• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:58
CEST 18:58
KST 01:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025)14Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure6Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho4Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure5[ASL19] Ro4 Preview: Storied Rivals7
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results212025 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers)14Code S Season 1 - Classic & GuMiho advance to RO4 (2025)4[BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET7
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank: October 2018 herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025) Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho Replay Cast
Tourneys
SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series DreamHack Dallas 2025 announced (May 23-25) [GSL 2025] Code S Season 1 - RO4 and Grand Finals WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed
Brood War
General
who is JiriKara /Cipisek/ from CZ BW General Discussion Where is effort ? ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL19] Semifinal B Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
What do you want from future RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Grand Theft Auto VI Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Men's Fashion Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Narcissists In Gaming: Why T…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9440 users

TL Mafia LI - Page 96

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 131 Next
Tunkeg
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
Norway1235 Posts
April 12 2012 12:33 GMT
#1901
On April 12 2012 21:29 Zealos wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with finding other scum, but not at the cost of derailing all ongoing discussion.


DIS IS TRU!

But just hinting at Artonis beeing scum without any reasons behind it is certantly not scumhunting. It is just poking on a target and hoping that the snowball will start rolling (if a scumplayer does this) or beeing part of helping the scum starting a snowball (if a townplayer does this).
zelblade
Profile Joined December 2011
Australia901 Posts
April 12 2012 12:37 GMT
#1902
On April 12 2012 21:27 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 21:17 zelblade wrote:
On April 12 2012 20:58 ghost_403 wrote:
Would you look at that? Overnight, the town has become all quiet and helpful! :D

@prplhz: I'm happy with an Artanis lynch. That guy has been lurking like none other.

@zealos: Assuming you're right (that VE is scum), there are five more scum out there. Name one of them, and tell me why I should be lynching them.


Gonzaw + VE + Toad + Bugs sleeping ftw!

So I come back to the thread from school & sleep and it seems that VE has decided to claim Detective randomly for no bloody reason when there are goddammed sanities in play. This feels so f^$&!@ing retarded and I have no idea why the fuck he did so. I dont see why a town VE would claim at this point when the lynch was still split rather evenly (I think) WHEN HIS SANITY IS UNCLEAR WTF. The fckin problem is that it makes even less sense for mafia to claim cop in this setup at this point. Screw this shit -.-

And than the thread goes into flipout mode.

And than Toades decides to claim too - and as a Veteran. As said asking for medic prot when ones a vet makes approx 0 sense, since the chances of toad getting doublestacked last night was close to none in the first place. So why the fuck ask for medic prot? His reason makes no sense to me wtf and he even admits that he had no thread presence n1, and that medics wouldnt listen to his "protect Jackal" plea which shows that even he knows that his reason for "confirmed" is dumb as hell.

I have no goddammed idea if this two claims are actually true. Both are so goddamed bad, and yes this feud is stupid as shit.



No I said medics wouldn't medic ME. I honestly thought someone would be smart enough to medic Jackal and not only consider WBG / VE...
What does the doublestack thing mean? If I get protected and shot I keep my 2nd life. That's a townie with 2 lifes, who claimed a hit while having a shitload of threadpresence and out there is some guy who knows exactly that I am not making stuff up. I mean i did not go for that, I never thought someone would medic me in the first place but that as a "bad case szenario" sounds still preeeeeetty awesome because mafia has to shoot/eliminate that.



If you really think you asking Jackal to be protected was going to be actually considered by any medic I dont know what to say.

And the doublestack thing. I saw your claim, raged, typed this out, than calmed down a little (not much) and checked if anyone asked you why the hell you asked for medic prot and saw it. In other words, I had not seen your "reason" for asking for prot yet and thought that it was that move was dumb, and proceeded to find your reason, which was even dumber. I personally believe that if someone mediced a person (and a vet (experinced player, not the role) at that), would countinue protecting him, which is why mafia would try to avoid said player unless he was being a massive threat. Which would make your second live useless. I see your point though, maybe asking for prot wasnt that out of the realm of possibilites -.-
ghost_403
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1825 Posts
April 12 2012 12:38 GMT
#1903
This isn't derailing the thread, this is moving the thread back towards sanity. This is a town. We are supposed to hunt scum, not argue over a VE lynch versus a Toads lynch. Right now, we're hunting scum. If you don't think Artanis is a good lynch, tell me why.
They say great science is built on the shoulders of giants. Not here. At Aperture, we do all our science from scratch, no hand holding. Step aside, REAL SCIENCE coming through.
GMarshal
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States22154 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-12 12:40:22
April 12 2012 12:39 GMT
#1904
On April 12 2012 11:04 Mementoss wrote:

WILL SANITY BE REVEALED WHEN DT'S FLIP? IF YOU CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION BECAUSE OF BALANCE, JUST RESPOND WITH "I CANT ANSWER THAT"

Sanity is not revealed on death.

Sorry for missing this earlier.
Moderator
Zealos
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom3573 Posts
April 12 2012 12:40 GMT
#1905
You're making pretty pointless speculation because a player hasn't posted enough. If you think Artanis is a good lynch, tell us why. That's how it's supposed to work, right?
On the internet if you disagree with or dislike something you're angry and taking it too seriously. == Join TLMafia !
Artanis[Xp]
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
Netherlands12968 Posts
April 12 2012 12:40 GMT
#1906
On April 12 2012 21:38 ghost_403 wrote:
This isn't derailing the thread, this is moving the thread back towards sanity. This is a town. We are supposed to hunt scum, not argue over a VE lynch versus a Toads lynch. Right now, we're hunting scum. If you don't think Artanis is a good lynch, tell me why.

Tell me why you think lynching me is a good idea. I just refuted all of prphlz' points, but you just seem to be parroting him. My activity compared to the Mini Mafia game is not wildly different, and I have yet to see reasons other than "he's not a town leader in a 30 player game when he was in a small newbie 12 player game! These two are obviously completely comparable rather than the 30 man game he played as well!" for my lynch.
ghost_403
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1825 Posts
April 12 2012 12:43 GMT
#1907
@artanis: I've been happy with an Artanis lynch since before this post. I'm running off to a meeting at the moment, I'll address you more properly when I get back.
They say great science is built on the shoulders of giants. Not here. At Aperture, we do all our science from scratch, no hand holding. Step aside, REAL SCIENCE coming through.
Artanis[Xp]
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
Netherlands12968 Posts
April 12 2012 12:45 GMT
#1908
On April 12 2012 21:43 ghost_403 wrote:
@artanis: I've been happy with an Artanis lynch since before this post. I'm running off to a meeting at the moment, I'll address you more properly when I get back.

I made it when I had 10 minutes before I had to run off to school. I considered it a significant scum slip and wanted people to think about it immediately rather than 5 hours later. If I had the chance to check gonzaw's filter beforehand, I would've, but I didn't have the time.
Tunkeg
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
Norway1235 Posts
April 12 2012 12:45 GMT
#1909
On April 12 2012 21:38 ghost_403 wrote:
This isn't derailing the thread, this is moving the thread back towards sanity. This is a town. We are supposed to hunt scum, not argue over a VE lynch versus a Toads lynch. Right now, we're hunting scum. If you don't think Artanis is a good lynch, tell me why.


Zealos answered it:


On April 12 2012 21:40 Zealos wrote:
You're making pretty pointless speculation because a player hasn't posted enough. If you think Artanis is a good lynch, tell us why. That's how it's supposed to work, right?


Just throwing names out there when we clearly have a very unresolved issue between VE and Toad isn't scumhunting at all. Post an epic case on Artanis, and you might convinve people he is the most scummy player in the game. Then we lynch him. Do not post: I think "Insert random player" maybe scum you guys, maybe we should lynch him instead (feel free to call anyone scum though, but don't do it with the intention of a derail). Unless you have a desire to hurt town...

zelblade
Profile Joined December 2011
Australia901 Posts
April 12 2012 12:54 GMT
#1910
About some shit gonzaw asked me about:

I agree with you on zelblade, he hasn't posted in quite a bit and his posting wasn't very good.

[quoe]On April 08 2012 16:15 zelblade wrote:
Hi guys :D

First off, I'll be all for lynching a lurker today assuming we cant find a better targert. We probably could do better though, so lets start hunting some scum.

I find Risen's "case" on ET to be bad. Whilst ET was being fluffy in his first couple of posts (which is rather normal on the start of day 1 considering there is little to analyze), I dont really see how ET is kicking up dirt or how a smiley face or 2 is scummy. Its weak, and based off nothing much though.

The question here is if Risen is being dense on purpose. I dont think he is for now... Although I dont like his case, he could easily be a bad townie, and I feel that scum (esp considering that hes relatively new) wouldnt be this agressive early.




This post, now that I look at it is not that good.
It's too wishy washy. He comments about the ET vs Risen deal, but posts wishy washy stuff, he doens't arrive at any conclusion, for instance in the bolded bits.

I found odd his thoughts of BH and VE here

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=325046&currentpage=26#504

It seemed like a rehash of things previously stated, for instance I posted something very similar previously here:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=325046&currentpage=23#445

After that, he's been absent since the middle of D1, he even left his vote on Tunkeg and wasn't around by the time the Janaan wagon took form.

I am suspicious of him, what do you guys think?[/quote]

Yes, that post was wishy washy. But its simply because I wasnt sure of what Risen was at that time. He felt like bad town doing dumb crap lashing out at ET for retarded reasons, but it was so dumb that I doubted that he actually believed it, which is why I didnt give out a solid read - Because I wasnt sure of myself and thus didnt have one.

I apologise that my thoughts on BH and VE were similar to yours, but is it that out of place for us to have arrived at the same conclusion? Both of them are playing so differently from their meta, at least in sum of all fears anyway, and that is what I felt so I posted my thoughts on it. Didnt realise you already did so, probably missed it or something.

And yes I missed the D1 lynch due to some IRL circumstances - some crap with school happened and mafia became the last thing on my mind, which is why I missed the lynch.
zelblade
Profile Joined December 2011
Australia901 Posts
April 12 2012 12:55 GMT
#1911
Holy balls messed up a quote tag ._.

About some shit gonzaw asked me about:

Show nested quote +
I agree with you on zelblade, he hasn't posted in quite a bit and his posting wasn't very good.

On April 08 2012 16:15 zelblade wrote:
Hi guys :D

First off, I'll be all for lynching a lurker today assuming we cant find a better targert. We probably could do better though, so lets start hunting some scum.

I find Risen's "case" on ET to be bad. Whilst ET was being fluffy in his first couple of posts (which is rather normal on the start of day 1 considering there is little to analyze), I dont really see how ET is kicking up dirt or how a smiley face or 2 is scummy. Its weak, and based off nothing much though.

The question here is if Risen is being dense on purpose. I dont think he is for now... Although I dont like his case, he could easily be a bad townie, and I feel that scum (esp considering that hes relatively new) wouldnt be this agressive early.




This post, now that I look at it is not that good.
It's too wishy washy. He comments about the ET vs Risen deal, but posts wishy washy stuff, he doens't arrive at any conclusion, for instance in the bolded bits.

I found odd his thoughts of BH and VE here

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=325046&currentpage=26#504

It seemed like a rehash of things previously stated, for instance I posted something very similar previously here:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=325046&currentpage=23#445

After that, he's been absent since the middle of D1, he even left his vote on Tunkeg and wasn't around by the time the Janaan wagon took form.

I am suspicious of him, what do you guys think?


Yes, that post was wishy washy. But its simply because I wasnt sure of what Risen was at that time. He felt like bad town doing dumb crap lashing out at ET for retarded reasons, but it was so dumb that I doubted that he actually believed it, which is why I didnt give out a solid read - Because I wasnt sure of myself and thus didnt have one.

I apologise that my thoughts on BH and VE were similar to yours, but is it that out of place for us to have arrived at the same conclusion? Both of them are playing so differently from their meta, at least in sum of all fears anyway, and that is what I felt so I posted my thoughts on it. Didnt realise you already did so, probably missed it or something.

And yes I missed the D1 lynch due to some IRL circumstances - some crap with school happened and mafia became the last thing on my mind, which is why I missed the lynch.


Heres the post, ignore the one before -.-
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
April 12 2012 12:56 GMT
#1912
On April 12 2012 21:39 GMarshal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 11:04 Mementoss wrote:

WILL SANITY BE REVEALED WHEN DT'S FLIP? IF YOU CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION BECAUSE OF BALANCE, JUST RESPOND WITH "I CANT ANSWER THAT"

Sanity is not revealed on death.

Sorry for missing this earlier.


Thanks for the answer, this further makes me think that toad is the better lynch. The case against him is scummier, his claim also makes little to no sense. And if we lynch VE what information will we get? If he was lying or telling the truth. Then we have to guess his sanity and then most likely lynch toad. If we lynch toad he comes up scum we medic VE get him to do another check to ensure hes not lucky paranoid cop. If we lynch toad and he comes up town, we track VE. But I guess in this circumstance we would most likely have to kill VE. It really is a complicated situation.

Toad Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad case OMGUS vs VE. (imo)
-> Bad Vet claim (more vote on VE, bread crumb makes no sense)
-> Day 1 actions don't line up with Vet claim (asking for medic)
-> Very erractic defending after being accused

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a veteran
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Question VE's sanity/lying next day

VE Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad claim DT. (Votes split, no bread crumb)
-> Day 1 actions were generally all over the place.
-> Very erractic defending after being accused
-> WBG mentioned a few inconsistencies stories seem to change

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a DT (sanity not guarenteed)
-> Day 1 actions could be shown as blue play, seemed scared to die night 1.
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Decent case vs Toad (imo)
-> Toad still looks scummy next day, flips DT or not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
zelblade
Profile Joined December 2011
Australia901 Posts
April 12 2012 12:58 GMT
#1913
And to Risen:

Im too lazy to go back and find that post since day 2 is such a shitfest, but can you at least get your facts right if ur trying to accuse someone? I voted Toad and went to sleep before VE claimed ffs -.-

And just because someone disagrees with you doesnt mean they are scum.
Toadesstern
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Germany16350 Posts
April 12 2012 13:01 GMT
#1914
what about the case WBG did on VE mementoss?
I think that's the most important case in this game.
<Elem> >toad in charge of judging lewdness <Elem> how bad can it be <Elem> also wew, that is actually p lewd.
zelblade
Profile Joined December 2011
Australia901 Posts
April 12 2012 13:02 GMT
#1915
On April 12 2012 21:56 Mementoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 21:39 GMarshal wrote:
On April 12 2012 11:04 Mementoss wrote:

WILL SANITY BE REVEALED WHEN DT'S FLIP? IF YOU CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION BECAUSE OF BALANCE, JUST RESPOND WITH "I CANT ANSWER THAT"

Sanity is not revealed on death.

Sorry for missing this earlier.


Thanks for the answer, this further makes me think that toad is the better lynch. The case against him is scummier, his claim also makes little to no sense. And if we lynch VE what information will we get? If he was lying or telling the truth. Then we have to guess his sanity and then most likely lynch toad. If we lynch toad he comes up scum we medic VE get him to do another check to ensure hes not lucky paranoid cop. If we lynch toad and he comes up town, we track VE. But I guess in this circumstance we would most likely have to kill VE. It really is a complicated situation.

Toad Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad case OMGUS vs VE. (imo)
-> Bad Vet claim (more vote on VE, bread crumb makes no sense)
-> Day 1 actions don't line up with Vet claim (asking for medic)
-> Very erractic defending after being accused

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a veteran
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Question VE's sanity/lying next day

VE Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad claim DT. (Votes split, no bread crumb)
-> Day 1 actions were generally all over the place.
-> Very erractic defending after being accused
-> WBG mentioned a few inconsistencies stories seem to change

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a DT (sanity not guarenteed)
-> Day 1 actions could be shown as blue play, seemed scared to die night 1.
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Decent case vs Toad (imo)
-> Toad still looks scummy next day, flips DT or not.



Why are you basing the lynch on who "gives the most information"?

Cant you just vote for your stronger scumread out of the two?
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
April 12 2012 13:02 GMT
#1916
I mentioned that. WBG case on inconsistenies. But I really really can't believe your claim less so than VE's. I will go re-read the WBG case on VE though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
April 12 2012 13:04 GMT
#1917
On April 12 2012 22:02 zelblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 21:56 Mementoss wrote:
On April 12 2012 21:39 GMarshal wrote:
On April 12 2012 11:04 Mementoss wrote:

WILL SANITY BE REVEALED WHEN DT'S FLIP? IF YOU CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION BECAUSE OF BALANCE, JUST RESPOND WITH "I CANT ANSWER THAT"

Sanity is not revealed on death.

Sorry for missing this earlier.


Thanks for the answer, this further makes me think that toad is the better lynch. The case against him is scummier, his claim also makes little to no sense. And if we lynch VE what information will we get? If he was lying or telling the truth. Then we have to guess his sanity and then most likely lynch toad. If we lynch toad he comes up scum we medic VE get him to do another check to ensure hes not lucky paranoid cop. If we lynch toad and he comes up town, we track VE. But I guess in this circumstance we would most likely have to kill VE. It really is a complicated situation.

Toad Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad case OMGUS vs VE. (imo)
-> Bad Vet claim (more vote on VE, bread crumb makes no sense)
-> Day 1 actions don't line up with Vet claim (asking for medic)
-> Very erractic defending after being accused

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a veteran
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Question VE's sanity/lying next day

VE Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad claim DT. (Votes split, no bread crumb)
-> Day 1 actions were generally all over the place.
-> Very erractic defending after being accused
-> WBG mentioned a few inconsistencies stories seem to change

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a DT (sanity not guarenteed)
-> Day 1 actions could be shown as blue play, seemed scared to die night 1.
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Decent case vs Toad (imo)
-> Toad still looks scummy next day, flips DT or not.



Why are you basing the lynch on who "gives the most information"?

Cant you just vote for your stronger scumread out of the two?


I'm not I have been saying consistently the whole time I have a stronger scum-read on Toad so Im sticking with it. Which I think a lot of people aren't doing. I think most people are picking which side seems sexier and not who seems scummier imo. But I'm re-reading VE case Toad case WBG case and making sure my state of mind was okay yesterday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
zelblade
Profile Joined December 2011
Australia901 Posts
April 12 2012 13:06 GMT
#1918
On April 12 2012 22:04 Mementoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 22:02 zelblade wrote:
On April 12 2012 21:56 Mementoss wrote:
On April 12 2012 21:39 GMarshal wrote:
On April 12 2012 11:04 Mementoss wrote:

WILL SANITY BE REVEALED WHEN DT'S FLIP? IF YOU CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION BECAUSE OF BALANCE, JUST RESPOND WITH "I CANT ANSWER THAT"

Sanity is not revealed on death.

Sorry for missing this earlier.


Thanks for the answer, this further makes me think that toad is the better lynch. The case against him is scummier, his claim also makes little to no sense. And if we lynch VE what information will we get? If he was lying or telling the truth. Then we have to guess his sanity and then most likely lynch toad. If we lynch toad he comes up scum we medic VE get him to do another check to ensure hes not lucky paranoid cop. If we lynch toad and he comes up town, we track VE. But I guess in this circumstance we would most likely have to kill VE. It really is a complicated situation.

Toad Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad case OMGUS vs VE. (imo)
-> Bad Vet claim (more vote on VE, bread crumb makes no sense)
-> Day 1 actions don't line up with Vet claim (asking for medic)
-> Very erractic defending after being accused

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a veteran
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Question VE's sanity/lying next day

VE Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad claim DT. (Votes split, no bread crumb)
-> Day 1 actions were generally all over the place.
-> Very erractic defending after being accused
-> WBG mentioned a few inconsistencies stories seem to change

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a DT (sanity not guarenteed)
-> Day 1 actions could be shown as blue play, seemed scared to die night 1.
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Decent case vs Toad (imo)
-> Toad still looks scummy next day, flips DT or not.



Why are you basing the lynch on who "gives the most information"?

Cant you just vote for your stronger scumread out of the two?


I'm not I have been saying consistently the whole time I have a stronger scum-read on Toad so Im sticking with it. Which I think a lot of people aren't doing. I think most people are picking which side seems sexier and not who seems scummier imo. But I'm re-reading VE case Toad case WBG case and making sure my state of mind was okay yesterday.


This doesnt seem to be the case. If sanity flipped with a DT's death, would you have voted for VE despite having a stronger read on Toad? Thats the feel Im getting from your posts.
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
April 12 2012 13:13 GMT
#1919
On April 12 2012 22:06 zelblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 22:04 Mementoss wrote:
On April 12 2012 22:02 zelblade wrote:
On April 12 2012 21:56 Mementoss wrote:
On April 12 2012 21:39 GMarshal wrote:
On April 12 2012 11:04 Mementoss wrote:

WILL SANITY BE REVEALED WHEN DT'S FLIP? IF YOU CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION BECAUSE OF BALANCE, JUST RESPOND WITH "I CANT ANSWER THAT"

Sanity is not revealed on death.

Sorry for missing this earlier.


Thanks for the answer, this further makes me think that toad is the better lynch. The case against him is scummier, his claim also makes little to no sense. And if we lynch VE what information will we get? If he was lying or telling the truth. Then we have to guess his sanity and then most likely lynch toad. If we lynch toad he comes up scum we medic VE get him to do another check to ensure hes not lucky paranoid cop. If we lynch toad and he comes up town, we track VE. But I guess in this circumstance we would most likely have to kill VE. It really is a complicated situation.

Toad Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad case OMGUS vs VE. (imo)
-> Bad Vet claim (more vote on VE, bread crumb makes no sense)
-> Day 1 actions don't line up with Vet claim (asking for medic)
-> Very erractic defending after being accused

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a veteran
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Question VE's sanity/lying next day

VE Lynch:
Pros:
-> Bad claim DT. (Votes split, no bread crumb)
-> Day 1 actions were generally all over the place.
-> Very erractic defending after being accused
-> WBG mentioned a few inconsistencies stories seem to change

Cons:
-> Possibly lose a DT (sanity not guarenteed)
-> Day 1 actions could be shown as blue play, seemed scared to die night 1.
-> Seems to legit care about the situation
-> Decent case vs Toad (imo)
-> Toad still looks scummy next day, flips DT or not.



Why are you basing the lynch on who "gives the most information"?

Cant you just vote for your stronger scumread out of the two?


I'm not I have been saying consistently the whole time I have a stronger scum-read on Toad so Im sticking with it. Which I think a lot of people aren't doing. I think most people are picking which side seems sexier and not who seems scummier imo. But I'm re-reading VE case Toad case WBG case and making sure my state of mind was okay yesterday.


This doesnt seem to be the case. If sanity flipped with a DT's death, would you have voted for VE despite having a stronger read on Toad? Thats the feel Im getting from your posts.


If you asked me before Toads claim, I honestly probably woulda voted VE instead if sanity flipped. Because at that point I felt like 55% Toad lynch 45% VE lynch, not confident in either. Just because I felt it was a "safe" lynch.

Right now after the Toad Vet claim I feel a bit more confident in my read of lynching Toad (65/35). I wanted to know if he flipped sanity because the only reason I would switch my vote to VE would be for a) majority and b) safer -> because sanity could have a chance of telling us our automatic next day lynch would be scum. Now that sanity does not flip, I am almost sure(given info we have now) unless an important piece of information comes up, I will be sticking on Toad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
April 12 2012 14:39 GMT
#1920
So I've taken a gander at wbg's filter. Seemed a sensible thing to do as one of the most prominent posters on the VE/Toad issues. He seems ok with VE throughout the first day, and the suspicions only start coming a bit later


On April 11 2012 12:36 wherebugsgo wrote:
hmmm wtf I lived :/ VE living as well is also really weird. I would've expected at least one of us to die, but I think that this could possibly mean VE is scum.


Ok, first mention is with some idle speculation about the NK. But whatever.

Anyway, the entire point of wbg's case seems to be VE's failure to provide a case or reasoning on Toad for a long time after saying Toad was scum. This is absolutely fair enough, because there's like 2 pages of VE's filter between the original fingerpointing and his cases. What I don't like is how he absolutely goes after VE for this but let's Toad go.

On April 11 2012 16:27 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2012 16:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
No bugs, you're forgetting something - that I haven't responded to Toad's case or given ANY reasoning for my vote. I was at work, under the watchful eye of my IT department. Now, however....Now I'm home.

You're fucked.


herp that's exactly why you're scum

you just folded under the pressure and told me several times that Toad is scum because Toad is scum, and by Toad dying you'd find out my alignment even though Toad's alignment says nothing about my alignment (a self-acknowledged fact)



Bold in wbg is my emphasis. Compare to

On April 12 2012 01:59 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 01:25 marvellosity wrote:
I'm right and you're wrong isn't a defence. Two main cruxes of my post

1) you fingered VE as certain scum without making any sort of case until much later (see filter and my post)
2) you abandoned Hassy/VE to OMGUS gonzaw, twice saying "I will certainly get you lynched tomorrow".

Please answer these 2 at the very least.


I still haven't made a case on VE yet. That's because I'm still buisy answering everything. The reason VE is mafia is meta. Look at his town games and tell me you honestly think he is town. There is no way you'd come to that conclusion.



Why is this so infinitely more acceptable from Toad? Added to the fact the post spoilered below came BEFORE this post. Was this his case or not? According to the above it isn't. But then where IS the case? wbg is convinced VE is scum for this but doesn't give a shit that Toad is doing it worse (and semi-lying?). Meta or not, it seems too far.

+ Show Spoiler +
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote:
[image loading]


I know I'm about to post a big post and I know a lot of you people will be all like "uuuarg, not another one of those posts and this one is even bigger, noone can make me read THAT".
But I honestly ask you to please read this post. Don't skip it. I know it's a lot to read but it's important.


Ok do we lynch VE or Gonzaw today?

Right now both are voting for a basicly confirmed townie (read: me) and neither of those 2 is reading the game, not even with the most recent flips they're willing to read. I think we got 2 mafia palmars in here.

I'll explain this in three phases:

Phase 1 - Nightkills


We've got a claimed shot from ET against michaelthe. So for now I'm assuming he really is a town vig. Even if he is a mafia vig that doesn't matter because it's about the KP amount. Mafia only as 3 normal KP. So the important part it that this is one additional kill towards the usual 3 KP.

Ok what's left?
sputnik.theory
Jackal58
MidnightGladius
slOosh

That's 4 people. Still 1 KP more than Mafia should have, right? So now ask yourself for a second who do you think mafia shot and more importantly who was the target for our 2nd vig, no matter of alignment?

Let's assume we have a town vig for a second. Do you think a townvig would shoot someone like Jackal when there's people like Sputnik around? I doubt it.
Next question: Do you think mafia would have shot sputnik considering there's a shitload of people willing to lynch him? I doubt it. Therefore It's either 2 town vigs or 1 townvig + 1 mafiavig and the mafiavig is ET who shot michael because no way mafia would shoot sputnik. AT ALL. I doubt ET is a mafia vig though but that has nothing to do with me being confirmed.

That leaves this list of people who probably got shot by mafia, you may replace sloOsh or midnight with sputnik if you think those 2 looked equally bad but no way a townie shot Jackal:
Jackal58
MidnightGladius
slOosh
That's still 3 people. What's mafia KP? 3. That means mafia one-shotted every single one of those.

Remember who told people NOT TO protect Jackal at all costs? That's right, that's VE and WBG.
More importantly, remember who told people to protect Jackal and Toad as well? RIGHT, THAT'S ME click me!

So back to our kills. What did I just say? Mafia oneshotted those guys. Do you honestly beliefe I would be asking people to protect Jackal as a mafia if I was about to shoot Jackal with a single bullet?
In what world would I EVER do such a thing as mafia?


Phase 2 - Votes on Day 1


More onto why I am "confirmed"
Look into the people who voted d1 and how they voted. We killed a townie with Janaan. I am pretty sure there's plenty of mafia on him as we had A LOT of troubles getting a lynch at all.
Town was probably derping hardcore d1. I guess VE read that I think Hassy is mafia but did not comment on it because he did not think it was a threat because everyone ignored it. Once WBG got in the thread and placed his vote and I did the same he suddenly says he thinks Hassy is Mafia out of nowhere and places his vote there.
There's 2 options here:
EITHER Hassy is simply mafia and VE did not think it was a threat at all considering we only had like 4 hours left and need 16 people on Hassy and therefore wanted something to later point back and say "lookielookie, I tried killing hassy d1" only to switch later to janaan.
The other option is Hassy being a townie, although I doubt that's possible. In that case VE just did whatever he wanted to because both targets are town.

So basicly if Hassy is red there's probably a shitload of mafias on janaan and WBG and I pushed a red while VE conveniently jumped on the wagon himself when it looked to him like it was not going to happen and switched back to Janaan later on. If Hassy is green it's a null

Phase 3 - VE and Gonzaw the new and improves Mafia-Palmars


I'm going to make this short because this is not about me being as townish as you can get but about VE and Gonzaw being mafia. Short "sadly" means I'll be only covering one point each. It's still a wall of text.

First a little about VE:
Remember the weird post claiming VE thinks hassy is mafia?
I am talking about this one: clicky!

The second I saw that I asked wbg what he thinks about it because that post is highly suspicious, wbg said I am probably paranoid and I left it with that for the moment.
I'll just quote 3 really short phrases out of that post:
Show nested quote +
Hassybaby is SCUM
Show nested quote +
I think Toad is SCUM.
Show nested quote +
##Vote: Janaan

thefuck? Really?

Next thing: Remember how basicly everyone said I am looking okay or nullish except for gonzaw? VE did not say a thing because he saw everyone saying I'm okay, especially wbg and Jackal thinking I'm fine probably made him not want to touch me based on a case that's based on "Toad posts wall of texts".
He knows there's no way out of this. He is to go all-in on me to at least get another mislynch before he dies and you know what will happen the second I flip town?
gonzaw said he thinks VE and I am both Mafia. The second I flip town gonzaw will walz in this thread telling people some bullshit about being sorry how wrong he was and his reads are so off that he'll have to rethink everything, obviously no longer willing to lynch VE

Ok now a little about gonzaw: His case is still not existing. I kept asking him what his case is about. He keeps saying some bullshit about how I am not caring, not taking stances, not commiting, not asking questions and how I am so different.
Guess what. Everything he said so far was ruled out and declared to be bullshit. I am not taking stances? I did, I talked about my reads and made it pretty clear who I want dead and who I did not want dead. I was asked a shitload of questions from a lot of people. I answered every single one of those no matter how stupid. Yet he keeps telling me I am ignoring questions.

Gonzaw paddled back and said "well ok you did, BUT I should not have to ask you about those things, you should post them nonstop" which is firstly incredible wrong because I am not going to post every single read I have, especially the townie ones and secondly people already told me to chill out because I was posting way too much. He never wanted me to post more, he had to find a cheap excuse to keep his case alive. If I do post more about my reads people like wbg, VE and Jackal would have an easy time discrediting me because I am shitting up the thread and at least wbg did and if I did not post more about my reads I am considered to be mafia by gonzaw and he keeps on bombing the thread. He created a classic lose-lose situation for me and no matter what I did in that situation I would have been called mafia for what I was about to do.

Next thing he does is saying I don't care. I show him Mafia 48 telling him people thought I am the most likely guy in the WHOLE GAME to be a townie because I was caring about the game so much.
He again paddels back, agrees that that was wrong as well only to say "well you only pushed targets you wanted to push in Mafia 48". Well duh, what should I have pushed instead? Pulled a VE and be like "GUYSES I WANT TO LYNCH RAD SO I AM VOTING ANNUL LOL" ?!? If that's not what you were talking about but instead were talking about me pushing town targerts and not pushing mafias this is no different because we got a single flip so far. That guy was green and I was NOT on it. How in the world are you telling me I am pushing the wrong targets when you should not have information about such a thing as a townie? Especially not on d1 / n1

Next thing that happens is me asking for some example. So far he kept telling me I am posting different. What about some examples from my older games that show that I am posting so different? He goes on and says I am talking about old games in this game and talking about useless stuff which I only do as mafia. Newsflash: Storm clicky-clicky!
Yeah that post I did was pretty retarded, not one of my brightest moments, but saying I only do that stuff as mafia obviously is not true.

He paddles back, agrees that he was wrong there again to say my style resembles Storm the most but that's only because Mafia 48 doesn't count because it's already so old. I am sorry I am not 24 / 7 rolling mafia. It only played mafia twice ever: mafia 48 and Resistance 1.

I tell him to explain again what he thinks is "weird" about me and ask about specific examples because clearly nothing he said so far was right. He keeps on saying I am weird, doesn't provide any more examples other than what already was said and keeps repeating stuff he already agreed to be wrong.

That's it for gonzaw and his case on me. Now tell me: HOW IN THE WORLD is that guy a townie. He was probably told to tunnel me a bit by some of his buddies because of stuff like that:
Show nested quote +
On February 24 2012 13:20 Radfield wrote:
No, that's not why you were in group 2. I just needed more padding for group 2: risk.nuke because the previous game i played with him he was hyper-aggressive which often makes people suspicious, and Toad because your scum play is very 'pro-town' oriented which means that even if you are posting pro-town it's easy to be suspicious of you.


According to VE I am unreadable. That guy claimes to have legendary reads right now. How is it that someone like Kita FAKECLAIMES DT who got a green check on me in Storm because according to him I was so obviously town (just imagine the situation, fakeclaiming a DT check as a townie, that's rather drastic if you name is not schworz) to save me from being lynched by mafia + SK.
Yet VE walzes in this thread saying he wants to lynch me because I am unreadable. Because I am unreadable. I'm going to repeat that. I AM UNREADABLE?!? the fuck-#2 and the fuck-#3 at the same time.

There's two possiblities here:
1) He really thinks I am unreadable and has not a single Scumread that is better than true-rnd.
2) He really thinks I am mafia in which case I am not unreadable if he thinks he is right.

Case 1 is obviously not the case. IF that would be the case it would mean VE has not a single scumread on d1 with 6 dead townies that he considers to be better than true-rnd. That'd be totally awful.
Case 2 is interesting. Why should he claim I am unreadable if he thinks I am mafia? Either he lies about thinking I am mafia OR he wants to have a nice cop-out after lynching me claiming "sry guys, I told you he is unreadable "

Soooo. Long post is already long so I'll stop here. I haven't talked a lot about VE and gonzaw but I'm already doubting all of you will read this because it's so long so I'm stopping here.

Take what I said into consideration:
Do you really think I am a mafia who single-target-shot Jackal just to ask for medic protection on Jackal prior to shooting him?
Do you really think it's a good idea to lynch the guy who was not on the townie lynch d1 while probably of bunch of townies tried to get janaan killed?
Do you really think Gonzaw and VE are townies considering what I just said?

For those of you you answer a single or more of those 3 questions with yes go ahead and click the spoiler please:
+ Show Spoiler [click me!] +


For those of you who answered all of the 3 questions with a no: Congratz on being awesome.
Now talk about who we should lynch today. I am eating my hat if one of those two guys turns out to be town and I've only got a single hat. That's a fancy Faschings-hat (according to dict.cc that word exists in english as well!) and eating that would be painful:
+ Show Spoiler [my hat] +
It's actually not MY hat but the hat of a friend and they're all the same
[image loading]


That being sad. I'll quote myself from this very post because I can not believe how someone is possibly suggesting to lynch me given the kills we got unless that guy hasn't reath the thread or is not actively asking himself what those kills imply.
Show nested quote +
Ok do we lynch VE or Gonzaw today?


Oh and sry if I got a shitload of spelling mistakes or words missing inbetween. It's 8 am in germany so I'm still pretty sleepy. It took me an hour to write and check it.


Moving on.

On April 12 2012 04:25 wherebugsgo wrote:

... I thought VE was scum for independent reasons ...

When I went back on VE's posts I noticed he never actually had reasons for calling people scum. So, I chose to test it out and ask him why he was suspicious of Toad. His response had no reason in it , and was a post no townie VE would ever make.



Really? Go re-read his filter. It seems to me that he was very clear in why he was voting/pressuring Risen, and then he was equally clear on his case against Hassybaby. This is just misrepresenting VE, go read VE's filter for yourselves. Then to reiterate, yes VE not posting a case on Toad for ages was bad, but as per above, not sure why only VE gets the flak for this.

On April 12 2012 07:01 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 06:57 FourFace wrote:
Is there any chance that VE, Toad and wbg are all town and scum is stroking on laughter right now?


yes, but judging by VE's recent play I don't think this is likely. VE would never claim that he could confirm his sanity with one flip when it's clear to anyone who thinks for a half second that you can't possibly confirm sanity with one flip, regardless of what the flip is. VE would not then try to use that argument as town to back up his shoddy claim.

This hinges on a townie VE knowing what he's doing, but as far as that assumption goes, he knows better than pretty much every other player in this game.


Bold is my emphasis. Confirmation bias? The exact same argument applies for VE Mafia knowing what he's doing as VE town.

On April 12 2012 07:20 wherebugsgo wrote:
and Toad says stupid shit like "confirmed town" or "confirmed scum" all the time when he's town. He did that in Storm, he did it in L, he did it in AC. You of all people should know this because you were IN THOSE GAMES.

As for his case, I already said it's complete shit. So is yours! Neither of you has a case worth listening to, but you overreacted and you didn't have a reason to be voting Toad to begin with.

I hate lynching DT claims as much as the next guy, but this one makes no sense.


wbg's opinion is that VE's case is total shit. No it isn't. The case is at least decent, based on disruptive behaviour (mafia trait), pointing fingers all over the place (confusion, mafia trait), terrible OMGUS, wifom speculation, walls of text, and general complete lack of positive content - yet all you do is brush it off with "lololol toad meta". This isn't a good enough response, and it does NOT make VE's case bad.

Finally

On April 12 2012 08:13 wherebugsgo wrote:
Actually, what the fuck am I saying.

VE is a liar.


Show nested quote +
On April 12 2012 02:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Actually guys, I've got this. I've thought it through, and this is pretty much the only way.

I'm Undercover Investigator Charles Williamson. I got a Guilty back on Toad last night, hence the instantaneous vote.

This is why I called for medic protection.

This is why I've been whining about dying N1.

This is why I said I'd be the "atmosphere police" this game.

My sanity is in question obviously, but I feel like Toad is acting scummy as shit and I'm probably Sane.

Thread thinkers, votes off me. Votes on the claimed scum plz. Scum and knaves who are sheeping Toad because you don't want to read the thread, feel free to continue voting for me and prepare for ultimate disappointment. We'll start killing you in order of scumminess as soon as Toad is done.

GG scum.


VE didn't forget about sanity mechanics, he's just lying out of his ass.


Stupid, stupid pot-stirring. wbg gets annoyed at people "not reading the thread". And yet here, apparently, he completely fails to do so himself - VE mentions sanity on practically every occasion he posted about his claim, and wbg should bloody well know this. So he's either not reading the thread, or wilfully stirring by misrepresenting.

To round off - this isn't letting VE off the hook. I think his claim was awful, I think the amount of time he spent between accusing Toad and making a case was bad. But as per the above, it seems to me that wbg is simply misrepresenting VE at every turn, while not applying his own analysis to Toad purely based on "meta". I don't like it.



[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 131 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 2m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 629
UpATreeSC 109
BRAT_OK 31
MindelVK 15
EnDerr 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 27637
Calm 5261
Sea 1536
EffOrt 927
Jaedong 732
Mini 592
Snow 521
ggaemo 278
Rush 197
Dewaltoss 157
[ Show more ]
sSak 69
Aegong 65
Rock 28
Terrorterran 15
IntoTheRainbow 11
Dota 2
Gorgc10992
qojqva2455
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3972
olofmeister3513
Stewie2K386
edward61
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King173
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor152
XaKoH 106
Other Games
FrodaN1614
hiko963
Beastyqt632
ceh9443
ToD246
Lowko218
KnowMe93
Trikslyr72
QueenE67
NightEnD3
ptr_tv1
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 107
• HeavenSC 18
• OhrlRock 1
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 15
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2107
• Ler70
League of Legends
• Nemesis5216
• TFBlade1057
Other Games
• imaqtpie328
• Shiphtur280
Upcoming Events
BSL: GosuLeague
1h 2m
Replay Cast
7h 2m
Replay Cast
17h 2m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
Road to EWC
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
SC Evo League
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
BeSt vs Soulkey
[ Show More ]
Road to EWC
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
SOOP
5 days
NightMare vs Wayne
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
GSL Code S
6 days
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-05-16
2025 GSL S1
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Heroes 10 EU
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

Rose Open S1
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.