|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:21 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 01:35 Blazinghand wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Oh my lord, you're right. Syllo's managed to make several posts without actually comitting to anything at all. I take it all back, he's the scum here. He agrees with Sandro on me, but doesn't do anything about it. He would "like to lynch" probulous, but doesn't vote him.
I've seen the light.
##unvote
##vote: syllogism oh this makes his stuff look artificial... looks like he doesn't believe his own words. ahm okay. maybe i was wrong. BH can you link me like 2 recent towngames of you please?
Sure! I recently played in LIII as "BlazingJitsu" http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=329128 and in LV on this account: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=336250
In LIII I was a VT, and in LV I was a Hatter.
|
Supersoft what do you think of my post on Katina
|
On July 17 2012 02:21 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Palmar since you're here you and I are going to play a lighting round.
Marvellosity
Blazinghand
Rastaban
Supersoft
Scum or town, go.
No.
|
Palmar, Answer my question?
|
On July 17 2012 02:17 Palmar wrote:
I agree with BlazingHand let's kill syllogism. Nice catch supersoft.
Do you honestly agree? Be very honest. Also, what is the nice catch you are referring to?
|
Supersoft nailed it. MVP. I'm going to stop playing and start working on a bronze statue of him to erect in my bathroom.
|
Palmar why are you playing like ass right now. Surely you can do better than this. Even as scum I expected more from you.
|
On July 17 2012 02:27 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 02:17 Palmar wrote:
I agree with BlazingHand let's kill syllogism. Nice catch supersoft. Do you honestly agree? Be very honest. Also, what is the nice catch you are referring to?
Why do you not announce that you support my RL idea?
|
On July 17 2012 02:10 supersoft wrote:
yes of course, but do you think it's worth mentioning? This stuff is common sense. dont you think that these thought are rather thoughts a scumplayer has, because he has to control and plan who he accuses?
Could you quote stuff? I didn't realize this was directed at me. I actually do think it's worth pointing out because in a normal game, the only people who suddenly change their minds are DTs who got a red (or green) check. Someone doing an about face is often a good way of lynching scum without having to claim DT. In this game however, it'll be scum doing about faces so I think it's good to get it out there so we don't have to sift through multiple DT claims later in the game.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
|
On July 17 2012 02:17 Palmar wrote:
I agree with BlazingHand let's kill syllogism. Nice catch supersoft.
yeah well, someone has to be CEO, right? syllo would be a great choice from a hosts perspective lol
however I prefer to lynch MZ right now tbh... :-/
|
On July 17 2012 02:30 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 02:10 supersoft wrote:
yes of course, but do you think it's worth mentioning? This stuff is common sense. dont you think that these thought are rather thoughts a scumplayer has, because he has to control and plan who he accuses? Could you quote stuff? I didn't realize this was directed at me. I actually do think it's worth pointing out because in a normal game, the only people who suddenly change their minds are DTs who got a red (or green) check. Someone doing an about face is often a good way of lynching scum without having to claim DT. In this game however, it'll be scum doing about faces so I think it's good to get it out there so we don't have to sift through multiple DT claims later in the game.
Why in hell are you still talking about this. Isn't there anything more productive for you to comment on?
|
On July 17 2012 02:28 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 02:27 syllogism wrote:On July 17 2012 02:17 Palmar wrote:
I agree with BlazingHand let's kill syllogism. Nice catch supersoft. Do you honestly agree? Be very honest. Also, what is the nice catch you are referring to? Why do you not announce that you support my RL idea?
I don't support it and I was more interested in seeing how others would react to it. Even if I agreed that it was a good idea, there was about 0% chance of the majority actually agreeing to it. Regardless, did you expect me to agree? Mafia don't know who other mafia are, so they don't have the usual advantage of being able to control which alignment gets lynched in this format, especially on day 1.
|
On July 17 2012 02:25 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 02:21 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Palmar since you're here you and I are going to play a lighting round.
Marvellosity
Blazinghand
Rastaban
Supersoft
Scum or town, go. No.
Actually yes. You've done this before, I want to know if you're going to go through with it. If you're not, then you were essentially just causing chaos. That's not a very promising mark on your record.
So let's get rid of the asshole act and you can sit down and play nice or I'll assume that you were just trolling with the RL shit and I'll give Katina's case a second look.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:32 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 02:28 Palmar wrote:On July 17 2012 02:27 syllogism wrote:On July 17 2012 02:17 Palmar wrote:
I agree with BlazingHand let's kill syllogism. Nice catch supersoft. Do you honestly agree? Be very honest. Also, what is the nice catch you are referring to? Why do you not announce that you support my RL idea? I don't support it and I was more interested in seeing how others would react to it. Even if I agreed that it was a good idea, there was about 0% chance of the majority actually agreeing to it. Regardless, did you expect me to agree? Mafia don't know who other mafia are, so they don't have the usual advantage of being able to control which alignment gets lynched in this format, especially on day 1.
Yeah I mean part of the "goal" of a random lynch is that, for mafia players, it isn't random. They are hindered by their knowledge of alignment. This game, and others like it (sleeper cell, etc) are probably explicitly games where the advantage of random lynch is lost. It still has some value as a conversation starter, I guess, but honestly it's not worth it in general, and even less so in a setup where most scum don't know who most scum are.
|
On July 17 2012 02:31 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2012 02:30 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On July 17 2012 02:10 supersoft wrote:
yes of course, but do you think it's worth mentioning? This stuff is common sense. dont you think that these thought are rather thoughts a scumplayer has, because he has to control and plan who he accuses? Could you quote stuff? I didn't realize this was directed at me. I actually do think it's worth pointing out because in a normal game, the only people who suddenly change their minds are DTs who got a red (or green) check. Someone doing an about face is often a good way of lynching scum without having to claim DT. In this game however, it'll be scum doing about faces so I think it's good to get it out there so we don't have to sift through multiple DT claims later in the game. Why in hell are you still talking about this. Isn't there anything more productive for you to comment on?
I'm continuing my conversation with supersoft, read the thread.
|
CAN SOMEONE READ WHAT I POSTED ON KATINA, AT THE VERY LEAST TO JUST TELL ME IM WRONG
|
Man I want to kill so many people right now. 1 lynch just doesn't seem enough this game.
|
On July 17 2012 02:36 sandroba wrote:
Man I want to kill so many people right now. 1 lynch just doesn't seem enough this game.
I understand, pawn. Winning is cool. But I want to win this game.
|
On July 17 2012 02:36 Mattchew wrote:
CAN SOMEONE READ WHAT I POSTED ON KATINA, AT THE VERY LEAST TO JUST TELL ME IM WRONG
You are wrong. Katina alignment is non conclusive right now. Move on to palmar/mz/bh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
