|
Why yall gotta ignore my post.
On April 23 2013 07:28 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 07:15 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 23 2013 07:15 Palmar wrote:On April 23 2013 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 23 2013 07:13 Palmar wrote:
I could do oats.
also never forget that VE is superscum. False. why so shit then? Said the kettle. I'm inactive, but clearly trying. Look again. Someone mentioned it earlier but lurker VE is scum VE---since I had you as town read from beginning of game I was worried when you stopped posting. One particular thing that struck me as scummy about Oats (besides the inactivity and general uselessness of his posting) was the vote on Giygas....just looked like an easy way (since he showed minimal suspicion towards him) to toss up an easy vote with minimal substance behind it and fuck off for a while. One thing worries me though and that is this post: Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 21:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yamato is on a deadline.
No content=LYNCH.
Good luck yamato. What do the better players make of this in the context of yamato and Oats being both prime scum candidates for the day and Oats dropping this long before the yamato vote train started?
I think I'm more likely to vote for Oats than yamato.
|
On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day?
hmmm. It might be too late for a shift, but this logic is definitely something that I wouldn't mind a concerted effort in analyzing... Scum have that sort of mindset... but what if Oats is an offering? That would look bad on Vivax, then!
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:46 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:45 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 23 2013 08:45 yamato77 wrote:
Let's make horrid association cases before flips, guys.
Totally good scumhunting, and works so well every game. So is making a case against someone that is NOT the person you're trying to convince others to lynch! HEYO!!! I'm totally all about lynching you today, bro. It's the theme of today.
Furthermore, my vote is on you, LOLOLOLOL.
|
On April 23 2013 08:46 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:45 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 23 2013 08:45 yamato77 wrote:
Let's make horrid association cases before flips, guys.
Totally good scumhunting, and works so well every game. So is making a case against someone that is NOT the person you're trying to convince others to lynch! HEYO!!! I'm totally all about lynching you today, bro. It's the theme tunnel-of-false-contribution of today.
Fixed that for ya. ^^
|
WoS, what do you make of yamato's case against VE?
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:48 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:46 yamato77 wrote:On April 23 2013 08:45 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 23 2013 08:45 yamato77 wrote:
Let's make horrid association cases before flips, guys.
Totally good scumhunting, and works so well every game. So is making a case against someone that is NOT the person you're trying to convince others to lynch! HEYO!!! I'm totally all about lynching you today, bro. It's the theme tunnel-of-false-contribution of today. Fixed that for ya. ^^
I know you're salty that I catch you every game.
It's okay.
|
On April 23 2013 08:42 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day? I just wrote a post where I speculate that. I'm just not sure if I should submit.
ok, this post makes my point/what i was feeling pretty null
continue
|
On April 23 2013 08:46 WaveofShadow wrote:
Why yall gotta ignore my post.
Why you gotta ignore my questions for you?
|
On April 23 2013 08:47 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day? hmmm. It might be too late for a shift, but this logic is definitely something that I wouldn't mind a concerted effort in analyzing... Scum have that sort of mindset... but what if Oats is an offering? That would look bad on Vivax, then!
how would that look bad on Vivax?
|
11589 Posts
GUYS
LET'S LYNCH VE
I'm totally a bad lynch, and you'll save yourselves the moaning and groaning about my play this game if you just lynch mafia instead of me.
|
On April 23 2013 08:43 Ace wrote:
I think Oats is definite scum, yamato likely scum. But someone being useless is worth lynching. Too bad Town has gimped Vigis so we're gonna waste time getting rid of them both.
this is totally not true... furthermore, you shouldn't start a sentence with the word but, unless it has two t's
|
Thanks for the suggestion Bill. Make sure everyone who posts in this thread has correct grammar.
|
On April 23 2013 08:50 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:47 Bill Murray wrote:On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day? hmmm. It might be too late for a shift, but this logic is definitely something that I wouldn't mind a concerted effort in analyzing... Scum have that sort of mindset... but what if Oats is an offering? That would look bad on Vivax, then! how would that look bad on Vivax?
where he promoted the case on Oats, from hearsay; I've heard that it was his case
It was pointless speculation, since he's claiming he has a post dedicated to that. If he doesn't post it, however, and is filled with hollow, empty promises, I'm going to vote him.
My reasoning is that Yamato is ever-more-so looking town, and I'm not seeing the Vivax that I want to see right now. I may look at him in filter, but I'm slowly catching up on the game. I've read about ten pages back so far, and haven't seen any slips... Palmar is acting a bit funny, Yamato a bit desperate, but Yamato's case on VE is pretty telling to me... and why I may move my vote. I know it hasn't been on him long, but I don't see Yamato scum right this moment, anymore, like I did an hour ago
That has me a bit perplexed, though, regarding Vivax. If Yamato isn't scum, then Vivax wouldn't be trying to stick his neck out for him, unless he's wanting to play the defense attorney mafia style, where he defends bad lynches, and builds up credit that way
|
On April 23 2013 08:53 Ace wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Bill. Make sure everyone who posts in this thread has correct grammar.
Honestly, though, a policy lynch on sillyness/inactivity is a cancerous growth to the town
we lynch on slips, checks, and logic
|
On April 23 2013 08:51 yamato77 wrote:
GUYS
LET'S LYNCH VE
I'm totally a bad lynch, and you'll save yourselves the moaning and groaning about my play this game if you just lynch mafia instead of me.
Actually I would say if we lynched you we wouldn't have to worry about your play at all.  Does that men if VE gets lynched your actually going to try or is this something were only going to get out of you every time your in danger? (Still suspicious of the sudden burst of activity and serriousness by the way)
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:56 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:51 yamato77 wrote:
GUYS
LET'S LYNCH VE
I'm totally a bad lynch, and you'll save yourselves the moaning and groaning about my play this game if you just lynch mafia instead of me. Actually I would say if we lynched you we wouldn't have to worry about your play at all. Does that men if VE gets lynched your actually going to try or is this something were only going to get out of you every time your in danger? (Still suspicious of the sudden burst of activity and serriousness by the way)
I'll probably put in more effort this game if you lynch VE than if you lynch me, yes.
Can't promise anything, though.
|
I don't even fear you when I AM mafia yamato why would I fear you when I'm not? Get a grip son.
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
I don't even fear you when I AM mafia yamato why would I fear you when I'm not? Get a grip son.
Rofl.
|
|
|
On April 23 2013 08:48 Vivax wrote:
WoS, what do you make of yamato's case against VE?
Then,please explain how you see this post:
On April 23 2013 07:28 WaveofShadow wrote:One thing worries me though and that is this post: Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 21:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yamato is on a deadline.
No content=LYNCH.
Good luck yamato. What do the better players make of this in the context of yamato and Oats being both prime scum candidates for the day and Oats dropping this long before the yamato vote train started?
Cause I read it as you trying to distance Oats from Yamato: Like you were trying to show that Oats made a half-assed push against yamato early in the game. Unless you have another explanation for you posting this bit (which you probably should start making up now, in case I guessed correctly).
Could you please explain why you would vote for yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
