• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:35
CEST 05:35
KST 12:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025)7Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025) Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
SOOP Starcraft Global #22 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 30976 users

Newbie Mini Mafia XVI - Page 14

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 30 Next All
s0Lstice
Profile Joined August 2009
United States1832 Posts
June 10 2012 20:04 GMT
#261
ha236,

make sure your votes are bolded, they don't count otherwise
ATOBTTR
The_Zen_Man
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden202 Posts
June 10 2012 20:15 GMT
#262
Well, i have said my opinion on Lazermonkey, but i am still equally suspicous of grush (still don't know why people say i soft defended him), and seeing as the support for him is stronger than Lazermonkey i can vote for him too. But ha236 still does not seem scummy to me, and i would prefer not to lynch him.
s0Lstice
Profile Joined August 2009
United States1832 Posts
June 10 2012 20:20 GMT
#263
Vivax where are you?

So far your filter has a suspicion of grush, and an odd analysis post of all of our stances on him.
ATOBTTR
Lazermonkey
Profile Joined June 2011
Sweden2176 Posts
June 10 2012 20:28 GMT
#264
On June 11 2012 05:15 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Well, i have said my opinion on Lazermonkey, but i am still equally suspicous of grush (still don't know why people say i soft defended him), and seeing as the support for him is stronger than Lazermonkey i can vote for him too. But ha236 still does not seem scummy to me, and i would prefer not to lynch him.

YO ZENMAN! You have still some unanswered questions, remember? I explain why prople think you are soft defending grush, so it might be worth a look ; ).
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 10 2012 21:11 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:First of all, i would like to say that i am not making this in respond to Lazermonkey voring on me, but rather that he said that i did not have any ideas of my own.
That's cool for me.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Now i would like to talk about your vote. First you say that i should have just written "i agree" in my post, which is what I basically did, I just referred to Ha236 post. But you seemed to think that i wrote this as my own post, which i did not.
Yes, that's what you should've done in this case. Can you mention even one thing in this post that isn't already in ha236s post?

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:Then you later on say that i "tunnel" you, after i have just posted about 2 posts about you. Once again you exaggerate a lot. This is a typical scum play, to make small things seem very big, so that they can build on a case that is not really there.
I don't think it's an exaggeration. You've made 7 posts so far(not counting the /in-post).
1 is about how you missquoted
1 is about how you think Ha236 is not scum(but this is a crap post as you basically only says that).
1 is your introction post
4 is about me
So basically you have two useless posts, 4 about me and one that is not. So 80% of your posts of substance is about me.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:You go on to say that i put "sof defense" for grush. Where have i done this? This seems like a scum move also, fabricating facts that do not exists. I have stated my opinion on grush before. ##Fos: Lazermonkey
First you told Release to ease the pressure on grush. Then you also accused my case against grush of being bad. You are also one of the few people that havn't yet put any pressure on grush. This is ''soft defense'' in my eyes. You havn't said you don't think he is scum but if he flips green then you will be among those who looks least guilty.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
What is also interesting is that not long after ha236 posted about Lazermonkeys's flawed logic and "exaggerating", Solstice came and posted a "case" on ha236, which was imo very weak. Lazermonkey then jumped to this idea. Maybe Solstice and Lazermonkey are scumbros and tried to start a bandwagon?
It's intresting that you keep saying that the case on ha236 is so weak when there are already a couple of people willing to vote for him. Surely there must be at least something with his play that is suspicous? ''Lazermonkey then jumped to this idea. Maybe Solstice and Lazermonkey are scumbros and tried to start a bandwagon?'', so the fact that I thought there were something worth of notice in his post makes us both scum? eh...

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
After i posted some more on Lazermonkey where i was suspicous of his post on Grush, he immediatly voted on me to turn the attention to me. This can be a scum move, as they can start to panic and direct the attention elsewhere

Lolwat. This is like the opposite of what I did. Your first posts was insanly strange and with lack of logic. Yet I didn't post a case on you. It was only after you had posted no more than 3 posts against me, all filled with crap that I wrote the actual case.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Lazermonkey later goes on by saying that i pull the action away from grush, but that i am trying to start a bandwagon on him. This is contradictory. Why would i pull the action away from him if i wanted to bandwagon him?

I don't know, that is for you to decide as you are the scum : ). I can think of plenty of alternatives. This also adds up to my point about your indecisiveness of grush. You pull the action away from him, doesn't push him at all yet you say we should lynch him without giving any alternatives?

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
I am not going to vote for you because that would be to sink to your level. I prefer to stay calm instead of just voting for the other person, but you did rise on my scum reads.

##Fos: Lazermonkey

Why so scared of voting me? Why would I write this case if you were a townie? Either admitt your very flawed logic or you should belive that I am scum. You did neither. And you even said earlier in the post that my play was much like scum play and also you thought there was a chance for me and s0Lstice to be scumbros. And yet you don't vote me...

I have answered all you questions. You however failed to answer one of mine. Why do you not think Ha236 looks scummy?



To everyone else: Why have almost noone commented on my case on The_Zen_Man/his case on me so far?
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
21960 Posts
June 10 2012 20:29 GMT
#265
Here's an inofficial vote count somewhat including the order.

grush: Release
ha236: s0lstice, Release
The_Zen_Man: Lazermonkey
grush57: KTheZ
s0lstice: ha236
Release: ha236

Guys, we're at close danger of a no-lynch. I'm not very satisfied with ha236 as option cause I find his first posts regarding Lazermonkey and Release to be true, but on the other hand he didn't make a single case except for OMGUS ones now in the end and instead only spent time defending grush and himself.

It was a pretty bad day 1 imo, and it can get even worse if we will have to further lurk in the dark, you'll have my vote on ha236 for the sake of the lynch, but be aware of the fact that I'll gladly switch it for any other majority.

##vote ha236

@ s0lstice

odd analysis? To me town play seems to be messed up atm and you should actually thank me for getting a bit of transparency in here. Every single and good player would make such a summary in a case before going on and accusing single persons. I doubt one would want to play with a narrow sight.
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
21960 Posts
June 10 2012 20:33 GMT
#266
@ Lazermonkey

Gimme a sec and I'll go through your case against The_Zen_Man.
Release
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States4397 Posts
June 10 2012 20:35 GMT
#267
On June 11 2012 05:29 Vivax wrote:
Here's an inofficial vote count somewhat including the order.

grush: Release
ha236: s0lstice, Release
The_Zen_Man: Lazermonkey
grush57: KTheZ
s0lstice: ha236
Release: ha236

Guys, we're at close danger of a no-lynch. I'm not very satisfied with ha236 as option cause I find his first posts regarding Lazermonkey and Release to be true, but on the other hand he didn't make a single case except for OMGUS ones now in the end and instead only spent time defending grush and himself.

It was a pretty bad day 1 imo, and it can get even worse if we will have to further lurk in the dark, you'll have my vote on ha236 for the sake of the lynch, but be aware of the fact that I'll gladly switch it for any other majority.

##vote ha236

@ s0lstice

odd analysis? To me town play seems to be messed up atm and you should actually thank me for getting a bit of transparency in here. Every single and good player would make such a summary in a case before going on and accusing single persons. I doubt one would want to play with a narrow sight.

If you're not satisfied, go read some more.
☺
The_Zen_Man
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden202 Posts
June 10 2012 20:42 GMT
#268
On June 11 2012 05:28 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2012 05:15 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Well, i have said my opinion on Lazermonkey, but i am still equally suspicous of grush (still don't know why people say i soft defended him), and seeing as the support for him is stronger than Lazermonkey i can vote for him too. But ha236 still does not seem scummy to me, and i would prefer not to lynch him.

YO ZENMAN! You have still some unanswered questions, remember? I explain why prople think you are soft defending grush, so it might be worth a look ; ).
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 10 2012 21:11 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:First of all, i would like to say that i am not making this in respond to Lazermonkey voring on me, but rather that he said that i did not have any ideas of my own.
That's cool for me.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Now i would like to talk about your vote. First you say that i should have just written "i agree" in my post, which is what I basically did, I just referred to Ha236 post. But you seemed to think that i wrote this as my own post, which i did not.
Yes, that's what you should've done in this case. Can you mention even one thing in this post that isn't already in ha236s post?

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:Then you later on say that i "tunnel" you, after i have just posted about 2 posts about you. Once again you exaggerate a lot. This is a typical scum play, to make small things seem very big, so that they can build on a case that is not really there.
I don't think it's an exaggeration. You've made 7 posts so far(not counting the /in-post).
1 is about how you missquoted
1 is about how you think Ha236 is not scum(but this is a crap post as you basically only says that).
1 is your introction post
4 is about me
So basically you have two useless posts, 4 about me and one that is not. So 80% of your posts of substance is about me.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:You go on to say that i put "sof defense" for grush. Where have i done this? This seems like a scum move also, fabricating facts that do not exists. I have stated my opinion on grush before. ##Fos: Lazermonkey
First you told Release to ease the pressure on grush. Then you also accused my case against grush of being bad. You are also one of the few people that havn't yet put any pressure on grush. This is ''soft defense'' in my eyes. You havn't said you don't think he is scum but if he flips green then you will be among those who looks least guilty.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
What is also interesting is that not long after ha236 posted about Lazermonkeys's flawed logic and "exaggerating", Solstice came and posted a "case" on ha236, which was imo very weak. Lazermonkey then jumped to this idea. Maybe Solstice and Lazermonkey are scumbros and tried to start a bandwagon?
It's intresting that you keep saying that the case on ha236 is so weak when there are already a couple of people willing to vote for him. Surely there must be at least something with his play that is suspicous? ''Lazermonkey then jumped to this idea. Maybe Solstice and Lazermonkey are scumbros and tried to start a bandwagon?'', so the fact that I thought there were something worth of notice in his post makes us both scum? eh...

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
After i posted some more on Lazermonkey where i was suspicous of his post on Grush, he immediatly voted on me to turn the attention to me. This can be a scum move, as they can start to panic and direct the attention elsewhere

Lolwat. This is like the opposite of what I did. Your first posts was insanly strange and with lack of logic. Yet I didn't post a case on you. It was only after you had posted no more than 3 posts against me, all filled with crap that I wrote the actual case.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Lazermonkey later goes on by saying that i pull the action away from grush, but that i am trying to start a bandwagon on him. This is contradictory. Why would i pull the action away from him if i wanted to bandwagon him?

I don't know, that is for you to decide as you are the scum : ). I can think of plenty of alternatives. This also adds up to my point about your indecisiveness of grush. You pull the action away from him, doesn't push him at all yet you say we should lynch him without giving any alternatives?

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
I am not going to vote for you because that would be to sink to your level. I prefer to stay calm instead of just voting for the other person, but you did rise on my scum reads.

##Fos: Lazermonkey

Why so scared of voting me? Why would I write this case if you were a townie? Either admitt your very flawed logic or you should belive that I am scum. You did neither. And you even said earlier in the post that my play was much like scum play and also you thought there was a chance for me and s0Lstice to be scumbros. And yet you don't vote me...

I have answered all you questions. You however failed to answer one of mine. Why do you not think Ha236 looks scummy?



To everyone else: Why have almost noone commented on my case on The_Zen_Man/his case on me so far?


First of all, the reason i wanted release to ease the pressure was not to "soft defend" grush, but so that the discussion would not get more out of hand, and someone else say what they think about him. They filled up 5 pages of posts, and in the end of the discussion release himself said that his comment would be useless to anyone but grush, If it has turned out like that, it benefits the case if we get some fresh eyes on the subject.

You then say that i accused your case of being bad. You had a lot of flaws in your post, which we discussed before, and that is why i said it was bad.

I have from the beginning said that i am suspicous of grush, and i am pushing for a lynch of him now.

s0Lstice
Profile Joined August 2009
United States1832 Posts
June 10 2012 20:43 GMT
#269
On June 11 2012 05:29 Vivax wrote:
Here's an inofficial vote count somewhat including the order.

grush: Release
ha236: s0lstice, Release
The_Zen_Man: Lazermonkey
grush57: KTheZ
s0lstice: ha236
Release: ha236

Guys, we're at close danger of a no-lynch. I'm not very satisfied with ha236 as option cause I find his first posts regarding Lazermonkey and Release to be true, but on the other hand he didn't make a single case except for OMGUS ones now in the end and instead only spent time defending grush and himself.

It was a pretty bad day 1 imo, and it can get even worse if we will have to further lurk in the dark, you'll have my vote on ha236 for the sake of the lynch, but be aware of the fact that I'll gladly switch it for any other majority.

##vote ha236

@ s0lstice

odd analysis? To me town play seems to be messed up atm and you should actually thank me for getting a bit of transparency in here. Every single and good player would make such a summary in a case before going on and accusing single persons. I doubt one would want to play with a narrow sight.


Yea, it is odd. If I want to know what someone thinks of grush, I'll go look at their filter. Your post was a needless summarization. Now you just posted a vote count. This is like textbook 'scum trying to look useful' fodder.

I've seen your town play, and this doesn't look anything like it. Yea, it got you lynched last game, so you may be trying to change it up, but what you've changed to is not an improvement as of yet.

Lazermonkey, I'm gonna comment on your Zen_Man case in a bit.
ATOBTTR
The_Zen_Man
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden202 Posts
June 10 2012 20:45 GMT
#270
If it gets to a choice between grush and ha(which it seems to go too) i will choose grush. I do not like ha as a lynch, but grush has seemed much more suspicous to me. If people feel the same, now is the time to vote for him.

##Vote: grush57
Lazermonkey
Profile Joined June 2011
Sweden2176 Posts
June 10 2012 21:00 GMT
#271
On June 11 2012 05:42 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2012 05:28 Lazermonkey wrote:
On June 11 2012 05:15 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Well, i have said my opinion on Lazermonkey, but i am still equally suspicous of grush (still don't know why people say i soft defended him), and seeing as the support for him is stronger than Lazermonkey i can vote for him too. But ha236 still does not seem scummy to me, and i would prefer not to lynch him.

YO ZENMAN! You have still some unanswered questions, remember? I explain why prople think you are soft defending grush, so it might be worth a look ; ).
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 10 2012 21:11 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:First of all, i would like to say that i am not making this in respond to Lazermonkey voring on me, but rather that he said that i did not have any ideas of my own.
That's cool for me.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Now i would like to talk about your vote. First you say that i should have just written "i agree" in my post, which is what I basically did, I just referred to Ha236 post. But you seemed to think that i wrote this as my own post, which i did not.
Yes, that's what you should've done in this case. Can you mention even one thing in this post that isn't already in ha236s post?

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:Then you later on say that i "tunnel" you, after i have just posted about 2 posts about you. Once again you exaggerate a lot. This is a typical scum play, to make small things seem very big, so that they can build on a case that is not really there.
I don't think it's an exaggeration. You've made 7 posts so far(not counting the /in-post).
1 is about how you missquoted
1 is about how you think Ha236 is not scum(but this is a crap post as you basically only says that).
1 is your introction post
4 is about me
So basically you have two useless posts, 4 about me and one that is not. So 80% of your posts of substance is about me.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:You go on to say that i put "sof defense" for grush. Where have i done this? This seems like a scum move also, fabricating facts that do not exists. I have stated my opinion on grush before. ##Fos: Lazermonkey
First you told Release to ease the pressure on grush. Then you also accused my case against grush of being bad. You are also one of the few people that havn't yet put any pressure on grush. This is ''soft defense'' in my eyes. You havn't said you don't think he is scum but if he flips green then you will be among those who looks least guilty.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
What is also interesting is that not long after ha236 posted about Lazermonkeys's flawed logic and "exaggerating", Solstice came and posted a "case" on ha236, which was imo very weak. Lazermonkey then jumped to this idea. Maybe Solstice and Lazermonkey are scumbros and tried to start a bandwagon?
It's intresting that you keep saying that the case on ha236 is so weak when there are already a couple of people willing to vote for him. Surely there must be at least something with his play that is suspicous? ''Lazermonkey then jumped to this idea. Maybe Solstice and Lazermonkey are scumbros and tried to start a bandwagon?'', so the fact that I thought there were something worth of notice in his post makes us both scum? eh...

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
After i posted some more on Lazermonkey where i was suspicous of his post on Grush, he immediatly voted on me to turn the attention to me. This can be a scum move, as they can start to panic and direct the attention elsewhere

Lolwat. This is like the opposite of what I did. Your first posts was insanly strange and with lack of logic. Yet I didn't post a case on you. It was only after you had posted no more than 3 posts against me, all filled with crap that I wrote the actual case.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Lazermonkey later goes on by saying that i pull the action away from grush, but that i am trying to start a bandwagon on him. This is contradictory. Why would i pull the action away from him if i wanted to bandwagon him?

I don't know, that is for you to decide as you are the scum : ). I can think of plenty of alternatives. This also adds up to my point about your indecisiveness of grush. You pull the action away from him, doesn't push him at all yet you say we should lynch him without giving any alternatives?

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
I am not going to vote for you because that would be to sink to your level. I prefer to stay calm instead of just voting for the other person, but you did rise on my scum reads.

##Fos: Lazermonkey

Why so scared of voting me? Why would I write this case if you were a townie? Either admitt your very flawed logic or you should belive that I am scum. You did neither. And you even said earlier in the post that my play was much like scum play and also you thought there was a chance for me and s0Lstice to be scumbros. And yet you don't vote me...

I have answered all you questions. You however failed to answer one of mine. Why do you not think Ha236 looks scummy?



To everyone else: Why have almost noone commented on my case on The_Zen_Man/his case on me so far?


First of all, the reason i wanted release to ease the pressure was not to "soft defend" grush, but so that the discussion would not get more out of hand, and someone else say what they think about him. They filled up 5 pages of posts, and in the end of the discussion release himself said that his comment would be useless to anyone but grush, If it has turned out like that, it benefits the case if we get some fresh eyes on the subject.

You then say that i accused your case of being bad. You had a lot of flaws in your post, which we discussed before, and that is why i said it was bad.

I have from the beginning said that i am suspicous of grush, and i am pushing for a lynch of him now.

I don't care about your intentions here. You told him to ease the pressure on grush. You never said anything about grush but that you thought he looked scummy. You didn't bring the case even one centimeter further. You also said my case against grush was bad. Thus you soft defended him.

So you first say you think grush looks suspicious, without saying why. Then you post one hellofacase on me. You then decide to vote grush anyway. Lol? And you still haven't said why you think he is scummy. Just that he is...

On June 11 2012 05:45 The_Zen_Man wrote:
If it gets to a choice between grush and ha(which it seems to go too) i will choose grush. I do not like ha as a lynch, but grush has seemed much more suspicous to me. If people feel the same, now is the time to vote for him.

##Vote: grush57

Yet another post. He is suspicious. Why?
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
June 10 2012 21:00 GMT
#272
Current vote standings:

ha236 (3): s0lstice, Release, Vivax
grush57 (2): KtheZ, The_Zen_Man
The_Zen_Man (1): Lazermonkey

Yet to vote: ha236, grush57, ShiaoPi

All votes MUST be bolded for them to count. 2 hours or so left till the lynch. It takes 5 votes to lynch someone
[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
ha236
Profile Joined June 2012
Sweden36 Posts
June 10 2012 21:16 GMT
#273
##Vote: Release
snälla pappa haga mig inte i pannan
grush57
Profile Joined March 2011
Korea (South)2582 Posts
June 10 2012 21:18 GMT
#274
##Vote: ha236
Or there is going to be a no lynch, or me dying as a townie lynch.
(Ha voting Release is kind of strange)
"Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death."
grush57
Profile Joined March 2011
Korea (South)2582 Posts
June 10 2012 21:19 GMT
#275
oops, I'll bold it in the voting thread
"Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death."
ShiaoPi
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
June 10 2012 21:19 GMT
#276
I am sorry for my absence, blame my fixation on the EURO 2012 and Qualifiers for the International 2 (dota 2)...

Read through the posts until now and I am happy to see that you guys pressured ha236, his responses seems to have been accusations of so-called "dumb logic" and some OMGUS votes thrown around. The more he squirmed under pressure the more he seemed to be scummy.

Should be easy to consolidate on a lynch on ha236 now:

##Vote: ha236

@Lazermonkey:
I would consider looking at them more thoroughly on day1 if we had a chance to consolidate a lynch on one of you, but since it is (most likely) going to be between grush and ha236, it is for now better to off one of them instead of dividing our votes and maybe even make it into a no-lynch
LiquidDota Staff@TW_ShiaoPi
TL+ Member
grush57
Profile Joined March 2011
Korea (South)2582 Posts
June 10 2012 21:20 GMT
#277
Oh nvm it looks like there is not a voting thread, my bad.
##Vote: ha236
"Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death."
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
21960 Posts
June 10 2012 21:21 GMT
#278
Needless summarization? That is the type of summarization a good townie uses to get an idea of the connections someone had once he flips. If grush gets lynched, you can look up my summary and check the connections between grush and other players. Just cause you don't see the use doesn't mean it doesn't have any.

Btw, I can prove you are being selective since I didn't see you pick on the following summary yet. I just wonder if you are being selective on purpose cause raising suspicion on me would further increase the chance of a No lynch or if it's by mistake.
While working on Lazermonkeys case against The_Zen_Man i found another 'needless summarization':

+ Show Spoiler +
On June 11 2012 04:47 Lazermonkey wrote:
So right now, we have not too much time untill lynching. We need to get something done here. With nine players there are 5(Lol) players that have received FoS/Votes unless I'm misstaken. These players are:
grush
Ha236
me(Lazermonkey)
The_Zen_Man
s0Lstice
s0Lstice were also suspicious of KtheZ recently, although no FoS were placed.



Regarding The_Zen_Man case:

I especially liked LazerMans point regarding the contradiction between the FoS on him, but the vote on grush. It looks like The_Zen_Man doesn't believe much in his own case.
We also have to consider that The_Zen_Man mostly used ha236 points already posted to soft-defend grush. That would allow scum to deflect attention to ha236 again in case gursh flips green.

That's about the latest points made by Lazermonkey, now to my own analysis, I'll be especially focusing on The_Zen_Man's first posts:

On June 09 2012 18:11 The_Zen_Man wrote:
Hey guys, just woke up(time difference suck).

1:I have read some of the grush-release discussion, and i can say that i did found Grush comment weird. Also some of his later post is also strange. I will post a analysis on him later.

2:But release, you are going against him to hard. You said it yourself before, that your comment is useless to anyone but grush. If it's like that, you should let others give their opinions about him, and focus on someone else for a bit.

3:Also, as to my opinions on lynching, i agree that in case there is a hard lurker and no scum reads we should lynch the lurker, as he is not contributing anyways. But lynching with not much information (like d1) will probably result in a misslynch. We still gain information even is there is no lynch, by observing how players act before lynch, what they vote for, reaction after lynch, etc.


1. Here's the broken promise: We still have no analysis on grush from you. In a lynch all liars environment you would already be in huge trouble.

2. Without the analysis, you proceed to soft-defend him.
The problem about your posts is the way you do that:
You tell Release to focus on someone else. Imagine if he suddenly switched target like you propose, that would make him look quite inconsistent...and scummy.

3. The opinions on lynching. I mean, seriously? This part confuses the hell out of me.
We should lynch lurkers, but on the other hand you say it will probably result in a mislynch.
Then you actually say that we might gain information without a lynch. How is that so? Both points lack reasoning behind them and contradict the other points in your post.
Your opinion on lynching policy is wishy washy and no opinion, you seem to promote everything at once.

The next posts show your support of ha, always disproving points others make against grush, but at the same time you emphasize your beliefs that he looks scummy.

On June 10 2012 17:35 The_Zen_Man wrote:
I really don't know how ha got to be one of the "top" scum reads on this game. His play does not seem scummy at all to me. I think the best d1 lynch is grush, and then we can think about how to proceed once he flips.


Once ha gets into the crosshair, all of sudden you think it's best to drop all your defenses of grush and to lynch him.

When Lazermonkey actually notices your suspicious behavior:

On June 10 2012 20:14 The_Zen_Man wrote:
The case against Lazermonkey:

First of all, i would like to say that i am not making this in respond to Lazermonkey voring on me, but rather that he said that i did not have any ideas of my own.


I think this quotation of mine reminds that he does have a point about that. You took many of the points about grushs defense from ha236, allowing you to deflect responsibility in case they turn out to be wrong.

Looking at your and ha2's posts, your stances are soft and inconsistent as opposed to his, so I'll let you know: If there's a choice between a majority on you and a majority on ha2, I will pick the one against you.

##FoS The_Zen_Man
grush57
Profile Joined March 2011
Korea (South)2582 Posts
June 10 2012 21:23 GMT
#279
Yea if Ha flips red then it is either Zen man or KtheZ.
"Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death."
KtheZ
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States813 Posts
June 10 2012 21:24 GMT
#280
Since ha cannot vote for himself, a lynch for today would take either: grush and shiaopi voting for ha or someone switching their vote to ha.
or: A lot of vote-switching
Obvious things aside,

Although I am not convinced ha is scum, if it comes down to a no-lynch I will switch my vote to ha. I have read his posts and s0Lstice/Release's arguments and have concluded that he is a reasonable second to grush.

I have now read through Lazermonkey's posts about Zen_Man. After seeing Zen_Man's wishy-washy voting (voting grush without analysis, and his attempts to reduce the cross-examination of grush) I am suspicious enough to at least FoS him.
FoS: The_Zen_Man
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 30 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#36
PiGStarcraft877
CranKy Ducklings165
EnkiAlexander 126
SteadfastSC121
rockletztv 40
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft877
Nina 152
SteadfastSC 121
StarCraft: Brood War
JulyZerg 143
Icarus 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever644
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1665
Stewie2K620
taco 473
Super Smash Bros
ChuDatz8
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor106
Other Games
summit1g9168
C9.Mang01116
shahzam1014
JimRising 484
WinterStarcraft331
Mew2King143
Maynarde128
Sick54
Trikslyr49
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick988
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH282
• Hupsaiya 62
• practicex 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 214
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5042
• Lourlo1120
Other Games
• Scarra1136
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
6h 26m
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
20h 26m
The PondCast
1d 6h
RSL Revival
1d 6h
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
1d 20h
RSL Revival
2 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
SC Evo League
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Road to EWC
4 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.