Emergency Mini Mafia! - Page 15

On June 07 2012 06:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Pandain, you can't blame us for lynching you this day. We were analyzing players based on posts and then you came in saying "oh hey guys I'm vigilante also if there's masons they should claim because it's great for town. Can we talk about that instead of doing actual scumhunting please?" If for some reason you are in fact town, then you've played an anti-town game as you broke a good town atmosphere.

On June 07 2012 06:49 Pandain wrote:
Quick, Obvious Defense of How I'm Not Scum in a Million Years

1. Mafia would never claim vigi, and they wouldn't have let a bandwagon slip up on me so easily(when before, the lynches on BH didn't incite a bandwagon like this). There would have been some sort of counter vote planned.
a. Brings unneccesary attention, doesn't actually help mafia at all(Doesn't gain town cred, merely brings attention to me)
b. Could've been counterclaimed(Super suspicion)

2. Notice the lack of resistance, and a lack of a counter vote which ALWAYS happens, even if slightly. Usually they try to stack up on people. Unless its 100% obvious but I'm far, far , FAR from that assumption.

3. Really, the only possibility is that I am SK. But why would SK do that. It brings me to the attention of mafia, and town. Sure, it may provide cover for shootings, but vigilantes have limited shooting ability while SK is unlimited. I would've been 90% auto found out within a number of days.
a. Also, I would probably be checked, and found guilty.
b. If I instead had decided to pick Appear Innocent, I would be vulnerable to getting shot. And as I've said before, I'm heavily urging medics NOT to protect me, so claiming actually wouldn't have helped at ALL.

What I did was suspicious. I don't deny that.

But its not at all scum

On June 07 2012 06:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
You haven't proven anything false Pandain, why could you not be an SK in this situation?

On June 07 2012 06:51 Pandain wrote:


No you weren't.

I was the one who stopped you guys from being suspicious of Kips when he was obviously town. I tried to direct the discussion, and when I needed to I claimed. And don't talk about the mason discussion derailing town, that's a retarded argument. Scum don't actively derail town discussion. In fact, they don't often at all. Instead they just let bad discussion go onwards. They don't put themselves in the spotlight.

That's an incredibly important point for you guys to realize.

Lynching me because I "derailed town" is both subjective, false, and weak as an argument.

On June 07 2012 06:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

Wait, you needed to claim? What made you need to claim exactly? And no, scum don't want lynch discussion even if people are being wrongly accused because discussion generates information. Scum does not want town to have information. It is in scum's best interest to not talk about lynches at all times because it means there will be less reads available.

3. Really, the only possibility is that I am SK. But why would SK do that. It brings me to the attention of mafia, and town. Sure, it may provide cover for shootings, but vigilantes have limited shooting ability while SK is unlimited. I would've been 90% auto found out within a number of days.
a. Also, I would probably be checked, and found guilty.
b. If I instead had decided to pick Appear Innocent, I would be vulnerable to getting shot. And as I've said before, I'm heavily urging medics NOT to protect me, so claiming actually wouldn't have helped at ALL.