| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
misrepresentation/proof he's not reading OR EVEN LOOKING AT VOTECOUNT yamato's lynch had me, ace, and a ton of others trying to see whether or not he was truly scum Ace seemed to get a better read off of it than I... and coaxed a lot to vote Oats I Felt like Oats was town, and was only leaning on Yamato, so I went with the better wagon (WE KNOW THIS NOW) | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 23 2013 16:43 Clarity_nl wrote: Yes good point, clearly I should look at myself when I say "there's been no resistance" Anyway, I'll indulge you, why? twisting oats words here oats tried to question him, but clarity deflected didnt have to worry about town that was about to get lynched, huh? | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
What's your stance on yamato currently? What do we make of tube and Drazak? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:44 Vivax wrote: BM. What's your stance on yamato currently? What do we make of tube and Drazak? Yamato is coasting since his D1 wagon derailed He has improved his usefulness, but I would lynch him over Clarity right now... hell, I'd lynch Sharrant over both of them, even BC. I'd rather off people I have null reads on. Yamato is either a townie, or scum, from my standpoint. I don't see him being a power role | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 23 2013 11:39 Clarity_nl wrote: 1)Yeah okay I might have started reading and then figured I would read the last two pages and see palmar talking about possibly being the hammervote so figured I'd show my face. 2)interested why you think my case is reaching, though. BM's post adresses both of my posts. My original entry and my case post an hour later. He says "lol he read entire thread in 1 hour yeah right?" and comments that the case is bad I reply this (gonna paraphrase to get it in your thick skulls) 1) This is a reply to the first part, about my entry post. a) "Yeah okay I might have started reading and then", this is me saying I was already in the process of catching up b) Yes I saw Palmar say it was close to hammer so figured I'd post that I'm here and catching up 2) This is a reply to the second part, about the case. Then people start spewing shit about how it "took me an hour from catching up to posting a case and that's impossible" even though I thought I fucking addressed that in the above post. So I clarify saying I had been reading two hours prior to my entry post. The only time I show lack of conviction in my case is after wave comments on it properly, not before. Everyone satisfied? As for the people I said I'd check: pretty confident BC is town, giygas is who the fuck knows and I don't understand why the fuck shiao hammered after showing no interest in oats whatsoever. I'm going to bed, tomorrow I'm going to find scum and ignore everyone because this is just pissing me off. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 23 2013 21:18 Vivax wrote: [/b]UNOFFICIAL VOTE COUNT Oatsmaster: Hopeless1der: Bill Murray: Getmoript: TheRavensName: Raynpelikoneet: Sharrant, Sylencia, Hopeless1der, Ace: Sharrant: Yamato: VisceraEyes: With 25 alive it takes 13 votes to lynch. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BM's vote is wrong but that one doesn't matter anyway. Oats needs 4 votes for the hammer. Asking those on Rayn to switch to Oats pls. Why was Vivax not warned/modkilled for this? Having lines of information "Bill Murray's vote is wrong, and doesn't matter anyways" is ridiculous. His votecount is misleading, as well ...how can hosts let this behavior happen? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
You're "Reading two hours before" but you find your way to the last 2 pages randomly? explain that logic | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:58 Bill Murray wrote: Clarity, before you go - NO, I am NOT satisfied You're "Reading two hours before" but you find your way to the last 2 pages randomly? explain that logic I honestly don't remember nor care. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: So why did you decide those three players were the ones you should be reading more into over, let's say yamato/Oats? cause I had already read over oats and yamato Those three names were just cause looking at the playerlist I couldn't recall anything about them, reads etc. BC had a ton of stupid miller discussion crap but today he's as green as can be Bed now. | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
BM's post adresses both of my posts. My original entry and my case post an hour later. No, only your second. BM never mentioned your late entrance as accuse, but you felt like defending yourself for it. He says "lol he read entire thread in 1 hour yeah right?" and comments that the case is bad Yes, and you replied to it with a justification for your "catching up" post, instead of telling him that you were reading for 3 hours when he accused you of being too quick in catching up and dropping such a case, thus not answering to his accusations the same way you answered to mine. Then people start spewing shit about how it "took me an hour from catching up to posting a case and that's impossible" even though I thought I fucking addressed that in the above post. So I clarify saying I had been reading two hours prior to my entry post. That's cause you said different stuff to BM than to others even if the accusations are the same. Everyone satisfied? No. Hunt scum pls. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
At the very least, I would like to see you explain your town read on him since all you have said so far is "I have a super strong town read on him." and not actually went into WHY you have a town read on him | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 24 2013 08:05 TheRavensName wrote: Oh look, WoS asking questions and then doing nothing with them again. You have no analysis of anyone that isn't "But I'll wait to see what happens before I do anything with it." Which isn't really scum hunting, its more like pretending to be scum hunting and giving you an excuse not to follow up on. Someone look at his filter, and see most of the people he makes any accusation or comment on are: I guess he could be this but I'm hesittant and not really sure. Did you actually make any reads your willing to stand by? You call Sharant a couple of times in after the whole exchange me and Ray had with him, but you never actually state why you think hes town or even say it unless its in response to people making case against him. It almost seems like you want to protect him and then just not have any flat out reasons that can be analyzed and no real analysis of a connection between the two of you if one of you died. At the very least, I would like to see you explain your town read on him since all you have said so far is "I have a super strong town read on him." and not actually went into WHY you have a town read on him Adding to this, most of WoS posts about Sharrant also come after Sharrant posted something and he is trying to explain something to him or back it up, or someone just accused Sharrant of something. | ||
|
Vivax
22406 Posts
Find your scumreads and post your reasons, there's still enough time. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
OSC
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
