|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:14 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:08 yamato77 wrote:On April 23 2013 08:06 Vivax wrote:
You just don't make any sense.
You said you wanted to lynch Oats earlier.
There's a pretty awesome case against him on the previous page.
You come back ignoring it and spouting some weird nonsense about ace and BC, acting all emo and saying insane sounding things, joining BM in a ridiculous spamfest.
I was looking for a circus poster to post while watching the thread grow from your posts like cancer. I was on Oats before that case was posted. Like I said, he should definitely be lynched. I mean, it's all in mobilizing town. That isn't going to come from me. town gives zero fucks about what I say. Saying you think Oats should be lynched, then voting for VE, calling BC and Ace mafia, then casing Ace, then trying to convince someone that built a case on Oats that he should be voting for Oats in spite of the fact that he's already voting for Oats....does not count as you trying to get Oats lynched I'm afraid.
I never said I was trying particularly hard to gets Oats lynched.
Right now it's like, PR and stuff.
|
On April 23 2013 08:10 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:06 Bill Murray wrote:
Maybe
you know
if you'd quit thinking typing like this = town; make a case; work on your thread image, etc. The same could be said for you, bro. Why do you not care about what town thinks? Yeah.
so you're saying pot kettle... ok? how many votes do I have... and me posting like that was MOCKING YOU.
Where am I saying I don't care what the town thinks? I'm attacking you for that. In no way have I said that, and you blatantly misrepresenting me is keeping my vote on you for the rest of the cycle, even if there is an exodus off of you
at this point here's who I want to lynch:
yamato = seems nervous, playing poorly, misrepresented me for my attack on him, and lying about what I was saying. I was mocking him, and he attacked me for the same thing I attacked him for... akin to omgus, the dreaded "pot, kettle", or hypocrisy.
BC - buddying Ace to the point I believed Ace could be scum with him, but that makes me realize Ace is town. BC likes to coach his team, not buddy them. He likes to be the alpha wolf, even if he isn't that smart. He wants you all to bow down to his e-peen and ego
when the good players that understand American English, which excludes players like Vivax, Rayn, toad, etc because they're european, are Ace and DoctorH in this game.....just remember: These are the types that will create havoc in the thread... not someone spamming like me/yamato... because they will sway you into voting a mislynch. They understand that it's not what you know, it's what you can convince the thread
Policy: rayn,
vivax
I don't like long winded players to are passive-aggressive, so if I see a wagon on anyone I've mentioned, of these 4, that is the order that I would be willing to take. When I get done reading, I will have a good case on someone, if not a few people.
|
My point is, if you really feel like Oats is the lynch today, and that you're "still pretty sure" about your read, then why AREN'T you doing more to try and get him lynched? Instead of, you know, try and get ME lynched? Or BC/Ace?
Like, you keep saying "Hey I was on Oats before that other case there" but what does that matter when you're ACTIVELY trying to get people who AREN'T Oats lynched?
|
11589 Posts
Difference is, I clearly don't care enough to change how I'm playing to avoid getting lynched,
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
My point is, if you really feel like Oats is the lynch today, and that you're "still pretty sure" about your read, then why AREN'T you doing more to try and get him lynched? Instead of, you know, try and get ME lynched? Or BC/Ace?
Like, you keep saying "Hey I was on Oats before that other case there" but what does that matter when you're ACTIVELY trying to get people who AREN'T Oats lynched?
There's more than one mafia, and I'm trying to find them.
People think I'm mafia, I have to make sure that somehow they reach the correct conclusion.
|
On April 23 2013 08:19 yamato77 wrote:
Difference is, I clearly don't care enough to change how I'm playing to avoid getting lynched,
Then quit whining about players like Ace/BC thinking you're scum.
|
yamato, your best bet would have been to make a dedicated wall post, with good language, rhetoric, and logic
|
On April 23 2013 08:02 yamato77 wrote:
But hey, I'm trying pretty hard to get lynched this game.
Why sign up for a game you don't want to play... and why post things you don't want analyzed? This is an unacceptable attitude for anyone to have for any reason. If you want out so bad just ask for a replacement.... or just don't sign up. Mix with this with all the completly useless spamming and you got enough of a reason to vote you over anyone else.
##Vote: Yamato77
|
11589 Posts
Okay, fine, effort is obviously the only way you guys will get the message.
|
On April 23 2013 08:29 yamato77 wrote:
Okay, fine, effort is obviously the only way you guys will get the message.
It would be a nice token jesture if nothing else....
|
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day?
|
On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day?
Until one of them flips otherwise, totally.
|
On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day?
It could be! It could also be that they're both town and we're way the fuck off. What do YOU think about it?
|
On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote:
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day?
I just wrote a post where I speculate that.
I'm just not sure if I should submit.
|
11589 Posts
So let's look at VE, the guy I'm voting for. Why do I think he's mafia? In short, VE is someone I am familiar with on both sides of the coin. I've been town when he's been scum and town. I've been right about him most of the time, when the dust cleared. So, at least part of this read is meta-related, and I won't talk about that. What I will talk about is a series of posts that show just how little VE cares about the effort he's putting forth in his scumhunting.
On April 23 2013 01:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
I want to lynch BM. His antagonistic response to BC is too telling - reminds me of when he was protecting me in Boardwalk from the jackals.
Yamato looks bad too, I never like the excuse "Oh well you know my posting was INTENTIONALLY bad".
##Vote: Bill Murray
What is important here isn't just that he's slapping a vote down with such little thought, it's that he also slyly slips in that he'd be willing to lynch me as well, with reasoning that conflicts with his own earlier analysis of my posting. Early in the game, he clearly understood that I wasn't putting in effort for some reason, and reached the correct conclusion that I was sheeping Palmar out of a town read on him. So why does he suddenly not understand that some early posts, and indeed some of the latter ones, are truly just trolling? It seems like he's fabricating a reason to vote me after earlier having defended me, and I see no clear line of reasoning that caused the move.
On April 23 2013 03:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
But OO! FEELS! Lynch BM!
But he's on this BM thing pretty hard, and that's whatever. Notably, however, when he has screamed "lynch this dude", it's mafia VE.
On April 23 2013 05:04 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'll kill yamato sure.
And when he does this; sheeping town sentiment while yelling that someone else is scum; it's always mafia VE. It's the scumtell of absolute certainty.
On April 23 2013 06:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar stop voting me baddie. Vote yamato because he agrees with you.
So he's all like "Yo, this dude is mafia for no good reason, and I'm not voting him, but you totally should. Waiting for King Palmar to move his vote before I will do anything as to look like I'm doing it for a good reason."
On April 23 2013 06:39 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 06:37 Ace wrote:
To all you people lurking the thread lets get some consensus going. Right now I've got my vote on yamato but Vivax's case on Oats looks like an even better lynch. These are our top two suspects at the moment and imo, our best 2. do not stall these fucking wagons unless you've got a really good case of your own. Else wise the discussion should be focused on these two for now. Arguments for/against either of them will be greatly appreciated. My vote on yamato is completely OMGUS. I look into both candidates and provide my own thoughts directly.
Total lies. I pointed this out earlier, but it's also contradictory to his later statement:
On April 23 2013 07:15 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 07:15 Palmar wrote:On April 23 2013 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 23 2013 07:13 Palmar wrote:
I could do oats.
also never forget that VE is superscum. False. why so shit then? Said the kettle. I'm inactive, but clearly trying. Look again.
OMGUS is not trying. VE that doesn't try is mafia. Mafia VE.
|
I think Oats is definite scum, yamato likely scum. But someone being useless is worth lynching. Too bad Town has gimped Vigis so we're gonna waste time getting rid of them both.
|
11589 Posts
Let's make horrid association cases before flips, guys.
Totally good scumhunting, and works so well every game.
|
On April 23 2013 08:45 yamato77 wrote:
Let's make horrid association cases before flips, guys.
Totally good scumhunting, and works so well every game.
So is making a case against someone that is NOT the person you're trying to convince others to lynch! HEYO!!!
|
Ok, completely caught up now. Yamato is basically losing his mind, that can go either way, but the support behind his lynch his sound. I'll support a Yamato lynch if it's just me away from becoming a majority, but I'd still rather lynch oats right now.
At the very least, I want to see oats post again before we lynch. After all, we have infinite time.
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 08:45 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:45 yamato77 wrote:
Let's make horrid association cases before flips, guys.
Totally good scumhunting, and works so well every game. So is making a case against someone that is NOT the person you're trying to convince others to lynch! HEYO!!!
I'm totally all about lynching you today, bro.
It's the theme of today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
