is certain kirby is skum in his first post because he feels kirby changed his mind too easily. I feel he reads too much into kirby's unvote. Everything he's posted has been aggressive towards kirby, while being certain Rainbows is a townie because of his read on kirby.

I'm suspicious of him because his only reasons (that he's stated) come from kirby's noncommital way of saying that Rainbows is either scum or an idiot. Since then, he's done nothing aside from saying kirby is very suspicious ( using that as the reason he thinks Rainbows is townie).

Smancer - Nothing he's said raised any red flags and I like the variety in his posting style. A mixture of his opinions and questions to try to keep conversation going.

jampidampi - He hasn't given his own opinion on anything aside from saying that he thinks Rainbows misinterpreted Saraf's post. Also, a third of his posts talk about whether or not someone else is at their computer (even getting aggressive with kirby when kirby replies to him).

I don't have a strong opinion of him, though. It could be that he feels a delay in posting is scum chatting with each other to try to figure out what to do. I don't think it's a good idea to base opinions off of this since there will be a lot more false-positives with strangely long reply times than there will be actual scum catches.

Warent - He explains Rainbow's misinterpreting (which I completely agree with), and gave opinions on a couple other people. I like his style.

Saraf - He's pushing to lynch the spammiest asshole a bit too much. I think he did imply that Rainbows was the spammy asshole, but he certainly did not state that Rainbows was a townie.

kirby - I like his reasoning that he's given for his decisions recarding voting/unvoting Rainbows. At first he thinks he's malicious, then thinks he's an idiot fattie. I don't like how his reason to suspect jampidampi is that he isn't suspicious. It feels really weird to me.

TRN - He has only made three posts that aren't spam. He hasn't made any statements about his own opinion, just ask questions of others (aside from his post about the hypothetical A, B, C, D policy question). I like him less now than I did before.

Fishgle - I like that he appears to be posting a good mixture of calling other people out without accusing, and posting his own opinions. I like what he says about Warent's hypocrisy, but I'm unsure what I think about his suggestion that Rainbows got a blind hit on Saraf (I'll go into more once I'm done every person)

Obzy - I have a positive opinion of how he's been posting. I get a general okay vibe from him.

nobodywonder - His posting style seems defensive overall. It doesn't give me a good feeling, but I do like how he is able to critique why someone else voted for kirby, and then vote for kirby himself a little bit later. It implies an open mind. I have really mixed feelings about this guy,

Rainbows - I feel this has been the most controversial person. I really don't like how he is pushing so hard to have Saraf lynched off a sentence that Rainbows misinterpreted (multiple people pointed it out to him and he still kept going hardcore against Saraf).