EPTTL Mafia LXI - Page 63
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
tube
United States1475 Posts
Inactivity should be pushed. | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22424 Posts
Starts reading -> Says I'm here after 2h-> case after 1 h -> BM calls him out saying the case is bad and made in just one hour -> Clarity answers "Yeah well I figured I'd say hi after seeing that I didn't post anything -> Vivax calls him out again for quick case -> Clarity: "Yeah well I actually read for 3 hours." Why does he answer to BM, talking about clarity's case being bad and the short time (second post), with a justification for his entrance post (first post)? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Clarity could have replied, as town: "I actually read for 3 hours, so what's your problem with my case?" But Clarity was scared that his case looked scummy cause of BM's reaction, so he instead posted a justification for his late entrance, which he knew looked bad, and felt guilty for. And he didn't want to correct BM in saying that he read for so long precisely cause he'd have had less justification to explain the bad case. Now that he's being pressured for the short time in which the case was written, he gives another justification where he actually claims that he was reading for a longer time. When BM pressured him, he wanted to make it look like he made something in haste by arguing that he wanted to post before the hammer. Now that it's exactly the point against him, he says that he was actually reading for a longer time. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On April 24 2013 06:32 WaveofShadow wrote: Because I'd like to hear his opinion on arguably the most important thing that has gone down in the thread thus far. It doesn't really matter what he says about Oats as he already knows the results and it's his genuine thoughts or WIFOM and you have no way of telling which is it. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On April 24 2013 06:59 grush57 wrote: sais tube sais grush | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:17 raynpelikoneet wrote: It doesn't really matter what he says about Oats as he already knows the results and it's his genuine thoughts or WIFOM and you have no way of telling which is it. Nonetheless, I'd still like to hear it. Why do you feel the need to prevent me from scumhunting? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:02 Vivax wrote: The explanation doesn't add up at all. Starts reading -> Says I'm here after 2h-> case after 1 h -> BM calls him out saying the case is bad and made in just one hour -> Clarity answers "Yeah well I figured I'd say hi after seeing that I didn't post anything -> Vivax calls him out again for quick case -> Clarity: "Yeah well I actually read for 3 hours." Why does he answer to BM, talking about clarity's case being bad and the short time (second post), with a justification for his entrance post (first post)? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Clarity could have replied, as town: "I actually read for 3 hours, so what's your problem with my case?" But Clarity was scared that his case looked scummy cause of BM's reaction, so he instead posted a justification for his late entrance, which he knew looked bad, and felt guilty for. And he didn't want to correct BM in saying that he read for so long precisely cause he'd have had less justification to explain the bad case. Now that he's being pressured for the short time in which the case was written, he gives another justification where he actually claims that he was reading for a longer time. When BM pressured him, he wanted to make it look like he made something in haste by arguing that he wanted to post before the hammer. Now that it's exactly the point against him, he says that he was actually reading for a longer time. he's lying he claims he read the thread in an hour. try reading 50 pages in an hour. Drazak/Clarity have both spent about the same time "catching up" if you notice - around 45 minutes to an hour - which is long enough to coordinate with scum, but not really determine what is going on in the thread | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 24 2013 06:57 tube wrote: Where's drazak? Inactivity should be pushed. i've been pushing him... but you're only the 2nd one i've seen do so | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 24 2013 06:17 Clarity_nl wrote: I had four hours, you guys just can't read my posts and are making stuff up. I was caught up with the thread when I made the case, I didn't say I thought I looked bad I said I felt guilty. This refers to me saying that I'm here now, not my case post. and because I posted that I felt obliged to post some original thoughts, and I felt on a dealine cause it was 5 am. In fact my case post starts with saying I have no clue about oats. because i feel like you just filtered him, didn't read anything in context, and that indicates you have a scum agenda | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:20 Bill Murray wrote: he's lying he claims he read the thread in an hour. try reading 50 pages in an hour. Drazak/Clarity have both spent about the same time "catching up" if you notice - around 45 minutes to an hour - which is long enough to coordinate with scum, but not really determine what is going on in the thread READ MY FUCKING POSTS DIPSHIT | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
clarity shows up He was "reading the last two pages" "mistakenly" seeing Palmar say there was a hammer? If he's catching up, why is he flittering around? Makes no sense in general. Instead, I would point you towards it being a sign of active lurking, and him not wanting to be replaced. His case on Sharrant takes a reaching standpoint when it attacks him for questioning yamato and oats, the two main wagons of the day. Why is questioning them a bad thing? Clarity spins it as such... I don't feel like he read the thread in that 50 minutes, plus filtered Sharrant, plus got all those quotes, plus responded to them all Seems like scum that doesn't have to read... didn't respond to any of the events... responded to a filtered reaction of them. You see there is a miller claim, supposedly, but you have no thoughts on it? Any town would say "oh he was kidding" or "i thought he was being serious"... "Hes miller" "Hes scum" whatever Blame the late entrance? Blame Palmar? Who else is he going to blame? | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
not only am i reading them, but i'm reading them in context. notice how i posted MY post on you ELEVEN minutes after? Yeah... I didn't even get to read a page in that time.... and I'm a fast reader | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 23 2013 16:08 Clarity_nl wrote: I mean, you actually voted yamato in the voting thread, but okay. i was wondering who would notice this. funny it was you. way to sling mud. add that to your lying. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: BM the point here is he later on said he actually read for three hours. He either lied to you earlier or to us later on, or in general. Anyways seems like he lied. completely agree | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On April 23 2013 11:48 Clarity_nl wrote: Tis not how I roll. I read the thread I just posted I was catching up a little after I started reading >.> Maybe comment on my case instead of twisting my words? obvious lying is obvious^ | ||
|
Vivax
22424 Posts
On April 24 2013 07:33 Bill Murray wrote: oats pushes for his replacement in a post clarity shows up He was "reading the last two pages" "mistakenly" seeing Palmar say there was a hammer? If he's catching up, why is he flittering around? Makes no sense in general. Instead, I would point you towards it being a sign of active lurking, and him not wanting to be replaced. His case on Sharrant takes a reaching standpoint when it attacks him for questioning yamato and oats, the two main wagons of the day. Why is questioning them a bad thing? Clarity spins it as such... I don't feel like he read the thread in that 50 minutes, plus filtered Sharrant, plus got all those quotes, plus responded to them all Seems like scum that doesn't have to read... didn't respond to any of the events... responded to a filtered reaction of them. You see there is a miller claim, supposedly, but you have no thoughts on it? Any town would say "oh he was kidding" or "i thought he was being serious"... "Hes miller" "Hes scum" whatever Blame the late entrance? Blame Palmar? Who else is he going to blame? Please post like this as much as you can, and everyone will save bandwidth, time to read and bullets. | ||
| ||
