• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:23
CEST 11:23
KST 18:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202537Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder9EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced50BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? Scmdraft 2 - 0.9.0 Preview BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 695 users

Newbie Mini Mafia XXVIII - Page 2

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 28 2012 21:26 GMT
#268
great. another grush57.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 28 2012 21:41 GMT
#276
kush this "act" you are playing is not helping you, and is not helping town. Man the fuck up and make cases against people, try to defend yourself. I'd much rather lynch debears because I find the arguments against him to be much more substantial than the ones against you, which are mostly meta-based. I disagree with a meta-based lynch when I've provided real arguments against someone else (which, incidentally you shat on. It seems like you actually want to get lynched)
If you are town that is. If you are scum, go ahead and keep moaning, I'll gladly choose you over debears.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 28 2012 21:44 GMT
#277
On September 29 2012 06:39 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 06:33 kushm4sta wrote:
sdm you make no sense. I tried hard not to make scumslips last game. this game I did not. because I am not scum.

I don't know if any of you guys have had this experience but when everyone wants to lynch you and you are definitely going to get lynxhed, it just feels like why am I going to waste my time writing cases and making arguments for this shitty town. that's gonna kill me anyway.
I'm actually starting to hope I get lynched to teach town a lesson.. all scums put your votes right here. easiest d1 ever I hope you guys win.


Pointing out another scum slip at this point seems kind of redundant, but anyway, what the fuck? We're only like 24h into the game and you've got only 2 votes. Why would you give up at this point? You're being so anti-town it'll be hard for anyone not to vote on you, but if you shape up there's still a lot of time.

Anyway, really need to get some sleep now. I'm out.


How is that a scumslip?
Also, you chose to stick with "I think kush has a better case" while not even mentioning the shitbomb I've thrown against debears. Care to shed a comparative light and tell us why you think a meta based lynch is better than a inconsistent scumhunting-based one?
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 28 2012 22:15 GMT
#282
You have two fucking votes. That's not even one third of what it takes to lynch you. I hate little babies such as yourself. You are not even in the danger zone yet and are already crying. Now its starting more to look like a scum act rather than a pressured townie one, which is what I was inclined to believe.
it seems like I am.beyond helping myself. why would I want to help a town that is going to lynch me

Uh... assuming you are town, you want to help town because you want town to win?
Also, making cases show you have town interest, and puts you above other people who are also being useless.

Do this. Take the time to read the thread. Pretend you have nothing against you. Ignore all cases against you. Make a case against someone else, with arguments and a thought-out post.

I hope your next post is a useful one.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 28 2012 22:18 GMT
#284
@corrosion

What is the proper context then? Can you answer my questions?
You can start by addressing the issues I've presented
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 28 2012 22:35 GMT
#286
Agreed

##Unvote
##Vote kushm4sta
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 01:28 GMT
#305


READ




An interesting snippet from the op:

Play to win.
This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing.


So, read my exchange with him. I try a billion times to help him, and what does he do? Choose to mock me case and be insulting. That's not playing to win if he's town.

His sudden change of attitude probably came from a mod-warning, due to what I've quoted, and I'll assume this to be true. Now I have two train of thoughts that I'm killing myself over:

1) Lynch him. He's bad to have in the endgame and is a detriment to the town, no matter his alignment. His change of attitude might have come from his scummy friends, because I sure as hell couldn't sway him.

2) Assume he is a townie. Why can we do that? Because I am almost certain that his change of attitude came from a mod-warning. If he was mafia he wouldn't have gotten a mod-warning, because his play could have very well been some schematics or whatever. However, there is no town-motivation for his play whatsoever, and the way he mocked me is a completely infant behavior that does not go with a "play-to-win" scenario.

However...


There is one instance where he could have gotten a mod-warning as mafia. Observe this post:

On September 29 2012 07:44 kushm4sta wrote:
debears I saved you bro...scumteam 4 lyfe


If debears is indeed mafia, he would have gotten a mod-warning for basically giving in his teammate. This makes a lot of sense, if we can assume he got a mod-warning.

And SO I propose....


We lynch him. If I am correct in my assessment and he flips scum, then debears is most likely also scum and kush managed to ruin the game. If he flips town, then we are down someone who will be a detriment to the town, so I'm confident he is a good lynch for us right now.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 02:03 GMT
#314
On September 29 2012 10:36 debears wrote:
@kush

The ambiguous statement i made qbout you in the start of my vote post was addressed to your feeling of hoplessness despite your early enthusiasm

@k boson

You're association case is assuming way too much. Use ockhams razor. We can't assume modwarnings. That is ridiculous. Especially when using that reason to cherrypick his posts to create an association case


That only adds to the fact that I already have a strong scumread of you. Whatever his alignment, I'm pushing for you next.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 02:32 GMT
#317
DP, did you read my exchange with him? It's pointless discussing with him.
I think it would be more productive if you would read my case on debears and see if you agree with it.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 02:36 GMT
#320
Because like a good little townie you are a martyr of hope and will use your undying selflessness to aid our troubled woes with your last wisps of life, having your final breath echo in the void of grief caused by your untimely demise.

But you are scum and thus will use this as an excuse to die the quiet and lonely death, unloved, and derelict.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 02:39 GMT
#323
Why do you make it a point to insult my case? I know you think it's bad.
Go away and die quietly.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 03:01 GMT
#330
I saw your town meta in XXVI. This is not it. You are capable of pro town play. This is not it.


Are you not entertained?!?!!
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 05:12 GMT
#354
They are probably just echoing the suspicion I posted earlier, concerning my assumption on mods.
It's a theory I have in case he pops scum. Don't treat it as an argument. Treat my case as an argument.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 05:24 GMT
#355
Alsn has gone awfully quiet...
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 18:00 GMT
#396
Interesting. Let's see:

On September 30 2012 00:02 debears wrote:
Alright guys, sobered up and reading to go into ass kicking mode. At this point, kush is going to be lynched. However, some of you faultily believe this “association case” linking me and kush by Boson and his case against me. I originally intended this to be a pure defense case, but after typing it out, Z-Boson comes across scummy to me. Anyways here we go.

Yea, I was already a suspect on your list, so at least you realized that people were expecting a case.


Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 05:29 Z-BosoN wrote:
All right, I went through debears filter now, and I'm confident he is scum. Let's go through this more carefully now.
His first post:
+ Show Spoiler +

On September 28 2012 11:05 debears wrote:
Lol. Kush already going at it.

Hey guys. I'm debears. This is my second game ever of mafia. I have a couple of things to add:

+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 09:18 DarthPunk wrote:
On September 28 2012 09:10 Z-BosoN wrote:
On September 28 2012 08:43 DarthPunk wrote:
It is not impossible to find scum on the first day. Policy lynches get you no info, you are most likely going to hit a townie, and you end up in the same position the next day minus 2 town. @Djodref your 'day plan' is unnecessary. Scum hunt, vote for your top scum read and everything else will fall into place.


After LVII I'm rather liking the idea of policy lynches, in extreme cases.

Killing lurkers in a lurker-infested town, for example, is something I'm inclined to agree on. If the town proves itself active, then whoever proves himself scummier will occupy the noose.

Given that this is a newbie game, scums are generally more scared to post. While that is a general tendency, I don't agree with mass posters being cleared right off the bat, even if their posts seem meaningful.

What I suggest in this game, is that people read. From my few games, much time is usually wasted discussing things that have not been read properly.

On September 28 2012 06:56 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
Cool, we're on. Pretty bad timing though, I'm off to bed and then I've got a day at uni before I can really start posting. I hope to God when I get back we've moved past the lurker policy discussion. My message to newbies: the best way for you to clear yourself is to post a lot. Don't post just for the sake of posting though, that'll make you look like scum because posting for the sake of posting is what scum do.


This is a rather useless post. Newbie towns want to scumhunt. Newbie scum want to look like they are scumhunting. That =/= posting a lot but not for the sake of posting, or whatever you meant.

And please tell me, what do you mean? You say you hope to have moved past the lurker discussion, and yet you are telling people to post a lot? In my eyes you are telling people not to lurk because that will make them seem scummy. It seems to me that you are indirectly stating your views on lurkers despite openly saying you don't want to talk about them.









Meh. Don't like lurker policy lynches at all. It just tells scum: Post. and your safe. I have read every post so far as scummy and I don't see SDM's post as more or less scummy than the others.

But posting a lot will let people get a good read on you so you should 100% be doing this as town. And then if all the townies are posting you force scum to. Which makes it much easier to nab them also.

SO. Post a lot if you are town. You make scum uncomfortable and facilitate town reads on yourself and scum reads on scum.




You also clutter the thread if you just post alot. Let me specify. Post quality as often as you can. That means reread the thread and build good cases. One liners don't do much good. Cases with multiple quotes and a few sentences of explanation per quote are good (most of the time).

Also, USE YOUR COACHES TOWN. Thrawn pmed Hapa over 50 times last game and he had the best town performance. That isn't a coincidence.

@Kush

I don't like the way you are starting off this game kush. It's eerily similar as last game when you were mafia. You mention you're deathless streak, nk, and your scummy meta without anyone bringing it up. You should know that I most likely know you're trends better than anyone else in this game.

The only difference between this game and last is that you have engaged in a flame war with Darth this game, which is unhelpful to our town.

FOS Kush


@everyone

One more thing:

Feel free to accuse and build cases on anyone you want for the first 24 hours. However, let's start tunneling for the second 24 hours. Also, I would like everyone to start considering a lurker (in your head) once we hit the second 24 hours as a backup. If we get close to the lynch deadline, and there are no scummy candidates, feel free to post a good case on which lurker would be the best candidate.


First of all, his "I want town to win!!" post telling town to use their coaches. He then FoS's Kush, due to the fact that he's playing a similar game as the one he was scum. He says that DP + kush flame war is bad for the town, but doesn't attack Darthpunk, probably because he finds kush to be more scummy looking. Now, from a townie perspective, what does debear want? Information in order to lynch kush, as he pointed a FOS mostly based on a meta read. But suddenly, towards darthpunk:

snip --You could also say that you are too convinced in your reasons. What I am cautious of at this point is that you stated directly before the game that you were after kush if he plays like he has in his past 3 games. I feel like that may be clouding your judgement in this situation.


Our main goal is to lynch mafia. Yes, kush has said some scummy things. However, I'm not gonna go around parading this early saying "kush is scum. Kush is scum. OMFG".

Also, let the man defend himself instead of trying to rally everyone active behind your cause so early. If he is scummy, the votes will come.

He is defensive towards kush. That's not how townies think. While I agree that DP is a bit overboard on kush, I don't agree that he failed to give arguments as to why he thinks that is so. A townie with a FOS on someone will want to deal with the arguments first. He doesn't do that, and suddenly becomes defensive on Kush. He says, later:

I'm not defending him as much as I'm trying to tell you that you are going overboard right now. You don't have to rush in annointing him scum.


He is more bothered by DPs certainty than by his actual arguments. Inconsistency #1.

He then comes up with two cases. One against me, and one against Djoref:



@Boson

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 28 2012 09:10 Z-BosoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 08:43 DarthPunk wrote:
It is not impossible to find scum on the first day. Policy lynches get you no info, you are most likely going to hit a townie, and you end up in the same position the next day minus 2 town. @Djodref your 'day plan' is unnecessary. Scum hunt, vote for your top scum read and everything else will fall into place.


After LVII I'm rather liking the idea of policy lynches, in extreme cases.

Killing lurkers in a lurker-infested town, for example, is something I'm inclined to agree on. If the town proves itself active, then whoever proves himself scummier will occupy the noose.

Given that this is a newbie game, scums are generally more scared to post. While that is a general tendency, I don't agree with mass posters being cleared right off the bat, even if their posts seem meaningful.

What I suggest in this game, is that people read. From my few games, much time is usually wasted discussing things that have not been read properly.

Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 06:56 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
Cool, we're on. Pretty bad timing though, I'm off to bed and then I've got a day at uni before I can really start posting. I hope to God when I get back we've moved past the lurker policy discussion. My message to newbies: the best way for you to clear yourself is to post a lot. Don't post just for the sake of posting though, that'll make you look like scum because posting for the sake of posting is what scum do.


This is a rather useless post. Newbie towns want to scumhunt. Newbie scum want to look like they are scumhunting. That =/= posting a lot but not for the sake of posting, or whatever you meant.

And please tell me, what do you mean? You say you hope to have moved past the lurker discussion, and yet you are telling people to post a lot? In my eyes you are telling people not to lurk because that will make them seem scummy. It seems to me that you are indirectly stating your views on lurkers despite openly saying you don't want to talk about them.



Boson, please try not to read too hard into a person's very first posts and make something out of nothing. It is pretty clear what sonic was saying. He wants newbies to post so that they don't get grouped under the lurker corral that usually follows up later. Last game, we had lurkers galore and it really messed up the town.

Also, you mention that his post is useless. Now I will examine your two other posts in terms of uselessness.


On September 28 2012 09:12 Z-BosoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 09:01 kushm4sta wrote:
On September 28 2012 08:34 DarthPunk wrote:
On September 28 2012 06:58 kushm4sta wrote:
@sonic
getting everyone's thoughts on lurker policy is important. Don't argue about it but share your views on the matter please..

No it's not. It is simply a mechanism to get the discussion going and allows scum to seem to participate and to potentially mislynch an inactive townie. Any more talk of policy will get you FoS'd.


Sorry but who appointed this asshole boss?
you get people's thoughts on lurker policy, so you can catch them deviating from it later and question them about it.


And why are you that scared of a FOS?


A one-liner. A question that really doesn't accomplish anything. In other words, a useless post. Also, your next post doesn't address his response although he responded right after and you posted within 30 minutes of his response in a pretty light thread.

On September 28 2012 09:43 Z-BosoN wrote:
@DP

Saying we will lynch lurkers is one thing. Deciding whether a lurker should die later at day two is another.
What I said is I'm inclined to lynch a lurker if there aren't better choices, not that we will 100% lynch a lurker.

@Stutters

I'd like to see more posts from you. In XXIV you showed you were capable of making decent posts as town, so I encourage you to post eve more here.

@kush

What's your view on darthpunk? You said you don't like his coldness, but you don't like it in a "he's scum" sort of way?


Yet again, nothing of substance here. You go more in depth about semantics (is that the right word I'm looking for?) about lynching lurkers and lynching lurkers at day two.

Second, you call out stutters, who has already been warned by others and most likely the mods for no reason this early in the game.

Finally, two sentences, two questions going on about the exact wording of kush's statements.

It sounded like before the game you had stated that you have played in multiple games. Is that true?

For someone who is telling other people to not post useless posts, you aren't doing a good job of it yourself. Looks more like you are trying to just be active while off the radar. In other words, you are a semi-active lurker who has bad post quality. Sounds like characteristics of a certain alignment.


@Djoref


+ Show Spoiler +
On September 28 2012 08:51 Djodref wrote:
@Darthpunk

Nevermind you look just more confident to get a scum on D1 than me.


Regarding my plan, I think we need general directions to follow because of the majority lynch.
It is a way to gather everybody around 2-3 suspicious players and secure a lynch. I'm assuming everyone agree on a no-lynch to be stupid.


Djoref, I don't like that statement at all. That's the second post you bring up about the likelihood of lynching a townie d1. As town, you should never have that mentality. I would probably less likely to bring this up if you were a total nooby. However, you said you "know Kush's meta" which means you have some decent understanding of the game for a noob.

By saying this, it seems that you are setting yourself an excuse to be indecisive later in the day when the lynch voting comes around. Alone, it isn't much. However, your other posts don't help.


On September 28 2012 08:44 Djodref wrote:
@Darthpunk

Considering that we are likely to lynch a town on D1, don't you think it's a lesser wrong to get rid of someone inactive ?
Inactivity means no scumhunt and room to hide for the mafia...


After playing mafia last game, I feel like heavy lurking is a bad play for mafia. It puts too much pressure on you are as a scum. Instead, posting lightly without much substance is more mafia indicative.

Yet again, I feel you are just looking like you are contributing without saying much.

Especially when you already covered your thoughts in a previous post.

On September 28 2012 08:36 Djodref wrote:
Hello everybody !

About me

This is my first game ever on forum but I've been playing on SC2mafia and also irl. But I've been lurking on the TL Mafia forum for a while (so I know your meta kush^^) and I decided to join this newbie game.
I'm also a French guy and I live in Korea so my english is not on top and it's going to ne difficult for me to be around at deadline (5.00 am KST).

Lurker policy

From the games I've seen, unless you have a golden scumslip on d1, it's very difficult to lynch a scum the very first day.
So I have no problem ending up voting for the most suspicious lurker at the end of the day. I define most suspicious lurker as a semi-lurker just trying to blend in.


Day Plan

I don't think to be able to be around for the first deadline so I would like to propose a day plan to secure a lynch as we are using a majority vote. First 24 hours to find lynch candidates while scumhunting and next 20 hours to decide who is the scummiest. Last 4 hours to consolidate the vote or switch to a lurker.

Please discuss


Notice how you are just repeating points? It isn't helpful to us.

Next post

On September 28 2012 11:09 Djodref wrote:
@Kush

Show nested quote +
thank you now I won't be nk


Was it also a joke ?
How can you be so sure you are not going to be NKed ?


A two sentence, two question post. I don't like these. They are worthless. Also, this question came quite a bit later after darthpunk already was asking questions about joking. You seem to be sheeping onto darth's case against kush.

On September 28 2012 11:53 Djodref wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 11:22 kushm4sta wrote:

Because the most active townie is tunneling me?



I would also like to hear you explanations about this specific part. I don't have a read on Darth on the moment considering he has only been hard tunneling you. As you said yourself you have a scummy meta so you are an easy target for early game to put pressure on.

So what makes him so much town ?



Yet again, this post is just repeating what darth is saying. Another question. I don't like this.

Your early posts are indicative of a semi-active scum. Sheeping, question posts, and rehashing things already said multiple times.



Notice the similarity between the two. He attacks us for asking questions (later on denies that they provide any discussion whatsoever), and falls into the same "semi-active lurker" category he's sniffing about. I will ignore the quality of his arguments, which I personally think are horrible, and will look more towards their similarity.
From his case against me:

A one-liner. A question that really doesn't accomplish anything. In other words, a useless post. Also, your next post doesn't address his response although he responded right after and you posted within 30 minutes of his response in a pretty light thread.


For someone who is telling other people to not post useless posts, you aren't doing a good job of it yourself. Looks more like you are trying to just be active while off the radar. In other words, you are a semi-active lurker who has bad post quality. Sounds like characteristics of a certain alignment.


From his case against Djoref:

A two sentence, two question post. I don't like these. They are worthless. Also, this question came quite a bit later after darthpunk already was asking questions about joking. You seem to be sheeping onto darth's case against kush.


Your early posts are indicative of a semi-active scum. Sheeping, question posts, and rehashing things already said multiple times.


See the similarity, especially the bolded part? It seems that he has this "semi-active scum" cake recipe that he is using to sniff out scum. He also calls us out on our posting quality, in my case saying it is bad.

I won't address his next post towards me because I've already done so, and because it doesn't increase his scumminess , as "bad cases =/= scum" (although it pisses me off).

Anyways, now to the main stuff. He has a case against me and Djoref, for pretty much the same reasoning. Yet, check out what his next post on Djoref is:

On September 29 2012 01:55 debears wrote:
@Djoref

Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 15:22 Djodref wrote:
@DarthPunk

For your information, i consider the comments of debears on my posts legitimate. Let me say that I even don't like them. Currently reading the guides and older game analysis.


Please pm marv for help. The coaches are great


Wtf??? What ?? Where is his case against Djoref?? He goes from a scummy-looking sheep with one liners to a "townie who should pm marv for help"? Could he have forgotten that Djoref was one of his main suspicions? Inconsistency #2


Note that I no longer think that his defense of SDM is scummy. I've gone over that a few times and I admit that it can also come from a townie perspective.

To summarize, here are the main inconsistencies in his play that scream to me SCUM:
1) He had a FOS on kush, then hurried on to defend him, in the manner I've shown above. I cannot fathom for the life of me having a FOS on someone and suddenly feel like I have to address an exaggeration on that person before I actually address the case.
2) He completely absolves Djoref for absolutely no reason. Townies do not throw around suspicions only to insta-drop them.

3) The other supporting arguments I've shown above.

debears is SCUM!

##vote debears


Note the use of red in this whole thing is to clarify what I’m refuting.

Inconsistency 1
1) My “want to win”, use the coaches pm has mainly townie motivation. Why wouldn't I tell everyone to PM their coaches after last game? Hapapauli specifically mentioned how Thrawn was the only one actually getting help from him. There can be some mafia WIFOM argument, but that is assuming more than the fact I want to win and the obvious townie motivation for it.

That's right, there can be some Mafia WIFOM. I chose to add all the things that can come from mafia WIFOM and would go along with mafia rationale, but I didn't use them as main arguments.

2) Next, you say that I don’t attack DarthPunk. While I never attacked DarthPunk (he had good reasoning for suspecting kush), I did tell him to cool his jets and stop trying to convince others to his argument so early in the game, especially since kush was afk at the moment darth attacked kush. Now, because of his early hardcore tunnel, we are in a situation where the lynch is one sided. That doesn’t do really any good for us unless he is mafia. If he turns town, we gave the mafia a veil to hide under. Another townie side Z-Boson failed to address.

Come on man. that's not even a supporting argument. I just said you didn't attack DP to make it crystal clear that your FOS on kush was entirely meta-based, because if the flame wars was any suspicious, then you would FOS DP as well.

3) From a townie perspective, I wanted more information on kush, and I wanted to spread out some focus on other people early on to avoid a one sided lynch for the reasons in 2), hence the posts directed at Djo and Z-Boson early on.

Yea, but you didn't say anything, your FoS on kush disappeared. It doens't look to me like a townie move. It looks more like a "empty FOS just to distance yourself from him" then a "I honestly think kush looks suspicious".

4) Then, your points about me being defensive at kush were not defenses of kush’s actions. They were attempts to tell darth to chill out and subdue some of his power trip, which I said in both quotes that you post in that section.

That's fine, I agree he was going overboard. I don't understand, however, your motivation for it. Like I said, you rushed in to critique DP BEFORE you dealt with his arguments against kush. I see you mention this below, so let's see....

5) When you say a townie with a FOS will want to deal with arguments first, that is true. However, kush was afk at the moment and darth was hammering him without kush able to defend himself at a very early point in time in the game. As stated above, look at the situation we are in now if kush flips town.

What? You wouldn't have been attacking kush. You would have been discussing DP's arguments. Why the fuck do you feel the need to help him defend himself? You feeling sorry or something? About someone you theoretically had a suspicion on? You say you weren't defending him, but in the way you've written point no.5), it's almost explicit that you were going for DP because he was hammering a defenseless kush. No, dude, no.

Inconsistency 2

1) If you looked at my posts after my “PM marv for help” post, I believe corrosion instantly assumed that I confirmed him town. That is not true at all. Notice A) Djo is a noob and B) I said COACHES. The word townie was never said in the sentence. You guys are putting words in my mouth. Also, note how in one of Djo’s prior posts, he says he was going to go look at guides. I don’t understand why you guys are so eager to jump on someone trying to help a newbie.

Yet again, townie motivation: If Djo is town, it will greatly help us if he gets help. Even if he isn't, it will raise the quality of this NEWBIE game and help us all improve if he gets help.

EXCEPT THAT YOU HAD A FOS ON HIM!!!! Do you know what it means to be suspicious of someone? You don't follow up a case you've made against someone with: "look for coaches", they help town a lot!! You didn't say explicitly that you thought him town, but you absolutely ignore your previous post on him only to never mention it again. This reeks of an empty case, you know, the ones that mafia are forced to make.

Ending

1) I want to quote something from Bosons post. “Note that I no longer think that his defense of SDM is scummy. I've gone over that a few times and I admit that it can also come from a townie perspective.” By his logic, that does not factor into my case. Also, how do the other two reasons in your post not have a townie perspective/motivation?

They don't. Town want to find scum, and when townies send out FoS's, they really mean it. They don't insta-drop them like you did. It's not scum-motivation, it's scum-slip.

2) The list of 1,2,3 Boson made at the bottom. If I read the post correctly, the only other argument is that my cases against Djo and Z-Bo early one were a "scum recipe". To that, I say duh. Semi-active lurker is a place where mafia can hide to look like they are contributing without actually doing so. I noticed this last game with JacobStrangeLove. I also read some guides that state that. Why wouldn't I call you out early when there's not much to go on?

My case isn't based on you calling me out. I just found it mention-worthy to say that your cases are really really similar (i.e fabricated). Even the wording at the end is the same. It doesn't strike me as legit cases.

Now for z-bos next post right after the post in which he attacked me (5 min after to be exact):

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 29 2012 05:34 Z-BosoN wrote:
I'm not against a kush lynch atm, but from what I gather kush's case is mostly meta-based with a side dish of not-scumhunting and also general scummy-looking posts. I think my evidence against debear is much more damning. Please read carefully his posts and my case and see if you don't agree.

So he bashs me for “defending kush” (according to himself) and then infers that the evidence against kush isn’t the greatest. That’s not very consistent.
On September 29 2012 05:55 Z-BosoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 05:46 kushm4sta wrote:
On September 29 2012 05:29 Z-BosoN wrote:
All right, I went through debears filter now, and I'm confident he is scum. Let's go through this more carefully now.
His first post:

On September 28 2012 11:05 debears wrote:
Lol. Kush already going at it.

Hey guys. I'm debears. This is my second game ever of mafia. I have a couple of things to add:

+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 09:18 DarthPunk wrote:
On September 28 2012 09:10 Z-BosoN wrote:
On September 28 2012 08:43 DarthPunk wrote:
It is not impossible to find scum on the first day. Policy lynches get you no info, you are most likely going to hit a townie, and you end up in the same position the next day minus 2 town. @Djodref your 'day plan' is unnecessary. Scum hunt, vote for your top scum read and everything else will fall into place.


After LVII I'm rather liking the idea of policy lynches, in extreme cases.

Killing lurkers in a lurker-infested town, for example, is something I'm inclined to agree on. If the town proves itself active, then whoever proves himself scummier will occupy the noose.

Given that this is a newbie game, scums are generally more scared to post. While that is a general tendency, I don't agree with mass posters being cleared right off the bat, even if their posts seem meaningful.

What I suggest in this game, is that people read. From my few games, much time is usually wasted discussing things that have not been read properly.

On September 28 2012 06:56 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
Cool, we're on. Pretty bad timing though, I'm off to bed and then I've got a day at uni before I can really start posting. I hope to God when I get back we've moved past the lurker policy discussion. My message to newbies: the best way for you to clear yourself is to post a lot. Don't post just for the sake of posting though, that'll make you look like scum because posting for the sake of posting is what scum do.


This is a rather useless post. Newbie towns want to scumhunt. Newbie scum want to look like they are scumhunting. That =/= posting a lot but not for the sake of posting, or whatever you meant.

And please tell me, what do you mean? You say you hope to have moved past the lurker discussion, and yet you are telling people to post a lot? In my eyes you are telling people not to lurk because that will make them seem scummy. It seems to me that you are indirectly stating your views on lurkers despite openly saying you don't want to talk about them.









Meh. Don't like lurker policy lynches at all. It just tells scum: Post. and your safe. I have read every post so far as scummy and I don't see SDM's post as more or less scummy than the others.

But posting a lot will let people get a good read on you so you should 100% be doing this as town. And then if all the townies are posting you force scum to. Which makes it much easier to nab them also.

SO. Post a lot if you are town. You make scum uncomfortable and facilitate town reads on yourself and scum reads on scum.




You also clutter the thread if you just post alot. Let me specify. Post quality as often as you can. That means reread the thread and build good cases. One liners don't do much good. Cases with multiple quotes and a few sentences of explanation per quote are good (most of the time).

Also, USE YOUR COACHES TOWN. Thrawn pmed Hapa over 50 times last game and he had the best town performance. That isn't a coincidence.

@Kush

I don't like the way you are starting off this game kush. It's eerily similar as last game when you were mafia. You mention you're deathless streak, nk, and your scummy meta without anyone bringing it up. You should know that I most likely know you're trends better than anyone else in this game.

The only difference between this game and last is that you have engaged in a flame war with Darth this game, which is unhelpful to our town.

FOS Kush


@everyone

One more thing:

Feel free to accuse and build cases on anyone you want for the first 24 hours. However, let's start tunneling for the second 24 hours. Also, I would like everyone to start considering a lurker (in your head) once we hit the second 24 hours as a backup. If we get close to the lynch deadline, and there are no scummy candidates, feel free to post a good case on which lurker would be the best candidate.


First of all, his "I want town to win!!" post telling town to use their coaches. He then FoS's Kush, due to the fact that he's playing a similar game as the one he was scum. He says that DP + kush flame war is bad for the town, but doesn't attack Darthpunk, probably because he finds kush to be more scummy looking. Now, from a townie perspective, what does debear want? Information in order to lynch kush, as he pointed a FOS mostly based on a meta read. But suddenly, towards darthpunk:

snip --You could also say that you are too convinced in your reasons. What I am cautious of at this point is that you stated directly before the game that you were after kush if he plays like he has in his past 3 games. I feel like that may be clouding your judgement in this situation.

Our main goal is to lynch mafia. Yes, kush has said some scummy things. However, I'm not gonna go around parading this early saying "kush is scum. Kush is scum. OMFG".

Also, let the man defend himself instead of trying to rally everyone active behind your cause so early. If he is scummy, the votes will come.


He is defensive towards kush. That's not how townies think. While I agree that DP is a bit overboard on kush, I don't agree that he failed to give arguments as to why he thinks that is so. A townie with a FOS on someone will want to deal with the arguments first. He doesn't do that, and suddenly becomes defensive on Kush. He says, later:

I'm not defending him as much as I'm trying to tell you that you are going overboard right now. You don't have to rush in annointing him scum.


He is more bothered by DPs certainty than by his actual arguments. Inconsistency #1.

He then comes up with two cases. One against me, and one against Djoref:



@Boson

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 28 2012 09:10 Z-BosoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 08:43 DarthPunk wrote:
It is not impossible to find scum on the first day. Policy lynches get you no info, you are most likely going to hit a townie, and you end up in the same position the next day minus 2 town. @Djodref your 'day plan' is unnecessary. Scum hunt, vote for your top scum read and everything else will fall into place.


After LVII I'm rather liking the idea of policy lynches, in extreme cases.

Killing lurkers in a lurker-infested town, for example, is something I'm inclined to agree on. If the town proves itself active, then whoever proves himself scummier will occupy the noose.

Given that this is a newbie game, scums are generally more scared to post. While that is a general tendency, I don't agree with mass posters being cleared right off the bat, even if their posts seem meaningful.

What I suggest in this game, is that people read. From my few games, much time is usually wasted discussing things that have not been read properly.

Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 06:56 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
Cool, we're on. Pretty bad timing though, I'm off to bed and then I've got a day at uni before I can really start posting. I hope to God when I get back we've moved past the lurker policy discussion. My message to newbies: the best way for you to clear yourself is to post a lot. Don't post just for the sake of posting though, that'll make you look like scum because posting for the sake of posting is what scum do.


This is a rather useless post. Newbie towns want to scumhunt. Newbie scum want to look like they are scumhunting. That =/= posting a lot but not for the sake of posting, or whatever you meant.

And please tell me, what do you mean? You say you hope to have moved past the lurker discussion, and yet you are telling people to post a lot? In my eyes you are telling people not to lurk because that will make them seem scummy. It seems to me that you are indirectly stating your views on lurkers despite openly saying you don't want to talk about them.



Boson, please try not to read too hard into a person's very first posts and make something out of nothing. It is pretty clear what sonic was saying. He wants newbies to post so that they don't get grouped under the lurker corral that usually follows up later. Last game, we had lurkers galore and it really messed up the town.

Also, you mention that his post is useless. Now I will examine your two other posts in terms of uselessness.


On September 28 2012 09:12 Z-BosoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 09:01 kushm4sta wrote:
On September 28 2012 08:34 DarthPunk wrote:
On September 28 2012 06:58 kushm4sta wrote:
@sonic
getting everyone's thoughts on lurker policy is important. Don't argue about it but share your views on the matter please..

No it's not. It is simply a mechanism to get the discussion going and allows scum to seem to participate and to potentially mislynch an inactive townie. Any more talk of policy will get you FoS'd.


Sorry but who appointed this asshole boss?
you get people's thoughts on lurker policy, so you can catch them deviating from it later and question them about it.


And why are you that scared of a FOS?


A one-liner. A question that really doesn't accomplish anything. In other words, a useless post. Also, your next post doesn't address his response although he responded right after and you posted within 30 minutes of his response in a pretty light thread.

On September 28 2012 09:43 Z-BosoN wrote:
@DP

Saying we will lynch lurkers is one thing. Deciding whether a lurker should die later at day two is another.
What I said is I'm inclined to lynch a lurker if there aren't better choices, not that we will 100% lynch a lurker.

@Stutters

I'd like to see more posts from you. In XXIV you showed you were capable of making decent posts as town, so I encourage you to post eve more here.

@kush

What's your view on darthpunk? You said you don't like his coldness, but you don't like it in a "he's scum" sort of way?


Yet again, nothing of substance here. You go more in depth about semantics (is that the right word I'm looking for?) about lynching lurkers and lynching lurkers at day two.

Second, you call out stutters, who has already been warned by others and most likely the mods for no reason this early in the game.

Finally, two sentences, two questions going on about the exact wording of kush's statements.

It sounded like before the game you had stated that you have played in multiple games. Is that true?

For someone who is telling other people to not post useless posts, you aren't doing a good job of it yourself. Looks more like you are trying to just be active while off the radar. In other words, you are a semi-active lurker who has bad post quality. Sounds like characteristics of a certain alignment.


@Djoref


+ Show Spoiler +
On September 28 2012 08:51 Djodref wrote:
@Darthpunk

Nevermind you look just more confident to get a scum on D1 than me.


Regarding my plan, I think we need general directions to follow because of the majority lynch.
It is a way to gather everybody around 2-3 suspicious players and secure a lynch. I'm assuming everyone agree on a no-lynch to be stupid.


Djoref, I don't like that statement at all. That's the second post you bring up about the likelihood of lynching a townie d1. As town, you should never have that mentality. I would probably less likely to bring this up if you were a total nooby. However, you said you "know Kush's meta" which means you have some decent understanding of the game for a noob.

By saying this, it seems that you are setting yourself an excuse to be indecisive later in the day when the lynch voting comes around. Alone, it isn't much. However, your other posts don't help.


On September 28 2012 08:44 Djodref wrote:
@Darthpunk

Considering that we are likely to lynch a town on D1, don't you think it's a lesser wrong to get rid of someone inactive ?
Inactivity means no scumhunt and room to hide for the mafia...


After playing mafia last game, I feel like heavy lurking is a bad play for mafia. It puts too much pressure on you are as a scum. Instead, posting lightly without much substance is more mafia indicative.

Yet again, I feel you are just looking like you are contributing without saying much.

Especially when you already covered your thoughts in a previous post.

On September 28 2012 08:36 Djodref wrote:
Hello everybody !

About me

This is my first game ever on forum but I've been playing on SC2mafia and also irl. But I've been lurking on the TL Mafia forum for a while (so I know your meta kush^^) and I decided to join this newbie game.
I'm also a French guy and I live in Korea so my english is not on top and it's going to ne difficult for me to be around at deadline (5.00 am KST).

Lurker policy

From the games I've seen, unless you have a golden scumslip on d1, it's very difficult to lynch a scum the very first day.
So I have no problem ending up voting for the most suspicious lurker at the end of the day. I define most suspicious lurker as a semi-lurker just trying to blend in.


Day Plan

I don't think to be able to be around for the first deadline so I would like to propose a day plan to secure a lynch as we are using a majority vote. First 24 hours to find lynch candidates while scumhunting and next 20 hours to decide who is the scummiest. Last 4 hours to consolidate the vote or switch to a lurker.

Please discuss


Notice how you are just repeating points? It isn't helpful to us.

Next post

On September 28 2012 11:09 Djodref wrote:
@Kush

Show nested quote +
thank you now I won't be nk


Was it also a joke ?
How can you be so sure you are not going to be NKed ?


A two sentence, two question post. I don't like these. They are worthless. Also, this question came quite a bit later after darthpunk already was asking questions about joking. You seem to be sheeping onto darth's case against kush.

On September 28 2012 11:53 Djodref wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 11:22 kushm4sta wrote:

Because the most active townie is tunneling me?



I would also like to hear you explanations about this specific part. I don't have a read on Darth on the moment considering he has only been hard tunneling you. As you said yourself you have a scummy meta so you are an easy target for early game to put pressure on.

So what makes him so much town ?



Yet again, this post is just repeating what darth is saying. Another question. I don't like this.

Your early posts are indicative of a semi-active scum. Sheeping, question posts, and rehashing things already said multiple times.



Notice the similarity between the two. He attacks us for asking questions (later on denies that they provide any discussion whatsoever), and falls into the same "semi-active lurker" category he's sniffing about. I will ignore the quality of his arguments, which I personally think are horrible, and will look more towards their similarity.
From his case against me:

A one-liner. A question that really doesn't accomplish anything. In other words, a useless post. Also, your next post doesn't address his response although he responded right after and you posted within 30 minutes of his response in a pretty light thread.


For someone who is telling other people to not post useless posts, you aren't doing a good job of it yourself. Looks more like you are trying to just be active while off the radar. In other words, you are a semi-active lurker who has bad post quality. Sounds like characteristics of a certain alignment.


From his case against Djoref:

A two sentence, two question post. I don't like these. They are worthless. Also, this question came quite a bit later after darthpunk already was asking questions about joking. You seem to be sheeping onto darth's case against kush.


Your early posts are indicative of a semi-active scum. Sheeping, question posts, and rehashing things already said multiple times.


See the similarity, especially the bolded part? It seems that he has this "semi-active scum" cake recipe that he is using to sniff out scum. He also calls us out on our posting quality, in my case saying it is bad.

I won't address his next post towards me because I've already done so, and because it doesn't increase his scumminess , as "bad cases =/= scum" (although it pisses me off).

Anyways, now to the main stuff. He has a case against me and Djoref, for pretty much the same reasoning. Yet, check out what his next post on Djoref is:

On September 29 2012 01:55 debears wrote:
@Djoref

On September 28 2012 15:22 Djodref wrote:
@DarthPunk

For your information, i consider the comments of debears on my posts legitimate. Let me say that I even don't like them. Currently reading the guides and older game analysis.


Please pm marv for help. The coaches are great


Wtf??? What ?? Where is his case against Djoref?? He goes from a scummy-looking sheep with one liners to a "townie who should pm marv for help"? Could he have forgotten that Djoref was one of his main suspicions? Inconsistency #2


Note that I no longer think that his defense of SDM is scummy. I've gone over that a few times and I admit that it can also come from a townie perspective.

To summarize, here are the main inconsistencies in his play that scream to me SCUM:
1) He had a FOS on kush, then hurried on to defend him, in the manner I've shown above. I cannot fathom for the life of me having a FOS on someone and suddenly feel like I have to address an exaggeration on that person before I actually address the case.
2) He completely absolves Djoref for absolutely no reason. Townies do not throw around suspicions only to insta-drop them.
3) The other supporting arguments I've shown above.

debears is SCUM!

##vote debears


Hi z bozon.
Inconsistencies do not make someone scum.
Also it's quite funny how you are so certain this early in the game.
To summarize this awesome post: your case is not strong. you are overconfident in your scumread.


But oh they can. Scum can't genuinely scumhunt, and will usually make mistakes in doing so. This early in the game, debears has managed to quickly change his mind about pursuing scum not once, but twice. Him just forgetting all about Djoref and basically assuming him to be town was just ??SDFG ?A?SDF?A?SDF?.

His inconsistencies to me look more scummy then townie, especially when looking at how repetitive his arguments are.

Who do you think is a better lynch then, kush? Grace us with a case.



I would like to know how I changed my mind twice on scumhunting. Just because someone looks scummy, we don’t need to bash their heads in with the same evidence over and over and over again. In kush’s case, Darth had gone overboard and was sufficiently bashing in kush’s head by himself. What’s the point in me picking up a club and going after him when he was afk?

What's the point in defending him if you find him scummy?

In Djo’s case, I called him out for the quality of his posting. He is a newbie. I decided it was best to not attack him and let him actually get into the game. As I said, I don’t read too much into early posts.

Yep. From suspicious semi-lurker one-line sheep to "townie who should ask coach for help" without any clarifications, without anything. k.

Also, the reason why I “changed my mind” is that Z-boson was becoming a scum read to me. His OMGUS FOS set off alarms in my head. His posts since then are picking out only the mafia motivations or stating the townie motivations and instantly discarding them. It is hard to split my focus on 3 people at a time, so I’d rather worry about Z-Bo and Kush than chase a newbie around.

Are you seriously that dense and think that my fos on you was OMGUS, after all I've written? What the fuck do you mean "only mafia motivations"? You are doing things that I find much more likely coming from a mafia then from a townie, period. This is the most ridiculous paragraph you've yet written.

Alright on to another post

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 29 2012 06:41 Z-BosoN wrote:
kush this "act" you are playing is not helping you, and is not helping town. Man the fuck up and make cases against people, try to defend yourself. I'd much rather lynch debears because I find the arguments against him to be much more substantial than the ones against you, which are mostly meta-based. I disagree with a meta-based lynch when I've provided real arguments against someone else (which, incidentally you shat on. It seems like you actually want to get lynched)
If you are town that is. If you are scum, go ahead and keep moaning, I'll gladly choose you over debears.

Yet again, he doesn’t like the case against kush, yet one of the main parts of his scumread on me was that I defended kush.
+ Show Spoiler +
On September 29 2012 10:28 Z-BosoN wrote:


READ




An interesting snippet from the op:

Show nested quote +
Play to win.
This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. However, this does not mean that you should try to win by being a jerk to the other players so they all want to quit playing.


So, read my exchange with him. I try a billion times to help him, and what does he do? Choose to mock me case and be insulting. That's not playing to win if he's town.

His sudden change of attitude probably came from a mod-warning, due to what I've quoted, and I'll assume this to be true. Now I have two train of thoughts that I'm killing myself over:

1) Lynch him. He's bad to have in the endgame and is a detriment to the town, no matter his alignment. His change of attitude might have come from his scummy friends, because I sure as hell couldn't sway him.

2) Assume he is a townie. Why can we do that? Because I am almost certain that his change of attitude came from a mod-warning. If he was mafia he wouldn't have gotten a mod-warning, because his play could have very well been some schematics or whatever. However, there is no town-motivation for his play whatsoever, and the way he mocked me is a completely infant behavior that does not go with a "play-to-win" scenario.

However...


There is one instance where he could have gotten a mod-warning as mafia. Observe this post:

Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 07:44 kushm4sta wrote:
debears I saved you bro...scumteam 4 lyfe


If debears is indeed mafia, he would have gotten a mod-warning for basically giving in his teammate. This makes a lot of sense, if we can assume he got a mod-warning.

And SO I propose....


We lynch him. If I am correct in my assessment and he flips scum, then debears is most likely also scum and kush managed to ruin the game. If he flips town, then we are down someone who will be a detriment to the town, so I'm confident he is a good lynch for us right now.
'

This post…..Not only is it an association case, it’s an association case BASED ON MOD WARNINGS and assuming a mod warning off one random post of kush’s, especially when that post references the scum team that I was on with kush in the last game…

Boson is going out of his way to pin me as scum, especially before kush even flips….I don’t get this.

Next post,

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 29 2012 11:03 Z-BosoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 10:36 debears wrote:
@kush

The ambiguous statement i made qbout you in the start of my vote post was addressed to your feeling of hoplessness despite your early enthusiasm

@k boson

You're association case is assuming way too much. Use ockhams razor. We can't assume modwarnings. That is ridiculous. Especially when using that reason to cherrypick his posts to create an association case


That only adds to the fact that I already have a strong scumread of you. Whatever his alignment, I'm pushing for you next.


So he says two things here.

1) That the post he quoted “added” to his scumread. Then he makes NO MENTION of why it does.

Read as: in addition to my scumread, there is this. Not "this adds to my scumread".

2) He specifically states that he is going for me no matter the outcome. Why has he already done this without seeing the flip? Seems like he knows kush’s alignment and doesn’t have to consider what is going on here today…

I don't know kushs alignment. I would rather lynch you because I find my arguments against you much more substantial. Hard to push a lynch on you though, when he refuses to act townie and basically begs himself to be lynched. I didn't think him, and still don't, more scummy than you, but he has put himself in a position where it's impossible for me to push a lynch on you.

Next post

Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 11:32 Z-BosoN wrote:
DP, did you read my exchange with him? It's pointless discussing with him.
I think it would be more productive if you would read my case on debears and see if you agree with it.


I don’t understand why Boson is lobbying his case against me still. It is a weak case based on mafia assumptions only. I hate this kind of play. If your case is good, people will believe it and vote for it. He is trying so hard to have his notions confirmed.

You think it's a weak case. I don't. And that's exactly what I'm trying to do, get people to agree with it. Not everyone have the same opinions on what constitutes a "good" and a "bad" case.
And what exactly do you hate about this kind of play? Making a case and try to push it? Of course you hate it. You are scum.


Final part of this (thank god)

Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 14:12 Z-BosoN wrote:
They are probably just echoing the suspicion I posted earlier, concerning my assumption on mods.
It's a theory I have in case he pops scum. Don't treat it as an argument. Treat my case as an argument.

Everyone who’s experience knows association cases are dumb without a flip unless it’s late game. You are making an early game association case and you make a huge post about it. How is that not an argument? Now you have everyone saying “debears is likely scum”.

It's a theory that makes a lot of sense. I was asked not to discuss hypothetical mod actions in-thread, and so I can't feasibly use this as an argument. If kush flips red, you will have the entirety of that post against you, in addition to my case on you. If he flips green, you'll have just my case, which is strong by itself, imo. A case in which you've done a very poor job defending yourself against it.

FOS Z-Boson

If kush did not implode this game, I would be voting for Z-Boson right now.

So you agree that kush must die now, because he imploded, and would rather vote me. That's exactly the same thing that happened to me. Except that I tried to push a vote on you before he imploded, and you did not on me. Because you were scared that it would seem like you know his alignment, as you've stated in this very post. Because you are scum.


I urge everyone to read this exchange. My lines are in red.
He still feels the need to use the same elements he did initially: My case is OMGUS, it's weak, it's bad, etc.
This post comes off to me as cornered scum trying to squirm his way out, but that could be just me tunneling him hard. Everyone please take the time to read and see if you agree with me.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 18:53 GMT
#398
More interesting. I noticed this earlier post from him.

On September 29 2012 15:21 debears wrote:
@djo

What parts of his case specifically do you believe?

His main case against me is contradiction. Look at my case against thrawn in the last game. What was the main point of that argument? Inconsistency. Its an easy point for scum to point out.

There are two possibilities for kushvin my eyes
1) a mafiab tryingbto pity his way out off a lynch
2) a townie acting likeva total noob with accusations against him.

Which has less assumptions? Number 1.

My problen with the scum by associstion is the case that i was defendung kush earky on. That us false i was trying ti communicate ti darth that his reasoning wad based off such a strong s assumption early in the game. In fact, I'd say that z-bosons case against me is the same. He looks at the mafia side only, which to me is a indicator of mafia. I can't make a case dur to drinking and being on my phone.

My read in you is that you are sheeping onto cases. I don't like it because i did the same.

Why do you think i would refer you to a coach? What are the townie and mafia motivations behind it.

@z-boson

The same question stated the line above refers to you



I'm suddenly mafia because I look at the mafia side only? I answered this in my reply, but dude, I've outlined the main arguments very carefully. Again, it's not that you kicked a cat and thus I think you are mafia because only mafia would have reason to kick the cat, which is what you are boiling down my whole case against you to. It's that kicking a cat is not something town would do. Dropping two cases instantly is what people who have made "FOSes" generally do. Your misty stance on kush doesn't seem towny at all. Things are making you seem scummy as opposed to townie. It's not my own crazy interpretation, I've already said why i think they make you scummy.

The second part, you are being blatantly ignorant. My case does not depend on whether you referred him to a coach. It's the fact that you insta-dropped your main accusations out of fucking nowhere. That does not have scum motivation. I just find it more likely that that is a mistake scum are much more inclined to make than town, due to the fact that they can't genuinely scumhunt.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 20:37 GMT
#410
Grats DP
I'm glad that he actually implored to get lynched with his "Why would I help a town that wants him dead?" and his insult posts.
I've actually read some of his filter this past hour, from XXVII, and I certainly hope he becomes more humble after this.

SDM, it is true what you say. I did not mention anything but his defense of you, and at the moment I really did think that it seemed scummy. I wanted to make a proper case on him, so I did a lot of reading on debears filters and realized there was more to it I hadn't yet seen. I made this clear in my case against him.

Anyways, my view on the game.

DP is pretty much town. I highly, highly doubt that it was an elaborate scheme to insta-bus a mafia member this early in the game. It's also consistent with my meta-read on him, he's playing much more like XXIV than LVII.

I have a town read on SDM. His post accusing kush which had some validity and a lot of meta analysis would be really unnecessary from a scum point of view. His latest post concerning me was quite down-to-earth and showed he is being attentive to the thread.

My top scum read is - you guys guessed it - debears, for all the reasons stated earlier.




@debears
I'm done with you for now, and I think you would agree that right now it's best to shift the town focus, yes? Read below.

On September 30 2012 04:58 debears wrote:
@zbo

I'm gonna try to do this from my phone.

Show nested quote +
EXCEPT THAT YOU HAD A FOS ON HIM!!!! Do you know what it means to be suspicious of someone? You don't follow up a case you've made against someone with: "look for coaches", they help town a lot!! You didn't say explicitly that you thought him town, but you absolutely ignore your previous post on him only to never mention it again. This reeks of an empty case, you know, the ones that mafia are forced to make.


When did i have a FOS against djo? You put this under the section against djo.

I misspoke. Not a FOS, but a case against him.

Another thing i want to address is your assumption that early d1 posts and cases carry a lot of weight. They don't.my cases against you and djo were based on the suspiciousness of your posts. They weren't full on you're scum in depth cases. Besides, people change their minds a bit on d1.

It's how they change their minds that concern me. There is nothing between your two posts in the thread that can even begin to ward off suspicion

The next thing i want to address is your assumption on the weight and meaning of a fos. To me, a fos is a heads up that Im suspicious of you qnd ill be watching. It doesnt necessarily mean I'm gonna make a huge case on you.

Finally, i want to address your assumptions of what townies do d1. As a townie, i have no idea who is what. Its confusing as hell. Why wouldnt i change my mind and explore more than kush d1. There are more than 1 scum.

You definitely can explore more than one person. But I'm tired of repeating myself of why I find you scummy, I believe I've made that clear

How am i supposed to know whether darth himself is scum trying to push an easy target (i will expand more on this tonight when i am at my computer) or whether he is a townie truly overconfident in his belief about kush being scum. A good case doesnt necessarily mean someone is town. Look at my case against thrawn last game.

Finally, why does everyone seem so damn confident in their reads? Especially on day 1?


Right I have you pegged as scum. You've done a piss poor job at defending yourself (in my opinion) and let us leave it at that.
You have a case on me. You think I'm scum. Now that kush is confirmed scum, there is, in your view, one other scum besides me.
I don't think that our exchange will go anywhere, this is getting highly redudant. So I propose, for the night, a slight change in how town is evolving.

I've taken a look at Alsn's lurker lists filters and found some interesting things. Out of those four, who do you think would be the third scum, assuming it's one of them?
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 29 2012 21:08 GMT
#416
It was directed @ debears. Also, please read. It's pretty clear that I'm asking debear's view on the third scum, granted that he assumes I'm the second.
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 30 2012 02:28 GMT
#438
DP, I don't see how that's hardly any helpful. Also, did you forget this?

On September 29 2012 13:24 DarthPunk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 29 2012 13:17 Djodref wrote:
Hey, guys !

I would like to bring up something that struck me in the post of corrosion about Darth. I didn't like this post in general because it didn't match my interpretations of the early events between Kush and Darth but I understand that our views can differ.
But looking back at corrosion filter, he's trying to find scummy motivation for Darth to give his links to his previous game. Check the bolded part in the spoiler.

+ Show Spoiler +

On September 29 2012 04:29 corrosion wrote:
I'm just going to address the "fight" between Darth and Kush. I'm going to focus on Darth for now. Looking more closely into Kush's contribution is something I think should be done well ahead of lynch time.

I'm actually going to start by telling about some thoughts I had after reading my role PM. I was trying to figure out what players town should be focusing on. I had obsed NMMXXVII, and came to the conclusion that it might be reasonable to go after any player except Kush. I figured that Kush was going to make a lot of posts anyway, so I was thinking that we could get a good analysis of him without any early pressure.

One of the first things Darth did was to antagonize Kush:

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 28 2012 08:34 DarthPunk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 06:58 kushm4sta wrote:
@sonic
getting everyone's thoughts on lurker policy is important. Don't argue about it but share your views on the matter please..

No it's not. It is simply a mechanism to get the discussion going and allows scum to seem to participate and to potentially mislynch an inactive townie. Any more talk of policy will get you FoS'd.


I'm thinking that this could easily be an attempt to start a fight that would result in derailing the thread. Kush responded the way I expected him to, and these two posters exchanged arguments back and forth.

In the middle of this, Darth made a remark against lurkers, but quickly changed his focus back on Kush.

Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 10:36 DarthPunk wrote:
So is everyone just going to drop their welcome posts and then afk?


I don't see why he should make this comment at this time, since it wasn't going to get looked at while there was a fight going on.

Shortly afterwards, Kush makes his supposed scum slip. Darth jumps on it, and shortly afterwards he posts about his previous mafia games. I've watched the game where he played cop, and seen that he and Shady argued a lot on D1. So I was thinking that this seems to be Darth's town meta. But I also asked myself why he did post about his previous games at this point in time. Maybe this was all intentional. Suppose he suddenly remembered that game. He might not have wanted people to look at those games earlier, but now he realized that if he posted them he would be able to establish a town read on himself.

I'm not sure if this is a strong case against Darth at the moment. I would like some input from the more experienced players here. If Kush hadn't made that slip, I think the derailing argument would have looked strong. Now it doesn't look so strong, because we've actually gotten new information. I'm not saying that I'm sure the scum slip is an actual slip, but if it is and it results in a succesful lynch, I think town got very lucky. Scum usually wouldn't slip in such an obvious manner.

His cases against Debears and Alsn are something that might reveal useful information, but I've not studied them closely yet. I still think that Kush seems more suspicious when everything is taken into consideration but with all the focus that has been on him, I'm sure someone else can post a decent case on him before we need to consider our first lynch.



But Darth was just answering a request from debears !

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 28 2012 11:39 debears wrote:
As I said, I want a quick look at you first. Second, there isn't much more to add to what you said about it. It does give off the impression of extra information.



I think corrosion was trying to cast scummy shadow on Darth to shift the focus on Kush. I did so by omitting/deforming some parts of the thread history. Also, he fits my definition of a semi-lurker trying to blend in.

So, corrosion, until I got your explanations about this point, I got my eyes on you.

##FoS: corrosion


Nice pick up. I already posted about this, But I assume you just picked it up as you were going through the thread. I was surprised no one else seemed to catch on to this.

I would like some further elaboration on your kush vote as you have black flipped somewhat from your earlier position.



What made you change your mind?

+ Show Spoiler +
Ok,ok, I can't resist a guessing game. My guts tell me omniscient
Z-BosoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil2590 Posts
September 30 2012 02:33 GMT
#440
Crap =p
He was one that I haven't read the filters properly yet.
Gotta go with stutters then

Anyways, please answer the bit on corrosion. It seemed earlier on that you thought he was coming off as scummy.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 318
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 11521
Hyuk 2715
ggaemo 1499
firebathero 807
Hyun 677
Larva 636
actioN 546
Leta 229
Noble 221
Dewaltoss 95
[ Show more ]
Mong 66
ivOry 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever622
XcaliburYe549
ODPixel156
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1046
Super Smash Bros
Westballz37
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor320
Other Games
summit1g7688
gofns6987
Fuzer 184
Mew2King71
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 2017
UltimateBattle 158
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta54
• Dystopia_ 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV372
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
38m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4h 38m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
6h 38m
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
HeRoMaRinE vs MaxPax
Wardi Open
1d 1h
OSC
1d 14h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
HCC Europe
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.