|
On February 12 2013 08:55 Sylencia wrote:
Currently at work - I can answer questions and make shallow comments about posts but I can't go too indepth with analysis at the moment (though this part has never really been a strong point of mine in these games)
Lowering expectations of how good they will be at scumhunting
and then the 5 posts on D1 about blue claims and the like which really only helps scum on D1
On February 13 2013 09:21 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 08:52 Mocsta wrote:
Sylencia
I just checked your filter
and noticed your recent posts are defensive (perhaps due to pressure you)
What I need from you to determine alignment is not a defense; but to see you scum hunt.
I could not find a vote in your filter.Please indicate who your top scum read, and dot point why. I've only checked a few filters unfortunately (bad play by me) but from those I've checked I'm going to still stick with my suspicion on Warbaby. I've tunneled on him a little bit too much though...
another post admitting to being a bad player and altogether undermining thier own stance on things which is a great tactic if later your going to have to go back on your reads. real easy to go "I told you guys I was bad at scum hunting"
looking through the whole filter I just see a lot of answering direct questions and no real cases.
|
On February 16 2013 12:15 warbaby wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 12:09 cDgCorazon wrote:On February 16 2013 12:01 warbaby wrote:
Following up on Corazon's questions...
I currently think Sylencia is the scummiest of the lurkers, due to the extreme lack of effort in his filter. I'd like Sylencia to explain why he's less scummy than sevryn and mandalor, if he can. Don't you think it would be more prudent to ask all of them why the other two are scummier? Or do you feel like we need to go lurker-by-lurker? I'd be overjoyed other two responded as such (or made just make post in the first place). But yeah I'm highlighting sylencia for now. Maybe that's wrong, since sevryn did help mislynch glurio. Sevryn states here that he voted glurio because glurio made a crappy case, and because he thought I was getting too much attention? Those are some pretty bad reasons to vote someone when there are lurkers about.
Glurio was a lurker. maybe not the worst but at the time he was the scummiest to me
on my posts I think that glurio is the bigger lurker but syls posts just looks much more scummy to me. there is a differance to not being here and being here but making yourself look not that helpfull on purpose so people dont expect much from you. that said I wouldnt be suprised if they were both scum however syl atm looks to me more likely
|
On February 16 2013 13:54 Sylencia wrote:
Sorry guys, wasn't around last night.
Corazon: I'm still sure that Warbaby is scum, potential slip during day 2, one of the weirdest statements I've read during day 1, and he's now also claimed I've fake roleblock claimed. Remember when you were scum and you managed to slip under the radar for another 3 days while we flailed around until the other scum kind of screwed up your plans? This is something I don't want to let happen again.
Sevryn: It's not like I'm even talking about my level of scumhunting wihtout backup - you can check my filters for the other 3 games I've been in. How many cases have I truly brought up? Not too many. You guys all mention how I talk about the potential blue claim for quite a while on Day 1 - I didn't even say it's likely he's blue unless it's a Vig.
talking about it at all isnt really something thats good for down it can only help scum on Day 1
|
On February 16 2013 14:00 warbaby wrote:
Sevryn, I've been working on the assumption that there are 3 scum. Let's assume you're right that sylencia and Mandalor are scum. Who do you think the 3rd scum could be?
Do you think any of the active players have been attacking you harder than sylencia and Mandlor, because they know you're the one remaining town lurker?
Does anyone think we can extend this hypothetical to scenarios where sevryn and sylencia are scum? Or sevryn and mandalor?
My point is that if two lurkers are scum, then one active player is scum, and perhaps we can spot a difference between the way active players have been treating the different lurkers.
Nobody thats still alive.
|
On February 16 2013 14:11 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 14:10 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 14:00 warbaby wrote:
Sevryn, I've been working on the assumption that there are 3 scum. Let's assume you're right that sylencia and Mandalor are scum. Who do you think the 3rd scum could be?
Do you think any of the active players have been attacking you harder than sylencia and Mandlor, because they know you're the one remaining town lurker?
Does anyone think we can extend this hypothetical to scenarios where sevryn and sylencia are scum? Or sevryn and mandalor?
My point is that if two lurkers are scum, then one active player is scum, and perhaps we can spot a difference between the way active players have been treating the different lurkers. Nobody thats still alive. So there's 2 scum?
ahh no that was too the second question. if we assume that there are three scum I would probably say you cora are at the top of my list which would go
1. cora
2. warbaby
3.mocsta/sno
4.zera
5.TS who is confirmed town?
that actually makes me wonder is there a scenario where TS isnt confirmed townie?
|
On February 16 2013 15:03 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 13:59 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 13:54 Sylencia wrote:
Sorry guys, wasn't around last night.
Corazon: I'm still sure that Warbaby is scum, potential slip during day 2, one of the weirdest statements I've read during day 1, and he's now also claimed I've fake roleblock claimed. Remember when you were scum and you managed to slip under the radar for another 3 days while we flailed around until the other scum kind of screwed up your plans? This is something I don't want to let happen again.
Sevryn: It's not like I'm even talking about my level of scumhunting wihtout backup - you can check my filters for the other 3 games I've been in. How many cases have I truly brought up? Not too many. You guys all mention how I talk about the potential blue claim for quite a while on Day 1 - I didn't even say it's likely he's blue unless it's a Vig.
talking about it at all isnt really something thats good for down it can only help scum on Day 1 How is reasoning someone is potentially scum good for scum? Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 14:16 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 14:11 cDgCorazon wrote:On February 16 2013 14:10 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 14:00 warbaby wrote:
Sevryn, I've been working on the assumption that there are 3 scum. Let's assume you're right that sylencia and Mandalor are scum. Who do you think the 3rd scum could be?
Do you think any of the active players have been attacking you harder than sylencia and Mandlor, because they know you're the one remaining town lurker?
Does anyone think we can extend this hypothetical to scenarios where sevryn and sylencia are scum? Or sevryn and mandalor?
My point is that if two lurkers are scum, then one active player is scum, and perhaps we can spot a difference between the way active players have been treating the different lurkers. Nobody thats still alive. So there's 2 scum? ahh no that was too the second question. if we assume that there are three scum I would probably say you cora are at the top of my list which would go 1. cora 2. warbaby 3.mocsta/sno 4.zera 5.TS who is confirmed town? that actually makes me wonder is there a scenario where TS isnt confirmed townie? If OO was scum, possibly could make a case where TS isn't confirmed, but it'd be the greatest shot in the dark if TS guessed OO did something, seeing as how he was SK and so scum have no info as to who that is.
talking about blues is good for scum not who is scum
|
On February 17 2013 10:11 cDgCorazon wrote:
Well I doubt Sevryn is going to come out of his hiding place unless we smoke him out:
##Vote: Sevryn
Tell us why we should lynch someone else and not you.
I made a post about the other two lurkers my times I'm able to be on are a little different than most people but that doesnt mean I'm hardcore lurking mandalor is the lurkiest but syl is the scummiest IMO so if you want to smoke somebody out why woudlnt you go for the least active this seems to me almost like an OMGUS from the previous night and my posts about you.
WB that is the deffinition of sheeping voting with someone without giving your own reasons I know you said you thought I was the scummiest but your whole case is cherry picking my filter I have made good constructive posts and you have just ignored them. you want me to go through your whole filter and post all the zero content posts?
right now my current scum team read is
1.syl
2.Cora
3.wb
in that order
|
On February 17 2013 14:13 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2013 13:15 Sevryn wrote:On February 17 2013 10:11 cDgCorazon wrote:
Well I doubt Sevryn is going to come out of his hiding place unless we smoke him out:
##Vote: Sevryn
Tell us why we should lynch someone else and not you. I made a post about the other two lurkers my times I'm able to be on are a little different than most people but that doesnt mean I'm hardcore lurking mandalor is the lurkiest but syl is the scummiest IMO so if you want to smoke somebody out why woudlnt you go for the least active this seems to me almost like an OMGUS from the previous night and my posts about you. WB that is the deffinition of sheeping voting with someone without giving your own reasons I know you said you thought I was the scummiest but your whole case is cherry picking my filter I have made good constructive posts and you have just ignored them. you want me to go through your whole filter and post all the zero content posts? right now my current scum team read is 1.syl 2.Cora 3.wb in that order It's not hard to say that Mandalor and Sylencia are scum. We are all suspicious of them. We're not going for the least active person, as far as I'm concerned, you all have the same level of activity: inactivity. We are trying to lynch the scummiest person, and I think it's you. We have three different regions in this game: USA, Australia, and Europe (and Lesotho). There is always someone on, and you can always post when people are asleep. I'm saying you haven't scum hunted because all your ideas are not original. For example, your arguments about me are taken from a general consensus that was given N1 (that my vote for Glurio was suspicious), and from what TestSubject had tunneled me all of D2 about. You haven't brought anything to the table. Taking other people's ideas and rewriting them as your own is not original content. It's looking like you are scumhunting without doing actual scumhunting. I've challenged you to make a case on me. All you have done since is run away and hide from my challenge. Why is that so? Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 15:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Sevryn: Can you bring anything new to the table in the argument against me? If so, I'd love to hear it. @all: Do you agree with my point about Sevryn's cases being unoriginal, or would someone else disagree?
my case on glurio was unoriginal? Im not proud that I got another townie lynched but atleast I was trying to find scum
|
On February 17 2013 14:13 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2013 13:15 Sevryn wrote:On February 17 2013 10:11 cDgCorazon wrote:
Well I doubt Sevryn is going to come out of his hiding place unless we smoke him out:
##Vote: Sevryn
Tell us why we should lynch someone else and not you. I made a post about the other two lurkers my times I'm able to be on are a little different than most people but that doesnt mean I'm hardcore lurking mandalor is the lurkiest but syl is the scummiest IMO so if you want to smoke somebody out why woudlnt you go for the least active this seems to me almost like an OMGUS from the previous night and my posts about you. WB that is the deffinition of sheeping voting with someone without giving your own reasons I know you said you thought I was the scummiest but your whole case is cherry picking my filter I have made good constructive posts and you have just ignored them. you want me to go through your whole filter and post all the zero content posts? right now my current scum team read is 1.syl 2.Cora 3.wb in that order It's not hard to say that Mandalor and Sylencia are scum. We are all suspicious of them.We're not going for the least active person, as far as I'm concerned, you all have the same level of activity: inactivity. We are trying to lynch the scummiest person, and I think it's you. We have three different regions in this game: USA, Australia, and Europe (and Lesotho). There is always someone on, and you can always post when people are asleep. I'm saying you haven't scum hunted because all your ideas are not original. For example, your arguments about me are taken from a general consensus that was given N1 (that my vote for Glurio was suspicious), and from what TestSubject had tunneled me all of D2 about. You haven't brought anything to the table. Taking other people's ideas and rewriting them as your own is not original content. It's looking like you are scumhunting without doing actual scumhunting. I've challenged you to make a case on me. All you have done since is run away and hide from my challenge. Why is that so? Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 15:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Sevryn: Can you bring anything new to the table in the argument against me? If so, I'd love to hear it. @all: Do you agree with my point about Sevryn's cases being unoriginal, or would someone else disagree?
I was asked why I am less scummy than the "other" two lurkers/
how about your reads? who do you think the scum team is? you think its all lurkers?
|
On February 17 2013 14:30 cDgCorazon wrote:Once again... Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 15:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Sevryn: Can you bring anything new to the table in the argument against me? If so, I'd love to hear it. If you think I'm scum, make the case. Find points that make me look scummy that haven't been talked about already. Contribute to the scum hunt.
I will throw that right back at you you never give examples you say that I am full of broken promises. like what?
show me why im scummy dont just say YOUR SO SCUMMY PROVE YOUR NOT.
im going to try to get who I think is most likely scum lynched today what you do is your own choice but I would try to find scum by making a really case.
but as to scum hunting let me ask you a question.
Why do you think im more scummy than scy have you looked at his filter?
|
On February 17 2013 15:00 cDgCorazon wrote:
Alright, you want my logic as to why you are scum?
1. Your filter is 3 pages long. It's D3. You are lurking.
LOL mandalor and syls filters are shorter than mine and yet im the one you vote on to get activity out of?
2. Your arguments are either unoriginal or not very well reasoned.
a. Your case on Glurio wasn't well thought out (it described the actions of other players)
and you still went a long with it this is just as much a point against you.
b. Your case on me was a rehash of what TS and Geript said.
hey if something is true its true
3. You've only made two arguments the whole game. You're not scumhunting.
right now im making an argument with you about why your focusing me when syl is a much scummier option
4. I have to vote for you to come out and defend yourself. You've made about 30% of your posts in the past couple of hours only after I voted for you. Why does someone need to pressure you for you to come out and post?
this is just downright false. its a lot closer too 9-10% why would you lie about this?
All three of you guys are lurking. To figure out who is scum and who isn't, we need to delve into deeper reasoning such as this.
I've already pressured Sylencia to make another read besides Warbaby. There's still 43 hours left in this day, so there is plenty of time for me to change my vote if I see fit.
aparently you have to vote to pressure people so why didnt you vote sylencia? this is the scummies reasons ive scene to think I'm the scummiest of the lurkers
if we lynch syl today(which I think we should) when they flip scum your going to be next for soft defending them like this when you have no reason too other than being scum buddies.
|
On February 17 2013 15:14 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2013 15:08 Sevryn wrote:On February 17 2013 15:00 cDgCorazon wrote:
Alright, you want my logic as to why you are scum?
1. Your filter is 3 pages long. It's D3. You are lurking.
LOL mandalor and syls filters are shorter than mine and yet im the one you vote on to get activity out of?
2. Your arguments are either unoriginal or not very well reasoned.
a. Your case on Glurio wasn't well thought out (it described the actions of other players)
and you still went a long with it this is just as much a point against you.
b. Your case on me was a rehash of what TS and Geript said.
hey if something is true its true
3. You've only made two arguments the whole game. You're not scumhunting.
right now im making an argument with you about why your focusing me when syl is a much scummier option
4. I have to vote for you to come out and defend yourself. You've made about 30% of your posts in the past couple of hours only after I voted for you. Why does someone need to pressure you for you to come out and post?
this is just downright false. its a lot closer too 9-10% why would you lie about this?
All three of you guys are lurking. To figure out who is scum and who isn't, we need to delve into deeper reasoning such as this.
I've already pressured Sylencia to make another read besides Warbaby. There's still 43 hours left in this day, so there is plenty of time for me to change my vote if I see fit. aparently you have to vote to pressure people so why didnt you vote sylencia? this is the scummies reasons ive scene to think I'm the scummiest of the lurkers if we lynch syl today(which I think we should) when they flip scum your going to be next for soft defending them like this when you have no reason too other than being scum buddies. I didn't need to vote Syl to get him to talk more. He's starting to talk more as well. As you (hopefully have read), my order of scummiest lurker is you, then syl, then Mandalor. It's up to you to change it. Threatening me with voting me off is not going to help you.
where show me where syl is being productive and sharing their reads. obviously you havnt read my filter if you thought I had made one third of my posts today so why did you say that? just guessing it was a third?
|
anyway im done talking to you about myself ill be making a case in a while although I'm at work so it might be a couple hours.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On February 15 2013 09:05 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 06:09 warbaby wrote:
Note that there is only a mafia roleblocker. If sylencia is not lying, there will still be a mafia roleblocker on N2 (unless we lynch the mafia roleblocker today).
Scum slip ? ? On February 15 2013 09:16 Sylencia wrote:
How is it possible to say for certain that there's only a mafia roleblocker, when we don't know if it was a JK or a RB? On February 16 2013 15:03 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 13:59 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 13:54 Sylencia wrote:
Sorry guys, wasn't around last night.
Corazon: I'm still sure that Warbaby is scum, potential slip during day 2, one of the weirdest statements I've read during day 1, and he's now also claimed I've fake roleblock claimed. Remember when you were scum and you managed to slip under the radar for another 3 days while we flailed around until the other scum kind of screwed up your plans? This is something I don't want to let happen again.
Sevryn: It's not like I'm even talking about my level of scumhunting wihtout backup - you can check my filters for the other 3 games I've been in. How many cases have I truly brought up? Not too many. You guys all mention how I talk about the potential blue claim for quite a while on Day 1 - I didn't even say it's likely he's blue unless it's a Vig.
talking about it at all isnt really something thats good for down it can only help scum on Day 1 How is reasoning someone is potentially scum good for scum? Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 14:16 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 14:11 cDgCorazon wrote:On February 16 2013 14:10 Sevryn wrote:On February 16 2013 14:00 warbaby wrote:
Sevryn, I've been working on the assumption that there are 3 scum. Let's assume you're right that sylencia and Mandalor are scum. Who do you think the 3rd scum could be?
Do you think any of the active players have been attacking you harder than sylencia and Mandlor, because they know you're the one remaining town lurker?
Does anyone think we can extend this hypothetical to scenarios where sevryn and sylencia are scum? Or sevryn and mandalor?
My point is that if two lurkers are scum, then one active player is scum, and perhaps we can spot a difference between the way active players have been treating the different lurkers. Nobody thats still alive. So there's 2 scum? ahh no that was too the second question. if we assume that there are three scum I would probably say you cora are at the top of my list which would go 1. cora 2. warbaby 3.mocsta/sno 4.zera 5.TS who is confirmed town? that actually makes me wonder is there a scenario where TS isnt confirmed townie? If OO was scum, possibly could make a case where TS isn't confirmed, but it'd be the greatest shot in the dark if TS guessed OO did something, seeing as how he was SK and so scum have no info as to who that is. On February 17 2013 10:38 Sylencia wrote:
Right now, I don't even think they're roleblocking to block a blue - they're roleblocking me to make it seem like I'm fake claiming. Pretty sure I haven't left any unintentional breadcrumbs, the only time I've mentioned anything about my role is back at the end of Night 1, where I said "I'm not blue". On February 17 2013 10:56 Sylencia wrote:DIdn't I already answer the question? Show nested quote +On February 16 2013 13:54 Sylencia wrote:
Corazon: I'm still sure that Warbaby is scum, potential slip during day 2, one of the weirdest statements I've read during day 1, and he's now also claimed I've fake roleblock claimed. Remember when you were scum and you managed to slip under the radar for another 3 days while we flailed around until the other scum kind of screwed up your plans? This is something I don't want to let happen again.
On February 17 2013 10:59 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote:
In the scum game I played; we got the RB to block me.. to get town cred... i can see this happening here. Yeah, I can understand it happening once - I was considering it myself when I was scum. But why twice? And as I just said, this is the exact reaction that the scum want from me having to claim RB twice. On February 17 2013 10:26 Sylencia wrote:
Who was roleblocked - seeing as it's confirmed that it's scum RB now since they didn't protect TU (unless they're playing to try make me a liar) On February 17 2013 10:27 Sylencia wrote:
Never mind - I was roleblocked again. On February 17 2013 10:31 Sylencia wrote:
I checked the forums on my phone, which doesn't have me logged in - I hopped on the computer and typed it out before even noticing the new PM.
these are syls 11 posts since thursday
syls being roleblocked claims: why would scum roleblock two days in a row? pretty much all WIFOM about what would look the least suspisious. sly then says that the scum are roleblocking him to make it seem suspisious which looks to me like "look how town I am im pointing out why my claim is odd" but is pretty much all WIFOM and and a pretty empty post(as are most of slys posts).
this whole game slys has been pointing out even pointing at thier meta how unhelpful a townie they are and that they are not good at making cases or figuring out anything on their own.
his last post is just talking about lurkers honestly as I have said before syl plays like one giant excuse and the only reason I can see for pointing out how weak any case you would make would be is to set it up if you do make a case and the lynchie gets flipped townie that you obviously didnt know what you were doing and you shouldnt have been taken seriously which is a really scummy attitude.
|
On February 17 2013 18:46 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2013 14:27 Sevryn wrote:
how about your reads? who do you think the scum team is? you think its all lurkers? Whoah whoah, take a step back sunshine. You're not in a position to be questioning others. It works like this Mr.Lurker.
We question you and your motives. OR You build a case on someone, that we pick to shreds to find out if you are bullshitting.
The "case" you wrote on Sylencia is pretty hard to read; and reads as a summary post to me. I want to see some analysis on why the things you are raising have to be from scum; and not from town.
so sharing your reads and answering questions is something people who are on 24/7 dont have to do?
|
Sylencia
here are my thoughts after reading his filter
Sylencia starts off by posting the chances of hitting town with RNG lynch making it clear he is not going to scumhunt and instead getting ezpz town cred.
States the obvious with warbabys claim that we all knew. talked definitivly with "when he doesnt die on night 1" which leads me to think he had knowledge of the kill target. than he continues with more talk of warbaby with some setup speculation thrown in there. where is the scum hunting? these are just empty posts that he doesn't take anywhere.
All of his pressure on Warbaby is summaries of his play no questioning his motives with OMGUS posts which is just classic scum play.
Of course town will survival vote but it is much better to play more town oriented and not have to rely on it. because hey(scum will survival vote as well)
He automatically decides its a scum RB. how does he know the JK doesnt exist while the RB does? he also points out a frame possibility which seems kind of odd if I was RB I wouldn't think "ohh this is me being frameda obviously" first. why is he ready to speculate about things he couldn't possibly know as town?
All game he tunnels warbaby(while applying very weak pressure) with a foundation of a scum slip which is a really weak case that gets dismissed which is perfect for scum to look like they are contributing.
makes a big post about the RB person to step up right before saying he got blocked a sec afterwards. and then we are right back to the being framed thing.
so basically sylencia has no real contributions.
He has had a game of weak tunneling on warbaby with no real pressure
and the rest is setup/role speculation with no outcome or saying he has been roleblocked and framed to be scum.
You can have problems with my play but I have tried to be heard when my posts are getting ignored. you attack me because I put what I think outthere and you dont like my opinion.
with syl he is just blending in.
its probably LYLO and he isn't doing anything to help town.
We need to lynch this scum
##vote sylencia
|
On February 19 2013 00:52 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2013 23:42 Sevryn wrote:
Sylencia
here are my thoughts after reading his filter
Sylencia starts off by posting the chances of hitting town with RNG lynch making it clear he is not going to scumhunt and instead getting ezpz town cred.
States the obvious with warbabys claim that we all knew. talked definitivly with "when he doesnt die on night 1" which leads me to think he had knowledge of the kill target. than he continues with more talk of warbaby with some setup speculation thrown in there. where is the scum hunting? these are just empty posts that he doesn't take anywhere.
All of his pressure on Warbaby is summaries of his play no questioning his motives with OMGUS posts which is just classic scum play.
Of course town will survival vote but it is much better to play more town oriented and not have to rely on it. because hey(scum will survival vote as well)
He automatically decides its a scum RB. how does he know the JK doesnt exist while the RB does? he also points out a frame possibility which seems kind of odd if I was RB I wouldn't think "ohh this is me being frameda obviously" first. why is he ready to speculate about things he couldn't possibly know as town?
All game he tunnels warbaby(while applying very weak pressure) with a foundation of a scum slip which is a really weak case that gets dismissed which is perfect for scum to look like they are contributing.
makes a big post about the RB person to step up right before saying he got blocked a sec afterwards. and then we are right back to the being framed thing.
so basically sylencia has no real contributions.
He has had a game of weak tunneling on warbaby with no real pressure
and the rest is setup/role speculation with no outcome or saying he has been roleblocked and framed to be scum.
You can have problems with my play but I have tried to be heard when my posts are getting ignored. you attack me because I put what I think outthere and you dont like my opinion.
with syl he is just blending in.
its probably LYLO and he isn't doing anything to help town.
We need to lynch this scum
##vote sylencia 1) Explaining how RNG is not beneficial does not give town cred, it's a completely neutral observation which anyone can and would've made. 2) Remember I was already being looked at as being suspicious. If I was scum, there's no way I'd be given the order to shoot. Jailkeeper, assuming decent deduction ability, would have a lot more options other than myself as to who to block. Knowing that I'm probably not taking the shot, there's a higher chance that they should protect the one they want not to die. Also, how is it ever LYLO with 8 players alive? 5:3, 6:2 are the only combinations that are possible/legitimate possibilities. Are you trying to turn the MYLO situation into a LYLO situation so that people panic and decide they need to vote? Nice try.
when you looked at RNG you looked at chance to hit town not scum which means you were NEVER looking to hunt scum
the JK stuff is WIFOM but you have been corrected for false info having false info more than once is just intentional
also the LYLO and MYLO stuff is just me not knowing all the terms I though they were just a different way to say the same thing it definitely is MYLO and we could vote no lynch but no lynch only works if your innocent and right now your defense looks scummy as hell with all the OMGUS) and no lynch should be brought up closer to the time cutoff
|
you dont think my current case is better than the glurio case? the vote is similar but thats how i phrase my vote when I am pretty sure someone is scum but whale cum back sno
|
On February 19 2013 10:15 warbaby wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2013 09:14 Mandalor wrote:
##Vote: No-lynch
I'll be explaining myself tomorrow. I am now the IT security branch at my company when we were four guys last month. Also my girlfriend of 4 years kinda broke up with me.
I have tons of stuff to do and this game, sadly, has to be at the bottom of my agenda. If you knew you were not able to play, you should have requested a replacement. Mandalore posted once in 4 days. Can you please replace or modkill him?For reference, here are the timestamps for his last two posts: February 15 2013 07:57 February 19 2013 09:14 According to the rules, players must post once per day and night cycle, and I believe Mandalor failed to post during N2.
day and night cycle is the whole day plus night. also if mandalor is town and gets mod killed we lose. assuming 3 scum
|
@corazon this is the stupidist game ever.
if we have a JK which is pretty much our only hope please protect someone who is going to get shot its all in your hands
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
