Newbie Mini Mafia VIII - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 06:57 yomi wrote: here comes our hero xatalos I guess this is super against my interest to post but it seems I'm dead no matter what Xatalos, your suspicion of me and brood is mutually exclusive as I was the first to finger brood. Remember when I said I find your reasoning bizarre at times? This is one of those times. also i typed brood's name wrong ##unvote ##vote: BroodKingExe You only said things like "I don't like Brood" and "Brood's been leading a useless discussion". Fits well into the category of Mafia teammates putting some distance between each other with weak pressure. Certainly nothing to redeem you if BroodKing flips Mafia. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
yomi: 3 Willz: 2 It is enough...? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 07:13 BroodKingEXE wrote: I thought that willz was more likely to be scum than Yomi. My thinking was that if I was wrong about either I don't want the Mafia (which could be Hiro or Trumpet to swing the vote). You couldn't really blame either of them as they have no posts so far. Swinging my vote to Yomi wasn't a bandwagon I talk about him here. I have reasons for voting for Yomi: This was before willz scummy post. Your logic there is very bad. You want to lynch Willz, yet you want to prevent Mafia making a vote switch to get Willz killed? So you think Willz isn't Mafia after all? Or what? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
I'm going to post a bigger post about my town/Mafia reads after we see what BroodKing flips. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 07:23 HiroPro wrote: Back from class. Going through filters for willz, yomi, and broodking. For people who are wondering why I am lurking, I sleep from 1-8 CDT and then I have classes until about 4-5 CDT, so obviously I can't post until after that. And being in different time zones doesn't help. Your vote is pretty much irrelevant at this point, because no matter what you vote, BroodKing is set to be lynched. So don't dwell too much on your vote (it doesn't make you look either town or Mafia right now) and rather tell us what you think of the events after your last appearance. Who are your Mafia reads right now? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
I think yomi is Mafia even more strongly after BroodKing's town flip. The way yomi seemed so eager to shift the vote from himself to BroodKing didn't feel right to me if they were both Mafia. However, this makes more sense... He saw an innocent townie making such a hugely suspicious move and immediately jumped on it as his last hope. If he isn't Vigi shot tonight, we will have to use the whole day 2 talking about him, so it's best to get rid off him right now. I'm much less suspicious of vonKlaust after these events. He was very active and contributed a lot to the discussion about our final lynch. I didn't get the feel he was afraid of telling his own reads and opinions. I have to question Acrofales a bit. You might have genuinely been AFK, but when we were playing AGOT, you were always online at the deadlines (I think) and very active in the Mafia chat - even if you lurked the normal thread at the same time. This is only a slight suspicion based on metagame, so I'm certainly not willing to lynch over it. You have contributed quite a lot to the thread after all. I'm not very convinced on my Mafia reads outside of yomi at the moment. However, analyzing this day 1 lynch and events that lead to it could reveal something new. Willz definitely needs to play like he played while defending himself from now on, not just as an exception. If you return to your slightly suspicious practices, you don't really deserve a second chance. I'm not sure if all the roles are included in this game (?), but here are some suggestions for night actions: Vigilante: yomi (this I have explained before) Jailer: Xatalos (I may not be a veteran, but at least I'm active and a threatening presence for Mafia, so I wouldn't be surprised if they chose to shoot me tonight) Detective: don't want to suggest anything for you, since there is a Framer Doctor: hmm... I don't have extreme confidence in anyone being town right now, but maybe Acrofales, vonKlaust, KharadBanar or Willz - none of them really strike me as Mafia at the moment If nothing else, this list will at least create some WIFOM to make Mafia's night actions harder. Good night! | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:54 yomi wrote: oh ya he ends up voting for brood so that's 10 and one guy is afk so 10/11 who didn't he suspect? I'm not going to let someone be "confirmed town" in my eyes, especially on day 1. If someone says something suspicious, acts generally suspiciously, or seems to be working with Mafia agenda, I'm going to point my suspicion at him. It's too bad there have been so many potential Mafia tells so far, but what can I do about it? Not say anything if I see someone as suspicious? Also, you have to consider that most of my suspicions have been only slight suspicion / pressure, not something I would feel very comfortable making a lynch with (even though I might have said I wouldn't mind seeing a player lynched at the moment, it doesn't mean he's my top read for lynching day 1 - if I suspect 5 players for example, I'm still going to try and get the most suspicious one lynched before the others). I realize I have said things like "I would be fine with lynching players A, B, C and D right now" and might be overstating my general suspicions a bit, but as you can see, the later day 1 went, the more I focused on a single player (you). And I don't think it's unreasonable to push hard for the lynch of someone you suspect the most of being Mafia. First you say I'm too much all over the place, now you say I shouldn't focus on getting one player lynched. What do you mean with this logic? If the lynch is going to be in a couple of hours, OF COURSE I need to focus on getting the most probable Mafia lynched. There's no point in throwing around cases/arguments against additional players while I have my hands full with switching the vote from Willz to you. Please make up your mind: if I shouldn't point out my suspicions of different players OR focus on getting my best read lynched, what should I do? Lurk? Follow others' opinions blindly? Say something vague about whatever is happening at the moment? All of those are Mafia plays. Why should I keep silent about my suspicions or not push the lynch of my top suspect? You suggesting I should do that seems... suspicious and anti-town, at best. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 08:55 willz22912 wrote: Wow, after what happened earlier today when I was the most likely lynch candidate, I pretty much felt like giving up, which is why I made the vote on myself. I was also pretty just bummed in general and didn't really care about how the game was going to go since I assumed no one would do something as crazy as BroodKingEXE just did. Still this leaves me with a shitty situation. I have little to no credibility (I made town wait around for so long for a bad case against a bad townie in the end) Trying to read scum behavior after that lynch vote is also going to super hard. I did not expect the majority to change within 30m to BroodKingEXE after he made that one terrible post. It screamed scumslip yes, but now we know that Mafia had a mis-lynch practically given to them. It's highly likely that all the Mafia members are in that lynch somewhere because it was so easy to justify. Makes the rest of the town's job harder. As to my play, I will try and step it up and be more transparent from now on, I promise. If I don't feel free to lynch me, but at this point I have to do a major rethinking of everything. I was expecting to be the lynch target on D1, and now I find myself alive but my proposed target dead in my place (and a town to boot). I won't be around for much of this night, I will be busy hanging out with family, I might be home in time for the N1 rollover, but that's not a guarantee. I'm also going to try to tone down my post count as well, I can easily see that I have the largest filter, but it's mostly full of fluff at this point. Being active is good, spamming the thread as I have been doing is bad. This is not an excuse for me to lurk, I'm merely saying I will be posting less (and hopefully better) responses. Thanks for keeping me alive town, I'll do my best to earn this second chance. Your situation isn't as bad as you seem to think it is. If yomi gets Vigi shot tonight and flips Mafia, I'm pretty confident to say you shouldn't be lynched unless you do something else suspicious. There's always the possibility of an extremely complicated Mafia play for bussing yomi to make you look more townie, but I really doubt it. If yomi flips town, I agree that you don't look too good based on day 1 alone... But I find that situation to be very unlikely at this point. Even so, if you step up your contribution from how you played on day 1 and convince us your play is consistently pro-town (at least not considering your bad plays earlier on day 1), that's the best defence you can have really. So get posting the same way you did after you were accused by Acrofales and you will gain more credibility. Dittert suggested a Vigi shot on you, which I might find a good idea in other circumstances, but I'm willing to see more from you (your later play on Day 1 was very pro-town, while yomi hasn't played pro-town so far). And a yomi Vigi shot will likely give us more information than shooting you + if yomi gets lynched tomorrow anyway, it's pointless to waste a day on him rather than shooting him now. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:26 imallinson wrote: Well now the BroodKing thing has settled into my head a bit more I will post my thoughts on the current situation. Honestly this lynch sucks if we had lynched either Willz or yomi we would have got info from it, lynching Brood and him turning town. I'm not entirely sure about Willz's idea about all the scum voting for Brood because absolutely everyone who was here in the hour before voting pretty much instantly switched to Brood. Also it's perfectly possible a scum member wasn't here near the end or was lurking super hard and didn't feel the need to come out of the shadows because the Brood lynch was obviously going through. Now my thoughts on some of our other townsmembers. Dittert: After his last post I'm really not convinced about the dumb town thing any more. Someone who isn't confident about their ability doesn't chastise people and call them idiots. I will admit there have been some fairly weak arguments (yomi, Xatalos and myself have all been guilty of this although Dittert is as well) however it's day 1 in a newbie game we probably aren't going to be seeing any Holmes-esque deductions yet. I think ArcticFox said it best here "That was the dumbest thing I think I've ever seen." He's right it was a dumb slip by Brood whether he is town or scum. Looking back at it it's easy to say it was a stupid thing to go for. It's not just because he started posting more. He actually put up some sort of defence (in between the moping), then yomi started looking more suspicious so the vote started to move to him, finally Brood posted his dumb slip and the vote moved to him. This all makes sense from a town perspective, everyone voted for who they thought was most suspicious at the time. People did vote for yomi and I don't think anyone has switched off of him. He is certainly high on my list of suspicious people (more on that later). A lot of this has been said before in the cases against Willz and yomi. This reeks of trying to be helpful while not actually contributing. This read of yours is both well before he slipped up and after he flipped town. You didn't have much reason to suspect him in the former and have hindsight in the later. You seem to be using the fact you weren't here when the vote flipped to Brood to show you as innocent which I'm not buying. It's easy to say a vote was stupid after it has happened if you had responded as such while it was happening I might take your accusations a bit more seriously. That whole post seems scummy to me ##FoS: Dittert yomi: I'm really not sure about you at the moment. There have been decent arguments against you you never properly responded to but your posting is so erratic and nonsensical that I think you might just be a really bad town player. I would think scum would be more careful and considered in their posting. That being said you are playing so badly currently I'm thinking you wouldn't be a terrible lynch / vig shot. I would really like to get some calmer some reasoned stuff from you. Xatalos: The one good point, although not conveyed well, that yomi made is about you Xatalos. You have actually been suspicious of, to various degrees, or have voted against everyone except yourself and trumpetarn who barely counts because he stopped posting midway through day 1. I can't see a reason why any town would be so suspicious of everyone around him. I understand being wary and throwing a few accusations around but you have taken it to an extreme. I'm not sure whether you are town or scum but I really would like to know why you are so suspicious of everybody. Willz: Everyone seemed to let you off the hook somewhat after yomi became suspect #1 and I will admit you were definitely helpful in what you thought were your death throes posting your reads on others but the mopyness and self voting really helps only the scum. I don't know whether you are town or scum at the moment but you need to cut that shit out. I'll just post short thoughts on everyone else as I don't have mountains to say about them. vonKlaus: You strike me as fairly town. You have defended your self well and haven't been afraid to makes cases. ArcticFox: Again you seem town for the same reasons as vonKlaus. Acrofales: You are probably my strongest town read. You made an excellent well reasoned case against Willz. KharadBanar: Your posting can be a bit sporadic but is helpful when it exists. I hope to see you really shine now we are past day 1. HiroPro: I don't know what to say about you, you barely post. You also seem to flop about a fair bit with your voting mainly following other people. I agree that BroodKing flipping town was the worst possible outcome for this lynch. If we had had Willz flipping town/Mafia or yomi flipping town/Mafia, it would have given us necessary information about what really happened on day 1. But what BroodKing did was so suspicious and stupid, his town flip really doesn't tell us anything... Everyone would want to vote for him after that post no matter their alignment. Town would want to lynch a likely Mafia, Mafia would want to jump on a super-easy bandwagon (or remain laughing in the shadows). I like your points about Dittert. I wonder why he played so stupidly on day 1 and yet now tells us we're "all idiots" and should have listened to him (easy to say because he lurked when it mattered and now lectures us with false wisdom). I still think this play can be explained from a stupid townie perspective though, and I want to see yomi's flip before saying more about Dittert. I think I addressed the points about my aggressiveness yomi made a bit earlier. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:50 imallinson wrote: I'm fine with you voicing suspicions but throwing out 4 or 5 people at a time you think are suspicious or you would be ok lynching doesn't help. All it does is confuse everyone else and erodes your credibility especially when you aren't actually backing your claims up with any evidence. Hmm. Okay, I can agree with the part about throwing so many suspicions so fast being a bit confusing, but what do you mean I haven't backed up my claims with any evidence? On the contrary, I haven't even once merely said "this player feels suspicious" or something similar and left it at that. I have made four full cases (ArcticFox, vonKlaust, imallinson, yomi) - of which I think yomi is my strongest case - and also noted at least some suspicious behaviour from the other players whom I was ready to vote for at the time (Dittert, Willz, BroodKing, HiroPro). Looking back at my play on day 1, I agree it would have been more effective to focus on pressuring a couple of players instead of mentioning every potentially suspicious move, but what's done is done. At least I have given my thoughts on every player in case I get shot tonight after all, and don't need any kind of a "last will" before the deadline (like KharadBanar did in his previous game). I wonder why this thread got so silent while I was sleeping. Acrofales, Willz, I'm most interested in hearing your thoughts about the Willz/yomi/BroodKing lynch event and what should be done next (Mafia reads, town reads, anything). Do you agree with Vigi shooting yomi or not? You two were originally my strongest town reads but I'm evaluating you two really hard right now. I really liked Willz's pro-town defence style yesterday, but I disliked his self vote and of course some of his actions before the case of Acrofales. I think Acrofales made a pretty good case against Willz, and I don't really hold it against him even if I think Willz is probably town. I also like that Acrofales finds yomi suspicious. What I don't like, however, is his total disappearance once he started the Willz bandwagon. I understand this could very well be an unavoidable real life situation, but IF he is Mafia, it's just a very convenient excuse for making a solid case against Willz and then coming back later to say "oh sorry Willz, I really liked your defence, but I wasn't on my computer so I couldn't unvote you anymore!". It's a reasonable excuse for him to get Willz lynched without appearing suspicious, especially since his case against Willz was good, and he could just blame Willz for playing bad and go on freely. This is just speculation, though, and I'm not really confident in Acrofales being Mafia just because of this. But I want both Acrofales and Willz to step up and tell their thoughts now. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On April 14 2012 19:55 vonKlaust wrote: While I must admit that I'm not the biggest fan of Ditterts' case on Willz, I think it had one good point, namely this: This comment by Willz is about as strange as Broods slip. Why in heavens name would town want to lynch town? Willz answers this in a post aimed at Dittert. Here's what he wrote: There is a veeery big difference between townies willing to kill other townies and townies mislynching other townies on purpose to punish bad play. Willz however seem to think that delibretly killing people that you suspect as being town can be a good thing, because of the reason that we get information from the votes. At the same time he claims he does not like Xatalos play since it "draws out too many bandwagoners". If we want to lynch townies to analyze bandwagons(or when anyone get lynched at all for that matter), the amount of votes on that townie is gonna be pretty large. We're unlikely to get lynches with 2-3 votes. I can't see how Xatalos is doing anything bad if you at the same time hold the position that it's worth to lynch townies to get information. Also I'm curious about this: How does these number have anything to do with his stance Xatalos' case? I would like Willz to explain this. And while I'm at it I would like to post a note on a similar subject: Xatalos, I think you have to chill with your accusations. In my opinion your cases so far have been pretty weak. This plus the fact that you alot of the time seem to have 100% confidence in your reads actually spreads more confusion than helpfullness. Your reasoning is weak at times and in my opinion you base way too much of your reasoning on meta and your experiences from your previous games. I actually think that Yomi is right when he says that you are too suspicious of people. Sure, you should call people on their bullshit, but you seem to get convinced of people being scum for any little wierd thing they post. For example in your recent case against Yomi, one of your key points is that he has said that he thinks Willz is innocent like three times troughout the thread. I don't even think this is wierd, but you seems to think that this is highly suspicious. Sure, you can argue that he doesn't really have an explanation, but so far pretty much no one as far as i remember have actually provided any evidence on their town reads exept for saying stuff like "I think he's town because his posts seem mostly pro-town". This isn't saying more than Yomis oneliners about Willz, since it's pretty obvious that anyone who thinks that anyone is townie does this based on that they think said person have acted pro-town. Instead of constructing cases on these kind of facts this early, I think it's better to save them for later. In my opinion we can't really make cases yet constructed on who voted for who and who thought who was innocent. However, if you see a pattern later in the game I think that could definetly be usefull. But right now, I think it's too vague. Note that this isn't saying that I necesserely think that Yomi is town. I still think he is more likely to be mafia than most people in the thread. He has posted very little of value, and has only started to make good posts after he was voted on. I think it's a bit wierd that he wrote so few(and mostly bad) posts early in the thread, but when he was voted on he started to post alot(he posted pretty much as much text last night(EU), as he had posted since the game began. Also, he seems pretty reasonable in his defence, and in my opinion he didn't seem very reasonable earlier. I'm hoping that he will keep up the posting, and hopefully try to do more analysis. I agree those points about Willz need some explanation. Willz, why do you think studying bandwagons is good for identifying Mafia, yet you don't like the fact that I was creating a bandwagon (or at least a semi-bandwagon) on ArcticFox? This is quite logically inconsistent... I don't really see how yomi has become more useful after he started gathering votes. Willz reacted in a very townie manner (in my eyes), sharing his opinions and trying to talk his way out of the situation with honest-feeling explanations and doing his best to be useful. yomi, on the other hand, just started saying things like "I'm going to ignore you", "you're an untrustworthy dunce", "you have me raging so hard" - much more suspicious behaviour in my eyes than what Willz said to Dittert earlier. yomi then proceeded to vote for Willz, his "most confident townie read", without any hesitation to try and save his own hide. Notice he didn't really try to talk his way out of the lynch in any pro-town manner, but just resorted to WIFOM (complete Mafia team and their inner plans), flaming (repeating I'm an idiot), and finally voting for Willz (before even trying to appear useful or pro-town, or talking his way out of the situation calmly like Willz). I haven't said I have 100% confidence in my cases. Indeed I have said things like "ArcticFox is 70-80%" Mafia or "yomi is 90% Mafia". That might seem like over-confidence or exaggeration, but I don't mean the percentages as a scale from zero to 100%: if I say someone is 50% Mafia, I have a neutral read on him, and 50-100% Mafia means likely Mafia. So with yomi being 90% Mafia I mean that from a scale of 1 to 5, his Mafia rating would be 4. | ||
| ||