|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 07:27 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv, if no one was off the table, who would you want to lynch?
Well, you seem kinda interested so maybe you're town this game. sloosh for right now I think is town, Palmar is null.
So really it's between austin and kenpachi. I'm fine with a policy lynch at this point and I don't trust austin for his checks at all. I don't know if now it's just ME being paranoid, but his explanation that he'd have to check me by myself seems such a copout.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
who cares if it's dumb, don't make yourself a policy lynch with the way you play is the answer.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2012 07:27 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv, if no one was off the table, who would you want to lynch? Well, you seem kinda interested so maybe you're town this game. sloosh for right now I think is town, Palmar is null. So really it's between austin and kenpachi. I'm fine with a policy lynch at this point and I don't trust austin for his checks at all. I don't know if now it's just ME being paranoid, but his explanation that he'd have to check me by myself seems such a copout.
Although I am monumentally displeased sloosh isn't here right now having just been here.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 07:33 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote:On December 14 2012 07:27 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv, if no one was off the table, who would you want to lynch? Well, you seem kinda interested so maybe you're town this game. sloosh for right now I think is town, Palmar is null. So really it's between austin and kenpachi. I'm fine with a policy lynch at this point and I don't trust austin for his checks at all. I don't know if now it's just ME being paranoid, but his explanation that he'd have to check me by myself seems such a copout. Pshaw. Look at the rest of my play this game. Or we can discuss my checks after this lynch/you can try to get me lynched/whatever. But you'll notice that the people who were around don't seem to be finding me scummy. At the very least, drop me for this cycle. Besides, you know I'll check you by yourself later 
what about the rest of your play. you just indulge in setup speculation which can be done by anyone
you poke and prod randombum when it should be clear he's a bad lynch right now
you excuse foolishness for his scumminess by going "um, he's townie because he never gave a satisfactory response on his scumminess"
your play is pointless and doesn't have to be townie in any way whatsoever.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 07:33 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv, did you see Keir's question for you in other world?
answered it
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Your Foolishness explanation was on a par with your risk.nuke explanation in Chrono trigger where you went
"um, risk is probably town because he's lurked so heavily since he was active early game, means he's probably town bros"
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why don't you just read, Mementoss
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
oh, I thought deadline was now.
:/
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
@Kei, can you explain for me so I have a framework to look in?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 05:29 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2012 05:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
I have a really hard time seeing who to lynch. I would be most comfortable with a Dieno lynch but am I convinced he's scum? Not really. He's just playing a bit off compared to chrono but it's his second game so it could be anything.
I personally had a townread on randombum before he suddenly wanted to lynch austin, but that was a really weird moment and I can't see a motivation for any alignment for him to act that was so I'm going with it was fault logic.
But this whole world can't possibly all agree that Foolish and Keirathi were the two scum in this world? Those two are my best guess but in no way are they set in stone. I don't think we should just no-lynch, assuming Foolish and Keirathi were the two scum. I was less certain of Foolishness's scumminess than this thread, because ... the whole thing was just kind of weak. If he were scum, I'd expect some kind of defense because it was sitting right in front of him. Palmar wanted to know why Foolishness was doing what he was doing, and it would have been plenty easy for Foolishness to figure out the "town" answer and give that. He didn't. So I wasn't left being sure about his scumminess.
seriously, what the fuck is all of this.
Foolishness did scummy thing. He was questioned on it. He didn't or couldn't give a satisfactory answer. Therefore Foolish probably not scummy.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 08:03 slOosh wrote:
marv, like I said I'm here on and off.
I'm not seeing where you are getting at with austin. Are you saying that town austin is usually paranoid about you and therefore would have no doubt included you in the check? I don't see much reason for scum to come in when town has no idea what to do after their main scum lynch was taken away, and then fake claim to offer up lynching guidance the way he did it.
I'm leaning Kenpachi as a lurker / unreadable lynch.
yes, I would absolutely expect him to include me on a check. In fact you were co-host in LV when I played around with austin in Toad's mason chat, and he's never trusted me since, and we've played many games together. austin is always paranoid of my alignment
to the bold, why not?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
@Kei, I'll take a look right now, thanks.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
bleh. Dieno, what about what I said about austin do you like in particular?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you never said you were sure on any of them. You checked Palmar because you said he would be useful later if he were town.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 14 2012 08:17 Dienosore wrote:
We lost our top read and the town was floundering. This sounds like the perfect time for a scumball to step in and start to influence people's opinions without looking too suspicious. What better way than create some vague detective check that no one can really confirm. It also creates the opportunity to give town cred to some names of his choosing.
I didn't feel comfortable voting for Kenpachi anyway. Even less once you guys mentioned he has a history of lurking. On the chance that I'm wrong about Austin and he does flip town, then we have three pretty much confirmed townies. If we are right and Austin is scum, then hurray scumball in a great position of power is down.
This does make it exceedingly tempting, yes.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's not wishy washy, it's just downright nonsensical
Foolishness being unable to explain his scumminess DOES NOT MAKE HIM LESS LIKELY TO BE SCUM
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
@other world
I'd quite like sandroba's input right now. I would say Foolishness but he seems totally uninterested in who we might lynch over here.
fu, clarity, srsly.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
austin your play is eternally illogical
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
in austin's world, if you do something scummy, as long as you don't have to explain it you're gonna be ok
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
