|
On June 25 2012 22:27 JieXian wrote:shit I just noticed that this wasn't what i thought it was. This actually means that we have 2 days to vote right? Release's game plan seems to be: 1) Create escape route. (just in case he got mafia)
So night. I will be less active in the following days (until night 3) for aforementioned reasons.
2) Create chaos
3) Claim it leads to more productive posting
4) Hide with aforementioned excuseShow nested quote +On June 25 2012 21:49 Vivax wrote:On June 25 2012 20:23 Esspen wrote:
But I believe we should try to identify and lynch blues first, confusing mafia and leaving them vulnerable...
Wat  You crazy? Vivax and I found that confusing = We must be mafia lolololol
If you're still stuck one this, i don't know what to say...
"They may be lynching lurkers"
I never said. I said go for scum. I even said lynchscum>lynchliars>lynchnottruth. I said that lurkers will always take a position lower than scum on priority list. Words in my mouth.
Yeah, i caused commotion. We weren't exactly making a lot of progress. I think commotion>banter because at least we get some honest opinions in there. Maybe even a scumslip if someone gets too emotional...
Night
|
I'm caught up on my reading. If i had been here b4 (deadline, impossible due to my schedule), i would have switched to Bio.
|
|
|
1 post:
On June 25 2012 12:57 BioSC wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2012 12:53 Hopeless1der wrote:
To further clarify my response to Release:
I'm saying lynch people that we can collectively agree have been dishonest in something they have said or done.
Further discussions on what constitutes 'dishonesty' may follow at a later time, or right now if whoever is reading this should so happen to desire. Right now would be the perfect time to discuss it, seeing as we've been talking about it since game start. Now would be a good time to say some things, seeing as how you have the first vote and all.
We're discussing fucking semantics. Some people called me out. I pursued it to try to get some more emotional/scumslip material into the thread.
And what do we get? You posting this gem.
"Keep going on with your bullshit. I'll watch here while you don't post anything useful."
You actually approved of our silly time-wasting. You also managed to sheep a "more activity" attitude when the activity you were promoting was shit. I said that my vote was to generate activity, and you act like it's a serious, life-threatening vote. You also manage to avoid taking any serious stances in this post and the posts after it until your vote.
Don't try to bullshit me with "it's just one post." Scumslips are supposed to be frequent. 1 is usually enough.
|
That's plausible, and honestly, i can't disagree with Hope's wishy-washy play.
But i am keeping my eye on you.
|
Am I saying your scummy? ATM, no. But to say that his constant stance switching and bad posts were my fault is ignorant at best.
________________________
Did i say it was your fault? I was pointing out what looked like promotion of useless discussion while trying to appear helpful.
|
Awfully defensive don't you think?
SS#2
|
I think the activity level in this game is quite shit.
|
There's been extremely low activity since death post. Considering i am putting like 1 hour a day into this game while having a longer filter than most, this is quite shit.
|
On June 27 2012 18:01 JieXian wrote:Doing his thing by not contributing anything.For example, you obviously are contributing. Get it right? Actually I'm spoilt for choices between Release, Esspen (plus hopeless earlier) and lurkers, just like I said earlier. What's keeping me from voting lurkers is my game plan of scummy behavior > lurkers. I chose Release because he's the most chaotic/irritating + confusing + noisy as you can see, but I'm not leaning too hard on him. As I said if I were around I'd have changed my vote. Show nested quote +On June 27 2012 17:14 BassInSpace wrote:Jiexian, miltonkram will be replacing one of aegonc or keirathi, who did not vote at all, if that's what you're unsure about. What exactly is holding you back from voting from the remaining lurkers (you do say you really feel like lynching lurkers) and sticking to release? What do you mean by release "doing his thing". He's right, activity isn't good in this game at all, with 2 players being modkilled/replaced already, and a bunch of others posting very little. I didn't like your original case against release; I think it's gotten even worse now. Esspen: On June 27 2012 08:14 Esspen wrote:On June 27 2012 08:07 BioSC wrote:
EBWOP: That goes for Esspen as well. There is NO excuse. There are plenty of cases to choose from. How people are missing Hopeless' scumminess is beyond me, but do NOT waste votes like that. You are too easy targets for scum to manipulate your votes like that. There are cases, but those cases are not going to be lynched anyway as now it's either Hopeless or Rofl. I unfortunately cannot vote for Hopeless as only thing he's done is gone maybe too far with attacking you, otherwise I completely agree with him. On June 27 2012 08:53 Esspen wrote:
##Vote Hopeless1der What was that? I gave you the benefit of doubt at first, but I'm gonna be looking at you very closely again.
I'm quite busy, so the few times i pop in to check up on the thread, i expect to see some valuable discussion. I'm quite annoyed when there isn't.
If this level of inactivity keeps up, the scum will win without having to do anything.
|
On June 27 2012 19:25 Vivax wrote:
Esspen voted for hopeless when rofl was set to lynch, as already mentioned.
If one of them is scum, the other most likely is, too. With the current information available, I would go for one of them.
Also remember that posting cases during the night can make you a target for scum.
Speaking of it, I think I'm the designed nightkill simply cause noone suspected me yet. Townies who are believed to be townies are dangerous for scum, and I didn't see any blue role vibes for them to use yet, so they don't have many alternatives.
So myself, rofles, and bio? (for clarification)
I think the self-pity attitude is silly. Strong cases make you the target for scum.
gtg.
|
|
|
Lol. Bio was so obvious. I don't see why you guys didn't vote him.
Especially that post Hope1 and I highlighted.
|
wow. IF i had posted my suspicions of Bio right before i died...
|
I love how the mafia actually thought i was agreeing with bio. Fuck my schedule...
|
This is so annoying. Bio should have died
|
"but if you have a strong read, don't take it to your grave."
3 hours b4 the deadline, i realized that Bio was scum. I would be away from the net for 4 hours. That sucked.
|
The only confirmed i had was Bio scum, Bass town. Everyone else, to my mind, was neutral.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
