EPTEmergency Mini Mafia! - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On June 07 2012 06:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Pandain, you can't blame us for lynching you this day. We were analyzing players based on posts and then you came in saying "oh hey guys I'm vigilante also if there's masons they should claim because it's great for town. Can we talk about that instead of doing actual scumhunting please?" If for some reason you are in fact town, then you've played an anti-town game as you broke a good town atmosphere. No you weren't. I was the one who stopped you guys from being suspicious of Kips when he was obviously town. I tried to direct the discussion, and when I needed to I claimed. And don't talk about the mason discussion derailing town, that's a retarded argument. Scum don't actively derail town discussion. In fact, they don't often at all. Instead they just let bad discussion go onwards. They don't put themselves in the spotlight. That's an incredibly important point for you guys to realize. Lynching me because I "derailed town" is both subjective, false, and weak as an argument. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On June 07 2012 06:49 Pandain wrote: Quick, Obvious Defense of How I'm Not Scum in a Million Years 1. Mafia would never claim vigi, and they wouldn't have let a bandwagon slip up on me so easily(when before, the lynches on BH didn't incite a bandwagon like this). There would have been some sort of counter vote planned. a. Brings unneccesary attention, doesn't actually help mafia at all(Doesn't gain town cred, merely brings attention to me) b. Could've been counterclaimed(Super suspicion) 2. Notice the lack of resistance, and a lack of a counter vote which ALWAYS happens, even if slightly. Usually they try to stack up on people. Unless its 100% obvious but I'm far, far , FAR from that assumption. 3. Really, the only possibility is that I am SK. But why would SK do that. It brings me to the attention of mafia, and town. Sure, it may provide cover for shootings, but vigilantes have limited shooting ability while SK is unlimited. I would've been 90% auto found out within a number of days. a. Also, I would probably be checked, and found guilty. b. If I instead had decided to pick Appear Innocent, I would be vulnerable to getting shot. And as I've said before, I'm heavily urging medics NOT to protect me, so claiming actually wouldn't have helped at ALL. What I did was suspicious. I don't deny that. But its not at all scum And there you have it - Pandain claims SK who picked "Bulletproof" as his modifier. /bow Please, hold your applause until after the lynch. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Do you find hyaach suspicious VE? Please, please, realize the lack of a counter wagon, how everything is going without mafia interference(I'm only one trying to stop it.) When that occurs, its mostly likely town. It could be SK, but again, I've proved that point false. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Stop trying to justify and apologize, saying that there's nothing you can do. Debate my arguments, don't say "you looked SO scummy". That's suspicious in itself, but if you are town, I ask you to please pick who you think is most likely scum. Not who played the most shady. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On June 07 2012 06:55 VisceraEyes wrote: You haven't proven anything false Pandain, why could you not be an SK in this situation? READ THE POST WHERE YOU SAID I SLIPPED I DONT HAVE TIME GOD DAMN IT THIS IS THE MOST OBVIOUS TOWN LYNCH OF ALL TIME | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
On June 07 2012 06:51 Pandain wrote: No you weren't. I was the one who stopped you guys from being suspicious of Kips when he was obviously town. I tried to direct the discussion, and when I needed to I claimed. And don't talk about the mason discussion derailing town, that's a retarded argument. Scum don't actively derail town discussion. In fact, they don't often at all. Instead they just let bad discussion go onwards. They don't put themselves in the spotlight. That's an incredibly important point for you guys to realize. Lynching me because I "derailed town" is both subjective, false, and weak as an argument. Wait, you needed to claim? What made you need to claim exactly? And no, scum don't want lynch discussion even if people are being wrongly accused because discussion generates information. Scum does not want town to have information. It is in scum's best interest to not talk about lynches at all times because it means there will be less reads available. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
So I cannot not vote because I was not around when the case was pushed? I actually thought him to be a serial killer rather than most who thinks his mafia. The flip do matters i tell you. You are saying like you know his scum/town before lynch. Time of vote matter but I agree its not applicable in my case because I was just not around when the case was pushed through. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On June 07 2012 06:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Wait, you needed to claim? What made you need to claim exactly? And no, scum don't want lynch discussion even if people are being wrongly accused because discussion generates information. Scum does not want town to have information. It is in scum's best interest to not talk about lynches at all times because it means there will be less reads available. I've generated more discussion than any town would! Scum don't play like this! Claiming, without any benefits, just to claim? That's retarded! Please ARtanis, realize this. Please. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
God damn it | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Fuck you internet. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
3. Really, the only possibility is that I am SK. But why would SK do that. It brings me to the attention of mafia, and town. Sure, it may provide cover for shootings, but vigilantes have limited shooting ability while SK is unlimited. I would've been 90% auto found out within a number of days. a. Also, I would probably be checked, and found guilty. b. If I instead had decided to pick Appear Innocent, I would be vulnerable to getting shot. And as I've said before, I'm heavily urging medics NOT to protect me, so claiming actually wouldn't have helped at ALL. Why would an SK do that? Because you know which modifier you chose and know what you're vulnerable to. First of all, the SK is NOT compulsive, it says so right in the sample Role PM....which means that you could just HOLD your shot as SK and NOT BE FOUND OUT EVER. However, you want to shoot. Which is understandable...because it means that the game is over faster for you. But the most intriguing point about this is that you never bring up the "possibility" of you picking Bulletproof - your thought-process while making this post was that you already have chosen Bulletproof...but you DO bring up the alternative possibility, "if I had chosen to Appear Innocent". This isn't me looking for a scumslip, it's me just pointing a blatent one out in your post. Where do you bring up the possibility of you having chosen Bulletproof? | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
| ||
| ||
